[ANNOUNCE] paccoin a new SHA256D coin is being introduced

[bbxx]

Instead of pre- / instamining, we now have coins without a compiled Windows-QT to make sure not too many people will mine it from the start.

yeah,
one million coins already mined
diff is 7.12GH now

i was since start, get no connections (using starting thread nodes)
after 800k coins mined i get finally connected

and now getting only rejected blocks using 70GH/sec

this is ridiculous lol

[markm]

I have just some eruptors, probably less than 15 GHash worth, on the case and get far more accepted than rejected and far more good blocks in listtransactions than orphans, though only of course a rather small proportion of the total number of blocks being mined.

-MarkM-

[inform]

How much pre-mining?

[platti]

I have just some eruptors, probably less than 15 GHash worth, on the case and get far more accepted than rejected and far more good blocks in listtransactions than orphans, though only of course a rather small proportion of the total number of blocks being mined.

-MarkM-

same here, 
very bad start for new coin

[markm]

How much pre-mining?

Maybe even none. Not many blocks if any. Looks like the original poster might not have even know how.

same here,  
very bad start for new coin

Huh? It looked like a good start, for a moment someone did spam orphans but either they toned it down or the difficulty adjusted fast enough to slow it down for them.

-MarkM-

[muddafudda]

Windows qt's.

http://www.mediafire.com/?cmxsdnfhku4qlfz

Donation address please donate for the windows build.
PAC- AowME5wDs8PmKq7vgk3xSSpwKHNKnKJQxu
BTC- 1DFHiFrrVW2b8r4atLAqASYM62svDCXFd3
LTC- LfjHJBJtEGdwMjbxi3RwUjd5UYsPGnZiu1

[bbxx]

any innowation with this coin ?

just another fail like flashcoin ?

[micax1]

So anybody mined smth?

 [2013-11-12 09:08:55] Probing for an alive pool
 [2013-11-12 09:08:55] blktmpl error: Unrecognized block version, and not allowed to reduce or force
 it
 [2013-11-12 09:08:55] Pool 0 is hiding block contents from us
 [2013-11-12 09:08:55] Network difficulty changed to 1.95k (13.95Gh/s)
 [2013-11-12 09:08:55] No suitable long-poll found for http://127.0.0.1:15661

mining running but it either pre-mined completely or smth is wrong?

[jackyrozario]

Reserved.......

[muddafudda]

any innowation with this coin ?

just another fail like flashcoin ?

How much innovation do you think you will get if OP can't even post windows qt's

[markm]

So anybody mined smth?

 [2013-11-12 09:08:55] Probing for an alive pool
 [2013-11-12 09:08:55] blktmpl error: Unrecognized block version, and not allowed to reduce or force
 it
 [2013-11-12 09:08:55] Pool 0 is hiding block contents from us
 [2013-11-12 09:08:55] Network difficulty changed to 1.95k (13.95Gh/s)
 [2013-11-12 09:08:55] No suitable long-poll found for http://127.0.0.1:15661

mining running but it either pre-mined completely or smth is wrong?

Are you maybe trying to use scrypt miner instead of SHA or something like that?

-MarkM-

[micax1]

So anybody mined smth?

 [2013-11-12 09:08:55] Probing for an alive pool
 [2013-11-12 09:08:55] blktmpl error: Unrecognized block version, and not allowed to reduce or force
 it
 [2013-11-12 09:08:55] Pool 0 is hiding block contents from us
 [2013-11-12 09:08:55] Network difficulty changed to 1.95k (13.95Gh/s)
 [2013-11-12 09:08:55] No suitable long-poll found for http://127.0.0.1:15661

mining running but it either pre-mined completely or smth is wrong?

Are you maybe trying to use scrypt miner instead of SHA or something like that?

-MarkM-

no. its bfl mining... but i wonder why i got these weird errors

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 BFL 0: 55.0C |  7.03/ 7.13/ 6.88Gh/s | A:3 R:0+0(none) HW:119/2.7%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [2013-11-12 09:44:15] blktmpl error: Unrecognized block version, and not allowed to reduce or force
 it
 [2013-11-12 09:44:15] Pool 0 is hiding block contents from us
 [2013-11-12 09:44:15] Network difficulty changed to 1.53k (10.93Gh/s)
 [2013-11-12 09:44:15] No suitable long-poll found for http://127.0.0.1:15661
 [2013-11-12 09:50:00] Network difficulty changed to 1.45k (10.40Gh/s)
 [2013-11-12 09:50:00] New block detected on network
 [2013-11-12 09:53:42] Network difficulty changed to 1.42k (10.16Gh/s)
 [2013-11-12 09:53:42] New block detected on network
 [2013-11-12 09:53:52] Network difficulty changed to 1.43k (10.22Gh/s)
 [2013-11-12 09:53:52] New block detected on network
 [2013-11-12 09:55:11] Network difficulty changed to 1.42k (10.20Gh/s)
 [2013-11-12 09:55:11] New block detected on network
 [2013-11-12 09:58:08] Found block for pool 0!

[markm]

Oh the hiding block contents maybe means Luke's miner program would have liked to use the protocol that lets it see the whole block and even manipulate it to suit your own tastes.

It is maybe Luke's way of saying he is forced to use normal protocols instead of the fancy new protocol he champions that gives the miner access to what is really being mined, instead of forcing the miner to not really be a real miner at all just a dumb hasher blindly hashing any damn thing the real miner (the pool for example; the entity that is actually deciding what exactly is to be mined, whether to merge mine, whether to include your friend's transactions or not and so on and so on) chooses to have the hashers blindly hash.

blktmpl likely means block template. He wanted a block template, and that is not what you normally get/use, it would let miners tell when pools are screwing them around and so on thus is not real popular yet.

So he probably fell back to getwork protocol, and without long poll.

From there on it looks just like cgminer.

(Uh wait, what do you mean by bfl mining? I glossed over that part, assuming you'd said bfgminer. Which hopefully is what you meant. The hiding blocks part just seemed so Luke.)

-MarkM-

[micax1]

Oh the hiding block contents maybe means Luke's miner program would have liked to use the protocol that lets it see the whole block and even manipulate it to suit your own tastes.

(Uh wait, what do you mean by bfl mining? I glossed over that part, assuming you'd said bfgminer. Which hopefully is what you meant. The hiding blocks part just seemed so Luke.)

-MarkM-

Are you maybe trying to use scrypt miner instead of SHA or something like that?
-MarkM-

BFL - butterfly labs - aka asic - aka completely not a scrypt )

it works now... mined 6k coins... however does not know if it worth it... no exchange whatsoever...

[Marty19]

iSpace Mining Pool up and running at http://pac.ispace.co.uk 

[maxsolnc]

I got several blocks on ~2.3 GH/s, 1 orphan and 5 mined. And after it I got nothing during last hours.

[Marty19]

The paccoind api is not returning any transactions using a listtransations call ..... any ideas?

[Marty19]

iSpace Mining Pool up and running at http://pac.ispace.co.uk 

I have shut the pool down temporarily while I look into why we were finding blocks but these were not showing up in the paccoind client.

[wmcorless]

ok, the network is now stable, thanks for all you early adopters!!

[wmcorless]

I got several blocks on ~2.3 GH/s, 1 orphan and 5 mined. And after it I got nothing during last hours.

The network is growing, and it sounds like you hit it hard, before it could compensate.