Threats to extort and blackmail BCT companies by the user 'pankkake'

[klee]

Hunting period begun!

C males our target - first to go PunkKate the 'Holes Wide Open'!!!

NxT - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345619.0;topicseen

[1714726389]

1714726389

[1714726389]

1714726389

[1714726389]

1714726389

[jackjack]

1M Nxt

Lol

[jackjack]

I'd reveal my own "identity" but alas, I only accept DogeCoin payments.

Besides, I have managed to keep Java off my system for years, and this isn't going to change for the scamcoin of the day.

I'm OK to be the intermediary

[klee]

1M Nxt

Lol

5-10btc lol? I lol 

5 - 10 = -5 BTC you dumbass, someone should give up the identity and 5 BTC on top of that ?
What kind of deal is that ?

The deal a stupid f@ck like you can't comprehend lolz

[davout]

The deal a stupid f@ck like you can't comprehend lolz

such butthurt

                        what faggotry

wow

        much self-mod

[minerpart]

I failed to quote pankkake before he deleted a post the other day in the ACtM thread. It was a reply to someone suggesting someone should pay a site visit to the company offices to 'sort Ken out'. Pankkake said 'Yes they should burn the Slaughterhouse down'.

[minerpart]

Asset	ActiveMining	Labcoin
Exchanges	BitFunder, BTC-TC, Cryptostocks, Crypto-Trade	BTC-TC, Cryptostocks
Identities	Known from the start; American alcoholic fatso and his family. Past get-rich-quick businesses disappeared (HFT trading, Million Dollar Web Hosting)	Known from the start; Italian guys, some of which already associated to scams (zenpad, bitdaytrade, bitscalper)
Technical competence of the team	None, yet claimed. Offloaded the work.	None. Offloaded the work for cheap.
Paid dividends	Yes	Yes
Faked mining	Yes (admits to using Cex.io without telling shareholders). Surely at a loss.	Yes (tried to resell the hardware on Italian eBay). Probably at a loss.
Mined with/produced own hardware	Never	Never
Posted pictures	Yes (mostly through third-parties), but nothing to see	Yes, with many users defending how legit they were despite apparent flaws
Posted detailed chip specs	Yes	Yes
Admitted failure to create chips and immediately talked about better chips	Yes	Yes
Contradictory statements	Many, some admitted.	Many, never admitted.
Official documents	Business registration, eASIC NDA	Business registration, fab order
Had "easy money" spreadsheet	Yes, made by user Vbs, officially part of the Advisory Board	Yes, on the first page
Officially relied on random forum users for PR	(Streets 2.0), (ffssixtynine, lolstate, Vbs, lewicki), (Bargraphics)	TheSwede75
Sockpuppets	Mac65, Bit-Vestor, Babefoot?	?
Traded on exchanges with verification before listing	Yes	Yes
Crowd opinion	Majority of Bitcointalk users say it's not a scam.	Majority of Bitcointalk users said it's not a scam, until final disappearance. Most of the evidence was already out there; only the final disappearance changed things.
Complaints about "FUD", "trolls", calls for ignores, etc.	Overwhelming.	Overwhelming.
Released financial reports	Flawed, and nothing released for months. No details on eASIC and UMC costs. Said "excellent financial position". Considers unpaid preorders as real sales. Salary?	Never. Said they had half left.
Traded own stock	Admitted multiple times	Likely
Exchange migration	Unnecessarily cumbersome, or even gouging, unnecessary delays	Flawless
Still operating	Yes, but dividends not paid	No
Switched from unmoderated to moderated thread	Yes. Many posts deleted totaling a high number of man-hours.	Yes. Many posts deleted totaling a high number of man-hours.
Cheap shares!	These are a bargain and should go very quick	take advantage of the current cheap prices
Lawsuit	No	Yes

So, which was the better investment? Which is a scam? You decide.

To finish, some trading advice.

[minerpart]

What's wrong with that,

That is you carrying out your threat to smear the reputation of a legitimate company because they have refused to pay your blackmail demands. You are committing serious offences here, serious in every country, including France.

[minerpart]

"was Ken acting in good faith when he took peoples money."

Exactly.
And now that he admitted some of his own lies, there's no doubt left.

I don't know if it's the SEC's job, but it's just a textbook investment fraud. Collect money, fail by doing nothing.

Plenty of kslaughter's lies and dirty tricks exposed on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=297530.0.
Unlike you, I don't have an economic interest in having new users buy ActiveMining shares; at that point you're just an accomplice of the scam.

[minerpart]

Anyone that thinks getting the SEC involved is a good idea also thinks getting 1 satoshi per share in return is a good idea.

The only way out I can see is forcing kslaughter to come clean on his lies, release financial statements, especially what was paid to eASIC and UMC - with proof. You'll also be able to judge how much he paid for his expenses.
Then you'll know how much bitcoins are left per share, and he could start a buyback program for those who want out.

There are other ways, which probably will result in jail time, but the victims might care more about their money than punishing the scammer.

Beware though, what made Labcoin disappear were talks about refunds.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

If you are a shareholder that is still frequenting this thread and replying to trolls please consider joining us in #ActM on Freenode.

Retreating to a troll-free place won't make this shares start hashing faster...

No, but it creates a place where Bargraphics and his other scamfriends can figure out how they are getting out of this one.
Interestingly, I still have my ban on #labcoin (Samuelat40!*@*).

Talking to me:

No, you refuse to acknowledge my responses, due to being a scammer with no way out.
Prepare yourself for jail buttsecks.

and:

Plenty of kslaughter's lies and dirty tricks exposed on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=297530.0 or follow some of the links of my comparison with Labcoin.
Unlike you, I don't have an economic interest in having new users buy ActiveMining shares; at that point you're just an accomplice of the scam.

[minerpart]

So above you see pankkake continue to smear the company ActiveMining (by calling it an investment scam, associating it with the known 'LabCoin scam', saying the CEO is facing jail and accusing me of being a scammer (!)) after Ken publicly refused to pay pankkake's blackmail money demand.

[dotcoin]

i have his real name and address now as he threat our company to we will file complaint against him next week.

Interesting partys can join us just contact me.

[dotcoin]

He told me by pm if i he is not Romain and if i share i am in a bad position, so let's figure out now:


So here are the details about him:

@pankkake

Domain owner of: http://headfucking.net/

domain owner is hidden by privacy service

let's take a look to wayback machine date 17.7.2011:

http://web.archive.org/web/20110717134630/http://headfucking.net/

there we see: Sister sites: vaginus.org

looking to vaginus.org whois

and voila we see a owner called:
Registrant Email:progs@headfucking.net
Admin ID:CR33918586
Admin Name:Bignon Romain
Admin Organization:
Admin Street: 55 rue Musulmane
Admin City:Bordeaux
Admin State/Province:
Admin Postal Code:33000
Admin Country:FR
Admin Phone:+1.23456789


need some confirmations about searching email progs@headfucking.net on google
https://www.google.fr/#q=progs%40headfucking.net


find also some other domains from him:

menareants.org


checking reverse ip for headfucking.net
http://reverseip.domaintools.com/search/?q=headfucking.net

2 domain on IP 94.23.215.174
headfucking.net
engu.in

engu.in is also NS2 of headfucking.net >>> Name Server: NS2.ENGU.IN
domain owner of engu.in is:

engu.in

Registrant Name:Roger  Floupard
Registrant Organization:None
Registrant Street1:12 Rue des petits pois
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Paris
Registrant State/Province:S
Registrant Postal Code:75002
Registrant Country:FR
Registrant Phone:+33.160725376


checking domain menareants.org

same addresse as above Romain Bignon
same NS engu.in


find also second address:

Romain Bignon
55 rue Judaique
Bordeaux
33000
France


and some more infos about him what music he listen and so on : http://www.wikiberal.org/wiki/Utilisateur:Pankkake


develop things
https://bitbucket.org/pankkake

join paris bitcoin meetup so people know him there
http://www.meetup.com/Paris-Bitcoin-Meetup/members/94121502/


and maybe hire him?
https://bitbucket.org/pankkake/bcwatch/src


Question now is what address is right and is his name Romain Bignon or Roger Floupard

But i am sure the police and or your Attorneys will find it out!

This info is for free and with much pleasure i will give it to you guys!

Now Headfuck back

[zumzero]

Is this person not Mircea Popescu?

[minerpart]

Is this person not Mircea Popescu?

No. pankkake is French. Popescu is a Romanian sociopath and he and his MPEx exchange is being investigated by the SEC.


As he owns headfucking.net I think Romain Bignon is pankakke. He has photos up on symlink of a Scorpions gig he went to - just the sort of music pankkake likes on last.fm.

http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/rbignon

[minerpart]

Here is a photo from Romain Bignon's symlink page. Behind his cat he is loged into IRC. The name is red which must be his login handle looks very much like 'pankkake'?


NSFW http://people.symlink.me/~rom1/creations/lolcats/cigarettes.png



http://people.symlink.me/~rom1/creations/lolcats/cigarettes.png

[PurpleTentacle]

Is this person not Mircea Popescu?

No. pankkake is French. Popescu is a Romanian sociopath and he and his MPEx exchange is being investigated by the SEC.


As he owns headfucking.net I think Romain Bignon is pankakke. He has photos up on symlink of a Scorpions gig he went to - just the sort of music pankkake likes on last.fm.

http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/rbignon

Interesting, Romain Bignon is a Python dev. Pankkake had some python work done for MP (he received a WoT rating which is now missing).


edit: found a screenshot

[minerpart]

Good find, that is more evidence that Pankkake is Romain Bignon.

So Romain:

-owns vaginus.org and uses the pankkake personal blog site (headfucking.net) as his contact details
-likes same genre of music music as pankkake
-has same Python dev skill set as pankkake

[minerpart]

It seems pankkake has complained and reported these latest posts:

No action will be taken for the three reports you sent in. Moderators will not remove a post just because one user deems it to be false.

So I just wonder why 'pankkake' would complain about this if he wasn't Romain Bignon? Why would he be bothered about a stranger being accused???  

[minerpart]

I'm happy for you to clear this up! Don't get so defensive!

So let's start at the begining, Romain uses your personal blog for his contact details. Why is that?


Unless you prove otherwise I think it is fair and right that me and dotcoin both see that quite a bit of evidence points to you being Romain Bignon.

A post about being allergic to cats from 10 years ago doesn't cut it. It could have been a lie and you can grow out of such allergies. Please give us concrete evidence you are not Bignon. Legal options are being investigated against you as we speak so you should consider that very very carefully.


Edit - you offered to meet me (by myself) with your friend (two of you) in an unknown Bar in Paris. I wouldn't be so stupid as to fall for that set-up so it was not a genuine offer and sounded like you wanted to threaten me.