Earn upto 0.6 BTC per month for your signature!

[mprep]

He's marked as a scammer now, oh well.

Well, when I looked there's only one feedback, just by a trusted member. I guess we'll have to wait till the end of the month to find out if all the warning signs did point to yes.

[rammy2k2]

u dont really expect to get paid 600$ ... right ?

[bitcoinpsftp]

This is going to be hilarious!!!!!!!

He'll pay the first month, then EVERY SINGLE PERSON on the forums will JUMP ON THE BANDWAGGON!!!

He'll get RIDICULOUS advertising that second month, get a crap ton of people on his site, and then he won't pay month 2.

GJ to everyone who's getting paid month 1!

[deisik]

This is going to be hilarious!!!!!!!

He'll pay the first month, then EVERY SINGLE PERSON on the forums will JUMP ON THE BANDWAGGON!!!

He'll get RIDICULOUS advertising that second month, get a crap ton of people on his site, and then he won't pay month 2.

GJ to everyone who's getting paid month 1!

No, I'm dead sure I won't!
Though if he does really pay out (I'm all for it), I hope that Stunna will raise the payouts for his signature a little...

[bitcoinpsftp]

This is going to be hilarious!!!!!!!

He'll pay the first month, then EVERY SINGLE PERSON on the forums will JUMP ON THE BANDWAGGON!!!

He'll get RIDICULOUS advertising that second month, get a crap ton of people on his site, and then he won't pay month 2.

GJ to everyone who's getting paid month 1!

No, I'm dead sure I won't!
Though if he does really pay out (I'm all for), I hope that Stunna will raise the payouts for his signature...

Stunna is already paying a very good amount for his signature.  But yea, if this does pay out, it would be good for all of us to get some additional money from Stunna... not like Stunna can't afford it xD

[jackjack]

He's marked as a scammer now, oh well.

If you're talking about my rating, it's just here to warn people about an extremely suspicious site/deal/person
He didn't scam yet but he refused to show some paid winning bets so far, he refused to use escrow, he refused to give his addresses, etc

I'll be happy to remove the rating once he gives us some positive details

[saif92]

if he start with low price or first gain some expereince from this forum then may be he have some response but suddenly came and starting this high payout without any escrow is always have bad feeling and now some one give him red its more big problem for him

[Lauda]

He's marked as a scammer now, oh well.

If you're talking about my rating, it's just here to warn people about an extremely suspicious site/deal/person
He didn't scam yet but he refused to show some paid winning bets so far, he refused to use escrow, he refused to give his addresses, etc

I'll be happy to remove the rating once he gives us some positive details

Well he's "marked" as suspicious, and it usually goes the bad way. He has no reason not to provide those details.

[monbux]

He's marked as a scammer now, oh well.

If you're talking about my rating, it's just here to warn people about an extremely suspicious site/deal/person
He didn't scam yet but he refused to show some paid winning bets so far, he refused to use escrow, he refused to give his addresses, etc

I'll be happy to remove the rating once he gives us some positive details

Well he's "marked" as suspicious, and it usually goes the bad way. He has no reason not to provide those details.

I hope now you understand why people in bitcoin are paranoid. 
A completely new user with a completely new website with no proof of owning ANY bitcoin and paying the highest for signature payments...
He might be completely legit, but he has made a bad impression on me.

[Lauda]

The problem with that is, what if some really good person with a real offer comes along, and we scare him off with the lack of trust?

[moderate]

The problem with that is, what if some really good person with a real offer comes along, and we scare him off with the lack of trust?

rofl. you are joking, right ?

When a good person with a real offer comes along he can back up the offer and not disappear from the forum after being called out.

[Lauda]

The problem with that is, what if some really good person with a real offer comes along, and we scare him off with the lack of trust?

rofl. you are joking, right ?

When a good person with a real offer comes along he can back up the offer and not disappear from the forum after being called out.

There could be situations in which he would be unable to back it up at the time. Disappearing is another thing.
We said that it is most likely a scam within the same day, didn't even give enough time (although this isn't a good example as it was a scam).

[moderate]

The problem with that is, what if some really good person with a real offer comes along, and we scare him off with the lack of trust?

rofl. you are joking, right ?

When a good person with a real offer comes along he can back up the offer and not disappear from the forum after being called out.

There could be situations in which he would be unable to back it up at the time. Disappearing is another thing.
We said that it is most likely a scam within the same day, didn't even give enough time (although this isn't a good example as it was a scam).

It's okay, you might have missed it. Here are some other clear indications unrelated to this (the first ones to be pointed out, before other people followed it):

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345107.msg3698773#msg3698773
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345107.msg3699315#msg3699315
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345107.msg3708017#msg3708017

[monbux]

The problem with that is, what if some really good person with a real offer comes along, and we scare him off with the lack of trust?

I state once again, this user shouldn't be depending on trust as a newbie, he should provide the facts that he could actually pay.
He has refused multiple times to provide any addresses that he stores his bitcoins on.

[Light]

I state once again, this user shouldn't be depending on trust as a newbie, he should provide the facts that he could actually pay.
He has refused multiple times to provide any addresses that he stores his bitcoins on.

I'm not even sure whether we can trust anyone to a great extent (at least on this forum), as it has been shown time and time again that there are people willing to wait a long time to gain rep and trust before scamming a lot of people out of coin. Thus, I find it even harder to trust newbie's without any tangible proof.

[Lauda]

I state once again, this user shouldn't be depending on trust as a newbie, he should provide the facts that he could actually pay.
He has refused multiple times to provide any addresses that he stores his bitcoins on.

I'm not even sure whether we can trust anyone to a great extent (at least on this forum), as it has been shown time and time again that there are people willing to wait a long time to gain rep and trust before scamming a lot of people out of coin. Thus, I find it even harder to trust newbie's without any tangible proof.

TF is the best example here.

[Light]

TF is the best example here.

TF is a good example in recent history, but there are a crap ton of examples since Bitcoin first started. Overall, it's a lesson to be learned by the community, trust no-one.

[BitcoinFr34k]

I don't trust it either, but I decided to accept his deal to test it out. I know I'll probably won't be paid, but it's not like I have to do anything for it right?

[MoneyGod]

TF is the best example here.

TF is a good example in recent history, but there are a crap ton of examples since Bitcoin first started. Overall, it's a lesson to be learned by the community, trust no-one.

I am not agree with this theory that trust no-one because if you are not trusting then how is this work going ahead you must have to trust and then check now few peoples doing this work and if they got paid then few must joine more and hope in next 1 or 2 months clear all this

[marcotheminer]

Hey please add me to the doc. Ive had the signature for 3 days nearly now!
Thanks