mrquackquack
Member
 Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 10
|
 |
September 08, 2019, 12:55:17 PM |
|
Thanks for the update will the exchanges be switching out automatically?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dead Things (OP)
|
|
September 08, 2019, 01:53:07 PM |
|
Not quite "automatically" - but yes.
|
|
|
|
mrquackquack
Member
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 10
|
|
September 08, 2019, 05:38:03 PM |
|
ok thanks please keep us posted.
|
|
|
|
|
cmelx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
October 25, 2019, 11:52:40 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dead Things (OP)
|
|
November 30, 2019, 03:24:04 AM |
|
01VPS.net Black Friday deals are here! - Get 80% off your first month when you rent a new VPS with a monthly subscription! Use promo code BF80M- Get 80% off your first two months when you rent a new VPS with a semi-annual subscription! Use promo code BF80S- Get 80% off your first three months when you rent a new VPS with an annual subscription! Use promo code BF80ALimited time offer, valid only 11/29 to 12/02. 
|
|
|
|
AyeAye2019
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
November 30, 2019, 08:10:46 PM |
|
Can you provide more information on IPV6 nodes. They don't appear to work very well. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dead Things (OP)
|
|
November 30, 2019, 10:33:22 PM |
|
Are you referring to ZOC nodes using IPv6 addresses? Yeah, it's a bit of a tricky situation and I'm afraid I don't have clear advice to give you. I can tell you what's happening with IPv6 nodes, though. As you've probably noticed, they have limited connectivity relative to their IPv4 brothers because most of the network is IPv4, and most IPv6 nodes are single-stack and therefore don't talk to the IPv4 side. In the past, this is what was causing our chainsplits, hence the need to introduce self-healing chain rules in v0.12.3.7. From a masternode perspective, this can lead to the network being more likely to label IPv6 nodes as "unhealthy" (due to having more consensus disagreements) and thus they earn reduced rewards compared to healthy nodes. That's actually being done on purpose to preserve the health of the masternode network.
So what's the takeaway here? That I don't really know. The easy answer is use IPv4. But I know that's not always feasible. cmelx says that if you use 'externalip=' instead of 'bind=' in your conf, though, then an IPv6 node should still be able to communicate with other IPv4 nodes provided your VPS has an IPv4 address as well. I can't personally vouch for that because I haven't tested that scenario myself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AyeAye2019
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
December 03, 2019, 09:04:21 PM |
|
Are you referring to ZOC nodes using IPv6 addresses? Yeah, it's a bit of a tricky situation and I'm afraid I don't have clear advice to give you. I can tell you what's happening with IPv6 nodes, though. As you've probably noticed, they have limited connectivity relative to their IPv4 brothers because most of the network is IPv4, and most IPv6 nodes are single-stack and therefore don't talk to the IPv4 side. In the past, this is what was causing our chainsplits, hence the need to introduce self-healing chain rules in v0.12.3.7. From a masternode perspective, this can lead to the network being more likely to label IPv6 nodes as "unhealthy" (due to having more consensus disagreements) and thus they earn reduced rewards compared to healthy nodes. That's actually being done on purpose to preserve the health of the masternode network.
So what's the takeaway here? That I don't really know. The easy answer is use IPv4. But I know that's not always feasible. cmelx says that if you use 'externalip=' instead of 'bind=' in your conf, though, then an IPv6 node should still be able to communicate with other IPv4 nodes provided your VPS has an IPv4 address as well. I can't personally vouch for that because I haven't tested that scenario myself.
Sadly, everything "sort of runs" but doesn't when 'bind=' is removed... will masternode something else for a while, rolling back to a prior version would obviously be counter productive for the network. Have you resolved the long waits in block movements? The latest wallet is very good compared to the last wallet. If Cmelx wasn't so sensitive, i'd give him a compliment. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dead Things (OP)
|
|
December 04, 2019, 10:48:25 PM |
|
lol - I'm sure cmelx will take that as a compliment!
But yeah - I usually use "bind" in my nodes too. I haven't tried not using it yet. Hopefully, with time, the IPv6 part of our MN layer will mature and keep abreast the IPv4 part. But right now, with it being so small compared to the IPv4 side, it's a bit of a risk to run IPv6 ZOC nodes.
|
|
|
|
CryptoGreek.Cafe
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
December 06, 2019, 11:03:58 PM |
|
https://CryptoGreek.CafeMining Pool for ZOC0.5% neoscrypt mining fee Payouts every 2 hours -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://CryptoGreek.Cafe:5256 -u WALLETADDRESS -p c=ZOC |
|
|
|
|
mrquackquack
Member
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 10
|
|
December 13, 2019, 09:35:16 PM |
|
any new add on features to ZOC?
|
|
|
|
|
mrquackquack
Member
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 10
|
|
December 18, 2019, 07:40:23 PM |
|
Dude come on when is this thing going to hit a $1
|
|
|
|
|
mrquackquack
Member
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 10
|
|
December 22, 2019, 06:17:20 PM |
|
Please excuse my rudeness but just an idea. Now i don't know how you run your business model but what if you change over your services of accepting ZOC to only fiat ie dollar pound etc etc.. and implement a buying of your currency thru the profits and proceeds made by your business establishment. Lets say you get 500 new subscribers you use the proceeds to buy back 300 worth of coins and the other 200 on whatever else like server costs, salaries etc etc.. This will maintain a foundation that offers a buy back of its own currency will still giving it the options of fiat.
|
|
|
|
|
mrquackquack
Member
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 10
|
|
December 23, 2019, 09:53:19 PM |
|
They're probably already doing something like that so who knows. It's just kinda sad too see a coin with an actual real life use case get beat up so bad..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dead Things (OP)
|
|
December 31, 2019, 08:50:27 PM |
|
There are a few reasons why we prefer to not accept fiat, not the least of which are legal and tax-related. But we are looking into branching out and offering other crypto payment gateways in 2020. We still haven't quite got the new datacentre humming along as efficiently as we'd like, so that's what our focus is on now. Once the datacentre issues are fully resolved to our satisfaction, though, we'll start working on the additional gateways.
I know I'm talking around your suggestion and what you'd really prefer is to be able to pay for VPS rentals with fiat. The door's not permanently closed to that, but I'll be honest - it's not something we'll be in a position to really look at in earnest any time soon.
|
|
|
|
mrquackquack
Member
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 10
|
|
January 03, 2020, 04:02:15 PM |
|
Well i have a couple of ideas, one is maybe find a partnership with a quote unquote bigger fish such as ionos google so on and so forth. You would be surprised how many people are interested in blockchain technology and digital currency. Plus you'll never know until you try. Or two create some sort of tech or add on that nobody in your given sector i.e. cloud based services has yet. One idea that seemed fairly interesting was a cloud data marketplace. Anyways just some food for thought. Also not trying to come off as a jerk. I just think that this thing can have some potential if implemented correctly. Anyways Happy New Years and we are waiting to hear Big Things from ZOC in 2020.
|
|
|
|
|
|
