MCXNow Shutting down (Temporary)

[Rune]

Anyone who left the site with coin/mcxfees and does not check it for months because it's down will have there account destroyed and lose everything?

I am not sure I read this right inactivity for 2 months you lose everything in your account. Does this apply to people before they accept his new TOS?

[1715206711]

1715206711

[1715206711]

1715206711

[1715206711]

1715206711

[1715206711]

1715206711

[Buffer Overflow]

Does this apply to people before they accept his new TOS?

TOS 

He makes the rules up as he goes along.

[Rune]

But he said he is shutting down 2-3 months the first time now he says anyone who is inactive for 2 months will lose everything on there account.
And of course he told everyone to get all their coins off the exchange but to keep there MCXfees or sell them.
Won't people who left their fees there because he said they be safe lose all of them if they don't check the site for 2-3 months while they believe it is down?

Do you see what I'm getting at he said leave for 2-3 months now if your inactive for 2 months you lose everything.

[NUFCrichard]

But he said he is shutting down 2-3 months the first time now he says anyone who is inactive for 2 months will lose everything on there account.
And of course he told everyone to get all their coins off the exchange but to keep there MCXfees or sell them.
Won't people who left their fees there because he said they be safe lose all of them if they don't check the site for 2-3 months while they believe it is down?

Do you see what I'm getting at he said leave for 2-3 months now if your inactive for 2 months you lose everything.

That sounds like something he would do.  Then he would say that it is your fault for not reading the terms and you are an idiot that deserves to lose your money.
But if you want to risk it, go for it.

[deodecagone]

Let's end the story of this Realsolid thinking he is a god of C++ devlopment but who is just yet another scammer not worth of interest and incapable of driving a real business on longer terms, incapable of expanding a team beyond the 1 person team.
Just, shame on his ball lickers getting the gold color on his "awesome" chat and let's get the community back on worthwile crypto world.

[lophie]

Let's end the story of this Realsolid thinking he is a god of C++ devlopment but who is just yet another scammer not worth of interest and incapable of driving a real business on longer terms, incapable of expanding a team beyond the 1 person team.
Just, shame on his ball lickers getting the gold color on his "awesome" chat and let's get the community back on worthwile crypto world.

I used to agree, But really MCXNow is GOOD. Lets see what the future holds for this awesome exchange.

[jasinlee]

Let's end the story of this Realsolid thinking he is a god of C++ devlopment but who is just yet another scammer not worth of interest and incapable of driving a real business on longer terms, incapable of expanding a team beyond the 1 person team.
Just, shame on his ball lickers getting the gold color on his "awesome" chat and let's get the community back on worthwile crypto world.

I used to agree, But really MCXNow is GOOD. Lets see what the future holds for this awesome exchange.

If by good, you mean arrogant, narcissistic, thieving, megadouche, scamming, puppeteer, con man, then yes I agree.

[Hazard]

I'll give it about 6 months before he triumphantly returns with the launch of microcash and makes this recent haul look like chump change.

Certainly is no shortage of idiots with money in the cryptoworld.

[poordeveloper]

"To receive support for any user fault will require $50 to $100 equiv in fees that will be given back to the exchange in payouts like any other fee. This is to encourage people to be more careful with their login details. Furthermore, failure to be logged into an account for 2 months will see that account destroyed and all funds returned to mcxNOW as fees. This is a big change and will require you to agree to new terms and conditions to continue using the site. These changes are designed to make people more self reliant and less bothersome to mcxNOW. If you do not like these new rules it is advised you stop using mcxNOW."

Wtf is this... I've never used mcxNOW, but I certainly won't use it now that they're adding this stuff.

This is literally the worst exchange ever if they actually implement those things. It was already sketchy just because RealSolid was running it, this is just icing on the cake.

It actually makes it dangerous to simply deposit any coins into this exchange. You might not be able to access the site for a few months - and your coins are gone. The worst thing they could have done indeed.

[erk]

"To receive support for any user fault will require $50 to $100 equiv in fees that will be given back to the exchange in payouts like any other fee. This is to encourage people to be more careful with their login details. Furthermore, failure to be logged into an account for 2 months will see that account destroyed and all funds returned to mcxNOW as fees. This is a big change and will require you to agree to new terms and conditions to continue using the site. These changes are designed to make people more self reliant and less bothersome to mcxNOW. If you do not like these new rules it is advised you stop using mcxNOW."

Wtf is this... I've never used mcxNOW, but I certainly won't use it now that they're adding this stuff.

This is literally the worst exchange ever if they actually implement those things. It was already sketchy just because RealSolid was running it, this is just icing on the cake.

It actually makes it dangerous to simply deposit any coins into this exchange. You might not be able to access the site for a few months - and your coins are gone. The worst thing they could have done indeed.

Ther is already a long list why you shouldn't deposit coins into mcxNOW, these new reasons are just on top of that. You have an anonymous unstable pool owner that wants people to invest millions into coins which can't be used on any other site or stored in a block chain. That should be reason enough.

mcxNOW is like a disreputable pub in a bad neighborhood, it attracts a certain kind of clientele if you know what I mean.

[poordeveloper]

"To receive support for any user fault will require $50 to $100 equiv in fees that will be given back to the exchange in payouts like any other fee. This is to encourage people to be more careful with their login details. Furthermore, failure to be logged into an account for 2 months will see that account destroyed and all funds returned to mcxNOW as fees. This is a big change and will require you to agree to new terms and conditions to continue using the site. These changes are designed to make people more self reliant and less bothersome to mcxNOW. If you do not like these new rules it is advised you stop using mcxNOW."

Wtf is this... I've never used mcxNOW, but I certainly won't use it now that they're adding this stuff.

This is literally the worst exchange ever if they actually implement those things. It was already sketchy just because RealSolid was running it, this is just icing on the cake.

It actually makes it dangerous to simply deposit any coins into this exchange. You might not be able to access the site for a few months - and your coins are gone. The worst thing they could have done indeed.

Ther is already a long list why you shouldn't deposit coins into mcxNOW, these new reasons are just on top of that. You have an anonymous unstable pool owner that wants people to invest millions into coins which can't be used on any other site or stored in a block chain. That should be reason enough.

Good points. There have been red flags all over this site all this time, just not as big as this one.

Hope people finally learn and stop using this site should it come back online. This is just too unprofessional.

[exnom]

"To receive support for any user fault will require $50 to $100 equiv in fees that will be given back to the exchange in payouts like any other fee. This is to encourage people to be more careful with their login details. Furthermore, failure to be logged into an account for 2 months will see that account destroyed and all funds returned to mcxNOW as fees. This is a big change and will require you to agree to new terms and conditions to continue using the site. These changes are designed to make people more self reliant and less bothersome to mcxNOW. If you do not like these new rules it is advised you stop using mcxNOW."

Wtf is this... I've never used mcxNOW, but I certainly won't use it now that they're adding this stuff.

This is literally the worst exchange ever if they actually implement those things. It was already sketchy just because RealSolid was running it, this is just icing on the cake.

It actually makes it dangerous to simply deposit any coins into this exchange. You might not be able to access the site for a few months - and your coins are gone. The worst thing they could have done indeed.

Yes! This part:

Furthermore, failure to be logged into an account for 2 months will see that account destroyed and all funds returned to mcxNOW as fees.

"failure to be logged into a account for 2 months", what if they disable login for 2 months!?
I think RS thinks this is a legit way to steal all coins still left on the exchange 2 months after he shuts it down..

[mogrith]

Yes! This part:
Quote
Furthermore, failure to be logged into an account for 2 months will see that account destroyed and all funds returned to mcxNOW as fees.


So you collect 'Interest' on your deposits except he will take everything if you just buy and hold. as fees means 90% to RS

[AndrewWilliams]

Boycott MCXNow.


It's obvious his greed has overtaken his logical reasoning.

[GoldSeal]

omfg. this guy is a real piece of shit. he wants to take your coins if you don't log in for two months? why would anyone want anything to do with someone who treats customers this way?

[Armchair Miner]

Boy, I was going to reply to some of the most ridiculous posts here but, alas, low ROI.

My main objection to 99% of the posts I skimmed over is - people are throwing words around without even understanding what these words mean, i.e. they don't really know what they are saying.

Examples:

arrogant, narcissistic, thieving, megadouche, scamming, puppeteer, con

If the authors of the posts would just quote what (dictionary, if need be) definition of these and other similar words they are using are, then maybe they wouldn't even write these words down in the first place.

So if the authors of the post don't even know what they are saying, how do they hope to provide anything useful to the readers?

There is nothing.

Moving on.

[erk]

Boy, I was going to reply to some of the most ridiculous posts here but, alas, low ROI.

My main objection to 99% of the posts I skimmed over is - people are throwing words around without even understanding what these words mean, i.e. they don't really know what they are saying.

Examples:

arrogant, narcissistic, thieving, megadouche, scamming, puppeteer, con

If the authors of the posts would just quote what (dictionary, if need be) definition of these and other similar words they are using are, then maybe they wouldn't even write these words down.

So if the authors of the post don't even know what they are saying, how do they hope to provide anything useful to the readers?

There is nothing.

Moving on.

Just because you don't understand what the author was saying doesn't mean others here have the same difficulty. I had no problem interpreting his post whatsoever.

[jasinlee]

Boy, I was going to reply to some of the most ridiculous posts here but, alas, low ROI.

My main objection to 99% of the posts I skimmed over is - people are throwing words around without even understanding what these words mean, i.e. they don't really know what they are saying.

Examples:

arrogant, narcissistic, thieving, megadouche, scamming, puppeteer, con

If the authors of the posts would just quote what (dictionary, if need be) definition of these and other similar words they are using are, then maybe they wouldn't even write these words down.

So if the authors of the post don't even know what they are saying, how do they hope to provide anything useful to the readers?

There is nothing.

Moving on.

You were quoting me, although you seem to be afraid to actually quote me. Shall I explain?

1. Realsolid is arrogant.
2. Realsolid is narcissistic.
3. Realsolid has stolen and continues to do so from investors and people on the forum through various scams over the past couple years.
4. Realsolid is a megadouche, seriously just watch the douchefilled things he posts in his chat room or on the forum or any IRC log where he is present.
5. Realsolid is a scammer ^ see above.
6. Realsolid is a habitual puppet master with many accounts and an army of yes men on the forum to help bolster his scams.
7. Realsolid is a con man ^ see above.

If you really need me to link to a dictionary for you to understand what any of those words mean, you should probably not be on here trying to argue any of these points.

[Armchair Miner]

I'm not being clear enough. And you're assuming all dictionaries have the same definitions.

In fact, to understand you, I need your definitions, see.

Quote your definitions of

scam

stolen

con man

before you go any further. If you can not do that, hmm, you may be running away from the truth.

Nothing personal. Everyone who uses such words should do  a deep introspection first.

[jasinlee]

I'm not being clear enough. And you're assuming all dictionaries have the same definitions.

In fact, to understand you, I need your definitions, see.

Quote your definitions of

scam

stolen

con man

before you go any further.

Scam : Not worth my time, if you are trying to pick apart the meaning of this word you are a lackey and will defend him to the death.

Stolen: Not worth my time, if you are trying to pick apart the meaning of this word you are a lackey and will defend him to the death.

Con man : Not worth my time, if you are trying to pick apart the meaning of this phrase you are a lackey and will defend him to the death.

Taking of any property tangible or intangible (without permission) constitutes theft, whether that goal was achieved via social engineering/breaking & entering/carjacking makes no difference.