beitris.dwlul
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
September 25, 2014, 04:38:56 PM |
|
I would like to see a higher fee.
|
|
|
|
cyberpinoy
|
|
October 11, 2014, 06:29:26 AM Last edit: October 11, 2014, 06:39:52 AM by cyberpinoy |
|
I would like to see a higher fee. you can take your higher fees back HOLY CRAP I tried to send 9745 IFC to my trading account and it wanted to charge me 6800 IFC in fees. What the hell is that about I mined those coins 6800 coins in fees. So i said maybe its to high of a transaction i then attempted to send 100 coins the fee was 200 IFC to send 100IFC. what are these high fees about HOLY CRAP not worth it to mine if you can only keep 1/3 of the coins you spent the electricity to mine. BETTER LOWER THESE FEES. so heres the 9744 IFC transaction AND THEN 100IFC transaction And ladies and gentlemen heres the icing on the cake a 0.00000001 IFC transaction is OVER the size limit and incurrs a 200 IFC transaction fee. These fees are absolutely rediculous This coin does not have infinite possibilities it has one-------> FAILURE if the devs dont fix these fees. No one will mine a coin that pays only 1/3 of the power we mine on it. SO unless you have an infinatecoinwalmart.com and powerandelectricforinfinitecoinminers.com, infinitecoinrent.com, infinitecoinwaterandsewer.com this coin = FAILURE If this is the case this coin does not have infinite possibilities except 1 FAILURE hahahaha
|
|
|
|
Atomicat
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 952
Merit: 1002
|
|
October 12, 2014, 03:08:27 PM |
|
This coin does not have infinite possibilities it has one-------> FAILURE if the devs dont fix these fees. No one will mine a coin that pays only 1/3 of the power we mine on it. SO unless you have an infinatecoinwalmart.com and powerandelectricforinfinitecoinminers.com, infinitecoinrent.com, infinitecoinwaterandsewer.com this coin = FAILURE
If this is the case this coin does not have infinite possibilities except 1 FAILURE hahahaha
Oh it's not the huge programming errors that's the problem. The problem is, what programmer in their right mind EVER releases an update or ANYTHING without running it first? I simply can't imagine it, but there it is. Time for a career at Diebold.
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
October 23, 2014, 07:58:29 AM |
|
Funny how you complain about the high fees while simultaneously complaining about how mining doesn't pay enough.... The fees are the only thing keeping the network running, and when you compare it dollar for dollar to any other crypto, it is quite a reasonable transaction fee.
cyberpinoy: the fees are also calculated by KB size added to the block. If you input a bunch of tiny transactions, it is going to cost you, because there is a limit on the KB size per block to prevent spam attacks and chain bloat. This isn't the client's fault, its yours for not being aware how it works. This is a fairly standard function for most coins, and it is a feature that keeps the network running. BTW I will play a little violin for your lost fractions of a penny tonight.
|
|
|
|
JCJr222
|
|
October 24, 2014, 03:46:56 PM |
|
Funny how you complain about the high fees while simultaneously complaining about how mining doesn't pay enough.... The fees are the only thing keeping the network running, and when you compare it dollar for dollar to any other crypto, it is quite a reasonable transaction fee.
cyberpinoy: the fees are also calculated by KB size added to the block. If you input a bunch of tiny transactions, it is going to cost you, because there is a limit on the KB size per block to prevent spam attacks and chain bloat. This isn't the client's fault, its yours for not being aware how it works. This is a fairly standard function for most coins, and it is a feature that keeps the network running. BTW I will play a little violin for your lost fractions of a penny tonight.
So I am going through the list of coins that the old CryptoRush hosted trying to determine which coins are dead and which are still functioning so we can list them again/repay old users their coins. From the looks of it this coin is still around, but I have to agree those fees are insane. If this is the case we will not be hosting it and will have to add it to our debt. There is no way we could charge these crazy withdrawal fees to our customers after everything they have already been through. I do understand how fees are in place to avoid small transactions and blockchain spam, however charging a fee of 6,800 coins for a transaction of 9,744 coins is ridiculous no matter how you attempt to explain it.
|
|
|
|
HashEngineering
|
|
November 09, 2014, 08:15:59 AM |
|
What is the status of the development of this coin? Is continued support for the Android Wallet required?
Yes, please continue to issue updates for the android wallet. Thank you. Currently the android app is not working, at least on my phone because it is stuck in August despite having two nodes connected.
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
November 13, 2014, 07:58:50 AM |
|
Funny how you complain about the high fees while simultaneously complaining about how mining doesn't pay enough.... The fees are the only thing keeping the network running, and when you compare it dollar for dollar to any other crypto, it is quite a reasonable transaction fee.
cyberpinoy: the fees are also calculated by KB size added to the block. If you input a bunch of tiny transactions, it is going to cost you, because there is a limit on the KB size per block to prevent spam attacks and chain bloat. This isn't the client's fault, its yours for not being aware how it works. This is a fairly standard function for most coins, and it is a feature that keeps the network running. BTW I will play a little violin for your lost fractions of a penny tonight.
So I am going through the list of coins that the old CryptoRush hosted trying to determine which coins are dead and which are still functioning so we can list them again/repay old users their coins. From the looks of it this coin is still around, but I have to agree those fees are insane. If this is the case we will not be hosting it and will have to add it to our debt. There is no way we could charge these crazy withdrawal fees to our customers after everything they have already been through. I do understand how fees are in place to avoid small transactions and blockchain spam, however charging a fee of 6,800 coins for a transaction of 9,744 coins is ridiculous no matter how you attempt to explain it. Actually its not if you examine the actual dollar value of the transfer. If it is too cheap then it is easy to spam the chain inexpensively.
|
|
|
|
TECSHARE (OP)
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3318
Merit: 2008
First Exclusion Ever
|
|
November 13, 2014, 07:59:30 AM |
|
What is the status of the development of this coin? Is continued support for the Android Wallet required?
Yes, please continue to issue updates for the android wallet. Thank you. Currently the android app is not working, at least on my phone because it is stuck in August despite having two nodes connected. Any idea why?
|
|
|
|
Thebend
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
November 16, 2014, 04:03:44 AM |
|
Funny how you complain about the high fees while simultaneously complaining about how mining doesn't pay enough.... The fees are the only thing keeping the network running, and when you compare it dollar for dollar to any other crypto, it is quite a reasonable transaction fee.
cyberpinoy: the fees are also calculated by KB size added to the block. If you input a bunch of tiny transactions, it is going to cost you, because there is a limit on the KB size per block to prevent spam attacks and chain bloat. This isn't the client's fault, its yours for not being aware how it works. This is a fairly standard function for most coins, and it is a feature that keeps the network running. BTW I will play a little violin for your lost fractions of a penny tonight.
So I am going through the list of coins that the old CryptoRush hosted trying to determine which coins are dead and which are still functioning so we can list them again/repay old users their coins. From the looks of it this coin is still around, but I have to agree those fees are insane. If this is the case we will not be hosting it and will have to add it to our debt. There is no way we could charge these crazy withdrawal fees to our customers after everything they have already been through. I do understand how fees are in place to avoid small transactions and blockchain spam, however charging a fee of 6,800 coins for a transaction of 9,744 coins is ridiculous no matter how you attempt to explain it. Actually its not if you examine the actual dollar value of the transfer. If it is too cheap then it is easy to spam the chain inexpensively. Agree If you put the time needed to mine 5k,it is a lot of money... Time is money Mining other for now.
|
|
|
|
rudarhr
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
November 24, 2014, 04:42:43 AM |
|
Does anyone have a current node list?
ya i wanna know too ! On http://infinitecointalk.org/index.php/topic,2189.msg10836.html#msg10836I wrote the following about this: I don't know how, but it started [synchronizing] again. For those in need of help with this, I'm using the 1.8.8 version of the client and my config has the following content. listen=1 daemon=1 server=1 rpcuser=rpcuser rpcpassword=rpcpassword rpcallowip=10.1.1.* rpcport=9322 rpcconnect=127.0.0.1 addnode=63.246.129.56 addnode=111.161.77.213 addnode=67.193.198.104 addnode=85.217.147.117 addnode=121.73.174.13 addnode=192.249.59.81 addnode=192.99.2.38 addnode=37.140.4.246 addnode=46.147.138.65 addnode=65.92.17.184 addnode=66.63.176.231 addnode=67.177.3.56 addnode=67.191.60.108 addnode=68.7.110.173 addnode=69.196.182.237 addnode=69.47.230.59 addnode=72.239.12.120 addnode=76.110.255.33 addnode=77.205.43.231 addnode=83.133.105.235 addnode=83.83.247.33 addnode=85.217.147.117 addnode=86.150.227.43 addnode=92.195.101.215 addnode=92.41.180.147 addnode=94.189.239.110 addnode=95.170.82.34 addnode=98.18.252.73 that helps to sync the wallet Syncing does not work.
|
|
|
|
grongo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
November 24, 2014, 09:04:17 PM Last edit: November 25, 2014, 05:55:06 PM by grongo |
|
This works for me:
addnode=71.175.81.45 addnode=63.246.129.56 addnode=212.204.164.23 addnode=61.166.241.207 addnode=82.200.205.106 addnode=95.150.102.167 addnode=204.11.237.73 addnode=85.25.197.186 addnode=78.145.241.30 addnode=96.2.40.126 addnode=23.92.218.130 addnode=98.238.145.154 addnode=192.99.37.139 addnode=167.160.36.184 addnode=198.199.83.168 addnode=107.170.244.90 addnode=198.245.62.191 addnode=180.252.104.254 addnode=85.25.197.186 addnode=92.42.160.251 addnode=205.145.137.99 addnode=72.46.152.250 addnode=84.74.102.146 addnode=86.30.210.4 addnode=76.217.14.190 addnode=192.241.216.151 addnode=67.214.249.178 addnode=106.187.92.19 addnode=96.244.196.98 addnode=93.210.222.85 addnode=62.114.154.48 addnode=92.42.160.251 addnode=211.155.81.18 addnode=76.164.237.242 addnode=198.245.63.172 addnode=176.9.31.178 addnode=192.99.15.174 addnode=192.99.13.127 addnode=119.32.147.134 addnode=39.13.176.159 addnode=104.131.239.136 addnode=106.187.89.50 addnode=206.192.231.183 addnode=37.187.144.69 addnode=50.149.31.242 addnode=84.101.239.139 addnode=50.182.191.190 addnode=115.66.167.250 addnode=87.103.15.30 addnode=204.11.237.252 addnode=23.92.218.130 addnode=188.165.2.147 addnode=91.150.123.23 addnode=99.48.204.150 addnode=188.226.148.83 addnode=39.8.24.114 addnode=74.208.97.13 addnode=94.23.16.150 addnode=24.253.155.129 addnode=81.224.228.175 addnode=98.246.194.221 addnode=70.81.35.93
|
|
|
|
HashEngineering
|
|
December 12, 2014, 06:03:37 AM |
|
What is the status of the development of this coin? Is continued support for the Android Wallet required?
Yes, please continue to issue updates for the android wallet. Thank you. Currently the android app is not working, at least on my phone because it is stuck in August despite having two nodes connected. Any idea why? I don't know why, yet. No one else has sent in any bug reports, perhaps it is limited to me alone.
|
|
|
|
maxamity
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
December 23, 2014, 07:53:32 AM |
|
Loving the looks of this! Will be taking part in this coin. Looks like it has a lot of potential! Mining them as we speak
|
|
|
|
|
coinits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1019
011110000110110101110010
|
|
December 31, 2014, 04:07:03 PM |
|
Loving the looks of this! Will be taking part in this coin. Looks like it has a lot of potential! Mining them as we speak I liked this coin too but doing a fanboy post as your first one smacks of bullshit.
|
Jump you fuckers! | The thing about smart motherfuckers is they sound like crazy motherfuckers to dumb motherfuckers. | My sig space for rent for 0.01 btc per week.
|
|
|
coinits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1019
011110000110110101110010
|
|
December 31, 2014, 04:08:12 PM |
|
is 1.8.5.0 still working?
I don't think so. Upgrade to 1.8.8
|
Jump you fuckers! | The thing about smart motherfuckers is they sound like crazy motherfuckers to dumb motherfuckers. | My sig space for rent for 0.01 btc per week.
|
|
|
sawa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1308
Merit: 1011
|
|
January 15, 2015, 05:19:05 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
ltcifc
|
|
January 18, 2015, 01:12:21 PM |
|
IFC picking up. Will go up a lot more.
|
|
|
|
dida
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
SoNiC BooM
|
|
February 28, 2015, 09:26:01 AM |
|
Is this coin still alive?
|
|
|
|
tittiecoiner
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
|
March 26, 2015, 05:50:01 PM |
|
Good question, interested to know, too.
|
|
|
|
|