[ANN][DOGE] Dogecoin - very currency many coin - v1.10.0

[SoftLayer]

I'm launching a 51% attack against Dogecoin. I'm offering $250 in BTC to a developer that implements the following:

$250 (paid in BTC) for the following two modifications for http://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin in order to perform a 51% attack: This is not about 51% attacking Bitcoin.

1) JSON-RPC command to make the network ignore blocks above a certain height, and restore all state back to specified block (until the client itself mines a block, in which case the height ceiling is incremented by one).

Example: Network block height is 1500. I call "setblockheight 1470", and the daemon restores the state back to 1470, and will start mining from 1470. Eventually, it mines to say block 1511, and that overtakes the main chain (as we have >51% hashpower).

Now, another mining pool mines block 1512. Because this block isn't ours, and setblockheight is active (still at 1511), the daemon will ignore the other pool's block. When our daemon mines 1512, setblockheight would be incremented by one, and it'll mine 1513, etc.

Effect: Orphans everyone else's blocks, allows double spending with (2).

2) JSON-RPC command to reject certain transaction hashes from being in memory pool, included in blocks. This TXID blacklist can be just stored in memory, it doesn't need to be saved to disk.

Example: I call "ignoretxid [transaction ID]". The transaction is already in the mempool of the daemon, and would be included in the next block. However, the txid is now removed from the mempool, ignored, and won't be included in the next block.

Example 2 (double spend):

1. I'm at block 1500. I send 1000 DGC to [A] with [TXA].
2. I withdraw the 1000 DGC from [A] when it confirms, at block 1506.
3. I pass "setblockheight 1499" to my daemon , and pass "ignoretxid [TXA]". The [TXA] is now removed from the memory pool.
4. I create [TXB], spending the same inputs, sending the 100 DGC to [.B]. This is accepted in the memory pool, as [TXA] (which previously conflicted) is no longer there.
5. I mine block 1500 with [TXB], and I keep mining up to block 1507. At this point, the network will orphan my previous chain, and the fork with [TXB] is now authoritative.

------

What to modify: http://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin

Pool I will be using: https://github.com/zone117x/node-stratum-pool (I don't think you need to modify anything on the pool, but you might).

If anyone is interested in working together on 51% attacking Dogecoin, especially if you can patch dogecoind to make us double spend, send me a PM.

UPDATE: No longer need patches, already done If you have large amounts of hashpower and would like to make us an offer (we already have enough, but cheaper is nice, PM)

If you think this is FUD, think what you want, it will not change the outcome

[BayAreaCoins]

I'm launching a 51% attack against Dogecoin. I'm offering $250 in BTC to a developer that implements the following:

$250 (paid in BTC) for the following two modifications for http://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin in order to perform a 51% attack: This is not about 51% attacking Bitcoin.

1) JSON-RPC command to make the network ignore blocks above a certain height, and restore all state back to specified block (until the client itself mines a block, in which case the height ceiling is incremented by one).

Example: Network block height is 1500. I call "setblockheight 1470", and the daemon restores the state back to 1470, and will start mining from 1470. Eventually, it mines to say block 1511, and that overtakes the main chain (as we have >51% hashpower).

Now, another mining pool mines block 1512. Because this block isn't ours, and setblockheight is active (still at 1511), the daemon will ignore the other pool's block. When our daemon mines 1512, setblockheight would be incremented by one, and it'll mine 1513, etc.

Effect: Orphans everyone else's blocks, allows double spending with (2).

2) JSON-RPC command to reject certain transaction hashes from being in memory pool, included in blocks. This TXID blacklist can be just stored in memory, it doesn't need to be saved to disk.

Example: I call "ignoretxid [transaction ID]". The transaction is already in the mempool of the daemon, and would be included in the next block. However, the txid is now removed from the mempool, ignored, and won't be included in the next block.

Example 2 (double spend):

1. I'm at block 1500. I send 1000 DGC to [A] with [TXA].
2. I withdraw the 1000 DGC from [A] when it confirms, at block 1506.
3. I pass "setblockheight 1499" to my daemon , and pass "ignoretxid [TXA]". The [TXA] is now removed from the memory pool.
4. I create [TXB], spending the same inputs, sending the 100 DGC to [.B]. This is accepted in the memory pool, as [TXA] (which previously conflicted) is no longer there.
5. I mine block 1500 with [TXB], and I keep mining up to block 1507. At this point, the network will orphan my previous chain, and the fork with [TXB] is now authoritative.

------

What to modify: http://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin

Pool I will be using: https://github.com/zone117x/node-stratum-pool (I don't think you need to modify anything on the pool, but you might).

If anyone is interested in working together on 51% attacking Dogecoin, especially if you can patch dogecoind to make us double spend, send me a PM, or email me at opwolf@mail.com

UPDATE: No longer need patches, already done If you have large amounts of hashpower and would like to make us an offer (we already have enough, but cheaper is nice, PM)

If you think this is FUD, think what you want, it will not change the outcome

Just move 10 billion and one DOGE in one transaction.

But you sir are a dick! Don't break their main toy...

DDoS their foundation or something! If you want to be a dick... you know shit that doesn't matter!

[Viper1]

Does it occasionally take a long time for a transaction to confirm? It's been over 24 hours and a transaction of mine is sitting at only 6 peers.

[BayAreaCoins]

when doge first launched the blocks werent stacking right.  This causes the sync to be longer... this problem was addressed/fixed by Pronooob adding supernodes.

What happen to Probooob?
I know there is a lot FUD - but he was always very helpful and polite to me, with solving mining issues.

Skip to the underline if you don't want to hear my gay little story


He wasn't a bad guy, just DOGE was moving so fast.

We had our little argument because we are both hard headed and I wasn't in his ball league as far as computer stuff. Also, I did a little marketing for his pool and never got paid. When I didn't get paid I posted about how Netcodepool was DDoS'ed by one of ProNooobs association (which is true remember all the Dogehouse.org pop up the day of the attack.)

I'm not saying DDoSing netcodepool was all bad. They fucked up and got WAY to close 51%. However, DOGEHOUSE did make a small fortune off of it marketing their customers & it was kind of shitty to put a 50 million DOGE bounty on them.
 
Jackson then began raising money to donate to Pronooob for supplying the infrastructure, but I was later informed it never even made it to Pronooob.  Bad sign when the Foundation isn't even giving the money where they say they are. (Although, Pronooob is a dick weed and I'm glad he didn't get shit.)

DOGE mining was hot day 1 - 50... after that it was pretty much the smucks.

He vanished after the mining was hot.

[TookDk]

He vanished after the mining was hot.

Thanks for the update, he properly cashed out.
Nevertheless I have nothing bad to say about pronoob, like I said he was always very friendly and helpful to me.

[BayAreaCoins]

He vanished after the mining was hot.

Thanks for the update, he properly cashed out.
Nevertheless I have nothing bad to say about pronoob, like I said he was always very friendly and helpful to me.

That's good. Glad you were apart of "pronooob" era... good times! Many riches!

[life2you]

is doge dying?? i feel sad.

[BayAreaCoins]

is doge dying?? i feel sad.

Returning to mean meme...

www.DogecoinCharts.com

[lynn_402]

Does it occasionally take a long time for a transaction to confirm? It's been over 24 hours and a transaction of mine is sitting at only 6 peers.

Usually not, but it can happen if you paid no transaction fees.

[Viper1]

Does it occasionally take a long time for a transaction to confirm? It's been over 24 hours and a transaction of mine is sitting at only 6 peers.

Usually not, but it can happen if you paid no transaction fees.

I paid the 1. Does it also depend on the size of the transaction? This one was roughly 25k bytes in size.

[devphp]

Special offer for Dogecoin users!

Exchange your 0.00000001 doge for 10 NXTs (worth ~$0.45).

PM me to get details of the trade.

[manfred]

is doge dying?? i feel sad.

Short answer is no, but devs neat to get going and do something

Edit: actually is almost the same as a month ago now

[UrsaMajorisBeta]

Special offer for Dogecoin users!

Exchange your 0.00000001 doge for 10 NXTs (worth ~$0.45).

PM me to get details of the trade.

Is it true?

[devphp]

Special offer for Dogecoin users!

Exchange your 0.00000001 doge for 10 NXTs (worth ~$0.45).

PM me to get details of the trade.

Is it true?

Of course, pm for details if you're interested.

[kentwo]

the doge exchange to the nxt?

[globallcoin]

Welcome dogecoins join www.globallcoin.com IPO.

I'd like to welcome everyone.

[lynn_402]

Does it occasionally take a long time for a transaction to confirm? It's been over 24 hours and a transaction of mine is sitting at only 6 peers.

Usually not, but it can happen if you paid no transaction fees.

I paid the 1. Does it also depend on the size of the transaction? This one was roughly 25k bytes in size.

The bigger the transaction, the bigger the tx fees should theoretically be. However, I always pay 1 doge and have never had any transfer problem.
Could you post the link in dogechain.info to your transaction?

[unitedminers]

i believe all scrypt coins will be picking back up by november, and then we will see a huge rise in all altcoins over the next several months.. ive studied economics and pennystocks quite a bit when i was a bit younger working for my uncle.

Why do you think altcoins will rise again in November?

if anyone has any good affordable suggestions for nvidia gpu's

Gainward Nvidia GTX 750 Ti (Maxwell) Golden Sample for X11 and newer algorithms


BTW Dogecoin made the 3rd place at UNESCO Entrepreneurship Competition

https://www.youth-competition.org/groups/entrepreneurship-competition-2013/contests/2/?filter[16]=&filter[17]=&order=votes_desc&filter-submit=Filter

[Equate]

is doge dying?? i feel sad.

Doge is not dying but things have slowed down for Doge and for many other coins.

[unitedminers]

Doge is not dying but things have slowed down for Doge and for many other coins.

It slowed down because nearly 87 BILLION coins were mined in 7 months! That's the only reason.

The community, with nearly 88000 (!) members only on Reddit, and the devs are working harder than ever before and when the high inflation stops in January 2015 ... lift off