Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 04:56:02 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: A possibly stupid question  (Read 914 times)
uranian (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 16, 2013, 12:23:47 AM
 #1

Having spent the past week getting my first 2 mining rigs up and running, I've read in the CGMiner readme files that the figure I should  ultimately be paying attention to is the WU, rather than the kh/s, despite the fact that everyone seems to obsess over this. I've been researching Block Erupters a bit, and I see 3 of them running at 1gh/s, but producing a WU of 13.8/minute, in contrast to the 435 WU/minute I'm getting from an HD7970 (yes it's a crappy version of this card, unfortunately). I understand that USB block erupters are using loads less power than a GPU, but given that the auction linked below is for a similar cost to the 7970 I bought while producing 23 WU/min rather than 435 WU/min, I'm wondering if I'm either missing something (my electricity costs to run the 7970 are 100 times that of the USB sticks, but still less than a dollar a day), or if Block Erupters are a waste of money.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/5-x-USB-Bitcoin-ASIC-Miner-Block-Erupter-IN-HAND-Ships-Immediately-asicminer-/190942176648?pt=UK_Computing_FlashDrives_SM&hash=item2c750a6588
1714755362
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714755362

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714755362
Reply with quote  #2

1714755362
Report to moderator
1714755362
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714755362

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714755362
Reply with quote  #2

1714755362
Report to moderator
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714755362
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714755362

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714755362
Reply with quote  #2

1714755362
Report to moderator
PincoPluto
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 16, 2013, 06:19:47 AM
 #2

Having spent the past week getting my first 2 mining rigs up and running, I've read in the CGMiner readme files that the figure I should  ultimately be paying attention to is the WU, rather than the kh/s, despite the fact that everyone seems to obsess over this. I've been researching Block Erupters a bit, and I see 3 of them running at 1gh/s, but producing a WU of 13.8/minute, in contrast to the 435 WU/minute I'm getting from an HD7970 (yes it's a crappy version of this card, unfortunately). I understand that USB block erupters are using loads less power than a GPU, but given that the auction linked below is for a similar cost to the 7970 I bought while producing 23 WU/min rather than 435 WU/min, I'm wondering if I'm either missing something (my electricity costs to run the 7970 are 100 times that of the USB sticks, but still less than a dollar a day), or if Block Erupters are a waste of money.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/5-x-USB-Bitcoin-ASIC-Miner-Block-Erupter-IN-HAND-Ships-Immediately-asicminer-/190942176648?pt=UK_Computing_FlashDrives_SM&hash=item2c750a6588

I don't know much of mining for now but they warned me about mining with a graphic card, you warm it basically for nothing, i got a hub with 10 ports and would like to start with 10 block erupter
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4102
Merit: 1631


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
December 16, 2013, 06:47:42 AM
 #3

Sounds like you're comparing bitcoin mining on the erupters to sshyt mining on the GPUs which are not comparable.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Xyver
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 281
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 16, 2013, 09:01:19 AM
 #4

Block Eruptors are wayyyyy more power efficient then GPU's.

Graphics cards are ~200 watts for 300-700 megahashes.

Block eruptors are 2.5 watts for 335 megahashes.  They're basically a graphics card equivalent, yet they take 2.5 watts instead of ~200.
uranian (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 16, 2013, 01:49:01 PM
Last edit: December 16, 2013, 02:03:46 PM by uranian
 #5

Sounds like you're comparing bitcoin mining on the erupters to sshyt mining on the GPUs which are not comparable.

does the 0.9 ratio between kh/s and WU applies to BTC mining too, or is that just for scrypt? ah i l know, i shall just go RTFM.

related, am i correct in understanding that the WU is the figure i should be paying attention to? i can get my 7970 hashing faster but producing less WU, so i'm thinking that it's better to have a lower hash rate with a higher WU.
uranian (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 16, 2013, 02:07:53 PM
 #6

aren't manuals useful?  Wink

Quote
Q: What should my Work Utility (WU) be?
A: Work utility is the product of hashrate * luck and only stabilises over a
very long period of time. Assuming all your work is valid work, bitcoin mining
should produce a work utility of approximately 1 per 71.6MH. This means at
5GH you should have a WU of 5000 / 71.6 or ~ 69. You cannot make your machine
do "better WU" than this - it is luck related. However you can make it much
worse if your machine produces a lot of hardware errors producing invalid work.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!