|
jack80
|
 |
March 19, 2014, 08:57:00 AM |
|
I have great quantity of Unconfirmed HVC , Why ? .
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 19, 2014, 08:59:01 AM |
|
I have great quantity of Unconfirmed HVC , Why ? .
Blocks you have mined them in have not matured yet and cannot be spent by the pool to pay you. In HVC it takes 100 subsequent blocks for a block to mature, it takes cca 3.5 hours on average. |
|
|
|
|
|
jack80
|
|
March 19, 2014, 09:09:40 AM |
|
Thank YoU  . |
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 19, 2014, 09:38:49 AM |
|
Heavycoin cgminer is now released on http://hvc.1gh.com. All beta users are advised to upgrade, release version has improved stability and performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 19, 2014, 09:49:35 AM |
|
Ok im try on ATI 5770 and dont work .
Im use --heavy --vote 512 -o stratum+tcp://hvcpool.1gh.com:5333 -u WALLET -p x .
The miner is beta and WIP, it does not work on anything but GCN cards yet, give it up. I've compiled on Mac (6770HD) with the same result.  Also I cannot seem to get even --skein working. Always getting "Pool 0 JSON stratum auth failed: (unknown reason)". Any ideas why? The released version on hvc.1gh.com hopefully supports VLIW cards (at least compiler does not crash anymore). Please upgrade. For skein, you were probably using the wrong pool, I have tested that it works on skc.coinmine.pl |
|
|
|
|
|
mfqrs3
|
|
March 19, 2014, 12:12:22 PM |
|
Heavycoin cgminer is now released on http://hvc.1gh.com. All beta users are advised to upgrade, release version has improved stability and performance. Unfortunately this version is not working. Fail to init GPU thread 0. Disable device 0 Error -11. Compilation fail. I have tryed with all R9 cards ( 270,280x,290 ) none of them work. |
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 19, 2014, 12:17:47 PM |
|
Heavycoin cgminer is now released on http://hvc.1gh.com. All beta users are advised to upgrade, release version has improved stability and performance. Unfortunately this version is not working. Fail to init GPU thread 0. Disable device 0 Error -11. Compilation fail. I have tryed with all R9 cards ( 270,280x,290 ) none of them work. An update to address this in underway, github source is already updated. |
|
|
|
|
rurki
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
|
March 19, 2014, 12:36:10 PM |
|
New cgminer.exe is failing with "cgminer.exe is not a valid win32 application".
|
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 19, 2014, 12:49:28 PM |
|
New cgminer.exe is failing with "cgminer.exe is not a valid win32 application".
This is embarassing, the file got currupted during copy. Please redownload. |
|
|
|
|
rurki
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
|
March 19, 2014, 12:58:53 PM |
|
New cgminer.exe is failing with "cgminer.exe is not a valid win32 application".
This is embarassing, the file got currupted during copy. Please redownload. Redownloaded, now getting "Access is denied" when executing. Beta is still working fine and I ran from administrative command prompt. |
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 19, 2014, 01:13:45 PM |
|
New cgminer.exe is failing with "cgminer.exe is not a valid win32 application".
This is embarassing, the file got currupted during copy. Please redownload. Redownloaded, now getting "Access is denied" when executing. Beta is still working fine and I ran from administrative command prompt. Must be the old one cached somewhere, I have tested that current download works. Renamed the file just in case. |
|
|
|
|
rurki
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
|
March 19, 2014, 01:19:39 PM |
|
New cgminer.exe is failing with "cgminer.exe is not a valid win32 application".
This is embarassing, the file got currupted during copy. Please redownload. Redownloaded, now getting "Access is denied" when executing. Beta is still working fine and I ran from administrative command prompt. Must be the old one cached somewhere, I have tested that current download works. Renamed the file just in case. Really odd, working fine on my windows 8.1 miners, but not the windows 7; Rename still did not fix. Appreciate your hard work! |
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 19, 2014, 01:20:55 PM |
|
New cgminer.exe is failing with "cgminer.exe is not a valid win32 application".
This is embarassing, the file got currupted during copy. Please redownload. Redownloaded, now getting "Access is denied" when executing. Beta is still working fine and I ran from administrative command prompt. Must be the old one cached somewhere, I have tested that current download works. Renamed the file just in case. Really odd, working fine on my windows 8.1 miners, but not the windows 7; Rename still did not fix. Appreciate your hard work! Antivirus software blocking it perhaps? |
|
|
|
|
rurki
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
|
March 19, 2014, 01:27:44 PM
Last edit: March 19, 2014, 01:40:54 PM by rurki |
|
New cgminer.exe is failing with "cgminer.exe is not a valid win32 application".
This is embarassing, the file got currupted during copy. Please redownload. Redownloaded, now getting "Access is denied" when executing. Beta is still working fine and I ran from administrative command prompt. Must be the old one cached somewhere, I have tested that current download works. Renamed the file just in case. Really odd, working fine on my windows 8.1 miners, but not the windows 7; Rename still did not fix. Appreciate your hard work! Antivirus software blocking it perhaps? Nope, not that either. It's odd, if I double click cgminer.exe it will run, but then die after I enter the connection information. If I pass the arguments via a batch file or try to run cgminer.exe from a command prompt it displays "access is denied". Update : Reboot resolved it. Using ccminer that was posted for nividia as well, 6.5M on a 680GTX, nice! |
|
|
|
|
Chello
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
March 19, 2014, 01:29:54 PM |
|
This new version is slower than the old one (at last on my 270s) Old was 4,2M per card and the new one is 3,8M.
|
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 19, 2014, 01:32:14 PM |
|
This new version is slower than the old one (at last on my 270s) Old was 4,2M per card and the new one is 3,8M.
Do you run cgminer-heavy-2014-03-19-3.zip? The first one posted today really was slower on many cards (but not on Pitcairn/Tahiti where it was developed), the current one only has surefire optimizations that should benefit all cards. |
|
|
|
|
Chello
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
March 19, 2014, 01:33:22 PM |
|
Yes, its cgminer-heavy-2014-03-19-3.zip from 1gh.com and this version also creates a new bin file from a diff cl file. (heavy140319Pitcairngv1w256l4.bin) Old one was heavy140312Pitcairngv1w256l4.bin
|
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 19, 2014, 01:49:09 PM |
|
Yes, its cgminer-heavy-2014-03-19-3.zip from 1gh.com and this version also creates a new bin file from a diff cl file. (heavy140319Pitcairngv1w256l4.bin) Old one was heavy140312Pitcairngv1w256l4.bin
In fact, on 7870 (the same chipset with 270) for me it went from below 3.2mhs to 3.7mhs. Does the new version by any chance start with 2 or more GPU threads? (1 is best for this kernel) |
|
|
|
|
Chello
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
March 19, 2014, 02:23:10 PM |
|
Yes, its cgminer-heavy-2014-03-19-3.zip from 1gh.com and this version also creates a new bin file from a diff cl file. (heavy140319Pitcairngv1w256l4.bin) Old one was heavy140312Pitcairngv1w256l4.bin
In fact, on 7870 (the same chipset with 270) for me it went from below 3.2mhs to 3.7mhs. Does the new version by any chance start with 2 or more GPU threads? (1 is best for this kernel) possible, i added now "gpu-threads" : "1" to my conf and now it the same speed as it was with the old version (4,2M) |
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
March 19, 2014, 02:46:24 PM |
|
Yes, its cgminer-heavy-2014-03-19-3.zip from 1gh.com and this version also creates a new bin file from a diff cl file. (heavy140319Pitcairngv1w256l4.bin) Old one was heavy140312Pitcairngv1w256l4.bin
In fact, on 7870 (the same chipset with 270) for me it went from below 3.2mhs to 3.7mhs. Does the new version by any chance start with 2 or more GPU threads? (1 is best for this kernel) possible, i added now "gpu-threads" : "1" to my conf and now it the same speed as it was with the old version (4,2M) I have found out I was testing with Catalyst 12.8 when I got significanlty higher numbers. For 13.12 there is still some modest hashrate gain, but apparently it requires a different approach to optimization. |
|
|
|
|
|
