[ANN] [SHA256]+[CPU] MediterraneanCoin (MED) - REUSE your ERUPTER!!

[smallplatf]

and also:

we have a new logo! have a look!

[smallplatf]

we have a new release for mcproxy which implements a multithread architecture in order to increase the performance!!!

you can find the source code here:   https://github.com/mrtexaznl/mcproxy

and the mcproxy binary here: https://github.com/mrtexaznl/mcproxy/tree/master/mcproxy/dist

you can download just the new mcproxy.jar file (direct link from github: https://github.com/mrtexaznl/mcproxy/raw/master/mcproxy/dist/mcproxy.jar) and replace the old file.

IMPORTANT! In order to enable the multithread architecture, please add the -a option ; without the -a option, the program works with the original, non-multithreaded implementation.
 

[smallplatf]

hi all,

go here to get some free MEDs!

http://faucet.mediterraneancoin.org

[battsali]

 Fresh logo   

[cr1st0f]

we have a new release for mcproxy which implements a multithread architecture in order to increase the performance!!!

 

Tested tonight. More efficiently but always only 1 core at full load


p.s.
I like new logo, good choice ! 

[Krisjohntrip]

Just confirming that you can't use an ASIC for the SHA-256 part and a GPU for the Scrypt part. As currently implemented it's ASIC or GPU for SHA-256 and CPU for Scrypt, yes?

Or in other words, if I have a LTC mining rig with a high end graphics card, I could add some old ASICs and mine MED without either interfering with the LTC mining or short-changing myself on the MED mining?

Interesting idea.

[GigaCoin]

so this coin will be widely used by mediterranean nations ? 

[smallplatf]

we have a new release for mcproxy which implements a multithread architecture in order to increase the performance!!!

 

Tested tonight. More efficiently but always only 1 core at full load


p.s.
I like new logo, good choice ! 

have you used the -a option?

[smallplatf]

Just confirming that you can't use an ASIC for the SHA-256 part and a GPU for the Scrypt part. As currently implemented it's ASIC or GPU for SHA-256 and CPU for Scrypt, yes?

Or in other words, if I have a LTC mining rig with a high end graphics card, I could add some old ASICs and mine MED without either interfering with the LTC mining or short-changing myself on the MED mining?

Interesting idea.

answers: yes and yes.

[nohow82]

hot to use -a option? i tried but nothing different... http asyncronous: false...
what's wrong?

[cr1st0f]

have you used the -a option?

Ohhh yeah, ASYNC web server is ON, but always 1 core used.

i think that there is a little bug, i think in a memory leak. After some hours on bfgminer, hash speed  go down from 28ghs to 5ghs... i reboot only mcproxy and it go back to 28ghs

hot to use -a option? i tried but nothing different... http asyncronous: false...
what's wrong?

insert "-a" at end of execution string.

java -jar mcproxy.jar -a

[smallplatf]

have you used the -a option?

Ohhh yeah, ASYNC web server is ON, but always 1 core used.

i think that there is a little bug, i think in a memory leak. After some hours on bfgminer, hash speed  go down from 28ghs to 5ghs... i reboot only mcproxy and it go back to 28ghs

hot to use -a option? i tried but nothing different... http asyncronous: false...
what's wrong?

insert "-a" at end of execution string.

java -jar mcproxy.jar -a

for debugging the issue:
what os are us using? how many cores does your cpu(s) have?

also, are you observing core usage by looking at taskman or similar, correct?

thanx for the info 

[cr1st0f]

for debugging the issue:
what os are us using? how many cores does your cpu(s) have?

also, are you observing core usage by looking at taskman or similar, correct?

Windows 7 64Bit,
my cpu is a i3 3220 2physical core, 4 logical.



 


edit.:
After 4hours



The Memory usage continuously increase

[smallplatf]

for debugging the issue:
what os are us using? how many cores does your cpu(s) have?

also, are you observing core usage by looking at taskman or similar, correct?

Windows 7 64Bit,
my cpu is a i3 3220 2physical core, 4 logical.



 


edit.:
After 4hours



The Memory usage continuously increase

ok, thank you very much for the info.
We are testing some improvements to mcproxy, will post here for updates.

[smallplatf]

hi all,

go here to get some free MEDs!

Faucet has been replenished!!!

http://faucet.mediterraneancoin.org

[fonollvert]

good morning - google translations
I can not mining - I have all proven
 you  know pool ?

thanks

[cr1st0f]

good morning - google translations
I can not mining - I have all proven
 you  know pool ?

thanks

For now only pool is p2ppool but is difficult to configure.

What problem with solo mining?

[madcat777]

Hi all,

I have problem to start bfgminer - maybe someone has idea what is wrong...
I run it next way:
I:\win32-bfgminer\bfgminer.exe --submit-stale -o http://localhost:8080 -u user -p pass -Q 0 -S all -T --verbose
mcproxy has next errors:
http://s28.postimg.org/4a0qs24wt/porblem.gif

[rmindel]

good morning - google translations
I can not mining - I have all proven
 you  know pool ?

thanks

For now only pool is p2ppool but is difficult to configure.

What problem with solo mining?

with 2 BEs i get maybe 1 block a day
it's been running for 1.5 days now and i'm with : avg:665.5 u: 0.00 Mh/s | A:0 R:1+0(100%) HW:34/.84%

so it's not doing anything...
waiting for a pool...

[rfe3]

Hi all,
     I've got a couple of questions about cgniner and bfgminer for Medcoin. I've been sucessfully mining for a few days now but there seems to be some inconsistencies (I think) with cgminer. I'm fairly new to the whole Cryptocoin scene and find it pretty cool...I just havn't been able to get things running as smoothly as I think they should.
   
My setup is as follows:
Toshiba Qosimo Laptop
Win 7x64
i7 cpu
16 Mb Ram
Antminer U1

     I can get it all working with cgminer 32 and 64bit but the Hashrates swing between 1.4Mhs and 150khs...It won't find a "Sweet Spot" and deliver a constant hashrate. Is this normal? I notice that my CPU is also only loading up between 1 and 8%....no more. I am using the new Java jar with the -a command ("C:\Program Files\Java\jre7\bin\java.exe" -jar mcproxy.jar -a) it seems to be working but not really loading up my CPUs.
     Does this mean that 1 Antminer is really using so little of my processing power? If I add more Antminers, theoretically they will then put more load on the CPU? Or...is something not correct in the setup?
     My Command line for starting cgminer 3.9.0 (32bit) looks like this:
(cgminer -o http://localhost:8080 -u *my login* -p  *my pass*  -T)
     The Command line for cgminer 3.10.0 (64bit) is exactly the same.
I like using the 32 bit version better because the text in the Command prompt window doesn't constantly roll and I can see the hashrate better. I have the same fluxuating hashrate with both versions. I tried the exact same setup in another Laptop with an i3 Processor (Win-7x64) and the hashrate fluxuates the same as the i7.

     As for bfgminer, I can't get it to work at all...It looks as though you can do a lot more tuning than with cgminer, but like I said, I can't get it to run. The command line I'm using for bfgminer is as follows:
(bfgminer --submit-stale -o http://localhost:8080 -u *my login* -p  *my pass* -Q 0 -S all -T --verbose)

     I have DL'd the correct modified miner versions as per the links in this thread and the Med.coin Website. Any info would be appreciated.


many Thanks and Happy Mining,
Rick