Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 05:40:20 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Watchlist problem  (Read 1261 times)
Octopuss (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 04, 2014, 05:05:58 PM
 #1

Whenever I open the watchlist and click on the small blue "new" icon in the name of a thread, it takes me to top of the last page instead of first unread post. Is this some known bug, or what's the deal here? Any ideas? I am using Firefox v26.

Also, why are unread posts not marked by some icon inside a thread? That would make the forum much more readable/less chaotic.
1715233220
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715233220

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715233220
Reply with quote  #2

1715233220
Report to moderator
1715233220
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715233220

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715233220
Reply with quote  #2

1715233220
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715233220
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715233220

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715233220
Reply with quote  #2

1715233220
Report to moderator
whiskers75
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 502


Doesn't use these forums that often.


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 09:53:02 AM
 #2

Get the Bitcointalk++ script, by jackjack (look in Meta).

Elastic.pw Elastic - The Decentralized Supercomputer
ELASTIC ANNOUNCEMENT THREAD | ELASTIC SLACK | ELASTIC FORUM
dudel42
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 01:46:46 PM
 #3

same problem here in Firefox -- the new # anchors stopped working one or two days ago for me.
justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1009



View Profile
January 05, 2014, 01:51:52 PM
 #4

Most likely it was one of the features that was consuming too much in the way of database resources so Theymos had to turn it off.
Bagatell
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 722
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 05, 2014, 02:02:44 PM
 #5

Most likely it was one of the features that was consuming too much in the way of database resources so Theymos had to turn it off.

A links a link, I can't see how it would use db storage.
justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1009



View Profile
January 05, 2014, 02:07:46 PM
 #6

A links a link, I can't see how it would use db storage.
Finding the most recently read post in a thread is a calculation that has to be performed on a per-user basis.

Although that might not be it, because it looks like all anchor links are broken.
Bagatell
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 722
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 05, 2014, 02:09:33 PM
 #7

A links a link, I can't see how it would use db storage.
Finding the most recently read post in a thread is a calculation that has to be performed on a per-user basis.

Remove the link from the watchlist then?
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5194
Merit: 12976


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 05:13:09 PM
 #8

Nothing changed on the forum's end. This is probably a Firefox bug unless there's something invalid about the forum's XHTML.

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5194
Merit: 12976


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 09:14:48 PM
 #9

I refuse to use shit browser

Why are you using Firefox, then? Wink

I think that Firefox 26 is broken somehow. I'll investigate it when I can.

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
jackjack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1233


May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 09:19:58 PM
 #10

I refuse to use shit browser

Why are you using Firefox, then? Wink

I think that Firefox 26 is broken somehow. I'll investigate it when I can.

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/484719/html-anchors-with-name-or-id
Quote
According to the HTML 5 specification, 5.9.8 Navigating to a fragment identifier:

Quote
   For HTML documents (and the text/html MIME type), the following processing model must be followed to determine what the indicated part of the document is.

        Parse the URL, and let fragid be the <fragment> component of the URL.
        If fragid is the empty string, then the indicated part of the document is the top of the document.
        If there is an element in the DOM that has an ID exactly equal to fragid, then the first such element in tree order is the indicated part of the document; stop the algorithm here.
        If there is an a element in the DOM that has a name attribute whose value is exactly equal to fragid, then the first such element in tree order is the indicated part of the document; stop the algorithm here.
        Otherwise, there is no indicated part of the document.
So, it will look for id="foo" followed by name="foo"

Edit: As pointed out by @hsivonen, in HTML5 the a element has no name attribute. However, the above rules still apply to other named elements.
Could this be the reason?

See http://www.w3schools.com/tags/att_a_name.asp also


Edit: the forum uses
Quote
<a name="new"></a>

Own address: 19QkqAza7BHFTuoz9N8UQkryP4E9jHo4N3 - Pywallet support: 1AQDfx22pKGgXnUZFL1e4UKos3QqvRzNh5 - Bitcointalk++ script support: 1Pxeccscj1ygseTdSV1qUqQCanp2B2NMM2
Pywallet: instructions. Encrypted wallet support, export/import keys/addresses, backup wallets, export/import CSV data from/into wallet, merge wallets, delete/import addresses and transactions, recover altcoins sent to bitcoin addresses, sign/verify messages and files with Bitcoin addresses, recover deleted wallets, etc.
MiningBuddy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 927
Merit: 1000


฿itcoin ฿itcoin ฿itcoin


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 09:42:17 PM
 #11

I refuse to use shit browser

Why are you using Firefox, then? Wink

I think that Firefox 26 is broken somehow. I'll investigate it when I can.
I'm using FF 26 and everything is working as it should.
What browser do you use theymos?

justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1009



View Profile
January 05, 2014, 09:49:23 PM
 #12

Could this be the reason?

See http://www.w3schools.com/tags/att_a_name.asp also


Edit: the forum uses
Quote
<a name="new"></a>
The forum isn't HTML 5 though - it's XHTML 1.0 Transitional.

Firefox 26 here and I'm also seeing a complete failure of anchor links to resolve.
dudel42
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 05, 2014, 10:04:48 PM
 #13

the thing is, i haven't changed anything in my browser or OS setup in the last few days... and suddenly it stopped working in FF26. browser was not upgraded in the last days, so I can't believe nothing changed in the forum that broke it..?
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5194
Merit: 12976


View Profile
January 06, 2014, 01:00:28 AM
 #14

It's a bug in EasyList for Adblock Plus. All links (including "anchor" links) are blocked when immediately inside of a post <td>:
Code:
bitcointalk.org##td[style="padding: 1px 1px 0 1px;"] > a

Complain to EasyList.

It's impossible for an Adblock Plus filter to block all of the forum's ads. Some ads can be individually blocked, but not all forum ads in general. They should stop trying or they're going to keep breaking things for their users.

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
jackjack
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1233


May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage


View Profile
January 06, 2014, 01:09:37 AM
 #15

Don't they know the purpose of testing?  Roll Eyes

Own address: 19QkqAza7BHFTuoz9N8UQkryP4E9jHo4N3 - Pywallet support: 1AQDfx22pKGgXnUZFL1e4UKos3QqvRzNh5 - Bitcointalk++ script support: 1Pxeccscj1ygseTdSV1qUqQCanp2B2NMM2
Pywallet: instructions. Encrypted wallet support, export/import keys/addresses, backup wallets, export/import CSV data from/into wallet, merge wallets, delete/import addresses and transactions, recover altcoins sent to bitcoin addresses, sign/verify messages and files with Bitcoin addresses, recover deleted wallets, etc.
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5194
Merit: 12976


View Profile
January 06, 2014, 01:12:40 AM
 #16

What browser do you use theymos?

All browsers suck. I actually use Firefox (mostly) because it sucks a little less AFAICT, but I'm frustrated with it daily.

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
TheButterZone
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3052
Merit: 1031


RIP Mommy


View Profile WWW
January 06, 2014, 08:37:44 AM
 #17

This bugged me too. Disabled ABP on bitcointalk.org. Problem solved.

Saying that you don't trust someone because of their behavior is completely valid.
TiagoTiago
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500


Firstbits.com/1fg4i :)


View Profile
January 06, 2014, 08:42:23 AM
 #18

This bugged me too. Disabled ABP on bitcointalk.org. Problem solved.
I just disabled that rule in specific, and it seems to have worked

(I dont always get new reply notifications, pls send a pm when you think it has happened)

Wanna gimme some BTC/BCH for any or no reason? 1FmvtS66LFh6ycrXDwKRQTexGJw4UWiqDX Smiley

The more you believe in Bitcoin, and the more you show you do to other people, the faster the real value will soar!

Do you like mmmBananas?!
dudel42
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 06, 2014, 04:21:26 PM
 #19

It's a bug in EasyList for Adblock Plus. All links (including "anchor" links) are blocked when immediately inside of a post <td>:
Code:
bitcointalk.org##td[style="padding: 1px 1px 0 1px;"] > a

Complain to EasyList.

It's impossible for an Adblock Plus filter to block all of the forum's ads. Some ads can be individually blocked, but not all forum ads in general. They should stop trying or they're going to keep breaking things for their users.

thanks for figuring this out!
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!