AlexMc
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 30, 2015, 04:36:07 AM |
|
AlexMc, your suggestion would go a very long way towards solving the problem I just mentioned above as both parties would be clearly identified and specifically tied to the transaction; moreover, if the option were given to the wallet owner to make the "verified addresses" setting a required default for all transactions, that would also go a long way towards making theft much more difficult (and whoever wants to ignore that additional security level would be free to do so . . . to each his own  ). I like the idea for securing the wallet by requiring "verified addresses" for all transactions. This could also be implemented as a security option where transfers/payments to a verified address did not require the wallet passphrase, but all other transactions would still prompt for it. Perhaps options something like this, where ( ) would be a radio button and [ ] is a check box: Security Options (Making changes to these options will require your passphrase)
( ) Only allow payments to verified addresses
( ) Allow payments to all addresses
[ ] Require passphrase for payments to verified addresses
Note: Payments to non-verified addresses always require your passphrase if the wallet is encrypted.
A setup like this would be similar to the way my Internet banking works, where a payment to one of the beneficiaries I've added to my banking profile can be made without having to enter the one time PIN that is sent to my mobile phone for other payments to be authorised. |
|
|
|
|
DigiByte (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051
Official DigiByte Account
|
|
January 30, 2015, 07:16:32 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
HR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
|
|
January 30, 2015, 07:49:23 AM |
|
Hear, hear. Three cheers for Bryan Kelly. Excellent article all the way around! (You know, when people outside the very close knit digital currency world start becoming this knowledgeable, you know things are beginning to go mainstream.) I'm impressed. |
|
|
|
plumptoiletduck
Member
Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
|
|
January 30, 2015, 08:03:57 AM |
|
DigiByte mentioned on CNBC! http://www.c[Suspicious link removed]m/id/102369183 Hear, hear. Three cheers for Bryan Kelly. Go over to the Nautiluscoin thread and say that! Lol. |
|
|
|
|
halinyo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1000
The future is bright with DigiByte.
|
|
January 30, 2015, 08:24:51 AM |
|
It is funny that he does not mention his own coin nowhere but any other coin. I think he lost his hopes on his own coin and does not want people get involved in his coin since he does not want any trouble about it later on. He wants to protect his reputation and fame against his failure on Naut? In the end good for DGB |
|
|
|
|
|
24hralttrade
|
|
January 30, 2015, 09:48:50 AM |
|
Awesome news! Let´s tweet this and do a giveaway for 1 of the retweeters! I throw in 50k Digibytes. Digibyte can you create a tweet? |
|
|
|
|
CryptoRaver
|
|
January 30, 2015, 09:49:05 AM |
|
Congratulations such great news  |
|
|
|
|
SirChiko
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 30, 2015, 11:10:06 AM |
|
It is funny that he does not mention his own coin nowhere but any other coin. I think he lost his hopes on his own coin and does not want people get involved in his coin since he does not want any trouble about it later on. He wants to protect his reputation and fame against his failure on Naut? In the end good for DGB It isn't his fail at all some group just pumped and dumped it i don't see anthing new in crypto world there. |
The only online casino on which i won something. I made 17mBTC from 1mBTC in like 15 minutes. This is not paid AD!
|
|
|
|
RB25
|
|
January 30, 2015, 11:29:20 AM |
|
That is great. The mere mention of a specific coin by a major media outlet means someone thinks it is viable in the higher levels. They put Digibyte next to Bitcoin in the article. People will read that and wonder if these coins aren't the next generation of viable cryptos. That is where speculation and demand come from.
Good for DGB.
|
| .BITSONG. |
████
████
████
████
████ ████
████ ████
████ ████
████ ████
████ ████
████ ████ | |
████
████
████
████
████ ████
████ ████
████ ████
████ ████
████ ████
████ ████ | | ██
██
██
██
██ ██
██ ██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██ ██
██ ██ ██
██ | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24hralttrade
|
|
January 30, 2015, 12:03:57 PM |
|
I doubt this is Digibyte. |
|
|
|
|
CryptoRaver
|
|
January 30, 2015, 12:08:27 PM |
|
I doubt this is Digibyte. Is it ok that i share this on Dogecoin to  |
|
|
|
|
|
24hralttrade
|
|
January 30, 2015, 12:19:52 PM |
|
I doubt this is Digibyte. Is it ok that i share this on Dogecoin to Never tested it,seen it. It's not official i believe so be carefull. |
|
|
|
|
bytemuma
|
|
January 30, 2015, 12:36:48 PM |
|
What is the best exchange to buy this coin.  I do not even remember this coin, I was now update the wallet, lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
bytemuma
|
|
January 30, 2015, 12:48:14 PM |
|
Thank you. I have account in comkort, going to check. |
|
|
|
|
24hralttrade
|
|
January 30, 2015, 12:49:28 PM |
|
Thank you. I have account in comkort, going to check. Not much volume on comkort i believe. You could better create a account on cryptsy. Just takes you a few minutes. |
|
|
|
|
bytemuma
|
|
January 30, 2015, 12:54:33 PM |
|
Thank you. I have account in comkort, going to check. Not much volume on comkort i believe. You could better create a account on cryptsy. Just takes you a few minutes. I have just check comkort, and is true, there is no volume. What do you think about bittrex.com |
|
|
|
|
24hralttrade
|
|
January 30, 2015, 12:59:17 PM |
|
Thank you. I have account in comkort, going to check. Not much volume on comkort i believe. You could better create a account on cryptsy. Just takes you a few minutes. I have just check comkort, and is true, there is no volume. What do you think about bittrex.com Bittrex is 2nd in volume. Good choice. |
|
|
|
|
RD965
|
|
January 30, 2015, 01:00:49 PM |
|
It seems we have some activity here, always nice to see!
|
|
|
|
|
|
