l8orre
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1181
Merit: 1018
|
|
January 19, 2014, 11:55:55 AM |
|
COUNT ME IN!
and then let's see if you can muster up a communkity like NXT - which I seriously doubt, but interesting experiment anyway.
And come to think of it, I think this will be a really intricate promotion for NXT:
someone grabbing the NXT code, sprouting a billion digital oreos, and then failing for lack of support from a community so, thanks for the promotion!
|
|
|
|
OOO
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:01:33 PM |
|
Interested - we now have GetVisaCoin and NEX. Resources are being stretcheeeeeeed.
|
|
|
|
mingophoria
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:04:33 PM |
|
is this gonna be similar to DOGE coin from btc...... lol
|
|
|
|
salsacz
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:05:54 PM |
|
People paid for their NXT. That was fair.
With Nex, anyone can create multitudes of accounts and get more Nex. Don't tell me that you're going to base distribution on account history either. Anyone that knows anything about this forum, knows that there are many accounts with long histories that are controlled by ONE person. Also accounts are bought and sold routinely.
I'm sure the OP controls many accounts with long histories and will claim the majority of the NEX for himself if he gets people to support his scam.
A very small amount of people paid for their NXT you mean, while the rest were unexpectedly cut off much earlier before the announced date (3/1/14) in order to create an artificial shortage (Apple tactics anyone?). What the OP is imho doing, is showing that all NXT value is based on pure speculation, as it (probably) unable to accumulate a such high value within a such a short time period. There is quite little difference between 140$ (1 BTC on Sep' prices) and cost of time invested in forum posts. All NXT value is based on 1000 pages in the thread
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:07:14 PM |
|
I luv this pic! I'm gonna use it as my avatar now!
|
|
|
|
Maks7
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:10:01 PM |
|
I also want to be part of this. NEX and run rather go catch bitkoin))
|
|
|
|
Nullu
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:16:35 PM |
|
I do hope that us "early adopters" are the first in line if this does bare fruit.
|
BTC - 14kYyhhWZwSJFHAjNTtyhRVSu157nE92gF
|
|
|
OrphanedGland
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:18:23 PM |
|
Interested in some. But how about distribution via boinc/wcg credits?
|
|
|
|
utens
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:18:32 PM |
|
I wonder how many of us already espressed interest, about 200?
|
|
|
|
heskey
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:19:42 PM |
|
If this would be NXT without the very questionable initial distribution (and potentially more improvements over time compared to NXT because of opensource and more developers), then count me in. May be very interesting.
Q: How would you solve problem with scam accusations according to "unfair" distribution Nxt to 73 big stakeholders? BCNext: “This problem can not be solved. Even if we had a million stakeholders the rest seven billion people would call this unfair. A world with the money can not be perfect.”That was a very bright reflection. Creds to this dude for putting sucha stupid statement in sucha serious way.
|
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:20:31 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nullu
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:23:06 PM |
|
If this would be NXT without the very questionable initial distribution (and potentially more improvements over time compared to NXT because of opensource and more developers), then count me in. May be very interesting.
Q: How would you solve problem with scam accusations according to "unfair" distribution Nxt to 73 big stakeholders? BCNext: “This problem can not be solved. Even if we had a million stakeholders the rest seven billion people would call this unfair. A world with the money can not be perfect.”That was a very bright reflection. Creds to this dude for putting sucha stupid statement in sucha serious way. Yep. It's, called Capitalism. You have to have people at the top if you want people at the bottom, and without people at the bottom, there wouldn't be anyone at the top. The bottom want to be at the top, and the top don't want to be at the bottom. Of course it's unfair. It's Capitalism.
|
BTC - 14kYyhhWZwSJFHAjNTtyhRVSu157nE92gF
|
|
|
FrictionlessCoin (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:24:05 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
FrictionlessCoin (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1000
Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:26:09 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
utens
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:28:30 PM |
|
There is quite a difference , with 73 holders, means everyone have 1.5+% , while with 1000 starters, each have 0.1% .
Almost 2 orders of magnitude greater.
About what the other 7 bilion? If you think like that , then will be ok even if only 3 people got 33% of the coins each.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:29:00 PM |
|
Yep. It's, called Capitalism. You have to have people at the top if you want people at the bottom, and without people at the bottom, there wouldn't be anyone at the top. The bottom want to be at the top, and the top don't want to be at the bottom. Of course it's unfair. It's Capitalism.
My brain collapsed.
|
|
|
|
heskey
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:29:19 PM |
|
If this would be NXT without the very questionable initial distribution (and potentially more improvements over time compared to NXT because of opensource and more developers), then count me in. May be very interesting.
Q: How would you solve problem with scam accusations according to "unfair" distribution Nxt to 73 big stakeholders? BCNext: “This problem can not be solved. Even if we had a million stakeholders the rest seven billion people would call this unfair. A world with the money can not be perfect.”That was a very bright reflection. Creds to this dude for putting sucha stupid statement in sucha serious way. Yep. It's, called Capitalism. You have to have people at the top if you want people at the bottom, and without people at the bottom, there wouldn't be anyone at the top. The bottom want to be at the top, and the top don't want to be at the bottom. Of course it's unfair. It's Capitalism. I agree. But this guy rather seem to advocate dictatorship?
|
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
|
|
|
Nullu
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:30:02 PM |
|
Yep. It's, called Capitalism. You have to have people at the top if you want people at the bottom, and without people at the bottom, there wouldn't be anyone at the top. The bottom want to be at the top, and the top don't want to be at the bottom. Of course it's unfair. It's Capitalism.
My brain collapsed. It's economics, man. I could have said "You have to have people at the bottom if you want people at the top, but it means the same thing. You need one to have the other. It was just the way I phrased it. The top want people to be at the bottom, and the bottom want people to be at the top. It's a symmetry.
|
BTC - 14kYyhhWZwSJFHAjNTtyhRVSu157nE92gF
|
|
|
Tompa
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:31:20 PM |
|
I'm in :-) Interested!
|
|
|
|
x0rcist
|
|
January 19, 2014, 12:31:46 PM |
|
Interested!! Gonna setup a node today
|
|
|
|
|