[PoS+PoW] eXocoin [EXO]-gen 2.0- dev. from scratch! Give-Away | Open Beta

[cawson]

1.5BTC send to 1CdK3k3kgyn8rhhUihcF1ZpFmwmzFLai6Y

- transaction ID (TXID):
52184d8cc0220b991209d1ce1f38c8cbae1f346b76593b4a3ff18279b33942eb

-my email address:
1733517099@qq.com

-your website my username:
cowson

[1715075759]

1715075759

[1715075759]

1715075759

[1715075759]

1715075759

[1715075759]

1715075759

[mindact]

0.2872 btc sent to anon136 for escrow of exo early-bird ipo
To: 1J68eajnyueiLeYdaBUiVySFhPiwpafzmY

btc addr 12LKp3i4eUQVMhMSxPJbJT2VFFgzKp3aZJ
tx id 32ebccdfa0811e5c43d31f020db6b451f209c1eb8506cc9201650abf6ffdf269

[Thingamajig]

I think its funny how these new coins try to beat nxt distribution with all these mad ideas on how to keep it fair. But none of them succeed. Take nem for example sock puppet accs, exo has the same problem with the 1st level 2nd level 3rd level investments. Looks like nxt did alright.
Oh by the way im in on exo regardless of distribution this only matters to those that missed out learned this with nxt

Nem has at least 1500 unique accounts and a strong community right from start. That's what success means. Sock puppet accounts have never been an issue to me.
Nxt IPO was fair in its own way and nem did not intend to be "fairer" than nxt. You can stop speculating on what nem trying to do because beating some other crypto in any aspect isn't one of them.

Agreed. Something that I deem more important than a solid launch is resilience. Without that, a coin will never last. NEM most certainly had the former and i have no reason to think it will not have the latter, either.

I also forgot to state in my original post that a communication especially from Exo_coin was perfect. He had patience and answered all the questions, but we should keep in mind that these answers were merely promises. If we look at this perfect communication from a negative side one might say that he will get a nice reward for his patience and perfect communication, over $35,000 guaranteed as we speak, if this is a scam.

I think this is a bit of a stretch. Although he's done rather well to make things as clear as possible, there's still far too many unanswered questions and honestly, i was expecting more activity from the Exo team to quell any legitimate concerns.

For example, the whole process of ensuring Stake 1 holders get more for their BTC over Stake 2. This process hasn't been made completely clear.

The fact that Exo_Coin has been a bit quiet of late also troubles me a little. But i guess time will tell.

[findgreenland]

Although there is much concern about this IPO, more and more btc are sent.
to me, it is a gamble with high rish and low return.

[nhcaochong]

hi, Anon136

I just sent 1.009 btc to you for eXocoin, and 1 BTC for IPO and 0.009 BTC for your escrow fee.

thanks!

the TXID link is following:

https://blockchain.info/en/tx/ae15495b619d528c0703b2981f171885f95ea5aa45ca94fd8f651285a1347e06

rgs,

[timmyd]

I think its funny how these new coins try to beat nxt distribution with all these mad ideas on how to keep it fair. But none of them succeed. Take nem for example sock puppet accs, exo has the same problem with the 1st level 2nd level 3rd level investments. Looks like nxt did alright.
Oh by the way im in on exo regardless of distribution this only matters to those that missed out learned this with nxt

Nem has at least 1500 unique accounts and a strong community right from start. That's what success means. Sock puppet accounts have never been an issue to me.
Nxt IPO was fair in its own way and nem did not intend to be "fairer" than nxt. You can stop speculating on what nem trying to do because beating some other crypto in any aspect isn't one of them.

There will always be complainers.
Frankly, I'm amazed by the amount of activity that NEM generates. If you can get people *involved* with the coin instead of just having people hoarding them, that's a very good sign.

People looking for a "perfect" launch are searching for the mystical Land of Free Pie.

i may have been misunderstood whith my comment. I wasnt bashing any coin im an investor with nem along with exo. I was merley stating all the ipos refer to bettering the distribution that nxt had. Thats all. And so far i havnt seen a reason to believe any of these ipos have had better distribution than nxt had. I mean even if you have a few thousand investors from btt its still not fairly distributed is it we have 7 billion ppl on the plant a few thousand btt members is not truly distributed is it?
I wish all the ipos good luck epsecially nem as i feel it has more to offer than any 2.0 clone

[mikesbmw]

Hi Anon136,

I just now sent you 0,5BTC
TX id: 58c6bd09e50ccc43a8903808c4f875d6e78b372d0c6956123107eeaf8eb81ab5
Username: Mikesbmw

Oh, i just saw that you get a 0.005BTC escrow fee (of course)
TX id: e407d43c3cb0c50c1514c5c29bdf6115e919d0e60a711394bcbb628997cbd28b

Thanks in advance!

[Damelon]

I think its funny how these new coins try to beat nxt distribution with all these mad ideas on how to keep it fair. But none of them succeed. Take nem for example sock puppet accs, exo has the same problem with the 1st level 2nd level 3rd level investments. Looks like nxt did alright.
Oh by the way im in on exo regardless of distribution this only matters to those that missed out learned this with nxt

Nem has at least 1500 unique accounts and a strong community right from start. That's what success means. Sock puppet accounts have never been an issue to me.
Nxt IPO was fair in its own way and nem did not intend to be "fairer" than nxt. You can stop speculating on what nem trying to do because beating some other crypto in any aspect isn't one of them.

There will always be complainers.
Frankly, I'm amazed by the amount of activity that NEM generates. If you can get people *involved* with the coin instead of just having people hoarding them, that's a very good sign.

People looking for a "perfect" launch are searching for the mystical Land of Free Pie.

i may have been misunderstood whith my comment. I wasnt bashing any coin im an investor with nem along with exo. I was merley stating all the ipos refer to bettering the distribution that nxt had. Thats all. And so far i havnt seen a reason to believe any of these ipos have had better distribution than nxt had. I mean even if you have a few thousand investors from btt its still not fairly distributed is it we have 7 billion ppl on the plant a few thousand btt members is not truly distributed is it?
I wish all the ipos good luck epsecially nem as i feel it has more to offer than any 2.0 clone

Ah yes. I agree completely.
If all you have is the same code and only differ in your AIM for "better distribution", you are just being silly.
"Better distribution" is a dream and not a business plan in itself.

[Eadeqa]

I think its funny how these new coins try to beat nxt distribution with all these mad ideas on how to keep it fair. But none of them succeed. Take nem for example sock puppet accs, exo has the same problem with the 1st level 2nd level 3rd level investments. Looks like nxt did alright.
Oh by the way im in on exo regardless of distribution this only matters to those that missed out learned this with nxt

Nem has at least 1500 unique accounts and a strong community right from start. That's what success means. Sock puppet accounts have never been an issue to me.
Nxt IPO was fair in its own way and nem did not intend to be "fairer" than nxt. You can stop speculating on what nem trying to do because beating some other crypto in any aspect isn't one of them.

You do  have a really  think skin. You removed someone from the stake list because he said something you didn't like.

Sorry, but that is really bad bad start to Nem

[Thingamajig]

I think its funny how these new coins try to beat nxt distribution with all these mad ideas on how to keep it fair. But none of them succeed. Take nem for example sock puppet accs, exo has the same problem with the 1st level 2nd level 3rd level investments. Looks like nxt did alright.
Oh by the way im in on exo regardless of distribution this only matters to those that missed out learned this with nxt

Nem has at least 1500 unique accounts and a strong community right from start. That's what success means. Sock puppet accounts have never been an issue to me.
Nxt IPO was fair in its own way and nem did not intend to be "fairer" than nxt. You can stop speculating on what nem trying to do because beating some other crypto in any aspect isn't one of them.

You do  have a really  think skin. You removed someone from the stake list because he said something you didn't like.

Sorry, but that is really bad bad start to Nem

Hardly the right thread for this. The NEM community has already expressed a 50/50 stance on the individuals removal. This does not show a mob mentality and if anything, a very diplomatic stance towards the situation.

With this in mind, the person in question made posts with strong implications they wish to have no part in it. Sure, perhaps UP acted a bit rash, but the offer to reinstate his stake is there, so stop making an issue where there is none; as long as the offer still stands for him to reclaim the stake, this argument is absolutely feeble. The choice is his if he'd rather continue his tirade or actually reclaim his stake.


Back on the subject thread, i'm disappointed to still not see any response from any of the eXo team, and honestly i lose faith with each passing hour as long as nothing is heard. The only consolation is the fact the BTC/LTC funds still remain in the original fundraising accounts.

[twinklingstar]

transaction ID:ddd38047d89ceb0056576c5fabd3acc839c4b7b81cec3db11ab1becc386eb89e
0.1BTC

transaction ID: b36cc3fce17aef39301e7abadd1ee1cf04aeed0fdf6e3d79ba16fb086f714939
0.11BTC

transaction ID: e626f4377078c8ab075e094ffb9d351cc8050a9d2d716c586dfe84fc5c83c9c5
0.09BTC

total: 0.3 BTC

  

The email I used for register is 1436785859@qq.com

[timmyd]

Ye dont wanna jump to conclusions here but it is very quiet on the devs part here. Please respond and answer ppls questions. The only other reason is maybe they are busy writing the whitepaper? But im sure a quick update and message from the devs would be nice

[zorke]

Ye dont wanna jump to conclusions here but it is very quiet on the devs part here. Please respond and answer ppls questions. The only other reason is maybe they are busy writing the whitepaper? But im sure a quick update and message from the devs would be nice

Well Exo_coin was last active today so I am sure he saw all of the questions.

Name:   eXo_coin
Posts:   44
Activity:   44
Position:   Jr. Member
Date Registered:   January 09, 2014, 12:45:13 PM
Last Active:   Today at 11:34:59 AM

[findgreenland]

it seems writing nice text means a lot.
ppl here are fond of risk. Good luck, investors.

[CryptKeeper]

Sorry, I couldn't resist! 

[Qwitnix]

Hi Anon136,

Just send you 1.009BTC (1BTC exo + 0.009 fee)
TransactionID:  5b55e5d0b5be44e89ed59fcf55945a39af466945c4e561fcb19fbc83046e1324

Thanks,
Qwitnix

[Eadeqa]

The NEM community has already expressed a 50/50 stance on the individuals removal.

This should not be a question of voting. Rules were set. No one should be able to change the rule and remove people after the fact, even with voting.

Sure, perhaps UP acted a bit rash

Perhaps? Seriously? He removed someone from the list because he didn't like whatever he posted.  What does this say about him?  At least he is very thin skinned.

but the offer to reinstate his stake is there,

Which he did  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=426303.msg5276278#msg5276278

but no response

Lets be clear that only one person is running the show there .. so it really doesn't matter what people "voted" or what anyone else said.  

[timmyd]

I just want to add tht of the exo coin dev is a scammer hes a daft one. Because so much more funds could be generated by following through with the creation of exocoin than just scamming 50btc from investors. Think about it

[utopianfuture]

I think its funny how these new coins try to beat nxt distribution with all these mad ideas on how to keep it fair. But none of them succeed. Take nem for example sock puppet accs, exo has the same problem with the 1st level 2nd level 3rd level investments. Looks like nxt did alright.
Oh by the way im in on exo regardless of distribution this only matters to those that missed out learned this with nxt

Nem has at least 1500 unique accounts and a strong community right from start. That's what success means. Sock puppet accounts have never been an issue to me.
Nxt IPO was fair in its own way and nem did not intend to be "fairer" than nxt. You can stop speculating on what nem trying to do because beating some other crypto in any aspect isn't one of them.

You do  have a really  think skin. You removed someone from the stake list because he said something you didn't like.

Sorry, but that is really bad bad start to Nem

He said he was "interested" because he did not realize how NEM turned out to be. So he "joined in" by a mistake. So I corrected that and he was given a choice again. Similarly,  that applies to any people who ask for a refund. NEM is not selling stakes so there is no contract that you would have a stake if you say or do something.

That is how NEM will operate and read this post carefully before you think otherwise https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=426303.msg5283736#msg5283736

[utopianfuture]

The NEM community has already expressed a 50/50 stance on the individuals removal.

This should not be a question of voting. Rules were set. No one should be able to change the rule and remove people after the fact, even with voting.

Sure, perhaps UP acted a bit rash

Perhaps? Seriously? He removed someone from the list because he didn't like whatever he posted.  What does this say about him?  At least he is very thin skinned.

but the offer to reinstate his stake is there,

Which he did  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=426303.msg5276278#msg5276278

but no response

Lets be clear that only one person is running the show there .. so it really doesn't matter what people "voted" or what anyone else said.  

The voting is unofficial made by a NEM member. It doesn't affect my  decision but I will take input from that poll. YES, I am running the fundraising on behalf of the development team.  

It is my responsibility alone to uphold the social contract and principle in the first page of the fundraising. It is not a democratic decision. But people have a choice to participate or leave.