Patel
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1321
Merit: 1007
|
 |
January 29, 2014, 03:50:48 PM |
|
RIP CoinJoin..?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum was founded in 2009 by Satoshi and Sirius. It replaced a
SourceForge forum.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dancingnancy
|
|
January 29, 2014, 03:53:13 PM |
|
what are these people trying to propose anyway on this mornings panel? just a bunch of nonsense. why isnt the current banking establishment being brought up re: fraud and criminal negligence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
fonzie
|
|
January 29, 2014, 03:54:34 PM |
|
what are these people trying to propose anyway on this mornings panel? just a bunch of nonsense. why isnt the current banking establishment being brought up re: fraud and criminal negligence.
because it´s about virtual currencies??? |
"To know death, Otto, you have to fuck life in the gallbladder" www.hsbc.com - The world´s local bank "These FUDsters are insane egomaniacs that just want cheap BTC" - oblivi |
|
|
|
dancingnancy
|
|
January 29, 2014, 03:59:22 PM |
|
please, right out of this guys mouth is "no one should keep money from crimes if virtual or not" except all banks do this currently in the usa.. virtual money panel or not, its dumb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rygon
|
|
January 29, 2014, 03:59:30 PM |
|
LOL at their reference to being big holders of bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
threecats (OP)
|
|
January 29, 2014, 04:05:01 PM |
|
receeding hairline dude is clearly very paranoid about miners ....
|
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3738
Merit: 3844
|
|
January 29, 2014, 04:10:40 PM |
|
Receding hairline dude??? Man has to know his limitations.
How can he regulate a miner in China, Canada or Bulgaria? He will regulate a miner in US, hence other countries will get more bitcoin-simple.
Charlie Lee had a brilliant proposition yesterday-all three word agencies have to start mining NOW-it will increase their budget, LOL.
He also thinks that miners are "strategic", LOL.
|
|
|
|
|
P_Shep
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1795
Merit: 1198
This is not OK.
|
|
January 29, 2014, 04:11:05 PM |
|
receeding hairline dude is clearly very paranoid about miners ....
Christ, isn't he just! It's all he talks about! If the US government wanted to make sure the miners couldn't do what they wanted, they could simply set up a mining operation of, say 25% of the network. Job done. |
|
|
|
|
|
KFR
|
|
January 29, 2014, 04:12:27 PM |
|
Zabel came across well.
|
They're trying to buy all the coins.
We must not let them.
|
|
|
Torque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3542
Merit: 5039
|
|
January 29, 2014, 05:15:28 PM |
|
Panel 2 is kicking ass today!  Kudos to Fred, Jeremy, and that Overstock guy (didn't catch his name) |
|
|
|
|
|
KFR
|
|
January 29, 2014, 05:17:39 PM
Last edit: January 30, 2014, 02:40:19 PM by KFR |
|
John Johnson I think he said. They are all doing a fine job.
|
They're trying to buy all the coins.
We must not let them.
|
|
|
keithers
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1001
This is the land of wolves now & you're not a wolf
|
|
January 29, 2014, 05:48:28 PM |
|
I am watching some of this while I am at the office. I am actually really impressed by Lawsky, and the people on the panel asking the questions of the bitcoiners. They seem really open minded, and don't act as if they are economic gurus. They seem open and willing to help move the industry forward if possible...
|
|
|
|
|
|
BitcoinAshley
|
|
January 29, 2014, 05:49:20 PM |
|
also, in the second video, Charles Lee raises a point that although bitcoin may be potentially vulnerable to attack from large foreign powers, the USA equally has the power and resources to secure the system. That could be critical if the USA needs to make a decisive decision to back Bitcoin.
LOL. They would start an ASIC farm and grab 40% of the hashing power, then they would say "We need over 51% so that we can fuck with the known terrorist wallets!" Then they would gain 51%, and get really confused when BTC instantly crashes to $0 and nearly all the value travels to Litecoin, Namecoin, and DOGE. "Hmm? But we're from the government, we're here to help! Why don't you want our AML help?" DOGE? You must be joking. Yeah, I must be  |
|
|
|
|
|
Denton
|
|
January 29, 2014, 06:06:21 PM |
|
Today the panelists were much better, seems positive overall. I'm very interested in the third panel Panel 3- The Academic View on Virtual Currencies |
|
|
|
Patel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1321
Merit: 1007
|
|
January 29, 2014, 06:08:06 PM |
|
This last panel which just took place, the 3 panelists did an excellent job.
Regulators are very open minded it seems.
|
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3738
Merit: 3844
|
|
January 29, 2014, 06:10:59 PM |
|
I hope that they did not invite that Boston professor for the academic panel; he is just full of venom.
|
|
|
|
|
seleme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
|
|
January 29, 2014, 06:13:55 PM |
|
Overstock guy is cool as fuck.
|
|
|
|
|
Denton
|
|
January 29, 2014, 06:14:57 PM |
|
I hope that they did not invite that Boston professor for the academic panel; he is just full of venom.
*Ed W. Felten- Professor of Computer Science and Public Affairs, and Director of the Center for Information Technology Policy, Princeton University *Susan Athey- Professor of Economics, Stanford University |
|
|
|
snakebit
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
January 29, 2014, 06:17:27 PM |
|
I missed the 1st panel but I got to say, I was really impressed with everything I heard from the 2nd panel.
|
|
|
|
|
Biodom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3738
Merit: 3844
|
|
January 29, 2014, 06:34:32 PM |
|
I hope that they did not invite that Boston professor for the academic panel; he is just full of venom.
*Ed W. Felten- Professor of Computer Science and Public Affairs, and Director of the Center for Information Technology Policy, Princeton University *Susan Athey- Professor of Economics, Stanford University They don't list all people on the panel-Overstock guy was not listed. |
|
|
|
|
|
