1. evil ripple coin is centralised has a center and dosnt coppy like crazy
2. bitcoin has bitcoin cash bitcoin core bitcoin gold bitcoin diamond bitcoin ultimate and 100 other forks fighting for attention against each other
the centered cryptocurrencies will be clear and then will win over you all and you cant do anything about it then.
So the argument being present is that centralised coins are stronger because you can't fork them?
We're generally willing to accept the myriad pointless forks as a small price to pay for all the benefits gained from being open source. It doesn't matter if some of the forks want to believe they're fighting for attention, because in reality, few people care about most of these forks. They don't even appear on the radar. I honestly couldn't tell you what the difference is between "Bitcoin Diamond" and "Bitcoin Ultimate" because I, quite frankly, don't even care enough to even look them up and find out. They're not noteworthy or remarkable.
Open source gives us greater transparency, almost impenetrable resistance to corruption, total freedom and battle-hardened code where any developer can help find and solve issues. There are no plans to forsake any of those excellent qualities just because a small number of people decided to use Bitcoin as a base for their altcoin. That's simply not a weakness.