fxsniper
Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 45
|
|
May 17, 2021, 01:59:01 AM |
|
I have idea for solve puzzle #64
up to we want to solve puzzle by anyone or keep it for solve puzzle by yourself
if we want to keep it for solve puzzle by yourself don't do anything every one find way yourself (may be next year some one on GPU mining farm try to solve it)
or if want to solve by give away to anyone it easy to solve with in 1 month (30 days) just want to challenge over old records or not
just idea please ignore my old idea make bitcrack version #64 build-in public pool (use free firebase database) and promote every one to know will be solve by millions people do it make like 64bit pool do it but pool split share to who help to highest scan have record keyspace that scan already on database but this idea is have database record pool but give away to who lucky can scan found this project call bitcrack LOTTO it like a LOTTO for bitcoin value $28,797.44 USD (price for now post) I believe people over million will try to scan it by bitcrack special version puzzle #64 million people will scan free and one person lucky will win this lotto and get the key . user easy just run bitcrack (lotto) and waiting for lucky. it is FREE lotto no cost to pay just run computer don't worry still have 78 address leave to solve (next puzzle 66 may be can use this idea but for next #67 may be too high to do it) may be add script to make transaction when found key and split for developer 30% (0.2) and who lucky win 70% (0.44)
for me I think leave that idea for every one find the way to crack it themselves
puzzle is activity for fun if people think waste of time , no body to crack it, it is boring (no excite)
may be puzzle #64 will last one to can crack because it is to high bits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin mining is now a specialized and very risky industry, just like gold mining. Amateur miners are unlikely to make much money, and may even lose money. Bitcoin is much more than just mining, though!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
fxsniper
Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 45
|
|
May 17, 2021, 02:00:25 AM |
|
Can someone please help me. The cubitcrack hangs after loading address and does nothing. Thank you.
Did you have message or image capture Try test use without use GPU, may be GPU problem What is you GPU?
|
|
|
|
Blackhawktom
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
May 17, 2021, 02:06:00 AM |
|
Can someone please help me. The cubitcrack hangs after loading address and does nothing. Thank you.
Did you have message or image capture Try test use without use GPU, may be GPU problem What is you GPU? GPU is - GTX STRIX2080OC CUDA is 10.1 I followed all the instructions I can find. It does the same thing even with just using an address. https://ibb.co/YjmTY41
|
|
|
|
a.a
Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 36
|
|
May 17, 2021, 02:13:38 AM |
|
please ignore
I think this says all.
|
|
|
|
a.a
Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 36
|
|
May 17, 2021, 02:32:28 AM |
|
Well now I bought VS 2019 Pro with small money and used CLANG for compiling clBitCrack. Got from 190 MKeys/s to 192 MKeys/s.
|
|
|
|
WanderingPhilospher
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 219
Shooters Shoot...
|
|
May 17, 2021, 04:05:16 AM |
|
Can someone please help me. The cubitcrack hangs after loading address and does nothing. Thank you.
Did you have message or image capture Try test use without use GPU, may be GPU problem What is you GPU? GPU is - GTX STRIX2080OC CUDA is 10.1 I followed all the instructions I can find. It does the same thing even with just using an address. Which driver version are you using? You will probably have to roll back your driver to an earlier version. That is how I got it to work months ago.
|
|
|
|
fxsniper
Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 45
|
|
May 17, 2021, 07:23:27 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
NotATether
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 6715
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
|
|
May 17, 2021, 12:12:02 PM |
|
Well now I bought VS 2019 Pro with small money and used CLANG for compiling clBitCrack. Got from 190 MKeys/s to 192 MKeys/s.
So the Pro edition bundles a clang compiler? That could actually be useful for people who want to avoid screwing around with MSbuild since you can make both Windows and Linux binaries from a Linux system (and vice versa).
|
. .BLACKJACK ♠ FUN. | | | ███▄██████ ██████████████▀ ████████████ █████████████████ ████████████████▄▄ ░█████████████▀░▀▀ ██████████████████ ░██████████████ █████████████████▄ ░██████████████▀ ████████████ ███████████████░██ ██████████ | | CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTS BETTING | | │ | | │ | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄███████████████▄ ███████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████ ▀███████████████▀ ███████████████████ | | .
|
|
|
|
AuorFedelmid
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 3
|
|
May 17, 2021, 12:25:57 PM Merited by NotATether (1) |
|
Well now I bought VS 2019 Pro with small money and used CLANG for compiling clBitCrack. Got from 190 MKeys/s to 192 MKeys/s.
So the Pro edition bundles a clang compiler? That could actually be useful for people who want to avoid screwing around with MSbuild since you can make both Windows and Linux binaries from a Linux system (and vice versa). You can install C++ Clang tools for Windows on the community addition also
|
|
|
|
Desyationer
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
May 20, 2021, 12:00:07 PM |
|
I have not found a single comment on a successful search, neither in this thread nor in the main one! It looks like this is a puzzle of cheating and trolling over people, otherwise there would be at least a few successful treasure hunters in the early ranges up to 64. It looks like the range is incorrectly specified and can lie anywhere except the indicated one. 64 for a long time could be grouped into 100 people and sort out completely in a week or two.
|
|
|
|
WanderingPhilospher
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 219
Shooters Shoot...
|
|
May 20, 2021, 01:18:36 PM |
|
I have not found a single comment on a successful search, neither in this thread nor in the main one! It looks like this is a puzzle of cheating and trolling over people, otherwise there would be at least a few successful treasure hunters in the early ranges up to 64. It looks like the range is incorrectly specified and can lie anywhere except the indicated one. 64 for a long time could be grouped into 100 people and sort out completely in a week or two.
Yeah obviously you don't really understand the puzzle or math...100 people with one GPU, or two GPUs or maybe three GPUs?? There has been a pool set up for years, where I know for a fact over 300 GPUs have worked on #64 for weeks at a time. All combined, over a few years, only around 15% of the range has been searched.
|
|
|
|
NotATether
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 6715
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
|
|
May 20, 2021, 01:30:54 PM |
|
I have not found a single comment on a successful search, neither in this thread nor in the main one! It looks like this is a puzzle of cheating and trolling over people, otherwise there would be at least a few successful treasure hunters in the early ranges up to 64.
That is because the majority of the transactions before #64 were solved by this tool https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1877935.0 long before Bitcrack was invented.
|
. .BLACKJACK ♠ FUN. | | | ███▄██████ ██████████████▀ ████████████ █████████████████ ████████████████▄▄ ░█████████████▀░▀▀ ██████████████████ ░██████████████ █████████████████▄ ░██████████████▀ ████████████ ███████████████░██ ██████████ | | CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTS BETTING | | │ | | │ | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄███████████████▄ ███████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████ ▀███████████████▀ ███████████████████ | | .
|
|
|
|
|
WanderingPhilospher
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 219
Shooters Shoot...
|
|
May 20, 2021, 07:53:40 PM |
|
That program is, or is using, VanitySearch Program created by Jean Luc Pons AND Bitcrack. First program is VanitySearch and second program is Bitcrack. Nothing new there. https://github.com/JeanLucPons/VanitySearch
|
|
|
|
blm98
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
May 20, 2021, 07:56:47 PM |
|
It's VanitySearch... But you need to understand the BIG differences between this 2 programs : VanitySearch : Search patern of bitcoin address with random search. It's use the symetrie of the elliptic curve. Ex : privKey "1" -> Calc puKey = X, Y -> Sha256 -> Ripemd160 -> found ? no : puKey for "-1" = X, -Y -> Sha256 -> Ripemd160 -> found ? privKey "2" -> Calc puKey = X, Y -> Sha256 -> Ripemd160 -> found ? no : puKey for "-2" = X, -Y -> Sha256 -> Ripemd160 -> found ? ... So the speed is highter than Bitcrack because for 1 pubKey calc you have 2 result. But if you search in a specific range like "BitcoinChallenge", 50% of the search no use... BitCrack : Specific bitcoin address in specific range with ordered search. It don't use the symetrie of the elliptic curve. Ex : privKey "1" -> Calc puKey = X, Y -> Sha256 -> Ripemd160 -> it's equal ? privKey "2" -> Calc puKey = X, Y -> Sha256 -> Ripemd160 -> it's equal ? ... So the speed is hight for specifique range. But you need to know your graphic card to configure the program. For exemple, with a gtx 1066, the SM count is 10 so the param should be : -b 10 -t 256 -p 1024 or -b 20 -t 256 -p 768 or -b 100 -t 256 -p 512
|
|
|
|
archyone
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 1
|
|
May 20, 2021, 08:49:40 PM |
|
Yeah ! faster .. see your screenshot - https://ibb.co/Dpc0HxR - 50% in 1.26609e+32years ^^ good luck so DON'T BUY IT !!
|
|
|
|
a.a
Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 36
|
|
May 22, 2021, 06:50:32 PM |
|
I am fixing and optimizing the OpenCL Version of the Bitcracker... It is really odd, but the debug version is faster than the release version... Crazy.
Any Ideas?
|
|
|
|
a.a
Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 36
|
I forked now BitCrack and improved it a little. https://github.com/Uzlopak/BitCrackOpenCL/In this Fork I concentrate on the OpenCL implementation. So no CUDA-stuff. I already could improve the performance about 30 %. I assume I can get it better, when I start vectorizing the operations. Already wrote on stackoverflow for help to get atleast the multiply256 function improved: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67667314/transform-native-c-matrix-multiplication-to-opencl-simd-matrix-multiplicationAlready posted in various chats and on fiverr with a bounty of 25 € to get it done by somebody else... Probably will ending solving it by myself. Some dude on fiverr was first promising to implement it, but I guess it was more like a dud. I assume a performance improvement of 200-300% when this function is using SIMD-Operation.
|
|
|
|
NotATether
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1582
Merit: 6715
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
|
|
May 25, 2021, 09:28:50 AM |
|
At least your question didn't get closed as "duplicate" But I would change the matrix multiplication algorithm to O( n^2.8 ) Strassen which is faster than standard O(n^3) matmul. Changes in the algorithm used generally make a much more noticeable performance impact than vectorization does.
|
. .BLACKJACK ♠ FUN. | | | ███▄██████ ██████████████▀ ████████████ █████████████████ ████████████████▄▄ ░█████████████▀░▀▀ ██████████████████ ░██████████████ █████████████████▄ ░██████████████▀ ████████████ ███████████████░██ ██████████ | | CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTS BETTING | | │ | | │ | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄███████████████▄ ███████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████ ▀███████████████▀ ███████████████████ | | .
|
|
|
|
|
|