fxsniper
Member

Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 47
|
 |
October 25, 2021, 11:56:59 AM |
|
The openCL version is broken in the original project.
ok, Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
a.a
Member

Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 36
|
 |
October 27, 2021, 02:09:04 PM |
|
If you want to use clBitCrack then use my fork which works for OpenCL.
|
|
|
|
|
NotATether
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2310
Merit: 9631
┻┻ ︵㇏(°□°㇏)
|
 |
October 27, 2021, 07:17:07 PM |
|
Either use CuBitcrack or ClBitcrack for;
1x RTX™ A6000 (total 48 GB GPU Memory, 10,752 CUDA cores) 2x RTX™ 3090 (total 48 GB GPU Memory, total 20,992 CUDA cores)
1) The same amount of GPU memory, which GPU can get more MKey/s?
2) Between GPU Memory or CUDA core, which is an important factor for speed in MKey/s?
As you could use 2x RTX 3090 you will search twice as fast as in the A6000. Memory is not a very important metric, I believe Bitcrack has a memory ceiling of about 4GB of GPU memory or so.
|
|
|
|
fxsniper
Member

Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 47
|
 |
October 28, 2021, 03:18:29 AM |
|
If you want to use clBitCrack then use my fork which works for OpenCL.
Thank you a.a Where is you fork of bitcrack https://github.com/brichard19/BitCrack/network/membersa lot of people fork bitcrack bitcracn cuBitcrack better than clBitcrack but my otherr notebook can not use cuBitcrack but still can use openCL
|
|
|
|
|
a.a
Member

Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 36
|
 |
October 28, 2021, 11:12:38 AM |
|
I am uzlopak on GitHub.
|
|
|
|
|
fxsniper
Member

Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 47
|
 |
October 28, 2021, 01:07:19 PM |
|
I am uzlopak on GitHub.
Thank you I got BitCrackOpenCL, Thank a lot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NotATether
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2310
Merit: 9631
┻┻ ︵㇏(°□°㇏)
|
 |
November 10, 2021, 07:50:10 AM |
|
Use --device=N to select the IDs of the GPUs to use, which can be listed using --list-devices. If that doesn't work then I don't know what will since you are using closed source fork of Bitcrack.
|
|
|
|
fxsniper
Member

Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 47
|
 |
November 17, 2021, 12:56:44 AM |
|
I think it can not change, server give distribute split range to search and record what range search already look like each one add some address on range search for test your bitcrack still work fine and can found key I think so. Recommend to join with owner pool 64bit on telegram and talk with them
|
|
|
|
|
davidjjones
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 14
|
 |
November 20, 2021, 08:29:24 PM |
|
I've tested cuBitcrack and Keyhunt-cuda: Bitcrack generates starting points but checks the range sequentially from start to end ! So what is the use of these starting points?
|
|
|
|
|
fxsniper
Member

Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 47
|
 |
November 22, 2021, 12:12:39 PM |
|
For now, very rare to find one high-end graphics card Does anyone use a graphics card Nvidia GTX 1650 4GB, How many key can search by bitcrack both original and sp-mod 5?
GTX 1650 better than GTX 1050Ti Right?
|
|
|
|
|
Mehdish14
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 01, 2021, 07:11:53 PM |
|
0x
|
|
|
|
|
jovica888
Member

Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 17
|
 |
December 02, 2021, 01:26:42 AM |
|
I use sp-hash 5 I have 2 PCs and I have around 23.800.000 targets... Have Asus 1060 and Zotac 1060 both NVIDIA I have a speed of 100Milions keys per second on each... so 200MKeys/s against 23.800.000 addresses I am doing this for like few weeks.. not 24/7 but 24/6  and I scanned 371,524,951,867,394 addresses So what do you think - should I stop doing this???
|
|
|
|
|
NotATether
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2310
Merit: 9631
┻┻ ︵㇏(°□°㇏)
|
 |
December 02, 2021, 08:16:47 AM |
|
I use sp-hash 5 I have 2 PCs and I have around 23.800.000 targets... Have Asus 1060 and Zotac 1060 both NVIDIA I have a speed of 100Milions keys per second on each... so 200MKeys/s against 23.800.000 addresses I am doing this for like few weeks.. not 24/7 but 24/6  and I scanned 371,524,951,867,394 addresses So what do you think - should I stop doing this??? 371,524,951,867,394 = 2^48.4 so I'd agree you should just stop it. In 2^256 space you will hit on average 4865213833500680479981974160028903691313864901917670757960402689408114 unrelated addresses before you find one of your targets.
|
|
|
|
jovica888
Member

Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 17
|
 |
December 02, 2021, 10:27:47 AM |
|
I think we are not scanning 2^256 but 2^160... There are 2^160 of addresses not 2^256
I took range like this 24 random 0 to F + 40 x 0 like this e3b2c44298fc1c149afbf4c80000000000000000000000000000000000000000
|
|
|
|
|
NotATether
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2310
Merit: 9631
┻┻ ︵㇏(°□°㇏)
|
 |
December 03, 2021, 05:21:02 AM |
|
I think we are not scanning 2^256 but 2^160... There are 2^160 of addresses not 2^256
I took range like this 24 random 0 to F + 40 x 0 like this e3b2c44298fc1c149afbf4c80000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Thats a private key range not an address range. Vanitysearch is currently the only program that scans an address space. All other programs are searching based on private keys (which means that privkeys getting the same address is possible). You are technically correct about this search being 2^160 though, because intricate details about public key spending mean that only the HASH160 has to match for the spend to work.
|
|
|
|
jovica888
Member

Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 17
|
 |
December 05, 2021, 11:25:13 PM Last edit: December 06, 2021, 12:19:34 AM by jovica888 |
|
I saw Large Bitcoin Collider project and I saw that they found their 1st address after "only" 7400 billions of keys The pool found a private key to f92044c7924e5525c61207972c253c9fc9f086f7 (1PiFuqGpG8yGM5v6rNHWS3TjsG6awgEGA1) as 0x6bd3b27c591. At the time of the find, there were 0 BTC on that address. This is #43 of the puzzle transaction. I think they found 0 BTC because in the moment of collision the balance was already spent 6bd3b27c591 = 7409811047825So is this project real or fake?? I thought maybe they calculated the addresses they will find in the future and then they sent money to them and then show those addresses like "trophies"
|
|
|
|
|
NotATether
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2310
Merit: 9631
┻┻ ︵㇏(°□°㇏)
|
 |
December 06, 2021, 04:37:14 PM |
|
So is this project real or fake?? I thought maybe they calculated the addresses they will find in the future and then they sent money to them and then show those addresses like "trophies"
I wasn't there at the time but others around here have reported something suspicious with them, so I wouldn't touch it with a 10-foot pole if I were you.
|
|
|
|
|
gembitz
|
 |
December 10, 2021, 09:48:49 PM |
|
So is this project real or fake?? I thought maybe they calculated the addresses they will find in the future and then they sent money to them and then show those addresses like "trophies"
I wasn't there at the time but others around here have reported something suspicious with them, so I wouldn't touch it with a 10-foot pole if I were you. nah its legit whenever im short on rent i mine me some hash collisions  weeeee
|
©2021*MY POSTS ARE STRICTLY FOR NOVELTY AND/OR PRESERVATION/COLLECTING PURPOSES ONLY!*It should not be regarded as investment/trading advice.*advocate to promote sharing and free software for the bitcoin community* #EFF #FSF #XTZ ===> START WITH NOTHING AND BUILD IT INTO SOMETHING!
|
|
|
NotATether
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2310
Merit: 9631
┻┻ ︵㇏(°□°㇏)
|
 |
December 13, 2021, 09:59:55 AM |
|
So is this project real or fake?? I thought maybe they calculated the addresses they will find in the future and then they sent money to them and then show those addresses like "trophies"
I wasn't there at the time but others around here have reported something suspicious with them, so I wouldn't touch it with a 10-foot pole if I were you. nah its legit whenever im short on rent i mine me some hash collisions  weeeee Is it even still running?
|
|
|
|
|