BitCrack - A tool for brute-forcing private keys

[WanderingPhilospher]

https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/17s2b9ksz5y7abUm92cHwG8jEPCzK3dLnT

120 puzzle solved....

March 14, 2022, 08:41:20 AM
Ask Me to guess what Puzzle will be solved next? My answer: Puzzle #120 :-)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5389596

Reserved for other sponsors.
Special BTC address provided: 1BTCHomezHpFezxGEsXEkKp2iEv6bVRBfZ

Write an answer so that my topic is relevant and people can talk about my theory. Thanks!

The problem is…you were WRONG!
#64 was solved before #120

Soooo do you want to try again and guess the next challenge to be solved?

______________________

I did not say nothing about #64!
I only talked about #120, that it will be opened by the developers themselves ...
Do you have problems with your head? Does anyone else think that I was mistaken?

No, nothing wrong with my head. But I can read and you stated, “ Ask Me to guess what Puzzle will be solved next? My answer: Puzzle #120 :-)” and I am saying you were wrong. #120 was not solved next…#64 was solved next.

[walletrecovery]

No, nothing wrong with my head. But I can read and you stated, “ Ask Me to guess what Puzzle will be solved next? My answer: Puzzle #120 :-)” and I am saying you were wrong. #120 was not solved next…#64 was solved next.
[/quote]

What does it matter? You're an idiot? Can't you see the pattern I wrote about in my post? Here everyone is idiots like you or there are smart people and they understand that solving the puzzle after #64 is the work of the creators of this puzzle. You have to be an idiot not to get it. Those creators could read my post and solve puzzle #64 and then solve puzzle #120 so the idiots on this forum would waste their energy and try to crack the private key. No need to go on about the creators of the puzzle, they just scoff at you. We need to demand a simple task, for example, for miners who have 100 video cards, so that in 1 or 2 weeks they can open the next task and solve the puzzle, but what has been happening here for the last 5 years is not a show, but idiocy and cretinism and a waste time

[GR Sasa]

Lol guys, are you really fighting over a solved puzzle? Thats is meaningless. Doesnt matter which puzzle had been solved first, just move on lol !

[WanderingPhilospher]

Lol guys, are you really fighting over a solved puzzle? Thats is meaningless. Doesnt matter which puzzle had been solved first, just move on lol !

Is that a fight to you?! LOL LOL! Really? Maybe you and citb0in are too sensitive for this forum LOL.

If people come on here spouting nonsense, I'd hope you'd correct them too so that others won't fall for anything they may be saying or doing. But hey, that's just me.

To anyone trying to solve one of the many remaining challenges, keep up the good fight. It may be true that the original person who planted the bitcoin, may still have the private keys, but why wait until now to start "finding" or withdrawing the BTC? Why not withdraw it all when BTC was over $60k?

[citb0in]

@WanderingPhilospher: You have certainly misunderstood something.

I gave "GR Sasa" a merit for his contribution because he kindly pointed out that it is not worth attacking and insulting over such a thing. Because @walletrecovery attacked and insulted you WanderingPhilospher. @"GR Sasa" has come to your defense and criticized walletrecovery's actions. And I have supported GR Sasa, because I also agree with him. It's not worth arguing over something like this.

[digaran]

We need to demand a simple task, for example, for miners who have 100 video cards, so that in 1 or 2 weeks they can open the next task and solve the puzzle, but what has been happening here for the last 5 years is not a show, but idiocy and cretinism and a waste time

What do you mean we need to demand for a simple task? The challenge is not for earning, entertainment etc, it's a show of security, when you grasp that idea, it'd help you understand.

[GR Sasa]

You misunderstood the situation. You and walletrecovery were arguing over a useless things, which is of course okay for us.


BUT what made me post this and previous message is that the fact that walletrecovery insulted you for thing that is really not worth it. Like who cares which puzzle was first solved?


Exactly. Thank you for pointing that @citb0in. I mean we are here as a community to help develop new ideas and to help eachother. Like come on.

[citb0in]

I mean we are here as a community to help develop new ideas and to help eachother.

absolutely. That's what it is all about. 

[NotATether]

Meanwhile, #66 is chilling out and waiting for someone to find it, or maybe it will be found so quickly just like the other two in rapid succession.

Someone is really throwing good hardware at this challenge.

[Grantrocks]

I made a Web Tool to scan for the keys. https://newbtcbruterandom.grantrocks.repl.co its a random btc key checker (this one is new and it uses all possible cores on your cpu-1 so that it can update the gui). It features a select tool so that all you have to do is choose a puzzle that is somewhat possible to get randomly and click start. I get about 100000 keys per thread on a AMD Ryzen 7 5700G running at 4.4Ghz. I use 14 threads. so thats about 1.4 Million keys every 20 seconds that are randomly checked. Its also focused on performance and im constantly updating it. Please leave some feedback for me so i know where and how to improve. Im currently trying to speed up the hashing so any help with that would be much appreciated!

I also made a non random scanner https://32btcbrute.grantrocks.repl.co to scan for specified btc puzzles. this one is quite fast and allows you to customize where to search.


EDIT
im hoping to use a lib like gpu.js in the future to greatly speed up the tool. However i have no idea how to do this and it will take me a while to figure out.

[Grantrocks]

Meanwhile, #66 is chilling out and waiting for someone to find it, or maybe it will be found so quickly just like the other two in rapid succession.

Someone is really throwing good hardware at this challenge.

this is totaly out of the blue btw but i agree with defending PoW. People are trying to use renewable enrgey so that they can earn more for not paying/paying as much for electricity

[digaran]

Make a new thread, note that CPU is useless for this purpose.

[brainless]

I made a Web Tool to scan for the keys. https://newbtcbruterandom.grantrocks.repl.co its a random btc key checker (this one is new and it uses all possible cores on your cpu-1 so that it can update the gui). It features a select tool so that all you have to do is choose a puzzle that is somewhat possible to get randomly and click start. I get about 100000 keys per thread on a AMD Ryzen 7 5700G running at 4.4Ghz. I use 14 threads. so thats about 1.4 Million keys every 20 seconds that are randomly checked. Its also focused on performance and im constantly updating it. Please leave some feedback for me so i know where and how to improve. Im currently trying to speed up the hashing so any help with that would be much appreciated!

I also made a non random scanner https://32btcbrute.grantrocks.repl.co to scan for specified btc puzzles. this one is quite fast and allows you to customize where to search.


EDIT
im hoping to use a lib like gpu.js in the future to greatly speed up the tool. However i have no idea how to do this and it will take me a while to figure out.

in your search scripts, you have mistakes, by mistake or you know why ?

value="0x20000000000000000:0x3ffffffffffffffff:D7F207850C19B7B763B10D0A1AB049CF466B8FAE">Puzzle #66
value="0x40000000000000000:0x7ffffffffffffffff:739437BB3DD6D1983E66629C5F08C70E52769371">Puzzle #67

for puzzle 66, you mention hash160 for search is about pre define privatekey is for 0x20000000000000000
for puzzle 67, hash160, OK, but have lot of other mistakes inside your scripts, so dont try to waste time your self and others
correct all mistakes and get proved by testing professionals, and then launch your subject
thankx

[NotATether]

Meanwhile, #66 is chilling out and waiting for someone to find it, or maybe it will be found so quickly just like the other two in rapid succession.

Someone is really throwing good hardware at this challenge.

this is totaly out of the blue btw but i agree with defending PoW. People are trying to use renewable enrgey so that they can earn more for not paying/paying as much for electricity

Actually you just gave me a idea haha. What if people plugged their GPUs into a renewable energy source while cracking the keys so that they save on electricity fees?

BTC being at $23,000 currently, the rewards gained recently were around $10K or two each, but I wonder how much electricity they had to pay to achieve this? Nevermind the initial hardware investment as it's a 1 time thing.

[cixegz]

https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/17s2b9ksz5y7abUm92cHwG8jEPCzK3dLnT

120 puzzle solved....

so, send the private key
who solved ? which tools useing to crack keyhunt or BitCrack

[NotATether]

https://www.blockchain.com/explorer/addresses/btc/17s2b9ksz5y7abUm92cHwG8jEPCzK3dLnT

120 puzzle solved....

so, send the private key
who solved ? which tools useing to crack keyhunt or BitCrack

Nobody knows the private key except the guy who solved it. And there's nothing to force them to go to bitcointalk (or anywhere else) and post it here. What I do know, is that it wasn't someone from this forum.

[citb0in]

What I do know, is that it wasn't someone from this forum.

How can you know that ?

[NotATether]

What I do know, is that it wasn't someone from this forum.

How can you know that ?

Because I had my bets that they'd be celebrating about it on this thread by now if that were the case. Pretty safe educated guess to make if you ask me.

[citb0in]

I see it exactly the opposite way. There are numerous reasons why the true and happy finder would never want to disclose this information here in the forum, if this person is active here in the forum at all. I even claim that there are more logical reasons to hide it than to hang it on the big bell and supposedly brag about it.

This assumption can also be reflected analogously to a block find where a solo miner collects the reward but wants to remain anonymous. There are dozens of reasons for that.

[WanderingPhilospher]

What I do know, is that it wasn't someone from this forum.

How can you know that ?

Because I had my bets that they'd be celebrating about it on this thread by now if that were the case. Pretty safe educated guess to make if you ask me.

I would agree. If they are a regular in the discussion of this challenge, they'd at least let peeps know the priv key once all forks have been taken care of, especially if they follow on here and know people like to know the priv keys to try and "create" a pattern with the challenges.
Also, if it's somebody not on this forum, it seems like they would at least come forward (on some venue) as this is a new world record. Maybe sooner or later they will. Time will tell...