BUY a rating on ICObench

[pungopete468]

This is indeed a problem because now everything can be done with money. here are many things that really make us surprised. including this article that rating can be purchased. ico also sometimes just a stupid projeck

[Krabat]

I do not think that Icobench is an organization whose forecasts deserve attention. They are often irrelevant.

[chocopapaya]

There is so much evidence that shows that ICO ratings websites and crypto "news" channels are scams.
If anyone still goes and trusts these sources even with the mountain of information out there then they are just lazy.
And if they choose a scam ico because of an ico ratings site, I have no sympathy for them.

Exchanges are also crooked in a similar way.
Even kucoin (which is actually low volume even though westerners love it) charges over $150,000 to get listed.
On top of that there are all kinds of "administrative" fees so companies are looking at almost a half a million dollars to get listed on decent exchanges.

this is why the decentralized exchanges and dao projects are so important.
It is exactly what the blockchain was designed for.
Instead of scammy corps manipulating things behind the scene, blockchain was meant to be open source, collaborative, and face to face.

[damsix]

I prefer to take part in the ICO with my own heart, because with that I understand the risks involved.
Bench ICO is good for monitoring us as investors and returning to each of us to choose ICO.

[NewBet]

This just goes to show that the ico rating websites are just as scammy as the scam icos that are flooding the market right now. That is why I can never trust the ratings from any of these websites, they can be easily bought and the highest bidder gets the best ratings. I would rather take out the time to sit and research which coins are good for me to invest in,

[lagharto]

Recently i was really surprised that approximately a half of projects in binance rating list (https://info.binance.com/en/rate/list) have a score from icobench... didn't expect that, i thought that binance team knows how is it going on icobench with projects listings and with their experts scores.

[nekonyun]

I myself am more confident with my research because websites like this are less accurate, the data is almost the same as other web sites, so it's better to learn by your own research than to rely on a website

[macit800]

It is not ethical if you buy ratings, because it do not give the right way of a ICO rating. When someone describe and rate a project on a fair way then we can trust them only.

[lihaidong198871]

As soon as I saw that website earlier this year, I knew that high rated ICOs were purchased or paid with a token. Also, I found that the ICO sites did not provide an objective assessment of each project

[kramchers]

This is why i dont trust ratings of some website.
I always stick on my resources and research.
Market is very dangerous and if an ICO want to have additional success they will pay money to fake the ratings.

[mitsarasss]

It has long been known and it is quite obvious that the ratings can be bought, it enjoys quite a lot of projects. Therefore, you should not blindly trust what other analysts write, you should have your own methods of analyzing and selecting projects. However, rating sites can be useful, I can only trust someone else’s analytics if at least 10 reviews from different experienced specialists are done on the project.

[humantraffic]

This rating site has long been selling its services associated with the rating. All experts write reviews for money. Better to trust the community sites that actually invest in ico.

[nthere]

This is how those sites earn money.
We can say they support scam ICOs and cheat community.

[milani]

Personally I do not trust to ratings services, because nowadays people turned  such services into business, that was expected. My advice is to before investing just check the information by your own and trust to your own opinion only.

[Altero]

This rating site has long been selling its services associated with the rating. All experts write reviews for money. Better to trust the community sites that actually invest in ico.

We probably loss our money if we follow in that site. Not exactly we've spreading FUDs but it is to give awareness for everyone especially for new comers and didn't have enough knowledge about these. Totally propaganda's happen around and that's the way they take money from investors.

[asayoyaasa]

I knew that website for ICOs review are fake, the team of ICO can make it easy just give some money to the site owner to get a good rating. No matter what your project is, advantages or etc.
They just need money for made fake/lie review. That for me, I suggest you guys more specifically to choose ICO, at least its not a scam project.

[BitLendingClub]

Personally I do not trust to ratings services, because nowadays people turned  such services into business, that was expected. My advice is to before investing just check the information by your own and trust to your own opinion only.

The main difficulty is to define which service is paid and which fair. I don't use ICObench as rating service a quite long time from the first news about paid reviews. After I saw paid articles on the icodrops but there is such articles were marked as 'paid'. And today I use https://analytics.hypernum.com  while team make own work fair and hard

[DiabolicAnt]

That's why I always do my research and judge basing on the info from different sources & my own experience. It's really sad to see such corruption here, but there's nothing we can do.

[drmasa]

This is why I don't listen to any review so instead of depending to these reviews website, I'm still doing research with my due diligence.

I'm open with reviews and suggestions of others but I'm not totally relying on it. We've seen countless times on how it's easy to buy ratings as an example of it with John McAfee.

He's a well known shill of any project that he wants to give good review as long as they're going to pay him good amount too.

I don't know, he is just like google ad. If some team have enough money to pay for his shill its like they gave 300k $ for commercials... What is more moral pay for and ad or pay a shiller?! And bunch of good projects are doing both, and scams usualy dont do either.

[Ferki]

Those ratings are  not relevant for my decision which project i choose to invest or to promote.There are usefull for me when i need some second opinion on another point of view.