FAKE NEGATIVE TRUST SCORE FROM CORRUPTED USER.

[digaran]

Well I'm not familiar with reddit and their system, so it appears that you were trying to cheat their system indeed. now get out of here.

EDIT: goodbye. they'll tag all your accounts next time you ask to buy fake reputation.

[poutintsev]

Well all the assholes that give me fake negative review. You just received negative review from me, for the reason of abusing trust system on Bitcointalk.

And you know what, you are right about me having only 120 posts and you having thousands. My account is just few months old and yours is few years old. So the damage done to me is minimal. I can always create new account, or perhaps buy one of those Hero or Legendary accounts. And I guess you will want to switch account, you idiots will have to live with lower trust score now, just because you couldn't stay away from what is not your fucking business.

Goodbye jerks!

[Vod]

Well all the assholes that give me fake negative review. You just received negative review from me, for the reason of abusing trust system on Bitcointalk.

And you know what, you are right about me having only 120 posts and you having thousands. My account is just few months old and yours is few years old. So the damage done to me is minimal. I can always create new account, or perhaps buy one of those Hero or Legendary accounts. And I guess you will want to switch account, you idiots will have to live with lower trust score now, just because you couldn't stay away from what is not your fucking business.

Goodbye jerks!

See?  I am rarely wrong about a person's lack of morals. 

Don't let the door hit you on the way out. 

[poutintsev]

See?  I am rarely wrong about a person's lack of morals.  

Lack of morals? So you poison someone else's account, and talk about morals? You must be completely retarded!

If you do shit to people, don't expect anything good from them.

[suchmoon]

See?  I am rarely wrong about a person's lack of morals.  

Lack of morals? So you poison someone else's account, and talk about morals? You must be completely retarded!

If you do shit to people, don't expect anything good from them.

You said "goodbye" an hour ago. You clearly can't be trusted.

[Vod]

See?  I am rarely wrong about a person's lack of morals.  

Lack of morals? So you poison someone else's account, and talk about morals? You must be completely retarded!

If you do shit to people, don't expect anything good from them.

You said "goodbye" an hour ago. You clearly can't be trusted.

 

For some reason, that made me LOL. 

[xSplit]

OP Vod is a shitposter and a pedophile(search google), he is not punished yet only because the clique running this forum likes him

Check out
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4415201.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1179238.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4457684.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3968686.0

[endlasuresh]

Well I'm not familiar with reddit and their system, so it appears that you were trying to cheat their system indeed. now get out of here.

EDIT: goodbye. they'll tag all your accounts next time you ask to buy fake reputation.

What do you mean cheat their system?
Does upvoting come under cheat system or not?
Why Bounties are not suspended when they ask to upvote or share? Does these all wont come under cheating method?

[poutintsev]

OP Vod is a shitposter and a pedophile(search google), he is not punished yet only because the clique running this forum likes him

Check out
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4415201.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1179238.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4457684.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3968686.0

I suspected that already.

Look like Bitcointalk Trust system has a huge problem. This could be fixed by allowing new users to review old accounts.

[suchmoon]

Look like Bitcointalk Trust system has a huge problem. This could be fixed by allowing new users to review old accounts.

I see you already started fixing it. Thanks for your "review":


Edited 2020-11-29 to fix a broken image

[BitcoinSupremo]

OP Vod is a shitposter and a pedophile(search google), he is not punished yet only because the clique running this forum likes him

Check out
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4415201.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1179238.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4457684.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3968686.0

There is no clique running this forum. It is a decentralised forum and also the trust system is decentralised. If someone doesn't like you or think that you are not trustworthy they can leave you a negative feedback explaining the reason why they left it. And enough with the worse of the words against a member of the forum which rarely(I think never) have left a negative feedback without reason or totally undeserved to other members. You should be put to jail for the harassment you are doing against Vod. If you are so sure about what you say bring evident proofs otherwise stop once and for all with your bullshit.

[poutintsev]

There is no clique running this forum. It is a decentralised forum and also the trust system is decentralised. If someone doesn't like you or think that you are not trustworthy they can leave you a negative feedback explaining the reason why they left it. And enough with the worse of the words against a member of the forum which rarely(I think never) have left a negative feedback without reason or totally undeserved to other members. You should be put to jail for the harassment you are doing against Vod. If you are so sure about what you say bring evident proofs otherwise stop once and for all with your bullshit.

Really? Then explain this?

Why there is Trusted and Untrusted feedback?

I see this Vod has gotten 20 times more negative feedback, than positive, but all negative feedback is market as "untrusted". Doesn't seem fair.

[poutintsev]

I see you already started fixing it. Thanks for your "review":

Well why did you give me fake review? Did I do something to you? Seems like you are only looking for a fight.

[BitcoinSupremo]

There is no clique running this forum. It is a decentralised forum and also the trust system is decentralised. If someone doesn't like you or think that you are not trustworthy they can leave you a negative feedback explaining the reason why they left it. And enough with the worse of the words against a member of the forum which rarely(I think never) have left a negative feedback without reason or totally undeserved to other members. You should be put to jail for the harassment you are doing against Vod. If you are so sure about what you say bring evident proofs otherwise stop once and for all with your bullshit.

Really? Then explain this?

Why there is Trusted and Untrusted feedback?

I see this Vod has gotten 20 times more negative feedback, than positive, but all negative feedback is market as "untrusted". Doesn't seem fair.

That is called untrusted feedback as you say. There are a few DT (default trust) members who keep an eye here for anyone who want to cheat the system here and they punish the users accordingly. If they were not in DT this forum would be a mess. Vod is one of them. As I said he rarely leaves feedback without an explanation so you should find the mistake in yourself and not retaliate here against him or other DT members as you will gain nothing. Ok, there have been a very few times when someone of the DT members may have abused a feedback (that have happened almost 0% of the time) but DT members are humans so they may make an error but after reading the reference to your feedback I think Vod is not wrong. When someone wants to "cheat a system" no matter where this system is inside this forum or outside this forum a warning is given to that user in the form of the negative feedback in order to warn others to avoid trading or dealing with him. Still if you think it is not fair you have the right to do so as we are in free speech here but you can continue to trade, the only limitation is you have to go first with trusted members as they have no problems trading when anyone even negative rated persons when this person is sending them for example bitcoin first and receiving money soon after. This negative rated person knows that a trusted member with green trust in the majority of the cases will not scam him.

[suchmoon]

I see you already started fixing it. Thanks for your "review":

Well why did you give me fake review? Did I do something to you? Seems like you are only looking for a fight.

Fight? I'm not the one sending incendiary PMs.

If you're talking about the trust rating I posted for you - it's not fake in any way. Click on the reference link to find out why you got it.

On the other hand, all trust references that you posted for other people link back to your own profile so there is no actual reason provided. And then you posted this, which indicates that your trust ratings are retaliatory:

Well all the assholes that give me fake negative review. You just received negative review from me, for the reason of abusing trust system on Bitcointalk.

And you know what, you are right about me having only 120 posts and you having thousands. My account is just few months old and yours is few years old. So the damage done to me is minimal. I can always create new account, or perhaps buy one of those Hero or Legendary accounts. And I guess you will want to switch account, you idiots will have to live with lower trust score now, just because you couldn't stay away from what is not your fucking business.

Goodbye jerks!

[poutintsev]

That is called untrusted feedback as you say. There are a few DT (default trust) members who keep an eye here for anyone who want to cheat the system here and they punish the users accordingly. If they were not in DT this forum would be a mess. Vod is one of them. As I said he rarely leaves feedback without an explanation so you should find the mistake in yourself and not retaliate here against him or other DT members as you will gain nothing. Ok, there have been a very few times when someone of the DT members may have abused a feedback (that have happened almost 0% of the time) but DT members are humans so they may make an error but after reading the reference to your feedback I think Vod is not wrong. When someone wants to "cheat a system" no matter where this system is inside this forum or outside this forum a warning is given to that user in the form of the negative feedback in order to warn others to avoid trading or dealing with him. Still if you think it is not fair you have the right to do so as we are in free speech here but you can continue to trade, the only limitation is you have to go first with trusted members as they have no problems trading when anyone even negative rated persons when this person is sending them for example bitcoin first and receiving money soon after. This negative rated person knows that a trusted member with green trust in the majority of the cases will not scam him.

This is the whole problem, that ratings of certain members count and of others do not. This whole system is based on cronyism and it allows inner circle to to do what ever they want.
In order for trust system to be fair every user should have equal vote.

[suchmoon]

This is the whole problem, that ratings of certain members count and of others do not. This whole system is based on cronyism and it allows inner circle to to do what ever they want.
In order for trust system to be fair every user should have equal vote.

You can add any users you want to your trust list and give them equal votes.

[BitcoinSupremo]

That is called untrusted feedback as you say. There are a few DT (default trust) members who keep an eye here for anyone who want to cheat the system here and they punish the users accordingly. If they were not in DT this forum would be a mess. Vod is one of them. As I said he rarely leaves feedback without an explanation so you should find the mistake in yourself and not retaliate here against him or other DT members as you will gain nothing. Ok, there have been a very few times when someone of the DT members may have abused a feedback (that have happened almost 0% of the time) but DT members are humans so they may make an error but after reading the reference to your feedback I think Vod is not wrong. When someone wants to "cheat a system" no matter where this system is inside this forum or outside this forum a warning is given to that user in the form of the negative feedback in order to warn others to avoid trading or dealing with him. Still if you think it is not fair you have the right to do so as we are in free speech here but you can continue to trade, the only limitation is you have to go first with trusted members as they have no problems trading when anyone even negative rated persons when this person is sending them for example bitcoin first and receiving money soon after. This negative rated person knows that a trusted member with green trust in the majority of the cases will not scam him.

This is the whole problem, that ratings of certain members count and of others do not. This whole system is based on cronyism and it allows inner circle to to do what ever they want.
In order for trust system to be fair every user should have equal vote.

You should know that those members whose feedback counts were member like you in the beginning which were not included in the DT2 at that time. They climbed the ladders to be in DT by doing great works for the forum and their contribution was noted by the ones who created DT at first place and decided to include them in DT2 in order to have a forum without scams (although scams are all over the place here unfortunately).

PS. Please take some time to read stickies in Meta regarding DT and DT2 status and everything will be crystal clear to you.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I see this Vod has gotten 20 times more negative feedback, than positive, but all negative feedback is market as "untrusted". Doesn't seem fair.

That's because you don't understand how the trust system here works, or what the culture of bitcointalk is all about.  Had you understood the latter you might have avoided the negative feedback that's gotten you all in a snit.  Most of the human beings behind Vod's negative feedback should have been put in a jar upon birth--and you wonder why their feedback isn't trusted.

Goodbye jerks!

OK then.  We're all waiting for you to leave, then we'll vacuum and start cleaning up the silly string.

[poutintsev]

That's because you don't understand how the trust system here works, or what the culture of bitcointalk is all about.  Had you understood the latter you might have avoided the negative feedback that's gotten you all in a snit.  Most of the human beings behind Vod's negative feedback should have been put in a jar upon birth--and you wonder why their feedback isn't trusted.

There's nothing fair in the trust system, when only inner circle can rate others. This is just plain cronyism. No fairness even in sight.