Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
|
 |
February 07, 2014, 06:12:08 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schleicher
|
|
February 07, 2014, 07:14:08 AM |
|
If you replace "star" with "universe" then question 21 is clearly the best.
|
|
|
|
dank
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1002
You cannot kill love
|
|
February 07, 2014, 07:33:26 AM |
|
Creationism and evolution can coexist.
|
|
|
|
|
Ekaros
|
|
February 07, 2014, 08:15:01 AM |
|
Suddenly I got huge urge to slap around these people... Or maybe this is satire... I kinda like this as the best cop out...  |
|
|
|
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2607
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
February 07, 2014, 01:55:48 PM |
|
Question #5  Grammar fail  . |
|
|
|
pedrog
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031
|
|
February 07, 2014, 02:01:56 PM |
|
This is so hilarious!  I liked this one best:  |
|
|
|
|
compro01
|
|
February 07, 2014, 02:56:03 PM |
|
These people are a prime example of evolution occurring with a pathological selection criteria.
|
|
|
|
|
guybrushthreepwood
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1195
|
|
February 07, 2014, 04:33:41 PM |
|
These should be turned into a meme.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jcoin200
|
|
February 07, 2014, 05:53:52 PM |
|
Listen to David Berlinski, he basically knocks evolution down to "nothing more than an anecdote." If you still believe in the THEORY of evolution after listening to him, you are crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
devthedev
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1004
|
|
February 07, 2014, 05:55:53 PM |
|
Did you guys watch the debate with Ken Ham and Bill Nye?
|
|
|
|
guybrushthreepwood
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1195
|
|
February 07, 2014, 06:29:02 PM |
|
Listen to David Berlinski, he basically knocks evolution down to "nothing more than an anecdote." If you still believe in the THEORY of evolution after listening to him, you are crazy.
What's the less crazy alternative? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yatsey87
|
|
February 07, 2014, 06:32:01 PM |
|
These should be turned into a meme.
I'm sure it will be if it hasn't been already. |
|
|
|
|
thetruth
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
February 07, 2014, 06:34:55 PM |
|
First they ask what you believe in.
Then they say it's a heresy.
Next they burn you at the stake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jcoin200
|
|
February 07, 2014, 06:36:58 PM |
|
Did you guys watch the debate with Ken Ham and Bill Nye?
Although it was an interesting listen, I wasn't all that impressed by either side. Like I mentioned above, David Berlinski is an AGNOSTIC, and he makes some incredible points against evolution. Here is a good clip of him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHeSaUq-Hl8 |
|
|
|
|
BitChick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 07, 2014, 10:36:25 PM |
|
Did you guys watch the debate with Ken Ham and Bill Nye?
Although it was an interesting listen, I wasn't all that impressed by either side. Like I mentioned above, David Berlinski is an AGNOSTIC, and he makes some incredible points against evolution. Here is a good clip of him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHeSaUq-Hl8I watched. For the most part I really liked it. Although I completely agree with Ken Ham on almost all his points, I really wish he had not made as many references to the Bible, or at least saved it until the end when someone asked if he would ever change his mind or what was the most important thing to him. To use the Bible as a point of reference is irrelevant to those who do not believe in the Bible. Also, there was more observational scientific facts that he could have shared for a few topics. One being that there are some reasons why the stars can appear so far away even though the earth is young (It has to do with Einsteins theory of relativity. To learn more research Dr. Russel Humphrey's studies in his book "Starlight and Time") and there is evidence in the fossil record of plenty of sea animals that are in areas that would not be expected that can only be explained with a world-wide flood, just for a couple of things. But there is only so much time I guess. At least the discussion was started. It really is important to seperate the historical science that cannot be observed from the present day observational and experimental science that we can all agree on. That was a good point Ken Ham made. And, for those that watched the debate, what was up with Bill Nye's discussion on fish sex? I still don't really get the point he was trying to make there completely.  I never have thought much about it though!  |
1BitcHiCK1iRa6YVY6qDqC6M594RBYLNPo
|
|
|
devthedev
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1004
|
|
February 07, 2014, 11:14:26 PM |
|
Did you guys watch the debate with Ken Ham and Bill Nye?
Although it was an interesting listen, I wasn't all that impressed by either side. Like I mentioned above, David Berlinski is an AGNOSTIC, and he makes some incredible points against evolution. Here is a good clip of him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHeSaUq-Hl8I watched. For the most part I really liked it. Although I completely agree with Ken Ham on almost all his points, I really wish he had not made as many references to the Bible, or at least saved it until the end when someone asked if he would ever change his mind or what was the most important thing to him. To use the Bible as a point of reference is irrelevant to those who do not believe in the Bible. Also, there was more observational scientific facts that he could have shared for a few topics. One being that there are some reasons why the stars can appear so far away even though the earth is young (It has to do with Einsteins theory of relativity. To learn more research Dr. Russel Humphrey's studies in his book "Starlight and Time") and there is evidence in the fossil record of plenty of sea animals that are in areas that would not be expected that can only be explained with a world-wide flood, just for a couple of things. But there is only so much time I guess. At least the discussion was started. It really is important to seperate the historical science that cannot be observed from the present day observational and experimental science that we can all agree on. That was a good point Ken Ham made. And, for those that watched the debate, what was up with Bill Nye's discussion on fish sex? I still don't really get the point he was trying to make there completely. I never have thought much about it though! Yah, I didn't get that part either, lol. |
|
|
|
pedrog
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2786
Merit: 1031
|
|
February 08, 2014, 05:48:24 AM
Last edit: March 04, 2014, 10:36:43 PM by pedrog |
|
I hope everyone understand this "22 bla bla" is mocking with creationists... Did you guys watch the debate with Ken Ham and Bill Nye?
Although it was an interesting listen, I wasn't all that impressed by either side. Like I mentioned above, David Berlinski is an AGNOSTIC, and he makes some incredible points against evolution. Here is a good clip of him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHeSaUq-Hl8I watched. For the most part I really liked it. Although I completely agree with Ken Ham on almost all his points, I really wish he had not made as many references to the Bible, or at least saved it until the end when someone asked if he would ever change his mind or what was the most important thing to him. To use the Bible as a point of reference is irrelevant to those who do not believe in the Bible. Also, there was more observational scientific facts that he could have shared for a few topics. One being that there are some reasons why the stars can appear so far away even though the earth is young (It has to do with Einsteins theory of relativity. To learn more research Dr. Russel Humphrey's studies in his book "Starlight and Time") and there is evidence in the fossil record of plenty of sea animals that are in areas that would not be expected that can only be explained with a world-wide flood, just for a couple of things. But there is only so much time I guess. At least the discussion was started. It really is important to seperate the historical science that cannot be observed from the present day observational and experimental science that we can all agree on. That was a good point Ken Ham made. And, for those that watched the debate, what was up with Bill Nye's discussion on fish sex? I still don't really get the point he was trying to make there completely. I never have thought much about it though! I watched this debate... I do not like this kind of debates... Because there is not a debate regarding this issue. There are certain kind of religious folk who want to push their particular religion on other folk, and this only happens in USA, this kind of Christian extremism only happens in USA, there are not creationist out of USA, at least with this kind of propaganda... |
|
|
|
Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
|
|
February 08, 2014, 04:11:36 PM |
|
I hope everyone understand this "22 bla bla" is mocking with creationists... Did you guys watch the debate with Ken Ham and Bill Nye?
Although it was an interesting listen, I wasn't all that impressed by either side. Like I mentioned above, David Berlinski is an AGNOSTIC, and he makes some incredible points against evolution. Here is a good clip of him: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHeSaUq-Hl8I watched. For the most part I really liked it. Although I completely agree with Ken Ham on almost all his points, I really wish he had not made as many references to the Bible, or at least saved it until the end when someone asked if he would ever change his mind or what was the most important thing to him. To use the Bible as a point of reference is irrelevant to those who do not believe in the Bible. Also, there was more observational scientific facts that he could have shared for a few topics. One being that there are some reasons why the stars can appear so far away even though the earth is young (It has to do with Einsteins theory of relativity. To learn more research Dr. Russel Humphrey's studies in his book "Starlight and Time") and there is evidence in the fossil record of plenty of sea animals that are in areas that would not be expected that can only be explained with a world-wide flood, just for a couple of things. But there is only so much time I guess. At least the discussion was started. It really is important to seperate the historical science that cannot be observed from the present day observational and experimental science that we can all agree on. That was a good point Ken Ham made. And, for those that watched the debate, what was up with Bill Nye's discussion on fish sex? I still don't really get the point he was trying to make there completely. I never have thought much about it though! I watched this debate... I do not like this kind of debates... Because there is not a debate regarding this issue. There are certain kind of religious folk who want to push their particular religion on other folk, and this only happens in USA, this king of Christian extremism only happens in USA, there are not creationist out of USA, at least with this kind of propaganda... So extremism only comes from Christians in the USA "and this only happens in USA". Got it. |
|
|
|
|
BitChick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 16, 2014, 05:30:29 AM |
|
Listen to David Berlinski, he basically knocks evolution down to "nothing more than an anecdote." If you still believe in the THEORY of evolution after listening to him, you are crazy.
I had never heard of David Berlinski until today. A professor at Princeton and an agnostic Jew that believes in intelligent design is refreshing to listen to. He really is brilliant. Here is the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S89IskZI740 |
1BitcHiCK1iRa6YVY6qDqC6M594RBYLNPo
|
|
|
|
