✨ BITCASINO - Elevate Your Gameplay 💎 #1 VIP Crypto Casino ✈️

[BitcoinHunt3r]

Huh almost or still far? just a difference of 80 EUR and out of the top 10  even thrown to rank 141 the competition in the standings is really tight
But I won't give up until I win something from this promotion   the winners of the contest on the forum are the ones who post the predictions on the last day so maybe that's a good idea  

You never know buddy, you could win one day. You have to be in it to win it. That’s the only thing you can do.

Fingers crossed for you

I agree with you sir, even though there is only a small chance to win, maybe in the future we are the lucky ones, the important thing is to always follow and keep trying, I did it even though the chance to win was very minimal 

Yes I will continue to try and follow some advice here, some of them advised us to send predictions on the last day this method looks reasonable at least to get a closer price
But this month Bitcasino started Bitcoin predictors at the beginning of the month until August 22 and 9 days difference from the day of the announcement.

[1714292326]

1714292326

[1714292326]

1714292326

[wiss19]

Why not just also add USDC so the list of most popular stablecoins is completed. USDC is followed by USDT in terms of marketcap and is managed by Centre and Coinbase. I personally prefer USDC among the 3 because its local exchange rate of that stablecoin is slightly higher in the country I currently lived on.

Adding stablecoin on a gambling platform is a great idea because it will be easy for anyone to calculate how much they win or lose.

Still USDT has the majority of stablecoin marketcap so I think USDT still the safest and convenient to use in gambling because it support the most blockchain networks. I think there’s no sense to add different stablecoin because they are already redundant on its purpose. They only varies on the level of confidence but it serves same purposes.

But yeah, More choices is still betterif the casino has no problem integrating it.

Maybe, but at the same time we can't really have too much, can we? I mean I would say that adding USDC or BUSD or all of them at the same time can't be a bad deal. USDT is great and all and seems to be working for them, but that doesn't justify the main reason why we are doing this in the first place.

I personally would love to see more because I have grew up with the understanding of "the more the merrier" and that means adding more stuff here would only make it great. I know that some people think that it would bother the already established situation but I would say even if USDT ones drops, the addition from other stablecoins would cover that and then some.

[ultrloa]

Huh almost or still far? just a difference of 80 EUR and out of the top 10  even thrown to rank 141 the competition in the standings is really tight
But I won't give up until I win something from this promotion   the winners of the contest on the forum are the ones who post the predictions on the last day so maybe that's a good idea  

You never know buddy, you could win one day. You have to be in it to win it. That’s the only thing you can do.

Fingers crossed for you

I agree with you sir, even though there is only a small chance to win, maybe in the future we are the lucky ones, the important thing is to always follow and keep trying, I did it even though the chance to win was very minimal 

Yes I will continue to try and follow some advice here, some of them advised us to send predictions on the last day this method looks reasonable at least to get a closer price
But this month Bitcasino started Bitcoin predictors at the beginning of the month until August 22 and 9 days difference from the day of the announcement.

Advices coming from legitimate players is really good to hear since this is uplifting as the competition became more tighter, but sometimes the thrill will be lessen if you drop your prediction near on end date because sometimes some people will just forget about what entry they sent on the contest. Still good to see Bitcasino continue to drop this kind of contest since compare to other casino where they focus on their website only this one focus on other more things which can make their community more entertained.

[dimonstration]

Why not just also add USDC so the list of most popular stablecoins is completed. USDC is followed by USDT in terms of marketcap and is managed by Centre and Coinbase. I personally prefer USDC among the 3 because its local exchange rate of that stablecoin is slightly higher in the country I currently lived on.

Adding stablecoin on a gambling platform is a great idea because it will be easy for anyone to calculate how much they win or lose.

Still USDT has the majority of stablecoin marketcap so I think USDT still the safest and convenient to use in gambling because it support the most blockchain networks. I think there’s no sense to add different stablecoin because they are already redundant on its purpose. They only varies on the level of confidence but it serves same purposes.

But yeah, More choices is still betterif the casino has no problem integrating it.

Maybe, but at the same time we can't really have too much, can we? I mean I would say that adding USDC or BUSD or all of them at the same time can't be a bad deal. USDT is great and all and seems to be working for them, but that doesn't justify the main reason why we are doing this in the first place.

I personally would love to see more because I have grew up with the understanding of "the more the merrier" and that means adding more stuff here would only make it great. I know that some people think that it would bother the already established situation but I would say even if USDT ones drops, the addition from other stablecoins would cover that and then some.

As a player, I agree but I really believe that there’s an implication to business side of the casino that’s why they can’t add instantly most of the tokens in there supported currency. This is what I’m considering when I give my opinion above. Yeah more tokens will be good for us but if the casino can’t get benefit for doing that, I think it’s much better to stick on the major currency only which everyone use the most.

[aysg76]

Seriously? Stablecoins aren't always stable in the crypto world. USDT fluctuates widely sometimes and we all know what happened to UST recently.

I myself am not a big fan of these coins and only bitcoin is cool option for me but as you see there are small gamblers who can't handle bitcoin volatility and we see USDT is somewhat stable in that comparison.

What happened with UST was their algorithm fault but you see the case with USDT is different but for me personally bitcoin is the best option.

[michellee]

Why not just also add USDC so the list of most popular stablecoins is completed. USDC is followed by USDT in terms of marketcap and is managed by Centre and Coinbase. I personally prefer USDC among the 3 because its local exchange rate of that stablecoin is slightly higher in the country I currently lived on.

Adding stablecoin on a gambling platform is a great idea because it will be easy for anyone to calculate how much they win or lose.

Still USDT has the majority of stablecoin marketcap so I think USDT still the safest and convenient to use in gambling because it support the most blockchain networks. I think there’s no sense to add different stablecoin because they are already redundant on its purpose. They only varies on the level of confidence but it serves same purposes.

But yeah, More choices is still betterif the casino has no problem integrating it.

Yes, that's correct. Maybe the casino prefers USDT over other stablecoins. What is clear is that using the Tron network, which has a small transaction fee, can provide users with convenient use of USDT. And fortunately, many casinos also use the same network so users with multiple casino favorites can deposit their funds using the Tron network.

Well, it's just an idea if Bitcasino.io wants to add it. After all, having a USDT based on the Tron network is enough for Bitcasino.io to have loyal customers to keep playing on their site.

[salad daging]

Still USDT has the majority of stablecoin marketcap so I think USDT still the safest and convenient to use in gambling because it support the most blockchain networks. I think there’s no sense to add different stablecoin because they are already redundant on its purpose. They only varies on the level of confidence but it serves same purposes.

But yeah, More choices is still betterif the casino has no problem integrating it.

Yes, that's correct. Maybe the casino prefers USDT over other stablecoins. What is clear is that using the Tron network, which has a small transaction fee, can provide users with convenient use of USDT. And fortunately, many casinos also use the same network so users with multiple casino favorites can deposit their funds using the Tron network.

Well, it's just an idea if Bitcasino.io wants to add it. After all, having a USDT based on the Tron network is enough for Bitcasino.io to have loyal customers to keep playing on their site.

The Tron network is the fastest so many casinos are integrating USDT on the Tron network to be honest I like this network making it a favorite because it is quite cost friendly.
It's true for me that alone is enough with USDT stablecoin but if Bitcasino wants to add more it is their right that there will be more variations in the future for stablecoins but I think every customer sticks to USDT instead of USDC.

Maybe because there are many different preferences for each user.

[Coin_trader]

Seriously? Stablecoins aren't always stable in the crypto world. USDT fluctuates widely sometimes and we all know what happened to UST recently.

I myself am not a big fan of these coins and only bitcoin is cool option for me but as you see there are small gamblers who can't handle bitcoin volatility and we see USDT is somewhat stable in that comparison.

What happened with UST was their algorithm fault but you see the case with USDT is different but for me personally bitcoin is the best option.

UST is an isolated case because it’s the result of the foolishness of the CEO of that project for not listening about the danger of his stablecoin algorithm. But most of the stablecoins is performing better in terms of pegging the value to USD. Those time that some stablecoins deppeg usually don’t stay there for a long time. Right now the stablecoin FUD is already over and it’s back to normal value right now.

I can only say that the current stablecoin performance is much better and reliable in maintaining its pegged value that is perfect to use on gambling during bear market.

[Haunebu]

UST is an isolated case because it’s the result of the foolishness of the CEO of that project for not listening about the danger of his stablecoin algorithm. But most of the stablecoins is performing better in terms of pegging the value to USD. Those time that some stablecoins deppeg usually don’t stay there for a long time. Right now the stablecoin FUD is already over and it’s back to normal value right now.

I can only say that the current stablecoin performance is much better and reliable in maintaining its pegged value that is perfect to use on gambling during bear market.

Stablecoins do stay pegged to their respective FIAT currencies majority of the time, but they act crazy minority of the time which is when investors get screwed since they were never supposed to become unstable.

They are just as volatile as BTC and other popular cryptocurrencies sometimes which is why you shouldn't completely rely on them. It's common sense if you think about it.

There is some degree of risk associated with every single cryptocurrency out there.

[Kakmakr]

Karl and team.....

Can you guys ask some developer to design some kind of Player vs Player feature, where a player can challenge other players to beat his or her multiplier (WIN) ..... so you guys offer the feature and the player puts up a bounty for someone to beat his win... within a specific time-frame.  

Example : I win say $2000 on a 600x multiplier on a Slot.... then I put up say $500 as a bounty for someone else to beat the 600x multiplier within 3 days. (You guys can even add a fee for challengers to compete.... eg. $2 entrance fee.... (you give 50% to the player that puts up the bounty and you guys take 50%)

If someone beats the 600x multiplier within the 3 days.... you guys forward the $500 reward to that player..... and you give the 50% of the fees to the person that offered the challenge. (The fees are the incentive for people to do this)    {If it is not won... the reward goes back to the player that created the challenge... to decide if he or she wants to extend it ..or redirect it to his or her balance}

What do you think..... will this P2P challenges increase wagering and make things more interesting?

[michellee]

The Tron network is the fastest so many casinos are integrating USDT on the Tron network to be honest I like this network making it a favorite because it is quite cost friendly.
It's true for me that alone is enough with USDT stablecoin but if Bitcasino wants to add more it is their right that there will be more variations in the future for stablecoins but I think every customer sticks to USDT instead of USDC.

Maybe because there are many different preferences for each user.

Maybe because we have never tried to deposit funds using other stable coins instead of USDT. I don't think I've ever found a stable coin other than USDT available in casinos. So USDT will probably still be a favourite of people who gamble.

snip

I think it could be an interesting idea to create a one on one challenge in playing slot games because I've never come up with an idea like yours. But maybe for the first time, it will seem strange because we usually play slots alone, this time, we can challenge other players to play together and try their luck.

But it feels like it requires more complicated code than usual and for this, you have to discuss it with the game developer first.

[Betwrong]

Karl and team.....

Can you guys ask some developer to design some kind of Player vs Player feature, where a player can challenge other players to beat his or her multiplier (WIN) ..... so you guys offer the feature and the player puts up a bounty for someone to beat his win... within a specific time-frame.  

Example : I win say $2000 on a 600x multiplier on a Slot.... then I put up say $500 as a bounty for someone else to beat the 600x multiplier within 3 days. (You guys can even add a fee for challengers to compete.... eg. $2 entrance fee.... (you give 50% to the player that puts up the bounty and you guys take 50%)

If someone beats the 600x multiplier within the 3 days.... you guys forward the $500 reward to that player..... and you give the 50% of the fees to the person that offered the challenge. (The fees are the incentive for people to do this)    {If it is not won... the reward goes back to the player that created the challenge... to decide if he or she wants to extend it ..or redirect it to his or her balance}

What do you think..... will this P2P challenges increase wagering and make things more interesting?

Sorry, the question wasn't addressed to me, but I just wanted to share my personal opinion here.

Seeing how amazing some slots are, I believe slot developers and site designers are very smart people, and if P2P challenges like you described were potentially bringing more profit to the site, or were making things more interesting for users, they would have implemented that already. I mean, it's very difficult to make them even better.

Like this slot, Bitcasino Billion, for instance. When I thought it couldn't be more entertaining, they added this feature(temporarily):



I just tried it and it works! You can claim 7% of your winnings during those 7 minutes right away when time is up.

[Coin_trader]

UST is an isolated case because it’s the result of the foolishness of the CEO of that project for not listening about the danger of his stablecoin algorithm. But most of the stablecoins is performing better in terms of pegging the value to USD. Those time that some stablecoins deppeg usually don’t stay there for a long time. Right now the stablecoin FUD is already over and it’s back to normal value right now.

I can only say that the current stablecoin performance is much better and reliable in maintaining its pegged value that is perfect to use on gambling during bear market.

Stablecoins do stay pegged to their respective FIAT currencies majority of the time, but they act crazy minority of the time which is when investors get screwed since they were never supposed to become unstable.

They are just as volatile as BTC and other popular cryptocurrencies sometimes which is why you shouldn't completely rely on them. It's common sense if you think about it.

There is some degree of risk associated with every single cryptocurrency out there.

It’s true that we should not completely trust anything in crypto including stablecoin but you already stated by yourself that Stablecoins do stat pegged majority of the time which is enouh basis for there reliability. They do depegged but for only a short period and I don’t think this will will result to screwed investors unless you are pertaining on UST and other stablecoins that doesn’t have the majority of stablecoin marketcap.

It’s not right to compared the volatility of stablcoins to Bitcoin and other altcoins because you can clearly see the answer when you see the chart and measure the ATR(Average True Range) of Stablecoins compared to other altcoins and Bitcoin.

I’m not completely trusting stablecoin especially USDC. I just appreciate how they managed to pegged there coins despite this volatile market except during FUD but atleast we have this kind coin that we can convert to take cover from bear market.

[Kakmakr]

Karl and team.....

Can you guys ask some developer to design some kind of Player vs Player feature, where a player can challenge other players to beat his or her multiplier (WIN) ..... so you guys offer the feature and the player puts up a bounty for someone to beat his win... within a specific time-frame.  

Example : I win say $2000 on a 600x multiplier on a Slot.... then I put up say $500 as a bounty for someone else to beat the 600x multiplier within 3 days. (You guys can even add a fee for challengers to compete.... eg. $2 entrance fee.... (you give 50% to the player that puts up the bounty and you guys take 50%)

If someone beats the 600x multiplier within the 3 days.... you guys forward the $500 reward to that player..... and you give the 50% of the fees to the person that offered the challenge. (The fees are the incentive for people to do this)    {If it is not won... the reward goes back to the player that created the challenge... to decide if he or she wants to extend it ..or redirect it to his or her balance}

What do you think..... will this P2P challenges increase wagering and make things more interesting?

Sorry, the question wasn't addressed to me, but I just wanted to share my personal opinion here.

Seeing how amazing some slots are, I believe slot developers and site designers are very smart people, and if P2P challenges like you described were potentially bringing more profit to the site, or were making things more interesting for users, they would have implemented that already. I mean, it's very difficult to make them even better.

Like this slot, Bitcasino Billion, for instance. When I thought it couldn't be more entertaining, they added this feature(temporarily):



I just tried it and it works! You can claim 7% of your winnings during those 7 minutes right away when time is up.

The challenge is not on the 3rd party developer level, but rather the in-house developer that has access to the Bitcasino.io bet database. All bets are recorded on the Bitcasino.io servers, so they can just ask their developers to program a feature that will query that database to check for multipliers that are bigger than the multiplier that were flagged by the person that offered the challenge.

The developers can just design a nice GUI interface for users to insert the requirements for the challenge. Example : Fields for "Reward amount" / "Multiplier to beat" / "Time for challenge to expire" / "Entrance Fee" .....etc.... 

[Bitcasino.io Support]

While some new currencies are getting ready to be available on the site...
I'd like to say that all the opinions you've shared on stable coins are greatly appreciated. You can be sure that whatever is discussed here, I take with me and regularly discuss with other teams.

Karl and team.....

Can you guys ask some developer to design some kind of Player vs Player feature, where a player can challenge other players to beat his or her multiplier (WIN) ..... so you guys offer the feature and the player puts up a bounty for someone to beat his win... within a specific time-frame.  

Example : I win say $2000 on a 600x multiplier on a Slot.... then I put up say $500 as a bounty for someone else to beat the 600x multiplier within 3 days. (You guys can even add a fee for challengers to compete.... eg. $2 entrance fee.... (you give 50% to the player that puts up the bounty and you guys take 50%)

If someone beats the 600x multiplier within the 3 days.... you guys forward the $500 reward to that player..... and you give the 50% of the fees to the person that offered the challenge. (The fees are the incentive for people to do this)    {If it is not won... the reward goes back to the player that created the challenge... to decide if he or she wants to extend it ..or redirect it to his or her balance}

What do you think..... will this P2P challenges increase wagering and make things more interesting?

P2P challenge surely sounds interesting. I will be doing my research on it. Have you already seen it working somewhere else or is it just an idea you have?


Also, as the club football is approaching -just not fast enough- I have a cool piece for you. Until the weekend, if you need some more football in your life, here is a selection we've come up with:

Best Football Casino Games

Hope you find something you'll like  

[Haunebu]

I’m not completely trusting stablecoin especially USDC. I just appreciate how they managed to pegged there coins despite this volatile market except during FUD but atleast we have this kind coin that we can convert to take cover from bear market.

Understandable. I do appreciate many stablecoins like GUSD, Tether etc, but I only wanted to point out the fact that you shouldn't completely rely on them thinking that they will always be stable.

While some new currencies are getting ready to be available on the site...
I'd like to say that all the opinions you've shared on stable coins are greatly appreciated. You can be sure that whatever is discussed here, I take with me and regularly discuss with other teams.

Cool. I wonder which cryptocurrencies your team will be adding soon though I will still be sticking to BTC majority of the time.

[wozzek23]

Huh almost or still far? just a difference of 80 EUR and out of the top 10  even thrown to rank 141 the competition in the standings is really tight
But I won't give up until I win something from this promotion  the winners of the contest on the forum are the ones who post the predictions on the last day so maybe that's a good idea 

It is not actually about what you guessed but more about what others guessed and if you calculate how many people participated in this then you will realize that there would be 100 people between 100 dollar difference due to the sheer amount of people who guessed it. On top of that you went with something that is pretty close to what it is, which means that it would be packed more, like if you picked 50k or 70k, the difference wouldn't be 130 people, it would be a lot less because not many people would pick those numbers.

But, when you pick something very very close to what it was (literally 80 dollars which is very little) then there would be many people who are close to it.

[arwin100]

I’m not completely trusting stablecoin especially USDC. I just appreciate how they managed to pegged there coins despite this volatile market except during FUD but atleast we have this kind coin that we can convert to take cover from bear market.

Understandable. I do appreciate many stablecoins like GUSD, Tether etc, but I only wanted to point out the fact that you shouldn't completely rely on them thinking that they will always be stable.

We can look the incident happen on UST where many of its holder believe that this is one of the safest coin they can go on and they put on terrible situation because the value almost go to zero and so many investors got totally wrecked all of there investment because of that incident. That's why use those stable coins only for short term if you want to avoid volatility since this is the best thing to adopt by people who's afraid with that instances.

[CPNpr]

Seriously? Stablecoins aren't always stable in the crypto world. USDT fluctuates widely sometimes and we all know what happened to UST recently.

A few that are there are not very private. I don't see any other coins as great options here, but there are some small ones out there, but they can handle Bitcoin and if it turns out to be a bit more stable than that.  But here and there are other coins but they are not as popular as Bitcoin.  Here I think the most popular is Bitcoin.

[Kakmakr]

While some new currencies are getting ready to be available on the site...
I'd like to say that all the opinions you've shared on stable coins are greatly appreciated. You can be sure that whatever is discussed here, I take with me and regularly discuss with other teams.

Karl and team.....

Can you guys ask some developer to design some kind of Player vs Player feature, where a player can challenge other players to beat his or her multiplier (WIN) ..... so you guys offer the feature and the player puts up a bounty for someone to beat his win... within a specific time-frame.  

Example : I win say $2000 on a 600x multiplier on a Slot.... then I put up say $500 as a bounty for someone else to beat the 600x multiplier within 3 days. (You guys can even add a fee for challengers to compete.... eg. $2 entrance fee.... (you give 50% to the player that puts up the bounty and you guys take 50%)

If someone beats the 600x multiplier within the 3 days.... you guys forward the $500 reward to that player..... and you give the 50% of the fees to the person that offered the challenge. (The fees are the incentive for people to do this)    {If it is not won... the reward goes back to the player that created the challenge... to decide if he or she wants to extend it ..or redirect it to his or her balance}

What do you think..... will this P2P challenges increase wagering and make things more interesting?

P2P challenge surely sounds interesting. I will be doing my research on it. Have you already seen it working somewhere else or is it just an idea you have?


Also, as the club football is approaching -just not fast enough- I have a cool piece for you. Until the weekend, if you need some more football in your life, here is a selection we've come up with:

Best Football Casino Games

Hope you find something you'll like  

I do not want to promote other casinos here, but the one starting with a "S" has got a "challenge" section, where only selected people can post challenges. (not open to the public) .... they also do not have a "entrance fee" option for challengers. (this was my own idea... and a new income possibility for both gamblers and the casino) 

I know that there are also some Sport betting site that implemented something like this for Sports betting. (without the entrance fee option) .... so it is out there.

It can be beneficial for the casino (50% entrance fee and increase wagering) and for the gambler. (50% entrance fee and a possible reward that are funded by other gamblers)