Lamborghini Member hilariousandco has lost his FUCKIN mind !!!

[Anduck]

You're extremely rude. Who cares about your "rep" when you act like a five year old. You're ruining whatever reputation you had earlier. Cooling down wouldn't hurt.

[1715406054]

1715406054

[1715406054]

1715406054

[1715406054]

1715406054

[1715406054]

1715406054

[1715406054]

1715406054

[YuTü.Co.in]

You're extremely rude. Who cares about your "rep" when you act like a five year old. You're ruining whatever reputation you had earlier. Cooling down wouldn't hurt.

Here's my PM reply to another user echoing the exact same sentiment, buddy and hopefully friend ...

Okay. Sometimes it's the only language they understand. Notice that I didn't resort to such prior, nor even thought about employing such then, but this latest episode from the Global Mod asshole was uncalled for.

Bruno

For all practical purposes, this episode was close a few days ago, but last night hilariousandco opted to hurt me, hence this thread and my mindset.

[o_e_l_e_o]

Since hilariousandco has made himself King Shit on this forum, I suggest that all scam accusation be approved by him first, starting with ...

Check Arbitao's Telegram channel. It's been active today.

They link to this vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYHplHx1MLU

Looks like we found the Carlos of Arbitao. Let's stick it up his ass for advancing an obvious scam. On second thought, let's first get approval from hilariousandco in making sure we're doing the right thing. Ref.: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4542394.0.

I don't know what the truth is here, but it's safe to say this kind of behaviour really isn't going to help your case.

[YuTü.Co.in]

Since hilariousandco has made himself King Shit on this forum, I suggest that all scam accusation be approved by him first, starting with ...

Check Arbitao's Telegram channel. It's been active today.

They link to this vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYHplHx1MLU

Looks like we found the Carlos of Arbitao. Let's stick it up his ass for advancing an obvious scam. On second thought, let's first get approval from hilariousandco in making sure we're doing the right thing. Ref.: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4542394.0.

I don't know what the truth is here, but it's safe to say this kind of behaviour really isn't going to help your case.

Again, my behavior was 100% civil when discussing this issue a few days ago assuming then that this episode was closed.

But now it has morphed into King Shit deleting my posts ...

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Since hilariousandco has made himself King Shit on this forum, I suggest that all scam accusation be approved by him first, starting with ...

Check Arbitao's Telegram channel. It's been active today.

They link to this vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYHplHx1MLU

Looks like we found the Carlos of Arbitao. Let's stick it up his ass for advancing an obvious scam. On second thought, let's first get approval from hilariousandco in making sure we're doing the right thing. Ref.: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4542394.0.

[YuTü.Co.in]

Was just sent a PM which I'll reply here ...

Your accounts have been banned numerous times before. Care to tell me what the bans were for?

How is it humanly possible for a Global Moderator not know, or how to obtain as to why I've been banned in the past?

A couple of those bans I don't have a clue as to why I was banned. My recent ban pertained to this account for blasting PMs which I found on my own accord was a no-no, thus stopped the practiced but was banned ~2 weeks after the fact for the offense. Akin to stopping the practice of trying to sell my account for fear of what's happening now.

My first ban back in 2011 resulted in me founding the very first crypto-based charity - Bitcoin 100 - where not a single satoshi was misappropriated nor any of its Team members paid a single satoshi of their literally thousands of hours of work in advancing this space.

[ibminer]

Again, the account was attempted to be sold but nixxed the idea upon learning that such course of action would affect my cred, opting to go another route, i.e. sig campaigns. Then both course of actions were stuck up my ass. I was liking getting fuck up the ass till recently seeing that I was missing out, now fucking those up their ass who fucked me up my ass.

Is this not you essentially stating in your sales thread that selling an account effects credibility?
https://archive.is/Sk4PJ#selection-3023.0-2936.5

You also tell your potential buyers the accounts can be used for signature campaigns, so that "route" seems well known before you decided to sell. I can only imagine what changed your mind?  Regardless, you claim to have successfully sold 2 other accounts before deciding to go this other route...

I certainly had an elevated level of trust with the Gleb account (and others Bruno controls), and if "bigmelons25" would have contacted me the day after potentially purchasing the Gleb account and asked for help, a loan, etc. without a hint of changing hands, I may not have thought twice.

To know that you are willing to give that away to a brand new user, bigmelons25 (or known scammer for all I know) for a few hundred bucks is, to say the least, disappointing. You offered the e-mail & password to bigmelons25, seemingly to completely avoid detection... the whole thing just seems like a pretty lame and petty thing to do.

[suchmoon]

How is it humanly possible for a Global Moderator not know, or how to obtain as to why I've been banned in the past?

Maybe that's why he's asking - to verify if YOU know if you're the real Bruno.

[YuTü.Co.in]

How is it humanly possible for a Global Moderator not know, or how to obtain as to why I've been banned in the past?

Maybe that's why he's asking - to verify if YOU know if you're the real Bruno.

That's a valid point, bud. I didn't think of that. Oh wait, if I am really Bruno, I would've known that. I think I've been banned a total of 5-6 times in total over the course of 7+ years on this forum. Another time I remember was multiple shit posting, so I read in Bruno's post history. 

[hilariousandco]

Thanks, suchmoon. Now it's time to get my dick wet with shit from sticking it up hilariousandco's ass some more ...

Congratulations, you've proved that you can get Gage to take a picture of himself which we've already established that. Funny how these are never instantaneous and come hours into the debate. You have to wait for Gleb to wake up or something?

Was just sent a PM which I'll reply here ...

Your accounts have been banned numerous times before. Care to tell me what the bans were for?

How is it humanly possible for a Global Moderator not know, or how to obtain as to why I've been banned in the past?

A couple of those bans I don't have a clue as to why I was banned. My recent ban pertained to this account for blasting PMs which I found on my own accord was a no-no, thus stopped the practiced but was banned ~2 weeks after the fact for the offense. Akin to stopping the practice of trying to sell my account for fear of what's happening now.

My first ban back in 2011 resulted in me founding the very first crypto-based charity - Bitcoin 100 - where not a single satoshi was misappropriated nor any of its Team members paid a single satoshi of their literally thousands of hours of work in advancing this space.

You really are an fool, aren't you? The real Gleb would have been able to tell me what the bans were for and you still can't. I'm not interested in your recent bans that whatever naive rando has taken over this account got banned for. I'm talking about the bans the real Gleb received, you know, the ones he would know about and you don't. Yet another nail in the coffin for me.

I'll give you a clue what one of them was for: You keep doing it in this thread hence why your post are getting deleted. 

And I'll say it again: read the rules, you know, the ones you we're previously banned multiple times for breaking.

How is it humanly possible for a Global Moderator not know, or how to obtain as to why I've been banned in the past?

Maybe that's why he's asking - to verify if YOU know if you're the real Bruno.

Bingo, but this guy obviously isn't very smart is he? Gleb has always been a buffoon but he wasn't this dumb.

Again, the account was attempted to be sold but nixxed the idea upon learning that such course of action would affect my cred, opting to go another route, i.e. sig campaigns. Then both course of actions were stuck up my ass. I was liking getting fuck up the ass till recently seeing that I was missing out, now fucking those up their ass who fucked me up my ass.

Is this not you essentially stating in your sales thread that selling an account effects credibility?
https://archive.is/Sk4PJ#selection-3023.0-2936.5

You also tell your potential buyers the accounts can be used for signature campaigns, so that "route" seems well known before you decided to sell. I can only imagine what changed your mind?  Regardless, you claim to have successfully sold 2 other accounts before deciding to go this other route...

I certainly had an elevated level of trust with the Gleb account (and others Bruno controls), and if "bigmelons25" would have contacted me the day after potentially purchasing the Gleb account and asked for help, a loan, etc. without a hint of changing hands, I may not have thought twice.

To know that you are willing to give that away to a brand new user, bigmelons25 (or known scammer for all I know) for a few hundred bucks is, to say the least, disappointing. You offered the e-mail & password to bigmelons25, seemingly to completely avoid detection... the whole thing just seems like a pretty lame and petty thing to do.

I'm surprised I'm seemingly the only one who feels this way. Like Gleb or not, it's been proven he will sell or loan his accounts out for a few hundred bucks. For what it's worth, I don't think the guy who tried to sell the accounts or the person controlling the op account now is actually the real gleb though, but they are obviously in cahoots. Maybe greed just got to him and he wanted some of that tasty ICO money idiots are all to eager to spurge on, but either way I don't trust any account he is associated with due to all of this.

[tmfp]

I'll give you a clue what one of them was for: You keep doing it in this thread hence why your post are getting deleted.  And I'll say it again: read the rules, you know, the ones you we're previously banned multiple times for breaking.
 

I know the answer to that and I'm pretty sure I'm not Gleb.

I certainly had an elevated level of trust with the Gleb account (and others Bruno controls), and if "bigmelons25" would have contacted me the day after potentially purchasing the Gleb account and asked for help, a loan, etc. without a hint of changing hands, I may not have thought twice.

To know that you are willing to give that away to a brand new user, bigmelons25 (or known scammer for all I know) for a few hundred bucks is, to say the least, disappointing. You offered the e-mail & password to bigmelons25, seemingly to completely avoid detection... the whole thing just seems like a pretty lame and petty thing to do.

This ^^^ unfortunately, is a valid point.

[digaran]

So let me see if I understand what's going on:

1) darkstar lends Bruno money
2) darkstar tags one of Bruno's accounts when the loan is defaulted on
3) darkstar removes the tag when the loan is repaid
4) hilarious tags all Bruno's accounts because... the loan was repaid?

Struggling a bit with that last one, help me out.

If it helps here is the TX ID for the repayment:

39b6f7a939a2e0ec9748bef0f4c28c4636a8a6af807141a4af0d1b0bf6aae3dd

Now if there is anything wrong with that please do tag me and remove the tags from Bruno. I repaid the loan and arranged to return the Phinnaeus Gage account to Bruno without his permission or knowledge.

DarkStar_ tagged Gleb account because the Gage account was the collateral so he knew if he were to tag Gage account then there goes the collateral, you are also asking for negative feedbacks to be removed now for a few times because Gleb is in your hands and as long as it has negative trust it wont worth a buck.
You are trying to side with an account seller while you have been against such behavior yourself.

I'd like to suggest for a way out for Bruno, he is still a DT2 member and suchmoon needs to return his account so that he could start tagging ICO scammers, if Bruno has indeed busted many scams, then we could give him a chance to do it more effectively by tagging scammers this time. note to Bruno, if you get back your DT2 account you can't tag don hilary or do retaliatory tags, just tag them scammers sorry asses.

[YuTü.Co.in]

Thanks, suchmoon. Now it's time to get my dick wet with shit from sticking it up hilariousandco's ass some more ...

Congratulations, you've proved that you can get Gage to take a picture of himself which we've already established that. Funny how these are never instantaneous and come hours into the debate. You have to wait for Gleb to wake up or something?

Was just sent a PM which I'll reply here ...

Your accounts have been banned numerous times before. Care to tell me what the bans were for?

How is it humanly possible for a Global Moderator not know, or how to obtain as to why I've been banned in the past?

A couple of those bans I don't have a clue as to why I was banned. My recent ban pertained to this account for blasting PMs which I found on my own accord was a no-no, thus stopped the practiced but was banned ~2 weeks after the fact for the offense. Akin to stopping the practice of trying to sell my account for fear of what's happening now.

My first ban back in 2011 resulted in me founding the very first crypto-based charity - Bitcoin 100 - where not a single satoshi was misappropriated nor any of its Team members paid a single satoshi of their literally thousands of hours of work in advancing this space.

You really are an fool, aren't you? The real Gleb would have been able to tell me what the bans were for and you still can't. I'm not interested in your recent bans that whatever naive rando has taken over this account got banned for. I'm talking about the bans the real Gleb received, you know, the ones he would know about and you don't. Yet another nail in the coffin for me.

I'll give you a clue what one of them was for: You keep doing it in this thread hence why your post are getting deleted.  

And I'll say it again: read the rules, you know, the ones you we're previously banned multiple times for breaking.

How is it humanly possible for a Global Moderator not know, or how to obtain as to why I've been banned in the past?

Maybe that's why he's asking - to verify if YOU know if you're the real Bruno.

Bingo, but this guy obviously isn't very smart is he? Gleb has always been a buffoon but he wasn't this dumb.

Again, the account was attempted to be sold but nixxed the idea upon learning that such course of action would affect my cred, opting to go another route, i.e. sig campaigns. Then both course of actions were stuck up my ass. I was liking getting fuck up the ass till recently seeing that I was missing out, now fucking those up their ass who fucked me up my ass.

Is this not you essentially stating in your sales thread that selling an account effects credibility?
https://archive.is/Sk4PJ#selection-3023.0-2936.5

You also tell your potential buyers the accounts can be used for signature campaigns, so that "route" seems well known before you decided to sell. I can only imagine what changed your mind?  Regardless, you claim to have successfully sold 2 other accounts before deciding to go this other route...

I certainly had an elevated level of trust with the Gleb account (and others Bruno controls), and if "bigmelons25" would have contacted me the day after potentially purchasing the Gleb account and asked for help, a loan, etc. without a hint of changing hands, I may not have thought twice.

To know that you are willing to give that away to a brand new user, bigmelons25 (or known scammer for all I know) for a few hundred bucks is, to say the least, disappointing. You offered the e-mail & password to bigmelons25, seemingly to completely avoid detection... the whole thing just seems like a pretty lame and petty thing to do.

I'm surprised I'm seemingly the only one who feels this way. Like Gleb or not, it's been proven he will sell or loan his accounts out for a few hundred bucks. For what it's worth, I don't think the guy who tried to sell the accounts or the person controlling the op account now is actually the real gleb though, but they are obviously in cahoots. Maybe greed just got to him and he wanted some of that tasty ICO money idiots are all to eager to spurge on, but either way I don't trust any account he is associated with due to all of this.

Looks like sugar or vinegar won't work with this totally 100% motherfuckin moron. This cocksucker now believes that suchmoon and I are the same person or communicating with one other so to advance a fuckin lie on my part.

Gleb has always been a buffoon but he wasn't this dumb.

Reads to me like hilariousandco has had the red-ass toward me for a long time.

If anybody has any vitals on him, please PM me such so that this BUFFOON can uncover if this asshole has a scammy pass.

You really are an fool, aren't you? The real Gleb would have been able to tell me what the bans were for and you still can't.

So, I posted what I believe the bans were for in a truthful manner and according to memory but this motherfucker won't accept that. Reads to me like somebody was right in assessing that you PM'ed me to see if I'm the real Gleb which I am, you fuckin asshole, even providing the proof in the form of selfies above the fold.

Here's a question I posed/alluded to a few days ago: When is hilariousandco going to tag bigmelons25 for purchasing accounts?

Further, when is hilariousandco going to tag obvious scammers attempting to garner tens of millions from users in this space, e.g. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2084637

Again, I seriously want to know who this fucker is in real life. This fucker needs to be put in a mental ward.

So let me see if I understand what's going on:

1) darkstar lends Bruno money
2) darkstar tags one of Bruno's accounts when the loan is defaulted on
3) darkstar removes the tag when the loan is repaid
4) hilarious tags all Bruno's accounts because... the loan was repaid?

Struggling a bit with that last one, help me out.

If it helps here is the TX ID for the repayment:

39b6f7a939a2e0ec9748bef0f4c28c4636a8a6af807141a4af0d1b0bf6aae3dd

Now if there is anything wrong with that please do tag me and remove the tags from Bruno. I repaid the loan and arranged to return the Phinnaeus Gage account to Bruno without his permission or knowledge.

DarkStar_ tagged Gleb account because the Gage account was the collateral so he knew if he were to tag Gage account then there goes the collateral, you are also asking for negative feedbacks to be removed now for a few times because Gleb is in your hands and as long as it has negative trust it wont worth a buck.
You are trying to side with an account seller while you have been against such behavior yourself.

I'd like to suggest for a way out for Bruno, he is still a DT2 member and suchmoon needs to return his account so that he could start tagging ICO scammers, if Bruno has indeed busted many scams, then we could give him a chance to do it more effectively by tagging scammers this time. note to Bruno, if you get back your DT2 account you can't tag don hilary or do retaliatory tags, just tag them scammers sorry asses.

I can scam bust with this account or my Phinnaeus Gage account ... that used to belong to Bruno.  

[digaran]

Can I just put this one here?


Suchmoon is a trust abuser and is constantly misusing the trust system, she has also tagged me twice with one reference, she has also countered a negative trust for no valid reason. let DT1 members to keep suchmoon on their trust list because she leaves accurate feedbacks all the time, right?

Suchmoon first pays a loan on behalf of Gleb and then counters a negative feedback on Gleb's alt account to say that loan was paid, YuTü.Co.in account has done nothing to deserve a counter rating therefore suchmoon felt that since she paid the loan she has now the right to counter a valid negative trust.

Could you guys understand my sarcasm or do you need me to add a tag in front of every sarcastic line?

[YuTü.Co.in]

Can I just put this one here?


Suchmoon is a trust abuser and is constantly misusing the trust system, she has also tagged me twice with one reference, she has also countered a negative trust for no valid reason. let DT1 members to keep suchmoon on their trust list because she leaves accurate feedbacks all the time, right?

Suchmoon first pays a loan on behalf of Gleb and then counters a negative feedback on Gleb's alt account to say that loan was paid, YuTü.Co.in account has done nothing to deserve a counter rating therefore suchmoon felt that since she paid the loan she has now the right to counter a valid negative trust.

Could you guys understand my sarcasm or do you need me to add a tag in front of every sarcastic line?

Let me see if I understand this correctly. My YuTü.Co.in warrants negs due to what has or hasn't happened with my other accounts but suchmoon is forbidden from doing what he did in the same vein. How close am I?

[digaran]

Snip.

I am powerless in this community, all I have is my voice. all I can do is to point out the wrongdoings of people, I have also said before that if don hilary tags me I wont complain, so I'm not going to post a thread about it however he has tagged me with his alt account after I posted a thread about marlboroza changing his email address after getting on DT2 so here is the case you wanted against him. also note that I got tagged because of you. after he posted to talk about Gleb's account has been sold or hacked I was encouraged and posted a thread to warn people that marlboroza account could've changed hands as well but since don hilary was the one who included marlboroza on DT2 he didn't like it and tagged me for trolling. now I'm waiting for marlboroza to reset his pass and changes his behavior to call him out on my accusation.

Let's not forget that suchmoon is still a trust abuser and the people in position of power should deal with her, she has no right to counter a valid negative trust, DT members might as well tag your account as an account seller, would suchmoon counter that as well?

[YuTü.Co.in]

Okay, it was suggested that I sign an address associated with me, but I replied that I don't think I can do that via blockchain.info where I've generated addressed for the past several years. He provided me this link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2534452.0.

Upon review, I think I can now accomplish said task. Please state which address you wish me to sign so that we can once and for all close this episode.

Bruno

[suchmoon]

Suchmoon is a trust abuser and is constantly misusing the trust system, she has also tagged me twice with one reference

I tagged you the second time because you refused to read the first reference so I put the context into the feedback itself.

Suchmoon first pays a loan on behalf of Gleb and then counters a negative feedback on Gleb's alt account to say that loan was paid, YuTü.Co.in account has done nothing to deserve a counter rating therefore suchmoon felt that since she paid the loan she has now the right to counter a valid negative trust.

The loan is no longer in default. Which part of this do you find hard to understand? Repaid. Done. Gone. If that's a bad thing then I should be tagged and not Bruno. I can't tag myself though so I'll at least counter Bruno's tags. But don't let logic get in the way of a good rant.

[Anduck]

Okay, it was suggested that I sign an address associated with me, but I replied that I don't think I can do that via blockchain.info where I've generated addressed for the past several years. He provided me this link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2534452.0.

Upon review, I think I can now accomplish said task. Please state which address you wish me to sign so that we can once and for all close this episode.

Bruno

You don't seem to get it. He clearly stated he isn't trusting you no matter who you are now. You don't need to convince anyone. Now start insulting me, it's been a while.

[YuTü.Co.in]

Suchmoon is a trust abuser and is constantly misusing the trust system, she has also tagged me twice with one reference

I tagged you the second time because you refused to read the first reference so I put the context into the feedback itself.

Suchmoon first pays a loan on behalf of Gleb and then counters a negative feedback on Gleb's alt account to say that loan was paid, YuTü.Co.in account has done nothing to deserve a counter rating therefore suchmoon felt that since she paid the loan she has now the right to counter a valid negative trust.

The loan is no longer in default. Which part of this do you find hard to understand? Repaid. Done. Gone. If that's a bad thing then I should be tagged and not Bruno. I can't tag myself though so I'll at least counter Bruno's tags. But don't let logic get in the way of a good rant.

Hey, can I tag you for interfering with my scam?  

Okay, it was suggested that I sign an address associated with me, but I replied that I don't think I can do that via blockchain.info where I've generated addressed for the past several years. He provided me this link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2534452.0.

Upon review, I think I can now accomplish said task. Please state which address you wish me to sign so that we can once and for all close this episode.

Bruno

You don't seem to get it. He clearly stated he isn't trusting you no matter who you are now. You don't need to convince anyone. Now start insulting me, it's been a while.

I'll go one better, buddy. See your trust thingy.  

Yep, I'm gonna to learnt to love the trust thingy.

[digaran]

The loan is no longer in default. Which part of this do you find hard to understand? Repaid. Done. Gone. If that's a bad thing then I should be tagged and not Bruno. I can't tag myself though so I'll at least counter Bruno's tags. But don't let logic get in the way of a good rant.

Well of course you can't see anything you don't like, the tag on Gleb's accounts is not just for unpaid loans, they're to warn people for his untrustworthy behavior such as selling accounts and also defaulting on loans without having the intention of paying them back which could be considered as selling accounts in disguise. now that you refuse to understand this situation I should tag your sorry ass twice right?