Lamborghini Member hilariousandco has lost his FUCKIN mind !!!

[YuTü.Co.in]

The loan is no longer in default. Which part of this do you find hard to understand? Repaid. Done. Gone. If that's a bad thing then I should be tagged and not Bruno. I can't tag myself though so I'll at least counter Bruno's tags. But don't let logic get in the way of a good rant.

Well of course you can't see anything you don't like, the tag on Gleb's accounts is not just for unpaid loans, they're to warn people for his untrustworthy behavior such as selling accounts and also defaulting on loans without having the intention of paying them back which could be considered as selling accounts in disguise. now that you refuse to understand this situation I should tag your sorry ass twice right?

Boy, these people are slow. Again, which accounts were sold? For the life of me, I have no records of such. Further, which loan was defaulted on on which account that had no attention of repaying back a loan? These are very simple questions seeking simple answers.

Caution: I may be trying to trick you to answer.

[suchmoon]

The loan is no longer in default. Which part of this do you find hard to understand? Repaid. Done. Gone. If that's a bad thing then I should be tagged and not Bruno. I can't tag myself though so I'll at least counter Bruno's tags. But don't let logic get in the way of a good rant.

Well of course you can't see anything you don't like, the tag on Gleb's accounts is not just for unpaid loans, they're to warn people for his untrustworthy behavior such as selling accounts and also defaulting on loans without having the intention of paying them back which could be considered as selling accounts in disguise. now that you refuse to understand this situation I should tag your sorry ass twice right?

Yet no sale or default occurred, which is my opinion stated in my ratings. Tag me as many times as you want.

[YuTü.Co.in]

The loan is no longer in default. Which part of this do you find hard to understand? Repaid. Done. Gone. If that's a bad thing then I should be tagged and not Bruno. I can't tag myself though so I'll at least counter Bruno's tags. But don't let logic get in the way of a good rant.

Well of course you can't see anything you don't like, the tag on Gleb's accounts is not just for unpaid loans, they're to warn people for his untrustworthy behavior such as selling accounts and also defaulting on loans without having the intention of paying them back which could be considered as selling accounts in disguise. now that you refuse to understand this situation I should tag your sorry ass twice right?

Yet no sale or default occurred, which is my opinion stated in my ratings. Tag me as many times as you want.

Dude, I'm tryin' to trick him in answering my questions. Luckily for us he's slow, thus 99% certain he'll still be tricked.

How did you like my second trust thingy review?

[suchmoon]

Dude, I'm tryin' to trick him in answering my questions. Luckily for us he's slow, thus 99% certain he'll still be tricked.

How did you like my second trust thingy review?

You're not helping your case LOL

[YuTü.Co.in]

Dude, I'm tryin' to trick him in answering my questions. Luckily for us he's slow, thus 99% certain he'll still be tricked.

How did you like my second trust thingy review?

You're not helping your case LOL

Sure I am. H & Co. needs to be proven that I'm the same character he's known and loved all these years. Nobody else on the planet would be able to accomplish said feat but the RealBruno.

PS: I just noticed that this thread was moved to reputation. GULP! More ammo for them naysayers, declaring that the RealBruno would've noticed that when said was accomplished.

[DarkStar_]

DarkStar_ tagged Gleb account because the Gage account was the collateral so he knew if he were to tag Gage account then there goes the collateral, you are also asking for negative feedbacks to be removed now for a few times because Gleb is in your hands and as long as it has negative trust it wont worth a buck.
You are trying to side with an account seller while you have been against such behavior yourself.

I mean, I could have tagged the Gage account. It was pointless though, given that it was in my posession and it has not been touched for over a year at that point. I had no intention of selling it either. Do you really think suchmoon is trying to get the negatives removed to resell the account? That seems really pointless.

[YuTü.Co.in]

DarkStar_ tagged Gleb account because the Gage account was the collateral so he knew if he were to tag Gage account then there goes the collateral, you are also asking for negative feedbacks to be removed now for a few times because Gleb is in your hands and as long as it has negative trust it wont worth a buck.
You are trying to side with an account seller while you have been against such behavior yourself.

I mean, I could have tagged the Gage account. It was pointless though, given that it was in my posession and it has not been touched for over a year at that point. I had no intention of selling it either. Do you really think suchmoon is trying to get the negatives removed to resell the account? That seems really pointless.

I want to go on record and state that I don't have one iota of a problem with DarkStar. I 100% trust him. <not sarcasm>

[Phinnaeus Gage]

New thread for everybody's enjoyment: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4545633.0

[digaran]

WTF? why is suchmoon countering legitimate and valid negative trust feedbacks to help out known account sellers and desperate ICO scammers? suchmoon has countered negative feedbacks on both YuTü.Co.in and Phinnaeus Gage, and for what? to give a free pass to a notorious account dealer and ICO scammer in the making?

@Blazed and dooglus please I beg of you to review suchmoon's actions before she destroys your reputations as well. only if anybody could listen to me.
I'll refrain from tagging suchmoon twice, some other forum member do tag suchmoon if you believe she is misusing the trust system.

[mosprognoz]

WTF? why is suchmoon countering legitimate and valid negative trust feedbacks to help out known account sellers and desperate ICO scammers? suchmoon has countered negative feedbacks on both YuTü.Co.in and Phinnaeus Gage, and for what? to give a free pass to a notorious account dealer and ICO scammer in the making?

@Blazed and dooglus please I beg of you to review suchmoon's actions before she destroys your reputations as well. only if anybody could listen to me.
I'll refrain from tagging suchmoon twice, some other forum member do tag suchmoon if you believe she is misusing the trust system.

Dude, why are you sticking you nose in almost all threads, that are related to tagging someone or negative trust rules issues ? Do you really thing that anybody is interested in opinion of the dude, who was offering blatant and obvious scammy services https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3779450.msg37186083#msg37186083 and was tagged by default trust members countless times ? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=806776 You attacked almost every DT member in your senseless threads https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;threads;u=806776;sa=showPosts Now I'm sure you will start attacking me, because I wrote that you are a spammer.

[hilariousetc]

Yet no sale or default occurred, which is my opinion stated in my ratings. Tag me as many times as you want.

As I explained in my PM, that's purely semantics. Gleb has admitted he tried to sell it. You've left feedback for account selling before and I don't see the difference here.

WTF? why is suchmoon countering legitimate and valid negative trust feedbacks to help out known account sellers and desperate ICO scammers? suchmoon has countered negative feedbacks on both YuTü.Co.in and Phinnaeus Gage, and for what? to give a free pass to a notorious account dealer and ICO scammer in the making?

@Blazed and dooglus please I beg of you to review suchmoon's actions before she destroys your reputations as well. only if anybody could listen to me.
I'll refrain from tagging suchmoon twice, some other forum member do tag suchmoon.

It seems it is purely down to details. He disagrees with the fact that I said the account has in fact been sold, as opposed to it was attempted to be sold. The account probably hasn't been sold, but I still think there's something very shady going on here that Bruno has gotten himself involved with somehow or the account was or still is also in the possession of someone else (as well as Gleb - maybe whoever roped him into the ICO). Suchmoon said he'll change the feedback if I change mine and I have no issue in amending it to be more factually correct which I will do so later.

[digaran]

Snip.

As long as you don't suddenly change your mind and give Gleb and his other alts positive trust to say what a good guy he is, I'm fine with it and everybody else is also fine with it other than suchmoon, what you should know is that suchmoon is the one who paid the loan and took Gleb account as collateral in exchange for $600, so she would do anything to restore the said accounts reputations in order to get back her money which is lost forever now.

I wonder what would suchmoon do if her bought accounts are tagged as an account dealer and not a loan defaulter? also where is the usual hypocrite a.k.a The Pharmacist? he's not here to tag these accounts but only he tags people in no position of power or influence. facking hypocrite.

[Phinnaeus Gage]

Yet no sale or default occurred, which is my opinion stated in my ratings. Tag me as many times as you want.

As I explained in my PM, that's purely semantics. Gleb has admitted he tried to sell it. You've left feedback for account selling before and I don't see the difference here.

WTF? why is suchmoon countering legitimate and valid negative trust feedbacks to help out known account sellers and desperate ICO scammers? suchmoon has countered negative feedbacks on both YuTü.Co.in and Phinnaeus Gage, and for what? to give a free pass to a notorious account dealer and ICO scammer in the making?

@Blazed and dooglus please I beg of you to review suchmoon's actions before she destroys your reputations as well. only if anybody could listen to me.
I'll refrain from tagging suchmoon twice, some other forum member do tag suchmoon.

It seems it is purely down to details. He disagrees with the fact that I said the account has in fact been sold, as opposed to it was attempted to be sold. The account probably hasn't been sold, but I still think there's something very shady going on here that Bruno has gotten himself involved with somehow or the account was or still is also in the possession of someone else (as well as Gleb - maybe whoever roped him into the ICO). Suchmoon said he'll change the feedback if I change mine and I have no issue in amending it to be more factually correct which I will do so later.

I guess I can talk till I'm blue in the face in stating that there was nothing shady going on, never sold, and haven't gotten myself into anything, ICO related or not.

[pinkman12345]

Burno Bruno was the single guy who echoed my voice when i stood for hashcard scam, i never felt that the account had changed the hands.
I have respect for his judgement, but coming here and seeing this thread is really sad.

[suchmoon]

@Blazed and dooglus please I beg of you to review suchmoon's actions before she destroys your reputations as well. only if anybody could listen to me.
I'll refrain from tagging suchmoon twice, some other forum member do tag suchmoon if you believe she is misusing the trust system.

Have you contacted Blazed and dooglus yet?

As I explained in my PM, that's purely semantics. Gleb has admitted he tried to sell it. You've left feedback for account selling before and I don't see the difference here.

I've left feedback for selling green trust accounts, yes. I was able to prevent THIS sale though, that's the difference. I believe this outcome is better than if I just tagged AGLD and/or Gleb, Gage, et al and washed my hands off. I don't believe you'll ever agree with me so let's just leave it at that.

Snip.

As long as you don't suddenly change your mind and give Gleb and his other alts positive trust to say what a good guy he is, I'm fine with it and everybody else is also fine with it other than suchmoon, what you should know is that suchmoon is the one who paid the loan and took Gleb account as collateral in exchange for $600, so she would do anything to restore the said accounts reputations in order to get back her money which is lost forever now.

I wonder what would suchmoon do if her bought accounts are tagged as an account dealer and not a loan defaulter? also where is the usual hypocrite a.k.a The Pharmacist? he's not here to tag these accounts but only he tags people in no position of power or influence. facking hypocrite.

Yes, digaran, exactly. Everyone in the entire world is EXACTLY like you - a degenerate shitposter who would do anything for $600.

[YuTü.Co.in]

Replying publicly to the following PM ...

Dude, I'm tired and do see where I fucked up upon review in re posting off-topic. I'll lock this and start anew tomorrow [this was in reference to another thread, NOT this one].

Bruno

Maybe get some sleep instead of staying up all night trying to desperately find dirt where there is none. The simple matter of the fact is you fucked up by trying to sell your account along with its reputation to the highest bidder whether you want to admit it or not. Any good you may have done is now invalidated because of that and I'm only looking to protect the community. If you could look at this rationally you would see what a shady thing that is. Anyone could have used your accounts for any sort of illicit behaviour and that would have been your fault. You should have just admitted the mistake you made in trying to sell the account and you might have been able to change people's minds about the whole thing but you're just making things much worse for yourself. The only reason your account isn't painted red by dozens of people right now is because they're scared of you and the dirt you may dig up on them and they know it isn't worth the hassle. Well, I don't have anything to hide and don't back down to bullies and threats, but feel free to waste time on this.

Again, please read the rules: If I wanted to be a dick you would have been banned long ago, but I've given you several notifications now of things you have been banned for in the past and that is more than any other mod would have done. I'm not the bad guy here.

Rules: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0

Heeded, and thanks for the reply. I'm not the bad guy either, bud. I promise to chill.

Bruno

[InvoKing]

Could you boys have a phone talk? Skype? so you can verify who has the pass of those accounts?
I feel that Theymos or Cyrus should interfere to put an end to this drama.
(I know i will regret posting here but cannot see this mess and keep quiet!)...

@h&co / SM : at this point, i think a neutral trust is more relevant than - or + ones (until a solid proof is given).

[hilariousetc]

Heeded, and thanks for the reply. I'm not the bad guy either, bud. I promise to chill.

Bruno

I don't think you understand the concept of a private message. They're called private messages for a reason. If I wanted to post it publicly I would have. And good guys don't sell their accounts and act like petulant children threatening all kinds of nonsense when they get called out for their shady behaviour.

@h&co / SM : at this point, i think a neutral trust is more relevant than - or + ones (until a solid proof is given).

No, it's really not. He took out a loan, defaulted with no intention to pay it back, and then tried to sell his other Gleb account. This isn't disputed. He's admitted it and the proof has already been posted: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4476580.msg40196552#msg40196552

[YuTü.Co.in]

"Hal, Bruno didn't do anything wrong."

"Yeah, he did."

"So, this is how it's done inside a BCT courtroom."

I was about to post the above when hilariousetc posted, hence the below sentiment, the above reflecting me moving on and accepting my error.

Heeded, and thanks for the reply. I'm not the bad guy either, bud. I promise to chill.

Bruno

I don't think you understand the concept of a private message. They're called private messages for a reason. If I wanted to post it publicly I would have. And good guys don't sell their accounts and act like petulant children threatening all kinds of nonsense when they get called out for their shady behaviour.

@h&co / SM : at this point, i think a neutral trust is more relevant than - or + ones (until a solid proof is given).

No, it's really not. He took out a loan, defaulted with no intention to pay it back, and then tried to sell his other Gleb account. This isn't disputed. He's admitted it and the proof has already been posted: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4476580.msg40196552#msg40196552

Let me get this fuckin shit right. With motherfuckin apologies for posting your private PM, a couple hours ago, I publicly echoed your sentiment and was ending this episode upon seeing where I fucked up on more than one level. Now you come here to restick it up my fuckin ass. GODDAMN RIGHT I'M FUCKIN PISSED RIGHT NOW. I was cool as a cucumber until you posted the above, ready to move on. And where the fuck was your noble ass when the user posted a private PM depicting that it was the Gleb account that was for sale? And where the fuck is his tag for attempting to purchase accounts? GET THE FUCK OUTTA MY FACE. And how many accounts do you maintain to entrap sellers and buyers of accounts so to advance your fuckin cred?

Seriously, dude, I was moving on from this episode. Now that you've opened up my asshole anew, please don't feel like you have to be gentle in sticking your fuckin dick up by ass. GODDAMN IT AM I FUCKIN PISSED RIGHT NOW.

[DarkStar_]

No, it's really not. He took out a loan, defaulted with no intention to pay it back

I disagree with this part. I do think he did have an intention to pay the loan, but had issues with getting more money. The partial repayment he made was equal to $250, but the value of BTC had more than doubled.