stompix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2884
Merit: 6311
Blackjack.fun
|
|
February 14, 2014, 03:00:46 PM |
|
I saw on Reddit, someone linked a post from this forum where a user named "EnjoyThis" was asking about creating vanity addresses: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=301068.100Also, can someone explain to me: (1) why are these payments not getting confirmed; and (2) is this related to the malleability DDOS attack? They seem related since both involve unconfirmed transactions. Thanks. The payment are not getting confirmed because of the large transactions size (in kb) and the 0 fee.
|
. .BLACKJACK ♠ FUN. | | | ███▄██████ ██████████████▀ ████████████ █████████████████ ████████████████▄▄ ░█████████████▀░▀▀ ██████████████████ ░██████████████ █████████████████▄ ░██████████████▀ ████████████ ███████████████░██ ██████████ | | CRYPTO CASINO & SPORTS BETTING | | │ | | │ | ▄▄███████▄▄ ▄███████████████▄ ███████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ █████████████████████████ ███████████████████████ █████████████████████ ███████████████████ ▀███████████████▀ ███████████████████ | | .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3808
Merit: 2617
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
February 14, 2014, 03:07:33 PM |
|
The guy was asking for help creating a vanity address using "1Enjoy." That's the same as the spamming address.
Oh haha. I thought people were just being cyber detectives and assuming that he was the guy because of his name . Has anyone asked him?
|
|
|
|
kodiak1120
|
|
February 14, 2014, 03:14:19 PM |
|
Not that I know of... it seems pretty compelling based upon his question regarding "1Enjoy," and his user name. I wonder if this is part of some spamming service where companies will pay to have some stupid message sent via unconfirmed bitcoin transactions. From an advertising standpoint, I'm sure the ability to reach +1 million people would be desirable.
|
|
|
|
kodiak1120
|
|
February 14, 2014, 03:20:21 PM |
|
It seems he was just online about fifteen minutes ago. I can't seem to figure out how to search for posts by user name... I'd like to see what else he's been discussing. Edit: Also, the damn time-limits on posts, search, etc. are really a PIA. I understand the need to repel spammers, but waiting six minutes between posts is just ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
yatsey87
|
|
February 14, 2014, 03:33:50 PM |
|
Not that I know of... it seems pretty compelling based upon his question regarding "1Enjoy," and his user name. I wonder if this is part of some spamming service where companies will pay to have some stupid message sent via unconfirmed bitcoin transactions. From an advertising standpoint, I'm sure the ability to reach +1 million people would be desirable.
I think it just is some sort of advertising spam. It gets people talking and it's for free. It seems he was just online about fifteen minutes ago. I can't seem to figure out how to search for posts by user name... I'd like to see what else he's been discussing. Edit: Also, the damn time-limits on posts, search, etc. are really a PIA. I understand the need to repel spammers, but waiting six minutes between posts is just ridiculous. It goes down the more activity you get.
|
|
|
|
Luror
|
|
February 14, 2014, 03:58:33 PM |
|
The guy was asking for help creating a vanity address using "1Enjoy." That's the same as the spamming address.
There's also this guy, who basically confessed it was him: ok guys, this is the last batch. took some training to get it running on high volume.
everyone who will not get any enjoysatochis today, will not get any at all. sorry for the inconvinience, and i hope you enjoy. this is a no offense attack on bitcoin.
it is an attraction and improvement attack. we are fully commited to make bitcoin stronger.
and,,, do not waste so much energy on mining (hey, you use the power of 1-2 nuclear power plants for mining alone). it is neither green nor profitable.
lets start an adwords coin. omitting mining by feeding the coins value by advertisement revenue. and premiums for ad-free coins.
support your local bitcoin community.
|
BTC: 1DzAEtLoFxqmJoNH5ZYHyWxaSNYUGKf2S6
|
|
|
yatsey87
|
|
February 14, 2014, 04:02:52 PM |
|
The guy was asking for help creating a vanity address using "1Enjoy." That's the same as the spamming address.
There's also this guy, who basically confessed it was him: ok guys, this is the last batch. took some training to get it running on high volume.
everyone who will not get any enjoysatochis today, will not get any at all. sorry for the inconvinience, and i hope you enjoy. this is a no offense attack on bitcoin.
it is an attraction and improvement attack. we are fully commited to make bitcoin stronger.
and,,, do not waste so much energy on mining (hey, you use the power of 1-2 nuclear power plants for mining alone). it is neither green nor profitable.
lets start an adwords coin. omitting mining by feeding the coins value by advertisement revenue. and premiums for ad-free coins.
support your local bitcoin community. If he confessed to being Satoshi would you believe him?
|
|
|
|
EnJoyThis
|
|
February 14, 2014, 04:27:21 PM |
|
The guy was asking for help creating a vanity address using "1Enjoy." That's the same as the spamming address.
Oh haha. I thought people were just being cyber detectives and assuming that he was the guy because of his name . Has anyone asked him? kodiak1120 did as the question. Short answer: "No, I'm not the one spamming". In order to help out the detectives here on the forum: If you look at my question https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=301068.100 I was asking for 1En Joy as my username is En Joy This. If I was to be such an obvious spammer I would rather have chosen for the following two messages: (1) 1EnJoy (2) 1This Furthermore it would be kinda stupid to name myself after the spamming message sent out to the bitcoinworld, wouldn't it? And last but not least, I which I was the spammer as some of you detectives saw the origin of the satoshi's is a wallet which held 217+ btc and, sadly for me, I don't hold that many coins. BTW it supprised me it took this long before THE question was asked. Cheers all
|
1Ew9k5guAGb44Uz6rYfSVscgFBUcgDZp5C
|
|
|
kodiak1120
|
|
February 14, 2014, 04:30:31 PM |
|
So what did you do with your 1EnJoy vanity address? And, if you don't mind me asking, what is the meaning behind your username? Not trying to accuse anyone of anything, but it is a pretty big coincidence.
|
|
|
|
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3808
Merit: 2617
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
February 14, 2014, 05:10:26 PM |
|
The guy was asking for help creating a vanity address using "1Enjoy." That's the same as the spamming address.
Oh haha. I thought people were just being cyber detectives and assuming that he was the guy because of his name . Has anyone asked him? kodiak1120 did as the question. Short answer: "No, I'm not the one spamming". In order to help out the detectives here on the forum: If you look at my question https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=301068.100 I was asking for 1En Joy as my username is En Joy This. If I was to be such an obvious spammer I would rather have chosen for the following two messages: (1) 1EnJoy (2) 1This Furthermore it would be kinda stupid to name myself after the spamming message sent out to the bitcoinworld, wouldn't it? And last but not least, I which I was the spammer as some of you detectives saw the origin of the satoshi's is a wallet which held 217+ btc and, sadly for me, I don't hold that many coins. BTW it supprised me it took this long before THE question was asked. Cheers all But that's what you would say . Thanks for the clarification.
|
|
|
|
Lohoris
|
|
February 14, 2014, 05:22:26 PM |
|
So what did you do with your 1EnJoy vanity address? And, if you don't mind me asking, what is the meaning behind your username? Not trying to accuse anyone of anything, but it is a pretty big coincidence.
There's no reason to believe it's him. If it was him, there's no reason why he would first post his request in public, and then deny it was him. It doesn't make any sense.
|
|
|
|
btcton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1007
|
|
February 15, 2014, 06:02:22 AM |
|
So what did you do with your 1EnJoy vanity address? And, if you don't mind me asking, what is the meaning behind your username? Not trying to accuse anyone of anything, but it is a pretty big coincidence.
There's no reason to believe it's him. If it was him, there's no reason why he would first post his request in public, and then deny it was him. It doesn't make any sense. Why does it even matter, anyway?
|
The signature campaign posters adding useless redundant fluff to their posts to reach their minimum word count are lowering my IQ.
|
|
|
elasticband
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom
|
|
February 15, 2014, 08:19:32 AM |
|
It is.not EnjoyThis
|
|
|
|
Falkvinge
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
February 15, 2014, 08:22:02 AM |
|
So what did you do with your 1EnJoy vanity address? And, if you don't mind me asking, what is the meaning behind your username? Not trying to accuse anyone of anything, but it is a pretty big coincidence.
There's no reason to believe it's him. It's not an 1EnJoy address. See the screenshot I posted.
|
|
|
|
roslinpl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1199
|
|
February 16, 2014, 12:01:54 AM |
|
where have you post them? I dont see any ...
|
|
|
|
u9y42
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1071
|
|
February 16, 2014, 12:07:24 AM |
|
where have you post them? I dont see any ... It's in the last page in this thread, page 9.
|
|
|
|
roslinpl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1199
|
|
February 16, 2014, 12:45:19 AM |
|
where have you post them? I dont see any ... It's in the last page in this thread, page 9. Cheers I saw them now Just too many pages around and maybe too late
|
|
|
|
visionary
|
|
February 16, 2014, 08:20:55 AM |
|
it had returnd
|
|
|
|
guybrushthreepwood
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1195
|
|
February 16, 2014, 02:29:02 PM |
|
it had returnd
People are getting them again?
|
|
|
|
|