Is this the new strategy?

[weisner]

In this case reasonable that the coins are sold because it is a necessity of life not only to store coins, there are many needs that must be met. There are still many prize hunters who keep their coins for the long term by looking at the potential of the coin for the future. So the prize hunters keep the coins for a certain term investment.

[chandrarahmadewa]

I think the possibility of a dump is an organized fraud, and there may be a conspiracy of ICO project developers with Bounty Hunter, the question is "have you ever thought of it that way?"
Developers of a good ICO Project always think of investors from complaining.

[nonik]

Actually this is just the strategy of the owners of ICO for their altcoin prices not slumped, because of course the investors want their money back mumbuahkan good profit, especially the bounty hunter just want money from selling the coins as soon as possible, should the bounty hunter not in a hurry to immediately sell the coins, so they know the flavor of the investment and the benefits gained.

[lovly]

Of course, each company has a strategy, and I think it's their strategy to keep their altcoin prices from falling in the market because bounty hunters are just chasing money with as soon as possible their coins are sold, they should follow the rules of the game so they can get a good profit from coins they have. .

[alian17]

I don't think there's anything to worry about. The situation has been happening all the time. Bounty hunters use their time to work and earn profits. Some of them need immediate returns to sell encrypted currencies. This is indisputable.

[george_crypto]

It is good way. Because some investors don't like the bounty tokens. So there will be time for the correct market price.

[jgaspar]

I don’t think that Bounty Hunters are such a big deal, because usually companies give to hunters something around 1-2% of thir earnings during token sale, so how could it be?

[ranoby]

I think it's not fair when bounty hunters get a reward after investors. Because people must first pay for work ... And the fact that they merge their coins is their business, and a good opportunity to buy for those who did not have time on the ico

[modmalaney]

However, I somewhat disagree with this. the Bounty Hunter received only a few percents of the amount of all the existing token. so if for the bounty hunter price being down drastic I think it is not entirely true. a lot of other factors that make the price being down and not from the bounty hunter only. Indeed, in fact, yes the price down but I think there are other things that cause this condition to occur.

[chengyinoing]

I think investors should get their tokens before the bounty hunters. Otherwise the project falls after it hits the market, and people keep blaming the bounty hunters.

[lunaelucemauram]

If that is true then please tell us how it would it affect the price of the token of the ICO project if the allocation to bounty hunter is just 1% to 5% at best. There are many reason that a token price will face like no real application of the project, the investors are not interested anymore, the project is a scam and even manipulation of whales an pump and dump groups but to tell that the price drop is due to bounty hunters is not true since they only have a small portion of the whole volume of the token.

[xOdiumNostrumx]

I noticed this with some of the projects but definitely not most of them. But its definitely a legitimate practice which prevents a major price drop of the coin (in this market, most newly listed coins dumps either way, so they dont really need the help of bounty dumpers as well).

[dzelenyanskiy]

In addition to investors and bounty hunters, there are also advisers who receive coins before all and in large amounts. They are the first to sell these coins, bringing down their value!

[Barrueco]

Just recently i noticed a common trend with almost all ICOs.

There have been lots of complains that bounty hunters dump their tokens immediately after receiving them. Although, it is not true for all bounty hunters. Some still hold theirs.

Investors now get their tokens before bounty hunters. They are also allowed to start trading before bounty hunters get their rewards.
I believe this will prevent the investors from complaining and blaming the dump in price on bounty hunters.

Of course bounty hunter is a parameter on the market prices but relatively unimportant if there is a trade volume at the exchange. That's is the one of the reasons why the projects must list at the big exchanges. DEX could be dangerous if the volume is low.

[patykuprova]

I don’t think that Bounty Hunters are such a big deal, because usually companies give to hunters something around 1-2% of thir earnings during token sale, so how could it be?

I agree with you that Bounty Hunters is not the main issue when their token has been dump. Almost token will be manipulated by big investors or whale. And I think that the team should pay for hunter after paying for investors. So no one can blame Hunters.

[arunakiran]

Recent time it happens to all new ICOs, once bounty hunters receives their bounty reward they are selling immediately. So the price of the token is dumped.

[richan]

I also think this is the new trend, some projects I participated in have listed on exchange and almost a month, they are still keeping bounty hunters tokens. Each time they give excuses. They believe hunters will sell off their coins and bring prices down, hence this new trend.

[krinvat77]

I agree and think that this is very true. Bounty hunters are very rarely affected by the price reduction.

[athiftammam2018]

I do not know what that irresponsible bounty hunter thinks. I do not understand why. Obviously I will not follow their lead. Because I know that this can hurt us all. It's hard to do bounty months but token prices just dropped.

[rezwalker]

there is no such fear if the project is good
price will go up and sellers regret selling