Who dump coins early; Bounty hunters or ICO investors?

[Isiaka208]

Its true that bounty hunters dump early in exchange to fiat most times because the feel after working for many months, its to me to take their reward but who dumps more of the tokens? The ICO investors because they have a large chunk of the divide bounty hunters only have 2% most of the time.

[Betwrong]

Its true that bounty hunters dump early in exchange to fiat most times because the feel after working for many months, its to me to take their reward but who dumps more of the tokens? The ICO investors because they have a large chunk of the divide bounty hunters only have 2% most of the time.

Bounty hunters can get 5% or even more depending on the ICO, but the whole point of this thread is that they physically can't sell their coins early because they are not paid for months in order to prevent a possible coin crush because of their selling. I personally think that it's a bit unfair towards the bounty hunters. If not with 100%, they should be paid at least partially in the very early stages because they too deserve fair payment for their job, and not with tokens which worth nothing already.

[Korkorjkk]

I don't think bounty hunters are those responsible for dumping coins. It is actually investors because they are able to buy a lot of coins, and dumping it affects the price of the coin greatly. Even though some bounty hunters too dump their coins, they do not have a higher percentage of coins to dump.

[munareal]

I think the ICO investors have more impact when they dump their coins than the bounty hunters. The total token assigned to airdrops and bounty hunters are negligible  that they do not have much impact when dumped by the bounty hunters but when investors dump their coins the impact is more

[ynclksnr321]

I think it's the bounty hunter who's trying to take it off first. Because they do not invest in any material as they see what they see as profit. Investors do not leave their money without making a profit.

[Underw00d]

Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of hand we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys

I do not know why some people just choose to blame bounty hunters for every dump that is done. I have seen lots of coins that got dumped despite bounty hunters not being paid. I participated in a project that has not been listed and bounty hunters have not been paid, but could you believe that it has already been dumped on DEX. The price has reduced by almost x50 the ICO  price.

   I also received tokens today. The amount is just ridiculous ...)))) But I am very happy because I am an incurable optimist) I will spend them today - I’ll go to the movies with the girl)

[JayCue]

I don't think so if it is us, bounty hunters, who dump the coins or tokens. I believe those investors who participated in private sale or pre-sale who got big bonuses are the reasons why the coins' value drops. Well, even if they dump those bonuses they got it is still a profit for them no matter how cheap the price is.

[conanmori]

Investor who early listed on the whitelist and manage to get amount of great discount and bonuses are the winner here. But we can't remove the early bonuses cause that's what early Investor should received as early adopter perks. The people who lose here are those who joined on main sale and didn't received any bonuses.

[rangnatht]

Well in this condition almost everyone is think about once coin is listed on the exchange and of price going down below the ico price then everyone is thinking that bounty hunters selling their token. But I am not totally agree about it. May be some bounty hunters can sell their token but its not more effective. Bounty hunters also know the project possibilities and they also know that what is the worth of holding coin. So bounty hunters is not only the responsibility of dump. Its a bad marketing or so many AIRDROPs token is responsible. Airdrop is different from bounty. In airdrop you get free token but in the bounty you need to do a task for getting token. So if project is based on the airdrop then it could be bad.

[renemagritte]

Both and neither of them. There are flippers, who invest in ICOs then sell when they're released to the exchanges. But there are hodlers too. Also some bounty hunters hodl their coins (I hodl some projects I trust).

But actually everyone is here for big returns. If they earn something, they will sell and we cannot say anything about it.

But to be honest, I'm pretty mad at ICO investors who sell for 10-20% profit. ICOs were giving 3x 5x returns you idiots. Just find a good project and wait a little. (and a good market of course) 

[Bitknick]

In my opinion, it is not fair to blame bounty hunters, because the amount of coins they receive is not enough to manipulate the project!

[wizardcrypto]

l must agree with you that bounty hunters are not the real dumpers but earliest investors are the real dumpers. my my personal research l made so far without bounty , we still experience dump on the market. looking at the statistics of percentage been award to bounty hunters is very minima compare to the investors  and team . most dumps comes from earliest investors because they buy are very low price and they have huge percentage of them selling at the same time . also out of greed some team member dump the coin and leave the project and the if they are the key persons on the project you will see a steady dump continuously without any hope of reversal.

[67semih]

I think most of the dumpers are bounty hunters. They can sell their tokens for very cheap prices. And also you are right. The early investors can do the same..

[passeroutpass]

I'm sure it's the bounty hunters. In most cases, those people who participate in the bounty are absolutely illiterate and do not understand the cryptocurrency market. They do not hesitate to sell all their coins, and try to do it faster than other members of the bounty campaign.

[Gabri]

Did you pay attention to the number of tokens that are sold on the exchange? Practically always they correspond to awards which were received by hunters. And investors are waiting for the time when the token will rise in price. So very often the price is brought down by the bounty hunters.

[daglordjames]

for me most of the bounty hunter's drop their coins early because when they see that the price of the token goes down then they're going to dump it all.

[gurunanakji777]

Every time we can not blame bounty hunters that bounty hunters dump the coins. But every ICO does not give huge bonuses there can be some other reasons as well on the other hand we can say who bought huge amount of tokens during ICO with bonus they can also affect the market to sell their coins for meager profit. But on the contrary some bounty hunters does not hold the coins they sell their coins immediately the moment coin get listed on the exchange. In my opinion both dumps according to the market conditions.

[sinkfish]

Bounty hunters could be the 1st, bounty hunters would not have much information compare earlier investor. investor usually wait for the market move abit before they start releasing their coin.

[Britva2018]

Its so sad when we have been made to believe its bounty hunters who dump their bounty tokens immediately after ICO and so devalue the coins on the market. Because of this notion, project managers these days try to delay bounty rewards while some even go ahead to give small rewards so that the actions of bounty hunters will not affect the price of their coins. Now I participated in this bounty and we were paid late as usual. We went to the market and realized the price was already down, even below the ICO price. So who caused it ? I think we should have a second look at this issue. Don't you think its the investors who get bonuses during the ICO who try to dump their bonuses for profit and not the bounty hunters as we have been made to believe?. Let me hear your opinions guys

Of course investors throw the received bonus during ICO. Imagine you bought tokens at $100,000 and got a + 50% bonus from the purchased, what would you do? I will answer for myself: I would sell the bonus without hesitation!!!  So do investors, I'm sure.

[ven7net]

You are absolutely right! Mostly tokens or coins are poured out by early investors or funds, which entered at the beginning of the ICO and received an excellent discount of up to 50%, and sometimes more. Next, let's turn our attention to the number of tokens allocated to the bounty program. This percentage of tokens can not significantly affect the price of the token on the stock exchanges, because if ico was successful and the product is right and promising, tokens usually buy up than raise the price even higher. And if the price falls and falls aimingly, then of course it is not a matter of the bounty participants. It's just very convenient for many ico to blame the bounty participants for their failure.