★[ANN] [Fatecoin] [FATE] IS ON YOUR SIDE! No Premine - CPU Friendly★

[serje]

wth? I had over 3k FATE immature in my wallet. When I closed and reopened the wallet, there's nothing there.

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 22-02-2014 20:00
Source: Generated
Credit: (not accepted)
Net amount: 0.00 FATE
Transaction ID: 4df8f061c9f4bf47775e2121301fc3df0561bfa10b32b13b8682412ae77bbcf8

Generated coins must mature 80 blocks before they can be spent. When you generated this block, it was broadcast to the network to be added to the block chain. If it fails to get into the chain, its state will change to "not accepted" and it won't be spendable. This may occasionally happen if another node generates a block within a few seconds of yours.

I'm out.

someone deleted some blocks!!!! That's why they dissapeared!

62 blocks? That is all I mined so far and all the blocks show as 0/unconfirmed.

40 minutes ago we were at block 268 now we are only at 280 .... yeah ... a lot of blocks!

But how is it possible when I see 3k FATE immature in my wallet and when I close and reopen the wallet the immature is gone. That hardly took 30 seconds.

I don't know mate

30s/block (The entire network)

so they deleted around 70 blocks!

don't know why tho!

I just did the math!

[turboseed]

FOUND over 80+ blocks...... ALL REJECTS!
MISSING BLOCKS /DELETED...
THIS COIN IS EITHER BROKEN OR A SCAM!!!

[Prominence]

Probably forked and a scam

Or this is a feature to test your fate.

[sabyd]

Hope the wallet is not full of undetectable viruses.

[qunity3d]

Prompt how mining on linux example?

[baokychen]

I think we need to be caution with this kind of new scam coin.

[turboseed]

300 blocks now on the wallet......
I have had over 90 rejects..... the margin of this being a coincidence is not possible. I should have had at least 20-30 confirms.

AGAIN,    FORKED OR SCAM!!!

[serje]

We should not participate in any new launch!

This way they will treat us with respect!
Because at this moment they abuse us! Because they know we want to be millionaires in a new coin and they fuck us!

We need to stand together and show then that we can survive without their scam coins!

[hadi]

when launch timeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee?

[serje]

There is no fate coin! good bye everyone!

[EpsiloNs11]

OMG LOL FAIL ----->

36 pure core (Opteron 4171 * 4 + core i5 2400) = 0 FATE (OMG!!!)

9 * R9280X + 3 R9270X = 1 Acepted (42 fate)

------->
I AM OUT

FU DEV!

[Snard]

Wow...lots of misinformation here. I have nothing to do with this coin other than attempting to mine it. I too think its a shitty release, but there is info being posted that is just wrong.

so they deleted around 70 blocks!

don't know why tho!

Noone deleted blocks. You can't do that.  You probably mined some blocks and then later they were orphaned because someone beat you to it.  This is normal with any new coin that has low difficulty.

For those getting tons of rejects, once again this is normal with a new coin that has low diff. People with higher hash power are just beating you to the solution.  You don't know because you are using getwork and submit the solution anyway even when its too late.  A reject is given.  This is normal.

This coin is not premined. Look at the transactions and not the value field of the block. That value field is non-standard and appears to be something added by the dev.  Regardless, its reporting back incorrect info.  Always check the transactions as that is what contains that actual value for the coinbase (mined block).

The source code is a mess and can't compile in linux.  Not sure what the dev did, but obviously never tested his modifications in linux. I started patching the source and then just gave up.

People are saying the coin is forked? What is the proof of that or you just saying things for the sake of saying it?

Blocks are indeed being mined.  I personally mined 3 of them. See here:



I too am getting tons of rejects, which is normal.

[fatecoin]

This coin is officially dead - scam coin for me until somebody proofs that it works... NOBODY STILL GOT A FUCKING FATECOIN.

please be patient someone already get few coins,just continue mining you will get some surprise. It is really 0 premine and work well.

[Snard]

please be patient someone already get few coins,just continue mining you will get some surprise. It is really 0 premine and work well.

How about you fix the linux source code? Many of us have no desire to work in Windows.

[serje]

Wow...lots of misinformation here. I have nothing to do with this coin other than attempting to mine it. I too think its a shitty release, but there is info being posted that is just wrong.

so they deleted around 70 blocks!

don't know why tho!

Noone deleted blocks. You can't do that.  You probably mined some blocks and then later they were orphaned because someone beat you to it.  This is normal with any new coin that has low difficulty.

For those getting tons of rejects, once again this is normal with a new coin that has low diff. People with higher hash power are just beating you to the solution.  You don't know because you are using getwork and submit the solution anyway even when its too late.  A reject is given.  This is normal.

This coin is not premined. Look at the transactions and not the value field of the block. That value field is non-standard and appears to be something added by the dev.  Regardless, its reporting back incorrect info.  Always check the transactions as that is what contains that actual value for the coinbase (mined block).

The source code is a mess and can't compile in linux.  Not sure what the dev did, but obviously never tested his modifications in linux. I started patching the source and then just gave up.

People are saying the coin is forked? What is the proof of that or you just saying things for the sake of saying it?

Blocks are indeed being mined.  I personally mined 3 of them. See here:



I too am getting tons of rejects, which is normal.

well I don't know how I can mine more blocks that someone who has bigger power than me!!! Maybe you would like to explain !

at this right moment my qt is on block 314! and in your photo you are at 280+

[fatecoin]

how to fix this

make: *** [obj/rpcblockchain.o] Error 1

Pls copy *.so files to usr / lib folder.

If you os is 64bit ubuntu, pls run:
sudo apt-get install ia32-libs

[fatecoin]

still only rejects? any one any accepts?

Is this coin really 4 billion premined?

no premined at all will release the block check later,dont worry.

[fatecoin]

cgminer doesn't work...

You can compile by yourself,the official cgminer will be remove later,sorry for this.

[Amalker]

Wow...lots of misinformation here. I have nothing to do with this coin other than attempting to mine it. I too think its a shitty release, but there is info being posted that is just wrong.

so they deleted around 70 blocks!

don't know why tho!

Noone deleted blocks. You can't do that.  You probably mined some blocks and then later they were orphaned because someone beat you to it.  This is normal with any new coin that has low difficulty.

For those getting tons of rejects, once again this is normal with a new coin that has low diff. People with higher hash power are just beating you to the solution.  You don't know because you are using getwork and submit the solution anyway even when its too late.  A reject is given.  This is normal.

This coin is not premined. Look at the transactions and not the value field of the block. That value field is non-standard and appears to be something added by the dev.  Regardless, its reporting back incorrect info.  Always check the transactions as that is what contains that actual value for the coinbase (mined block).

The source code is a mess and can't compile in linux.  Not sure what the dev did, but obviously never tested his modifications in linux. I started patching the source and then just gave up.

People are saying the coin is forked? What is the proof of that or you just saying things for the sake of saying it?

Blocks are indeed being mined.  I personally mined 3 of them. See here:



I too am getting tons of rejects, which is normal.

what miner do you use??

[Snard]

Pls copy *.so files to usr / lib folder.

If you os is 64bit ubuntu, pls run:
sudo apt-get install ia32-libs

This wont fix it. It appears to be your attempt to add the value of the generated block to the block structure.  Only way I could get past that error was to remove the  Value field from rpcblockchain.cpp.  That number is reported wrong anyway, so no need to keep it.  That will fix compilation for a while but it eventually fails

See the errors:

Code:

rpcblockchain.cpp: In function 'json_spirit::Object blockToJSON(const CBlock&, const CBlockIndex*)':
rpcblockchain.cpp:56:60: error: conversion from 'const int64 {aka const long long int}' to 'const Value_type {aka const json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> > >}' is ambiguous
rpcblockchain.cpp:56:60: note: candidates are:
json/json_spirit_value.h:283:5: note: json_spirit::Value_impl<Config>::Value_impl(double) [with Config = json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> >]
json/json_spirit_value.h:275:5: note: json_spirit::Value_impl<Config>::Value_impl(uint64_t) [with Config = json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> >, uint64_t = long unsigned int]
json/json_spirit_value.h:267:5: note: json_spirit::Value_impl<Config>::Value_impl(int64_t) [with Config = json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> >, int64_t = long int]
json/json_spirit_value.h:259:5: note: json_spirit::Value_impl<Config>::Value_impl(int) [with Config = json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> >]
json/json_spirit_value.h:251:5: note: json_spirit::Value_impl<Config>::Value_impl(bool) [with Config = json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> >]
json/json_spirit_value.h:219:5: note: json_spirit::Value_impl<Config>::Value_impl(json_spirit::Value_impl<Config>::Const_str_ptr) [with Config = json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> >, json_spirit::Value_impl<Config>::Const_str_ptr = const char*] <near match>
json/json_spirit_value.h:219:5: note:   no known conversion for argument 1 from 'const int64 {aka const long long int}' to 'const char*'
json/json_spirit_value.h:439:5: error:   initializing argument 2 of 'json_spirit::Pair_impl<Config>::Pair_impl(const String_type&, const Value_type&) [with Config = json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> >, json_spirit::Pair_impl<Config>::String_type = std::basic_string<char>, json_spirit::Pair_impl<Config>::Value_type = json_spirit::Value_impl<json_spirit::Config_vector<std::basic_string<char> > >]'
make: *** [obj/rpcblockchain.o] Error 1