|
seriouscoin (OP)
|
 |
February 17, 2014, 04:54:46 PM |
|
This is bad, Dogechain is officially forked. Pools operators are mining on different blockchains.
Do not send your dogecoins until the pools agree on one blockchain.
Last time when a fork happened to Feathercoin, the whole currency went down the toilet. :/ This is due to greed ppl. Stupid miners mine on one fcking large pool
|
|
|
|
|
yuriygeorge
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 262
Merit: 250
I hate my family
|
|
February 17, 2014, 08:34:58 PM |
|
So when should I withdraw coins from an exchange? Should I wait until it settles, or should I gamble taking some out now on my 1.5 client?
|
|
|
|
|
Korean
|
|
February 17, 2014, 08:40:32 PM |
|
51%?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nullu
|
|
February 17, 2014, 08:44:40 PM |
|
This is bad, Dogechain is officially forked. Pools operators are mining on different blockchains.
Do not send your dogecoins until the pools agree on one blockchain.
Last time when a fork happened to Feathercoin, the whole currency went down the toilet. :/ This is due to greed ppl. Stupid miners mine on one fcking large pool
I don't blame the miners. |
BTC - 14kYyhhWZwSJFHAjNTtyhRVSu157nE92gF
|
|
|
|
WompRat
|
|
February 17, 2014, 08:48:29 PM |
|
The 1.5 client is fine. The issue is with the 1.4 client which some pools were using because of performance issues with 1.5. The pools are now switching to 1.5 or implementing the fix. All the exchanges are running 1.5 as far as I am aware, Cryptsy certainly is. This wasn't a 51% attack. Technical summary here: http://www.reddit.com/r/dogecoin/comments/1y5quc/serious_pool_owners_and_community_we_need_your/No need to panic, though I think it would be appropriate to try to get a version of 1.5 that solves the pool miner's issues out as soon as possible. |
|
|
|
|
flounderella
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Bitcoin Evengelist
|
|
February 17, 2014, 09:57:20 PM |
|
My God! Who in their right minds would fork Dogecoin. What monsters out there!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Hazard
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 17, 2014, 10:00:24 PM |
|
Bravo, dogecoin devs! Incompetent as always.
|
|
|
|
PyroClasTix
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
February 17, 2014, 10:00:42 PM |
|
Any update on this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
WompRat
|
|
February 17, 2014, 10:31:31 PM |
|
Bravo, dogecoin devs! Incompetent as always.
I think it is a bit early for blaming people Hazard. From what I have seen there were no issues with the 1.4 version of dogecoin which was running the Luckycoin code. When they upgraded to the Litecoin code in 1.5, it appears several mining pools encountered problems. It is quite possible that these performance problems that caused the pools to revert to 1.4 exist in Litecoin too. In retrospect perhaps they should have realized the potential problems of running 2 different databases (BerkeleyDB and LevelDB) and made the upgrade mandatory or issued a 1.4 fix then, especially given bitcoin had the same issue, but they probably weren't aware so many pools had reverted. The devs are working on the reasons why 1.5 is slow for pools, but otherwise I think we can consider this fixed. |
|
|
|
|
|
wasamata
|
|
February 17, 2014, 10:55:24 PM |
|
wish the idiot dumping would get a life, or maybe find the highest window  what a bunch of doge pussies |
|
|
|
|
|
achillez
|
|
February 17, 2014, 11:00:30 PM |
|
so fork so fail so dogecoin
|
|
|
|
|
|
wasamata
|
|
February 17, 2014, 11:03:37 PM |
|
such trolling
much failing
|
|
|
|
|
|
bramvnl
|
|
February 17, 2014, 11:20:09 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
iampingu
|
|
February 17, 2014, 11:25:53 PM |
|
Bravo, dogecoin devs! Incompetent as always.
I think it is a bit early for blaming people Hazard. From what I have seen there were no issues with the 1.4 version of dogecoin which was running the Luckycoin code. When they upgraded to the Litecoin code in 1.5, it appears several mining pools encountered problems. It is quite possible that these performance problems that caused the pools to revert to 1.4 exist in Litecoin too. In retrospect perhaps they should have realized the potential problems of running 2 different databases (BerkeleyDB and LevelDB) and made the upgrade mandatory or issued a 1.4 fix then, especially given bitcoin had the same issue, but they probably weren't aware so many pools had reverted. The devs are working on the reasons why 1.5 is slow for pools, but otherwise I think we can consider this fixed. Hazard is usually correct |
|
|
|
|
Ximp
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
CS Student - BC Logo Guy
|
|
February 17, 2014, 11:31:40 PM |
|
Bravo, dogecoin devs! Incompetent as always.
At least they don't shill for scam artists! I'll take incompetent over a corrupt writing hack any day! |
|
|
|
|
Hazard
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 17, 2014, 11:34:53 PM |
|
Bravo, dogecoin devs! Incompetent as always.
I think it is a bit early for blaming people Hazard. From what I have seen there were no issues with the 1.4 version of dogecoin which was running the Luckycoin code. When they upgraded to the Litecoin code in 1.5, it appears several mining pools encountered problems. It is quite possible that these performance problems that caused the pools to revert to 1.4 exist in Litecoin too. In retrospect perhaps they should have realized the potential problems of running 2 different databases (BerkeleyDB and LevelDB) and made the upgrade mandatory or issued a 1.4 fix then, especially given bitcoin had the same issue, but they probably weren't aware so many pools had reverted. The devs are working on the reasons why 1.5 is slow for pools, but otherwise I think we can consider this fixed. If you're at the helm of a coin with a $70m market cap, and you push out an update plagued by a well documented issue... Might be time to find a new hobby. I imagine some exchanges are going to get burned hard by this fork. Ah, who am I kidding... The dogedevs probably weren't even around when bitcoin was struck by this issue. |
|
|
|
Ximp
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
CS Student - BC Logo Guy
|
|
February 17, 2014, 11:39:56 PM |
|
Hey Hazard, how's Stablecoin doing? |
|
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
February 17, 2014, 11:47:57 PM |
|
My God! Who in their right minds would fork Dogecoin. What monsters out there!!!
ME  i will ensure your scam coin is dead.. see my sig too  |
FUD first & ask questions later™ |
|
|
|
wasamata
|
|
February 18, 2014, 12:46:57 AM |
|
My God! Who in their right minds would fork Dogecoin. What monsters out there!!!
ME i will ensure your scam coin is dead.. see my sig too How nice of you, you sound like such a lovely person! How about you try this: Go Fork Yourself! |
|
|
|
|
jubalix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1022
|
|
February 18, 2014, 12:56:26 AM
Last edit: February 18, 2014, 01:06:34 AM by jubalix |
|
its ok, BTC got through this, and went on stronger just a cheap coins event.
FTC was forked for a different reason.
The devs may want to think about how LTC has attracted real talent, e.g. wogtami.
I am sure Doge can raise a massive dev fund, 1doge's for a dev fund that will attract some quality talent.
|
|
|
|
|
