miniZv2.3c Equihash144,5 125,4 210,9 150,5 192,7 Beam ProgPoW Ethash CFX KLS PYI

[ChewbaccaBG]

Doesn't work for me either - CFX + ZIL ---> all zil shares rejected

Running miner: miniz-v2.0c3
Options: --nvidia --url=stratum+tcp://cfx:Wallet.rigName@pool.eu.woolypooly.com:3094 --url=zilWallet.rigName@eu.crazypool.org:5005 --shares-detail --show-shares --stat-int=5 --dag-fix --extra --forcenvml --pass=x

************ miniZ v2.0c3 ************
Number of miniZ CUDA>=[.] using driver CUDA[11.60] devices found: 3
Driver:               510.60
Algo:              EQ[octopus] [smart-pers]
Pool#0:       user[cfx:Wallet.rigName] server[pool.eu.woolypooly.com] port[3094] ssl[no] pers[cfx]
Pool#1:       user[zilWallet.rigName] server[eu.crazypool.org] port[5005] ssl[no] pers[zil]
Telemetry:    [http://localhost:20000]
Temp. limit:  [90C]
[INFO   ] Mining fee set to 2.00%
miniZ[17:0:00.0: 7821]: Selecting GPU#2[2] Palit 3070
miniZ[17:0:00.0: 7821]: Selecting GPU#1[1] Zotac GeForce RTX 3070
miniZ[17:0:00.0: 7817]: Selecting GPU#0[0] Palit 3070
[INFO   ] GPU[2]: Generating DAG #125 [6095+23=6119MB]
[INFO   ] GPU[1]: Generating DAG #125 [6095+23=6119MB]
[INFO   ] GPU[0]: Generating DAG #125 [6095+23=6119MB]
. . .
. . .
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[ 0d 0h 3m10s] S:  1/0/12 569(569.0)MH/s 1535(1410.4)W [eu.crazypool.org] (48.9%) (51.1%) (0.0%)
  0>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/2 [52C/65%]  51.59(51.59)MH/s 143(130.9)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.394
  1>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/1 [53C/65%]  51.64(51.64)MH/s 136(126.0)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.410
  2>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/2 [57C/65%]* 51.61(51.61)MH/s 138(127.3)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.405
  3>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/1 [49C/65%]* 51.73(51.73)MH/s 143(131.2)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.394
  4>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/0 [54C/65%]  51.21(51.21)MH/s 138(126.2)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.406
  5>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/0 [48C/65%]  51.32(51.32)MH/s 147(134.2)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.382
  6>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/1 [49C/65%]  51.39(51.39)MH/s 137(125.4)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.410
  7>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  1/3 [45C/65%]  52.12(52.12)MH/s 137(127.1)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.410
  8>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/1 [46C/65%]  51.66(51.66)MH/s 142(131.9)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.392
  9>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/1 [48C/65%]  51.37(51.37)MH/s 136(123.6)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.416
 10>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/0 [49C/65%]  51.63(51.63)MH/s 137(126.7)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.408
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share


For ZIL I've tried with ethproxy+tcp:// stratum+tcp:// and without anything - it's the same - all shares rejected.

[1714734201]

1714734201

[1714734201]

1714734201

[sxemini]

Doesn't work for me either - CFX + ZIL ---> all zil shares rejected

Running miner: miniz-v2.0c3
Options: --nvidia --url=stratum+tcp://cfx:Wallet.rigName@pool.eu.woolypooly.com:3094 --url=zilWallet.rigName@eu.crazypool.org:5005 --shares-detail --show-shares --stat-int=5 --dag-fix --extra --forcenvml --pass=x

************ miniZ v2.0c3 ************
Number of miniZ CUDA>=[.] using driver CUDA[11.60] devices found: 3
Driver:               510.60
Algo:              EQ[octopus] [smart-pers]
Pool#0:       user[cfx:Wallet.rigName] server[pool.eu.woolypooly.com] port[3094] ssl[no] pers[cfx]
Pool#1:       user[zilWallet.rigName] server[eu.crazypool.org] port[5005] ssl[no] pers[zil]
Telemetry:    [http://localhost:20000]
Temp. limit:  [90C]
[INFO   ] Mining fee set to 2.00%
miniZ[17:0:00.0: 7821]: Selecting GPU#2[2] Palit 3070
miniZ[17:0:00.0: 7821]: Selecting GPU#1[1] Zotac GeForce RTX 3070
miniZ[17:0:00.0: 7817]: Selecting GPU#0[0] Palit 3070
[INFO   ] GPU[2]: Generating DAG #125 [6095+23=6119MB]
[INFO   ] GPU[1]: Generating DAG #125 [6095+23=6119MB]
[INFO   ] GPU[0]: Generating DAG #125 [6095+23=6119MB]
. . .
. . .
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[ 0d 0h 3m10s] S:  1/0/12 569(569.0)MH/s 1535(1410.4)W [eu.crazypool.org] (48.9%) (51.1%) (0.0%)
  0>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/2 [52C/65%]  51.59(51.59)MH/s 143(130.9)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.394
  1>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/1 [53C/65%]  51.64(51.64)MH/s 136(126.0)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.410
  2>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/2 [57C/65%]* 51.61(51.61)MH/s 138(127.3)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.405
  3>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/1 [49C/65%]* 51.73(51.73)MH/s 143(131.2)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.394
  4>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/0 [54C/65%]  51.21(51.21)MH/s 138(126.2)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.406
  5>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/0 [48C/65%]  51.32(51.32)MH/s 147(134.2)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.382
  6>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/1 [49C/65%]  51.39(51.39)MH/s 137(125.4)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.410
  7>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  1/3 [45C/65%]  52.12(52.12)MH/s 137(127.1)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.410
  8>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/1 [46C/65%]  51.66(51.66)MH/s 142(131.9)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.392
  9>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/1 [48C/65%]  51.37(51.37)MH/s 136(123.6)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.416
 10>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/0 [49C/65%]  51.63(51.63)MH/s 137(126.7)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.408
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share


For ZIL I've tried with ethproxy+tcp:// stratum+tcp:// and without anything - it's the same - all shares rejected.

In my case - the miner accept shares - but the pool response 0 shares. tested flux+zil and btg+zil. cfx+zil test was planned for today. we tested different gpu´s - everytime the same problem.

[miniZ]

Thanks, it works fine, but getstat API responds wrong hashrate when zil mining active.

Hi angelbbs,
Thanks for the feedback.
We're having a look at this.
It should be fixed in the next version.
Cheers

[miniZ]

Flux+Zil is not working für me. Crazypool don´t accept the zil shares, but miniZ miner share accepted  

Os Windows
Driver 522.25

In my case - the miner accept shares - but the pool response 0 shares. tested flux+zil and btg+zil. cfx+zil test was planned for today. we tested different gpu´s - everytime the same problem.

Hi sxemini,
thanks for the feedback.
Could you paste here your command line?
* edit* Also, could you paste here the begining of miner log?
Cheers

[miniZ]

Doesn't work for me either - CFX + ZIL ---> all zil shares rejected

Running miner: miniz-v2.0c3
Options: --nvidia --url=stratum+tcp://cfx:Wallet.rigName@pool.eu.woolypooly.com:3094 --url=zilWallet.rigName@eu.crazypool.org:5005 --shares-detail --show-shares --stat-int=5 --dag-fix --extra --forcenvml --pass=x

************ miniZ v2.0c3 ************
Number of miniZ CUDA>=[.] using driver CUDA[11.60] devices found: 3
Driver:               510.60
Algo:              EQ[octopus] [smart-pers]
Pool#0:       user[cfx:Wallet.rigName] server[pool.eu.woolypooly.com] port[3094] ssl[no] pers[cfx]
Pool#1:       user[zilWallet.rigName] server[eu.crazypool.org] port[5005] ssl[no] pers[zil]
Telemetry:    [http://localhost:20000]
Temp. limit:  [90C]
[INFO   ] Mining fee set to 2.00%
miniZ[17:0:00.0: 7821]: Selecting GPU#2[2] Palit 3070
miniZ[17:0:00.0: 7821]: Selecting GPU#1[1] Zotac GeForce RTX 3070
miniZ[17:0:00.0: 7817]: Selecting GPU#0[0] Palit 3070
[INFO   ] GPU[2]: Generating DAG #125 [6095+23=6119MB]
[INFO   ] GPU[1]: Generating DAG #125 [6095+23=6119MB]
[INFO   ] GPU[0]: Generating DAG #125 [6095+23=6119MB]
. . .
. . .
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[ 0d 0h 3m10s] S:  1/0/12 569(569.0)MH/s 1535(1410.4)W [eu.crazypool.org] (48.9%) (51.1%) (0.0%)
  0>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/2 [52C/65%]  51.59(51.59)MH/s 143(130.9)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.394
  1>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/1 [53C/65%]  51.64(51.64)MH/s 136(126.0)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.410
  2>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/2 [57C/65%]* 51.61(51.61)MH/s 138(127.3)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.405
  3>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/1 [49C/65%]* 51.73(51.73)MH/s 143(131.2)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.394
  4>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/0 [54C/65%]  51.21(51.21)MH/s 138(126.2)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.406
  5>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/0 [48C/65%]  51.32(51.32)MH/s 147(134.2)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.382
  6>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/1 [49C/65%]  51.39(51.39)MH/s 137(125.4)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.410
  7>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  1/3 [45C/65%]  52.12(52.12)MH/s 137(127.1)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.410
  8>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/1 [46C/65%]  51.66(51.66)MH/s 142(131.9)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.392
  9>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/1 [48C/65%]  51.37(51.37)MH/s 136(123.6)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.416
 10>RTX 3070     [17] `S:  0/0 [49C/65%]  51.63(51.63)MH/s 137(126.7)W clk=1200MHz mclk=7550MHz MH/W=0.408
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share
[WARNING] Bad share: Invalid share


For ZIL I've tried with ethproxy+tcp:// stratum+tcp:// and without anything - it's the same - all shares rejected.

Hi ChewbaccaBG,
Thank you for the feedback.
We're having a look at this!
Cheers

[sxemini]

Flux+Zil is not working für me. Crazypool don´t accept the zil shares, but miniZ miner share accepted  

Os Windows
Driver 522.25

In my case - the miner accept shares - but the pool response 0 shares. tested flux+zil and btg+zil. cfx+zil test was planned for today. we tested different gpu´s - everytime the same problem.

Hi sxemini,
thanks for the feedback.
Could you paste here your command line?
* edit* Also, could you paste here the begining of miner log?
Cheers

--avg1=180 --show-mode --par 125,4 -cd 1 --url fluxwallet.test@de.flux.herominers.com:1200 -p x --pers auto --telemetry 0.0.0.0:4031 --url=zilwallet.test@eu.crazypool.org:5005

I will add the beginning of the log later.

EDIT:

This only my testbuild at the moment. You see an accepted share for zil, but the pool say invalid.



************ miniZ v2.0c3 ************
Number of miniZ CUDA>=[.] using driver CUDA[11.80] devices found: 2
miniZ: Excluding GPU#0 Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ: Excluding GPU#2 (TM) R9 380
Number of OpenCL[Tonga] devices found: 1
Driver:      522.25
Algo:      EQ[125,4] [smart-pers]
Pool#0:    user[fluxwallet.test] server[de.flux.herominers.com] port[1200] ssl[no] pers[ZelProof]
Pool#1:    user[zilwallet.test] server[eu.crazypool.org] port[5005] ssl[no] pers[zil]
Telemetry:   [http://localhost:4031]
Logging::    file[C:\Users\RIG-4\AppData\Roaming\AwesomeMinerService\miniz_v2.0c3_win-x64_4\console_output.txt] period[10] delay[0]
Optimisation:   oc1[1 0]
Temp. limit:   [90 C]
[INFO   ] Mining fee set to 2.00%
[WARNING] GPU[1]: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 does not have oc1 for this algo.
miniZ<125,4>[00:0:00.0: 3380]: Selecting GPU#1[0] Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
[ 0d 0h 0m09s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [41 C/94%] 10.11 I/s 20.17(20.17)Sol/s 134(134.0)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.150
[ 0d 0h 0m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [41 C/94%] 10.10 I/s 20.15(20.15)Sol/s 134(134.0)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.150
[ 0d 0h 0m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [43 C/95%]*10.01 I/s 19.97(19.97)Sol/s 132(132.5)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.151
[ 0d 0h 0m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [44 C/95%] 10.04 I/s 19.06(19.06)Sol/s 135(134.8)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.141
[ 0d 0h 0m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [46 C/95%] 10.00 I/s 20.59(20.59)Sol/s 136(136.0)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.151
[ 0d 0h 0m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [47 C/95%] 10.00 I/s 20.88(20.88)Sol/s 136(136.1)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.153
[ 0d 0h 1m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [49 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.18(20.18)Sol/s 136(135.8)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.149
[ 0d 0h 1m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [50 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 19.49(19.49)Sol/s 135(135.3)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.144
[ 0d 0h 1m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [50 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 20.05(20.05)Sol/s 134(134.6)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.149
[ 0d 0h 1m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [51 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 19.73(19.73)Sol/s 133(133.8)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.147
[ 0d 0h 1m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [52 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.01(20.01)Sol/s 132(133.5)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.150
[ 0d 0h 1m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [52 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.80(19.80)Sol/s 132(133.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.149
[ 0d 0h 2m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [53 C/95%]  9.97 I/s 20.12(20.12)Sol/s 134(133.8)W clk=1290MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.150
[ 0d 0h 2m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [53 C/95%]  9.98 I/s 20.00(20.00)Sol/s 134(133.6)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.150
[ 0d 0h 2m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [54 C/95%]  9.98 I/s 19.96(19.96)Sol/s 133(133.5)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.149
[ 0d 0h 2m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [54 C/95%]  9.98 I/s 20.10(20.10)Sol/s 133(133.6)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.151
[ 0d 0h 2m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [55 C/95%]  9.98 I/s 20.11(20.11)Sol/s 133(133.5)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.151
[ 0d 0h 2m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [55 C/95%]  9.98 I/s 20.26(20.26)Sol/s 135(133.9)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.151
[ 0d 0h 3m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [56 C/95%]  9.98 I/s 20.14(20.14)Sol/s 135(134.0)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.150
[ 0d 0h 3m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [56 C/95%]  9.98 I/s 20.03(20.03)Sol/s 135(134.0)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.149
[ 0d 0h 3m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [56 C/95%]  9.98 I/s 20.19(20.19)Sol/s 134(133.9)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.151
[ 0d 0h 3m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [57 C/95%]* 9.98 I/s 20.11(20.11)Sol/s 134(134.0)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.150
[ 0d 0h 3m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [57 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.12(20.12)Sol/s 134(133.9)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.150
[ 0d 0h 3m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [57 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.97(19.97)Sol/s 134(133.9)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.149
[ 0d 0h 4m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [57 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.83(19.83)Sol/s 136(134.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.148
[ 0d 0h 4m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [57 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 19.54(19.54)Sol/s 136(134.4)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.145
[ 0d 0h 4m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [58 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.59(19.59)Sol/s 136(134.5)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.146
[ 0d 0h 4m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [58 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 19.64(19.64)Sol/s 137(134.7)W clk=1316MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.146
[ 0d 0h 4m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [58 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.98(19.98)Sol/s 136(134.7)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.148
[ 0d 0h 4m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [58 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.01(20.01)Sol/s 137(135.0)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.148
[ 0d 0h 5m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [58 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.85(19.85)Sol/s 137(135.1)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.147
[ 0d 0h 5m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [58 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.72(19.72)Sol/s 137(135.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.146
[ 0d 0h 5m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [59 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.45(19.45)Sol/s 138(135.4)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.144
[ 0d 0h 5m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [59 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.64(19.64)Sol/s 138(135.6)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.145
[ 0d 0h 5m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [59 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.76(19.76)Sol/s 138(135.8)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.146
[ 0d 0h 5m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [59 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 19.81(19.81)Sol/s 138(135.9)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.146
[ 0d 0h 6m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [59 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.81(19.81)Sol/s 138(136.0)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.146
[ 0d 0h 6m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [59 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 19.74(19.74)Sol/s 138(136.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.145
[ 0d 0h 6m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [59 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.64(19.64)Sol/s 139(136.3)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.144
[ 0d 0h 6m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [59 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.69(19.69)Sol/s 139(136.4)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.144
[ 0d 0h 6m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [59 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.76(19.76)Sol/s 139(136.5)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.145
[ 0d 0h 6m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.74(19.74)Sol/s 139(136.7)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.144
[ 0d 0h 7m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.93(19.93)Sol/s 139(136.8)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.146
[ 0d 0h 7m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.09(20.09)Sol/s 139(136.9)W clk=1316MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.147
[ 0d 0h 7m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.01(20.01)Sol/s 140(137.0)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.146
[ 0d 0h 7m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.96(19.96)Sol/s 140(137.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.145
[ 0d 0h 7m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 20.18(20.18)Sol/s 140(137.3)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.147
[ 0d 0h 7m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 20.22(20.22)Sol/s 139(137.3)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.147
[ 0d 0h 8m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 20.39(20.39)Sol/s 139(137.4)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.148
[ 0d 0h 8m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 20.37(20.37)Sol/s 138(137.4)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.148
[ 0d 0h 8m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.21(20.21)Sol/s 138(137.4)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.147
[ 0d 0h 8m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.12(20.12)Sol/s 138(137.5)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.146
[ 0d 0h 8m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.05(20.05)Sol/s 138(137.5)W clk=1290MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.146
[ 0d 0h 8m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.82(19.82)Sol/s 138(137.5)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.144
[ 0d 0h 9m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.89(19.89)Sol/s 139(137.6)W clk=1316MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.145
[ 0d 0h 9m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.82(19.82)Sol/s 139(137.6)W clk=1316MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.144
[ 0d 0h 9m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.91(19.91)Sol/s 139(137.7)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.145
[ 0d 0h 9m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.84(19.84)Sol/s 139(137.7)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.144
[ 0d 0h 9m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.97(19.97)Sol/s 139(137.7)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.145
[ 0d 0h 9m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.93(19.93)Sol/s 139(137.8)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.145
[ 0d 0h10m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.41(20.41)Sol/s 139(137.8)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.148
[ 0d 0h10m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.30(20.30)Sol/s 139(137.9)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.147
[ 0d 0h10m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.45(20.45)Sol/s 140(138.0)W clk=1316MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.148
[ 0d 0h10m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.34(20.34)Sol/s 140(138.0)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.147
[ 0d 0h10m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.13(20.13)Sol/s 140(138.1)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.146
[ 0d 0h10m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.07(20.07)Sol/s 140(138.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.145
[ 0d 0h11m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.14(20.14)Sol/s 140(138.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.146
[ 0d 0h11m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.14(20.14)Sol/s 140(138.3)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.146
[ 0d 0h11m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 20.19(20.19)Sol/s 140(138.3)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.146
[ 0d 0h11m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.80(19.80)Sol/s 141(138.5)W clk=1316MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.143
[ 0d 0h11m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.77(19.77)Sol/s 141(138.5)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.143
[ 0d 0h11m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.91(19.91)Sol/s 141(138.6)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.144
[ 0d 0h12m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.72(19.72)Sol/s 141(138.6)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.142
[ 0d 0h12m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.82(19.82)Sol/s 141(138.7)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.143
[ 0d 0h12m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.55(19.55)Sol/s 141(138.8)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.141
[ 0d 0h12m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.17(19.17)Sol/s 141(138.8)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.138
[ 0d 0h12m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.26(19.26)Sol/s 141(138.9)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.139
[ 0d 0h12m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.08(19.08)Sol/s 141(138.9)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.137
[ 0d 0h13m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 19.09(19.09)Sol/s 141(139.0)W clk=1290MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.137
[ 0d 0h13m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.30(19.30)Sol/s 141(139.0)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.139
[ 0d 0h13m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 19.49(19.49)Sol/s 141(139.0)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.140
[ 0d 0h13m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.33(19.33)Sol/s 140(139.1)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.139
[ 0d 0h13m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.47(19.47)Sol/s 141(139.1)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.140
[ 0d 0h13m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.44(19.44)Sol/s 140(139.1)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.140
[ 0d 0h14m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.39(19.39)Sol/s 140(139.1)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.139
[ 0d 0h14m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.70(19.70)Sol/s 140(139.1)W clk=1290MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.142
[ 0d 0h14m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.85(19.85)Sol/s 139(139.1)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.143
[ 0d 0h14m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.76(19.76)Sol/s 139(139.1)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.142
[ 0d 0h14m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [62 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.85(19.85)Sol/s 138(139.1)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.143
[ 0d 0h14m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [62 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.78(19.78)Sol/s 139(139.1)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.142
[ 0d 0h15m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [62 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.78(19.78)Sol/s 139(139.1)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.142
[ 0d 0h15m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.90(19.90)Sol/s 140(139.1)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.143
[ 0d 0h15m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.80(19.80)Sol/s 140(139.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.142
[ 0d 0h15m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [62 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 19.71(19.71)Sol/s 139(139.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.142
[ 0d 0h15m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 19.72(19.72)Sol/s 140(139.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.142
[ 0d 0h15m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.66(19.66)Sol/s 140(139.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.141
[ 0d 0h16m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [62 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.52(19.52)Sol/s 140(139.2)W clk=1290MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.140
[ 0d 0h16m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [62 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.33(19.33)Sol/s 139(139.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.139
[ 0d 0h16m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.68(19.68)Sol/s 139(139.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.141
[ 0d 0h16m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.67(19.67)Sol/s 139(139.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.141
[ 0d 0h16m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.47(19.47)Sol/s 139(139.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.140
[ 0d 0h16m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.51(19.51)Sol/s 139(139.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.140
[ 0d 0h17m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.69(19.69)Sol/s 139(139.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.141
[ 0d 0h17m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.48(19.48)Sol/s 139(139.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.140
[ 0d 0h17m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.32(19.32)Sol/s 139(139.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.139
[ 0d 0h17m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 18.98(18.98)Sol/s 139(139.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.136
[ 0d 0h17m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.17(19.17)Sol/s 139(139.2)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.138
[ 0d 0h17m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [62 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.38(19.38)Sol/s 138(139.1)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.139
[ 0d 0h18m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.27(19.27)Sol/s 138(139.1)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.139
[ 0d 0h18m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.19(19.19)Sol/s 135(139.0)W clk=1290MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.138
[ 0d 0h18m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 19.37(19.37)Sol/s 135(138.9)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.139
[ 0d 0h18m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 19.42(19.42)Sol/s 135(138.8)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.140
[ 0d 0h18m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.59(19.59)Sol/s 135(138.8)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.141
[ 0d 0h18m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]* 9.99 I/s 19.60(19.60)Sol/s 136(138.7)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.141
[ 0d 0h19m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [62 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.50(19.50)Sol/s 136(138.7)W clk=1290MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.141
[ 0d 0h19m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.51(19.51)Sol/s 137(138.7)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.141
[ 0d 0h19m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [62 C/95%]  9.99 I/s 19.74(19.74)Sol/s 137(138.7)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.142
miniZ<125,4>[00:0:00.0: 3380]: Selecting GPU#1[0] Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
[ 0d 0h19m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [58 C/97%]  0.00(0.00)H/s 101(137.5)W clk=1366MHz mclk=3801MHz H/W=0.000
[INFO   ] GPU[1]: Generating DAG #0 [1023+15=1039MB]
[WARNING] GPU[01] Memory capped at 399MB
[WARNING] GPU[01] DAG cache disabled (399MB).
[INFO   ] GPU[1]: Generated DAG in 2.702
[ 0d 0h19m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  17.58(17.58)MH/s 116(137.5)W clk=1366MHz mclk=3801MHz MH/W=0.128
[ 0d 0h19m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  20.92(20.92)MH/s 125(137.4)W clk=1366MHz mclk=3801MHz MH/W=0.152
[ 0d 0h20m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  21.76(21.76)MH/s 129(137.4)W clk=1366MHz mclk=3801MHz MH/W=0.158
[ 0d 0h20m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  22.10(22.10)MH/s 134(137.4)W clk=1366MHz mclk=3801MHz MH/W=0.161
[ 0d 0h20m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  22.36(22.36)MH/s 135(137.4)W clk=1366MHz mclk=3801MHz MH/W=0.163
[ 0d 0h20m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  22.42(22.42)MH/s 135(137.4)W clk=1366MHz mclk=3801MHz MH/W=0.163
[ 0d 0h20m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  22.46(22.46)MH/s 136(137.4)W clk=1366MHz mclk=3801MHz MH/W=0.163
[ 0d 0h20m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  22.48(22.48)MH/s 136(137.3)W clk=1366MHz mclk=3801MHz MH/W=0.164
[ 0d 0h21m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  22.51(22.51)MH/s 136(137.3)W clk=1366MHz mclk=3801MHz MH/W=0.164
[ 0d 0h21m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]* 22.54(22.54)MH/s 136(137.3)W clk=1366MHz mclk=3801MHz MH/W=0.164
[ 0d 0h21m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  22.55(22.55)MH/s 136(137.3)W clk=1366MHz mclk=3801MHz MH/W=0.164
[ 0d 0h21m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%] 48.35 I/s 16.84(16.84)Sol/s 138(137.3)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.123
[ 0d 0h21m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%] 45.09 I/s 17.25(17.25)Sol/s 138(137.3)W clk=1290MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.126
[ 0d 0h21m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%] 42.10 I/s 17.55(17.55)Sol/s 139(137.3)W clk=1316MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.128
[ 0d 0h22m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%] 36.87 I/s 17.83(17.83)Sol/s 139(137.4)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.130
[ 0d 0h22m10s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%] 34.58 I/s 18.00(18.00)Sol/s 140(137.4)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.131
[ 0d 0h22m20s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%] 32.49 I/s 17.99(17.99)Sol/s 139(137.4)W clk=1290MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.131
[ 0d 0h22m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [61 C/95%]*30.57 I/s 18.77(18.77)Sol/s 140(137.5)W clk=1303MHz mclk=3801MHz Sol/W=0.137

[miniZ]

************ miniZ v2.0c3 ************
Number of miniZ CUDA>=[.] using driver CUDA[11.80] devices found: 2
miniZ: Excluding GPU#0 Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
miniZ: Excluding GPU#2 (TM) R9 380
Number of OpenCL[Tonga] devices found: 1
Driver:      522.25
Algo:      EQ[125,4] [smart-pers]
Pool#0:    user[fluxwallet.test] server[de.flux.herominers.com] port[1200] ssl[no] pers[ZelProof]
Pool#1:    user[zilwallet.test] server[eu.crazypool.org] port[5005] ssl[no] pers[zil]
Telemetry:   [http://localhost:4031]
Logging::    file[C:\Users\RIG-4\AppData\Roaming\AwesomeMinerService\miniz_v2.0c3_win-x64_4\console_output.txt] period[10] delay[0]
Optimisation:   oc1[1 0]
Temp. limit:   [90 C]
[INFO   ] Mining fee set to 2.00%
[WARNING] GPU[1]: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 does not have oc1 for this algo.
miniZ<125,4>[00:0:00.0: 3380]: Selecting GPU#1[0] Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
miniZ<125,4>[00:0:00.0: 3380]: Selecting GPU#1[0] Nvidia GeForce GTX 970

[ 0d 0h19m30s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [58 C/97%]  0.00(0.00)H/s 101(137.5)W clk=1366MHz mclk=3801MHz H/W=0.000
[INFO   ] GPU[1]: Generating DAG #0 [1023+15=1039MB]
[WARNING] GPU[01] Memory capped at 399MB
[WARNING] GPU[01] DAG cache disabled (399MB).
[INFO   ] GPU[1]: Generated DAG in 2.702
[ 0d 0h19m40s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  17.58(17.58)MH/s 116(137.5)W clk=1366MHz mclk=3801MHz MH/W=0.128
[ 0d 0h19m50s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  20.92(20.92)MH/s 125(137.4)W clk=1366MHz mclk=3801MHz MH/W=0.152
[ 0d 0h20m00s] 1>GTX 970[00]  100% [60 C/95%]  21.76(21.76)MH/s 129(137.4)W clk=1366MHz mclk=3801MHz MH/W=0.158

Hi sxemini,
thank you for the feedback.
The message you left on Twitter is also regarding this GPU? CFX mining should be fixed now.
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 has only 4GB memory, this is not enough for Flux+Zil mining.
This can cause a DAG cut that corrupts the solution that is sent to pool. -  [WARNING] GPU[01] Memory capped at 399MB
For dual mining  with this GPU you can try 144,5 + ZIL for example.  Or even progpow + ZIL.
Let us know how it goes.
Cheers

[miniZ]

Hi everyone,

A new miniZ version v2.0c4 is out with ZMP support, and few new options for ZIL mining.

Please find the miniZ v2.0c4 version @ Download page.
 



Changelog:
* Added support for ZMP. *
* Added --memoffset2, --coreoffset2, and --power2 options for setting OCs for ZIL dual mining.* *
* Added --zil-init option for miniZ to generate, and log, Zil dag at startup.
* Fixed issue with invalid shares with ZIL mining.
* Fixed issue with CFX + ZIL mining.
* Fixed issue with 150,5 invalid shares.
* Fixed issue with progpow invalid shares.

*  For zmp support you can write --url=zmp://ZIL_Wallet.Worker_Name@server
* * Sudo (Linux)/administrator privileges (Windows) required.

Check if the option --autoclocks works for you, it can be very useful for changing OC settings during dual mining.

For additional information check our Usage or FAQ pages.

Download miniZ latest version here.

Engage, feedback and support:

Because your feedback is very important, miniZ kindly encourages you to use the comment box on the website or this forum for feedback (questions, suggestions, requests...).

We wish you a fast and friendly mining experience!
 

[miniZ]

Hi everyone,

A new miniZ version v2.0c5 is out with fix for OC/power options that were having a few issues.

Please find the miniZ v2.0c5 version @ Download page.
 



Changelog:
 * Fixed gpuoffset/memoffset/power options that were not working properly.
 * Fixed gpuoffset2/memoffset2/power2 options for dual mining.


Check if the option --autoclocks works for you, it can be very useful for changing OC settings during dual mining.

For additional information check our Usage or FAQ pages.

Download miniZ latest version here.

Engage, feedback and support:

Because your feedback is very important, miniZ kindly encourages you to use the comment box on the website or this forum for feedback (questions, suggestions, requests...).

We wish you a fast and friendly mining experience!
 

[Divinity666]

What is --jobtimeout max setting? Tried =999 but it certainly doesn't work because I had message(in pool's stats stream) that I was reconnected to the pool in less than 15 minutes if there is not a single share submitted.

[deedeeranged]

What is --jobtimeout max setting? Tried =999 but it certainly doesn't work because I had message(in pool's stats stream) that I was reconnected to the pool in less than 15 minutes if there is not a single share submitted.

It would be more helpfull if you would give some more details, like videocard, pool and settings used.

[Divinity666]

I'm mostly encounter it with my 6800xt in my PC, because in rigs I've got 6-8 cards so share rate is higher, but it can be any videocard. Im mining flux at Herominiers and use big share size(24ksol) because overall it gives higher h\r, but sometimes when it's taking too long to find a share it would disconnect\reconnect from pool. I tried settings like 0 or 60 - and they work, with 0 you disconnect\reconnect after 10-15 seconds and then it starts doing it constantly. With 60 its like the same 10-15 second buffer + 60, but if I use like 999 or 9999 or something in between it seems it doesn't work because I get disconnect\reconnect sooner than it's supposed to. And I mean even with 999 seconds setting it shouldn't get any disconnects because single 6800xt finds a share sooner than that with 24ksol sharediff.

[deedeeranged]

I'm mostly encounter it with my 6800xt in my PC, because in rigs I've got 6-8 cards so share rate is higher, but it can be any videocard. Im mining flux at Herominiers and use big share size(24ksol) because overall it gives higher h\r, but sometimes when it's taking too long to find a share it would disconnect\reconnect from pool. I tried settings like 0 or 60 - and they work, with 0 you disconnect\reconnect after 10-15 seconds and then it starts doing it constantly. With 60 its like the same 10-15 second buffer + 60, but if I use like 999 or 9999 or something in between it seems it doesn't work because I get disconnect\reconnect sooner than it's supposed to. And I mean even with 999 seconds setting it shouldn't get any disconnects because single 6800xt finds a share sooner than that with 24ksol sharediff.

Do yu actually need to use --jobtimeout? Just curious.
As it is with the videocard in your PC have you tried a different miner(s) or pool(s) just to see if  it still happens.
It might be a driver issue or something else, I know its a bummer to troubleshoot but I have no experience with mining flux and my last use of miniZ is abt a year ago.

Hope this triggers some other people with more miniZ experience to help you.

[Divinity666]

Well its basically same as not using --jobtimeout at all. Unless you use small values(like 0-120 or so) that it happens sooner - so they work. Really high values seem not to work though.

[deedeeranged]

Well its basically same as not using --jobtimeout at all. Unless you use small values(like 0-120 or so) that it happens sooner - so they work. Really high values seem not to work though.

Just read that --jobtimeout 300 is the default and that decreasing n below 80-100 may cause instabilities, depends also on the pool. Out of curiosity what is your ping to the pool and did you try if another pool gives the same issue?

[Divinity666]

I've tested low values simply out of curiosity - I need high values(to work). Ping is 50-60ms but even 200ms shouldn't cause anything. Haven't tried other pools.

upd. So after a bit of testing I can confirm that values above 999 don't work.

[Mr.merson]

hi, 144/5 seems to be broken on dual (btg+zil) mining on vram adjusted cards

[Coinx0x]

intensity not working only for the first few second

[somaton]

With zerg/192.7 worker name in format wallet.worker sometimes works, sometimes not. Showing btc wallet instead of worker name when not.

[Divinity666]

Will you ever fix fan control I wonder? If miner stays on maximum % set in config(e.g. --fanmax 60) for too long it won't change it anymore when temperature will actually go down...