Maged
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
|
 |
October 11, 2011, 04:54:55 AM |
|
I work with EC2 myself, and know how much it can cost. They charge based upon CPU cycles. Just a quick question, how much will the 400 EC2 server instances cost, and who is going to be footing the bill?
His employer... No cost, no loss besides I'm leaving soon anyway. Bullshit. I've had enough of you. It's quite clear that not only do you not have those servers, you also don't know what you're talking about. The only reason that I believed you in the Namecoin incident was because you said you optimized Artforz attack code. I knew of an optimization, so I assumed that it was the same one you thought of. It's quite clear that you were just saying that, though, and aren't a real developer. Don't try coming back here again. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CoinHunter
|
|
October 11, 2011, 04:55:25 AM |
|
Would you rather listen to a known liar or the developer?
I can't see a difference in the options you provided. Care to provide the "lie" or "lies" you think I've told? Another baseless claim from a troll. |
|
|
|
|
johnj
|
|
October 11, 2011, 04:55:46 AM |
|
How this troll can just create lie after lie with no evidence and people eat it up like its christmas pudding I have no idea.
Oh, the irony is astounding. I feel privileged to witness such an intense moment. Thank you CH. For that alone my time here on the forums has been worth it. |
1AeW7QK59HvEJwiyMztFH1ubWPSLLKx5ym
TradeHill Referral TH-R120549
|
|
|
|
CoinHunter
|
|
October 11, 2011, 04:56:25 AM |
|
I work with EC2 myself, and know how much it can cost. They charge based upon CPU cycles. Just a quick question, how much will the 400 EC2 server instances cost, and who is going to be footing the bill?
His employer... No cost, no loss besides I'm leaving soon anyway. Bullshit. I've had enough of you. It's quite clear that not only do you not have those servers, you also don't know what you're talking about. The only reason that I believed you in the Namecoin incident was because you said you optimized Artforz attack code. I knew of an optimization, so I assumed that it was the same one you thought of. It's quite clear that you were just saying that, though, and aren't a real developer. Don't try coming back here again. Thank you, once SC2 algorithm is released it will be proved beyond a doubt this clown is lying yet again. I'm surprised he hasn't been removed earlier. |
|
|
|
BurtW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1131
All paid signature campaigns should be banned.
|
|
October 11, 2011, 04:57:57 AM |
|
Is he really gone? Is it really over?  |
Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security. Read all about it here: http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/ Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated! |
|
|
|
BitterTea
|
|
October 11, 2011, 05:05:05 AM |
|
I'm downloading the block chain now, it's at 4000 and counting, difficulty of 21. Is the target rate still 3.5 minutes per block? If so, shouldn't the chain be somewhere around 100 blocks long right now?
Just passed 5000. 5000 / 328 minutes since launch (10th October 23:35 UTC) =~ 15 blocks/minute.
|
|
|
|
|
Maged
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
|
|
October 11, 2011, 05:05:10 AM |
|
BitcoinEXpress will go out as the winner!
At this moment I have right at 2000 blocks and if CH manages to pull this off and keep this going, BCX will have the largest amount of Solidcoin next to Coinhunter's 1 million pre-mined coins.
Either way it works for me.
HA! Always trying to leave that last bit of doubt. I knew you were bullshiting with Namecoin, and I know that you're bullshitting now. If you could have done anything, you would have already done it. SC2's launch was a perfect opportunity to take it out and make them look bad. You missed it. |
|
|
|
xzion
Member
Offline
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
|
|
October 11, 2011, 05:07:38 AM |
|
BCX permanently out
cheers for the good times! |
Tips: 1xzionJBueq1AkPSmexA7suWkztAkNwSs
|
|
|
|
BitterTea
|
|
October 11, 2011, 05:08:27 AM |
|
BitcoinEXpress will go out as the winner!
At this moment I have right at 2000 blocks and if CH manages to pull this off and keep this going, BCX will have the largest amount of Solidcoin next to Coinhunter's 1 million pre-mined coins.
Either way it works for me.
HA! Always trying to leave that last bit of doubt. I knew you were bullshiting with Namecoin, and I know that you're bullshitting now. If you could have done anything, you would have already done it. SC2's launch was a perfect opportunity to take it out and make them look bad. You missed it. May I ask how you are convinced that he's bullshitting? |
|
|
|
|
|
grod
|
|
October 11, 2011, 05:08:56 AM |
|
Looking at coinotron it looks like they're getting 95% invalid blocks. Something is def. up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bobnova
|
|
October 11, 2011, 05:10:22 AM |
|
As of this post, 7225 blocks and difficulty 68.
|
BTC: 1AURXf66t7pw65NwRiKukwPq1hLSiYLqbP
|
|
|
|
johnj
|
|
October 11, 2011, 05:11:37 AM |
|
I'm downloading the block chain now, it's at 4000 and counting, difficulty of 21. Is the target rate still 3.5 minutes per block? If so, shouldn't the chain be somewhere around 100 blocks long right now?
Just passed 5000. 5000 / 328 minutes since launch (10th October 23:35 UTC) =~ 15 blocks/minute.
As of this post, 7225 blocks and difficulty 68.
Looking at the post timestamps ,that's a difference of 2225 blocks in 5 minutes. Edit: Ahh, thanks bobnova. I knew I was missing something  |
1AeW7QK59HvEJwiyMztFH1ubWPSLLKx5ym
TradeHill Referral TH-R120549
|
|
|
|
Bobnova
|
|
October 11, 2011, 05:12:07 AM |
|
He hadn't fully downloaded the chain.
|
BTC: 1AURXf66t7pw65NwRiKukwPq1hLSiYLqbP
|
|
|
|
Bobnova
|
|
October 11, 2011, 05:12:36 AM |
|
Sidenote, still 68 diff, now 7285 blocks.
|
BTC: 1AURXf66t7pw65NwRiKukwPq1hLSiYLqbP
|
|
|
|
BitterTea
|
|
October 11, 2011, 05:14:06 AM |
|
Sidenote, still 68 diff, now 7285 blocks.
I'm stuck on block 6826. |
|
|
|
|
|
BitterTea
|
|
October 11, 2011, 05:15:08 AM |
|
Mine hasn't advanced past block 6826 for a few minutes.
|
|
|
|
|
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
|
October 11, 2011, 05:17:06 AM |
|
So simple question. The network has generated roughly 1 block per second since inception.
Is it suppose to do that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
grod
|
|
October 11, 2011, 05:18:47 AM |
|
It could be worse. mine-for.us is reporting 67.5% stales. Holy crap. I don't think a single pool is stable. I don't know WHAT the problem is, but something is certainly up.
Looks like 2 hours into the thing we're all late adopters. =)
|
|
|
|
|
tacotime
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005
|
|
October 11, 2011, 05:20:18 AM |
|
i think bcx is manipulating the block chain by progressively increasing hash rate over the network in increments, and is now mining the majority of the blocks... Maybe it has something to do with circumventing ch's magical new 51% protection algorithm.
|
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns |
|
|
|
bulanula
|
|
October 11, 2011, 05:21:48 AM |
|
Too bad you banned BCX. He will return and I will again have fun seeing his skewed characters and puppets spewing BS about anything random. We had fun. See you sometime soon, mr. maddox.
|
|
|
|
|
|
