Bitcoin Forum
December 06, 2016, 10:06:57 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: delete  (Read 22081 times)
Frozenace
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 09:32:03 AM
 #141

BCX is like a child with too much candy who doesn't want to share.


Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481062017
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481062017

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481062017
Reply with quote  #2

1481062017
Report to moderator
1481062017
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481062017

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481062017
Reply with quote  #2

1481062017
Report to moderator
1481062017
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481062017

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481062017
Reply with quote  #2

1481062017
Report to moderator
stryker
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 10:30:57 AM
 #142

I must admit I've got my interest in SC, even encouraged it, you see I'm here because I'm interested in crypto currencies....

But reading what you knob-heads are saying here all I feel is my confidence in my much loved BTC slipping away.... who is going to take it seriously with stupid little trolls like you?
sd
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 730



View Profile
October 11, 2011, 10:36:50 AM
 #143

I must admit I've got my interest in SC, even encouraged it, you see I'm here because I'm interested in crypto currencies....

But reading what you knob-heads are saying here all I feel is my confidence in my much loved BTC slipping away.... who is going to take it seriously with stupid little trolls like you?

Who is going to take paper cash seriously when there are so many scammers and trolls trying to rob you of it?

Seriously - Who is your comment directed at? The Pro-Solidcoin people, The Anti-Solidcoin people, or both?
stryker
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 11:33:38 AM
 #144

both to be honest....

good point on the paper cash comment tho, although there are no alternatives to paper cash / bank currencies in every day life.... BTC/SC/whatever is still fledgling and needs some help.... I cant see any way that all this tit-for-tat thats going on is helping anything.
Lolcust
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


Hillariously voracious


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 11:35:46 AM
 #145

This incident teaches us that pig-to-peer networks are bad and their designers should feel bad about them.

An important lesson.

Geist Geld, the experimental cryptocurrency, is ready for yet another SolidCoin collapse Wink

Feed the Lolcust!
NMC: N6YQFkH9Gn9CTm4mpGwuLB5zLzqWTWFw67
BTC: 15F8xbgRBA1XZ4hmtdFDUasroa2A5rYg8M
GEG: gK5Lx6ypWgr69Gw9yGzE6dsA7kcuCRZRK
localhost
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 389


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 11:52:56 AM
 #146

both to be honest....
The lesson is simple: stick to Bitcoin and trust no fork until they are a least a bit adopted/established... So for the moment just trust no fork. Cheesy

-
Lolcust
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


Hillariously voracious


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 11:54:09 AM
 #147

Oh come on, Namecoin is ossom, at the very least.

Also TBX is ossom too ^__^

Geist Geld, the experimental cryptocurrency, is ready for yet another SolidCoin collapse Wink

Feed the Lolcust!
NMC: N6YQFkH9Gn9CTm4mpGwuLB5zLzqWTWFw67
BTC: 15F8xbgRBA1XZ4hmtdFDUasroa2A5rYg8M
GEG: gK5Lx6ypWgr69Gw9yGzE6dsA7kcuCRZRK
johnj
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 12:16:59 PM
 #148

So it seems SC2.0 is still around 5s/blk, is that correct?   Can anyone else confirm...?

1AeW7QK59HvEJwiyMztFH1ubWPSLLKx5ym
TradeHill Referral TH-R120549
Lolcust
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


Hillariously voracious


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 12:18:27 PM
 #149

three second blocks here, reporting.

Geist Geld, the experimental cryptocurrency, is ready for yet another SolidCoin collapse Wink

Feed the Lolcust!
NMC: N6YQFkH9Gn9CTm4mpGwuLB5zLzqWTWFw67
BTC: 15F8xbgRBA1XZ4hmtdFDUasroa2A5rYg8M
GEG: gK5Lx6ypWgr69Gw9yGzE6dsA7kcuCRZRK
makomk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 12:22:50 PM
 #150

You must be using a definition of fork that I'm familiar with. BCX claimed to be mining a fork and followed with "Some of you are on my fork I suspect.". The only way they could be on that fork and not the main chain is if there was a break in the network somewhere. Peers share their blocks so the fork will become the main chain if it has a greater sum of work. For BCX to have a fork with a greater sum of work than the main chain he'd have to someone stop that from being distributed to the other peers. In which case the "Some of you are on my fork" can't be true.
You forgot that SolidCoin 2.0 is meant to have some kind of 51% attack protection, which by its nature means that under some circumstances the client has to reject a chain with a greater sum of work in favour of a chain with a lesser sum ofr work. Depending on how exactly CoinHunter implemented it, it'd be trivial for someone with a decent amount of hashing power to persistently fork the network in a way that would never get healed automatically. Unfortunately he's refused to say publicly how it works and the source isn't available.

Maged: I have a feeling that BitcoinEXpress wasn't kidding. I've no idea if he was bluffing about the namecoin attack because it was quite thoroughly forestalled (I submitted a patch with a really paranoid set of block lockins designed to stop any attack I'd heard of or could think of, including the obvious-but-impractical checkpoint bypass), but this isn't looking good.

Edit: I should really set up a couple of isolated VMs and test this, but effort...

Quad XC6SLX150 Board: 860 MHash/s or so.
SIGS ABOUT BUTTERFLY LABS ARE PAID ADS
Balthazar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988


Post rank racist


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 12:37:34 PM
 #151

TrollCoin 2.0  Grin

novaco.in | VMWare VMHGFS driver for 3.19.x kernels | Ukrainian translation for Novacoin [Done]
฿: 1GV8D5SRkA3cPccpYhVc2wMkjwz3UREEpy: 4RgnHWtnJWEyMhqhDdazW3Hdr7cx5ybF6i
johnj
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 12:38:02 PM
 #152

Woke up to a working network with stales out at coinotron heading toward disappearance and the blocks per second rate falling as expected.  Very nice.

How's the "attacking" going?

Depends on how long it takes for the chain to hit target.  With 5s blocks still, not looking so well.

1AeW7QK59HvEJwiyMztFH1ubWPSLLKx5ym
TradeHill Referral TH-R120549
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


Gerald Davis


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 12:39:03 PM
 #153

Woke up to a working network with stales out at coinotron heading toward disappearance and the blocks per second rate falling as expected.  Very nice.

How's the "attacking" going?

"Falling as expected"?  Over a blocks every 3 second after 12,000+ blocks?  On pace to dump 1 million coins on the market within 24 hours of genesis block?

Yup exactly as expected.
makomk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 01:41:23 PM
 #154

Woke up to a working network with stales out at coinotron heading toward disappearance and the blocks per second rate falling as expected.  Very nice.

How's the "attacking" going?
Hard to tell; as far as I know there's no block explorer for Solidcoin 2.0 yet and RealSolid hasn't released the information needed to write one, so it's quite tricky to see what's going on. Probably the only person that knows is BitcoinEXpress and I don't think we're going to be hearing from him any time soon. It does look like we're going to see a really substantial increase in the total number of solidcoins in existence during the first 24-48 hours of 2.0 though; if my maths is right then a third of all SolidCoin 2.0 coins existing right now were mined on 2.0 since it was opened and it's only going to get worse.

Quad XC6SLX150 Board: 860 MHash/s or so.
SIGS ABOUT BUTTERFLY LABS ARE PAID ADS
Lolcust
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


Hillariously voracious


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 01:48:30 PM
 #155

Does your math account for the "compensation million" ?

Geist Geld, the experimental cryptocurrency, is ready for yet another SolidCoin collapse Wink

Feed the Lolcust!
NMC: N6YQFkH9Gn9CTm4mpGwuLB5zLzqWTWFw67
BTC: 15F8xbgRBA1XZ4hmtdFDUasroa2A5rYg8M
GEG: gK5Lx6ypWgr69Gw9yGzE6dsA7kcuCRZRK
makomk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 01:52:05 PM
 #156

Does your math account for the "compensation million" ?
Nope, because I'm still not clear on what exactly CoinHunter has done with premining; it only counts the number of coins that were mined normally on 1.0 and 2.0 combined.

Quad XC6SLX150 Board: 860 MHash/s or so.
SIGS ABOUT BUTTERFLY LABS ARE PAID ADS
localhost
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 389


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 01:58:51 PM
 #157

Does your math account for the "compensation million" ?
The worst part is, this BTC forum is the first (and only) place where I've heard about premining in SC 2.0. AFAIK no visible communication has been made about this on the SC forums...... The only positive thing is that I mined in SC 2 in 6 hours on crappy hadware about half as much as I mined in SC 1 in 2 weeks on better hardware. Can't wait to try Litecoin...

-
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


Gerald Davis


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 02:01:53 PM
 #158

Does your math account for the "compensation million" ?
The worst part is, this BTC forum is the first (and only) place where I've heard about premining in SC 2.0. AFAIK no visible communication has been made about this on the SC forums...... The only positive thing is that I mined in SC 2 in 6 hours on crappy hadware about half as much as I mined in SC 1 in 2 weeks on better hardware. Can't wait to try Litecoin...

How is that a positive?  It essentially means any wealth (store of value) holders of SC 1.0 had has been wiped out by rampant monetary expansion.  Their coins which took significant time and electrical energy are worth next to nothing.   Which in turn doesn't bode well for the value of the "easy" coins.  If you made more in 6 hours on crappy hardware how many coins do you think someone w/ 400 EC2 instances made?
3phase
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 313


Third score


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 02:10:18 PM
 #159

Something seems to be wrong. Due to the lack of a blockexplorer:

Coinotron shows the last ~300 blocks found within ~35 minutes which is almost one block every 7 seconds. Difficulty however remains the same. No retargeting? Wasn't it supposed to be every 240 blocks (which is actually 120 blocks because every other block is mined with diff. 1 by the supernode)?

Fiat no more.
Δοκιμάστε το http://multibit.org - Bitcoin client τώρα και στα Ελληνικά
localhost
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 389


View Profile
October 11, 2011, 02:11:00 PM
 #160

How is that a positive?  It essentially means any wealth (store of value) holders of SC 1.0 had has been wiped out by rampant monetary expansion.
I was being sarcastic. Wink That's why I added I was waiting for Litecoin.

-
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!