Should we believe the ICObench?

[AngelSky]

This is shit and I do not believe thia site at all anytime dude. I would love to invest on ICO projects better I check the project's white paper, team details and their LinkedIn page.
If all set then only I decide the best projects in the market.

[1715003845]

1715003845

[1715003845]

1715003845

[1715003845]

1715003845

[1715003845]

1715003845

[adelablue]

ICObench is OK, I personally prefer cryptobriefing which promise they don't take any fee to advertise. Also the quality is really good and seems quite "neutral".

[Vargum]

Have you ever noticed that some ICOs refer on their score on ICObench during crowdsales. There are some experts that assess the ICO by follow criteria: Team, Vision and Product.

How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICObench?

In my opinion, I would not very much trust the estimates of the ICObench project. This is not always an indicator of a good project. I prefer to evaluate projects by other criteria before choosing the appropriate ICO

[okala]

I think we should be careful how we invest into icos using icobench or others rating sites. Many of them has rated many projects that has turned out to be a scam project. I think we should try to find out about the project before investing.

[Yoo]

I will consider ICObench as a way to find an ICO program. If the score in ICObench is good, then I will consider and understand the ICO program.
Then I will look at and consider the Vision Mission, Whitepaper, roadmap and team from the ICO. If it's really good then I will join the ICO.

[petrovkirill808]

This websites such as  icobench that gives thier rating to a project will not determine that the project will be a successful one. It is only a guide, its up to you on want to invest or not.

more to say, on these sites, even scam projects have a good rating, everything is paid for, including reviews, so they should not be trusted

[St4yInTh3D4rk]

Don't trust anyone blindly,all these things can be bought as well so you need to evaluate that project by yourself but you can also take those projects which listed on the ICO rating sites which may makes your research job much easier.But don't invest only for the reason that some ICO have high ratings.

[cabin]

Although you can believe the icobench rating because they take their time to do a very good research of a project before they list it on their site but you should also take your time to do a very deep research before you invest or participate in it because some time, a project gets higher rating than it deserve while some less rated ones even has more potentials.

[biznes35]

At the moment, there are at least a few projects involved in cheating ratings on this service. I saw how one American conducted an experiment and ordered a rating of 5 for a non-existent iCO, which this project had for several hours. To say that I was amazed is to say nothing.

[ciang huang]

I think ICObench is for assessment only, but it's good for an ico. but in my opinion, not making a successful project reference sometimes there is a high rating rating, it turns out a scam project ... but there are also successful ones depending on us

[jebul2]

Have you ever noticed that some ICOs refer on their score on ICObench during crowdsales. There are some experts that assess the ICO by follow criteria: Team, Vision and Product.

How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICO?

if I myself follow the first project seen from the concept and the team, if icobench is for assessment only if I think there is no influence for the project

[Quidat]

Have you ever noticed that some ICOs refer on their score on ICObench during crowdsales. There are some experts that assess the ICO by follow criteria: Team, Vision and Product.

How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICO?

Back in the past Ive used to trust with those ratings given by those popular rating sites but I do find out that it do have some issues regarding paid feedbacks or ratings then I do completely got dismayed
and telling up myself not to rely on any information given on these rating sites.Not only ICObench have this kind of issues but also plausible on other sites as well.
This wont really be reliable to consider to rely on your investment decisions.

[Arkham Knight]

ICO rating sites are lies. The only site that I trust is ICOdrops and the rest are just there to get paid by the ICOs who want to attract more foolish investors. How come all of them are very close to the perfect score? Where's the unbiased judgment in that?

[pedangrusak]

if you are a beginner in the ICO project then what you do is look for references on google and icobench is often found first. a web that discusses ico rating like this is needed but not the main benchmark for me, I will do a comparison with other good web ratings like icorating and more. the most important thing is to hone your own sensitivity towards ico ico so as not to be easily fooled by ico scam

[ovcijisir]

ICOBench rating is good indicator of how good the project is but it is only indicator.

You must get your hands dirty and do research yourself...

[Macinto$h]

I, as a person who deals with crypto-currencies relatively recently - this rating agency is just an auxiliary tool. I do not trust the ratings of these people very much.

[SeNeor]

Yes you can but the right decision to take depends on you because most projects do not really worth the ratings they get but after you check for the rating and also take time to patiently carryout your own research or the project, you will know the best decision to take on it.

[Black_bl]

Have you ever noticed that some ICOs refer on their score on ICObench during crowdsales. There are some experts that assess the ICO by follow criteria: Team, Vision and Product.

How useful is this score? Should we take it into consideration when performing a research on the ICO?

These sites for ICO reviews have one problem - paid listing. If you need experts on reviews, you as a site which provides ratings usually have to pay them also. Will you trust yourself or them? The phrase "do you own research" is important, unfortunately many people is lazy to spend time on own research

[oneidentity]

This rating resource is one of my favorites. For a long time I have been watching the projects that they add and almost always these are really worthwhile projects. But, of course, you can not base your opinion on recommendations alone. You need to analyze each Ico yourself.

[2017yizou]

ICObench's scores as a reference i think is feasible. If you want to study an ICO, i consider that comparing a few scoring websites is a good method. If there is tricky inside, it can be seen..