[ANN]Faircoin - MULTIPOOL PAYS --- 20%--- BONUS! for the next week!!

[DailyModo]

Please, This is as transparent as it can be, check the google analytics report during the signup phase. You will see 56828 visits and 27425 unique visitors. You know the dev couldn't claim all this for himself
https://mega.co.nz/#!jQIFULSZ!vRqeTVsI0qeZ9SC9ZV7BSSTfEkKirm66VIoso-TgqkY

Not interested in? what are you complaining about then?

To repeat myself, there is nothing to stop the developer creating a shit ton of accounts and simply assigning himself the coin. That is a fact.

Comparing a google analytics report to proof of work mining is ridiculous.

Why don't we just stop mining Bitcoins on ASICS and just dish out new Bitcoins based on google analytics? lmao.

You're lucky that too many people don't understand the basics of crypto and will just buy any old rubbish. But please do me a favour and stop shouting out from the rooftops about the fairness of Faircoin, the hypocrisy is shocking.

100 adresses of black coins only have 40% of the whole coins talk to me about fairness my friend haha.

Lol just a big group of potential dumpers who got their coins for the SO SO fair BC POW mining lol talking about ridiculous eh.

[freshmeat]

100 adresses of black coins only have 40% of the whole coins talk to me about fairness my friend haha.

this is true , these whales wallets could dump the coin to 1 satoshi

[mr_random]

How do you know how much the developer owns of Faircoin? He could create a thousand accounts and have assigned him 50% of all Faircoin.

If however he had used proof of work mining to distribute the coins (Blackcoin or almost any other coin) he wouldn't have been able to do this.

just for your information:

http://agran.net/bc_getbalance.php?top=100

http://fac.blockx.info/richlist/

Dont talk about fair distribution lol ur not helping ur case.

Are you naive? You do realise that a single wallet owned by a single person can contain hundreds of addresses?

If anything that makes it MORE likely that the dev has a shit ton of the coins. Steps:

1. Create a shit ton of accounts
2. Send premined money to each of these accounts
3. Really these accounts all belong to one person but look like they belong to other people

Blackcoin distribution compares extremely well to any other proof of work mined coin which can be mathetically verified independently. It's nonsense comparing that to a method where some dude randomly gives away coins however he wants. You are comparing a method which is decentralised, verifiable, AND CANNOT BE GAMED, vs a method that requires complete trust, is centralised, cannot be verified, can be gamed and in all probability has been gamed.

This is how a real faircoin should be done:

1. ZERO premine
2. Proof of work mining period to distribute the coins fairly
3. No shadiness

That coin already exists and it's called Blackcoin. The true faircoin.

[mr_random]

Please, This is as transparent as it can be, check the google analytics report during the signup phase. You will see 56828 visits and 27425 unique visitors. You know the dev couldn't claim all this for himself
https://mega.co.nz/#!jQIFULSZ!vRqeTVsI0qeZ9SC9ZV7BSSTfEkKirm66VIoso-TgqkY

Not interested in? what are you complaining about then?

To repeat myself, there is nothing to stop the developer creating a shit ton of accounts and simply assigning himself the coin. That is a fact.

Comparing a google analytics report to proof of work mining is ridiculous.

Why don't we just stop mining Bitcoins on ASICS and just dish out new Bitcoins based on google analytics? lmao.

You're lucky that too many people don't understand the basics of crypto and will just buy any old rubbish. But please do me a favour and stop shouting out from the rooftops about the fairness of Faircoin, the hypocrisy is shocking.

100 adresses of black coins only have 40% of the whole coins talk to me about fairness my friend haha.

Lol just a big group of potential dumpers who got their coins for the SO SO fair BC POW mining lol talking about ridiculous eh.

You strengthen my argument by not being able to respond to my points. Thanks

[unick]

Please, This is as transparent as it can be, check the google analytics report during the signup phase. You will see 56828 visits and 27425 unique visitors. You know the dev couldn't claim all this for himself
https://mega.co.nz/#!jQIFULSZ!vRqeTVsI0qeZ9SC9ZV7BSSTfEkKirm66VIoso-TgqkY

Not interested in? what are you complaining about then?

To repeat myself, there is nothing to stop the developer creating a shit ton of accounts and simply assigning himself the coin. That is a fact.

Comparing a google analytics report to proof of work mining is ridiculous.

Why don't we just stop mining Bitcoins on ASICS and just dish out new Bitcoins based on google analytics? lmao.

You're lucky that too many people don't understand the basics of crypto and will just buy any old rubbish. But please do me a favour and stop shouting out from the rooftops about the fairness of Faircoin, the hypocrisy is shocking.

True, but then again what is the problem with that? really?

Do you know that KnCMiners operates about 7000 machines? and sells those miners too! they mined friggen 21000 bitcoins in March!

now let's talk about fairness and transparency there.  Isn't that a big conflict of interest?

Personally, I don't mind.  I know I got my shares, a lot of people did.  the coin is moving up, new services are seeing the day of light regularly and as time goes on, the market will adjust istself. Are we going to bash on people owning thousand of bitcoins because newly adopters don't have the same "fairness" that early adopters had? If not, why would it be different with FAC?

FAC is NOT BTC, so the philosophy behind it, while similar, isn't entirely the same, it is an evolving concept. You might not like it, that's fine, but you didn't have to be a geek to earn FAC, and that, IMHO, was (and still is) a concept that was worth a shot

[unick]

That coin already exists and it's called Blackcoin. The true faircoin.

Lol, I didn't realize this was a propaganda campaign... I'm finished on this subject.

[DailyModo]

Please, This is as transparent as it can be, check the google analytics report during the signup phase. You will see 56828 visits and 27425 unique visitors. You know the dev couldn't claim all this for himself
https://mega.co.nz/#!jQIFULSZ!vRqeTVsI0qeZ9SC9ZV7BSSTfEkKirm66VIoso-TgqkY

Not interested in? what are you complaining about then?

To repeat myself, there is nothing to stop the developer creating a shit ton of accounts and simply assigning himself the coin. That is a fact.

Comparing a google analytics report to proof of work mining is ridiculous.

Why don't we just stop mining Bitcoins on ASICS and just dish out new Bitcoins based on google analytics? lmao.

You're lucky that too many people don't understand the basics of crypto and will just buy any old rubbish. But please do me a favour and stop shouting out from the rooftops about the fairness of Faircoin, the hypocrisy is shocking.

100 adresses of black coins only have 40% of the whole coins talk to me about fairness my friend haha.

Lol just a big group of potential dumpers who got their coins for the SO SO fair BC POW mining lol talking about ridiculous eh.

You strengthen my argument by not being able to respond to my points. Thanks

lol the thing is you have no point! haha keep promoting faircoin im starting to love u

[mr_random]

Please, This is as transparent as it can be, check the google analytics report during the signup phase. You will see 56828 visits and 27425 unique visitors. You know the dev couldn't claim all this for himself
https://mega.co.nz/#!jQIFULSZ!vRqeTVsI0qeZ9SC9ZV7BSSTfEkKirm66VIoso-TgqkY

Not interested in? what are you complaining about then?

To repeat myself, there is nothing to stop the developer creating a shit ton of accounts and simply assigning himself the coin. That is a fact.

Comparing a google analytics report to proof of work mining is ridiculous.

Why don't we just stop mining Bitcoins on ASICS and just dish out new Bitcoins based on google analytics? lmao.

You're lucky that too many people don't understand the basics of crypto and will just buy any old rubbish. But please do me a favour and stop shouting out from the rooftops about the fairness of Faircoin, the hypocrisy is shocking.

True, but then again what is the problem with that? really?

Do you know that KnCMiners operates about 7000 machines? and sells those miners too! they mined friggen 21000 bitcoins in March!

now let's talk about fairness and transparency there.  Isn't that a big conflict of interest?

Personally, I don't mind.  I know I got my shares, a lot of people did.  the coin is moving up, new services are seeing the day of light regularly and as time goes on, the market will adjust istself. Are we going to bash on people owning thousand of bitcoins because newly adopters don't have the same "fairness" that early adopters had? If not, why would it be different with FAC?

FAC is NOT BTC, so the philosophy behind it, while similar, isn't entirely the same, it is an evolving concept. You might not like it, that's fine, but you didn't have to be a geek to earn FAC, and that, IMHO, was (and still is) a concept that was worth a shot

Bro Bitcoin was just an example. If we had distributed Litecoins the last two years based on google analytics the system wouldn't work for hopefully obvious reasons.

I actually have no problem with people owning lots of Faircoin. My issue here is:

1. Calling it faircoin when it's clearly not faircoin.
2. Bashing other coins for not being "fair" despite point number 1.
3. 100% premine and a distribution method which is centralised, requires trust and most likely was massively gamed

Let's call a spade a spade here.

[DailyModo]

Please, This is as transparent as it can be, check the google analytics report during the signup phase. You will see 56828 visits and 27425 unique visitors. You know the dev couldn't claim all this for himself
https://mega.co.nz/#!jQIFULSZ!vRqeTVsI0qeZ9SC9ZV7BSSTfEkKirm66VIoso-TgqkY

Not interested in? what are you complaining about then?

To repeat myself, there is nothing to stop the developer creating a shit ton of accounts and simply assigning himself the coin. That is a fact.

Comparing a google analytics report to proof of work mining is ridiculous.

Why don't we just stop mining Bitcoins on ASICS and just dish out new Bitcoins based on google analytics? lmao.

You're lucky that too many people don't understand the basics of crypto and will just buy any old rubbish. But please do me a favour and stop shouting out from the rooftops about the fairness of Faircoin, the hypocrisy is shocking.

True, but then again what is the problem with that? really?

Do you know that KnCMiners operates about 7000 machines? and sells those miners too! they mined friggen 21000 bitcoins in March!

now let's talk about fairness and transparency there.  Isn't that a big conflict of interest?

Personally, I don't mind.  I know I got my shares, a lot of people did.  the coin is moving up, new services are seeing the day of light regularly and as time goes on, the market will adjust istself. Are we going to bash on people owning thousand of bitcoins because newly adopters don't have the same "fairness" that early adopters had? If not, why would it be different with FAC?

FAC is NOT BTC, so the philosophy behind it, while similar, isn't entirely the same, it is an evolving concept. You might not like it, that's fine, but you didn't have to be a geek to earn FAC, and that, IMHO, was (and still is) a concept that was worth a shot

Bro Bitcoin was just an example. If we had distributed Litecoins the last two years based on google analytics the system wouldn't work for hopefully obvious reasons.

I actually have no problem with people owning lots of Faircoin. My issue here is:

1. Calling it faircoin when it's clearly not faircoin.
2. Bashing other coins for not being "fair" despite point number 1.
3. 100% premine and a distribution method which is centralised, requires trust and most likely was massively gamed

Let's call a spade a spade here.

lol your talking about WE BASHING OTHER COINS? wtf are you doing here then? lol

http://agran.net/bc_getbalance.php?top=100 enough said buddy.

[Kreativekrypto]

ugh scrypt coins profit is in the shitter, at least with my m/h

http://wafflepool.com/miner/14yX6HDH8nbp5gZzNz1T37Eu3n9bskGFZ1

[mr_random]

Please, This is as transparent as it can be, check the google analytics report during the signup phase. You will see 56828 visits and 27425 unique visitors. You know the dev couldn't claim all this for himself
https://mega.co.nz/#!jQIFULSZ!vRqeTVsI0qeZ9SC9ZV7BSSTfEkKirm66VIoso-TgqkY

Not interested in? what are you complaining about then?

To repeat myself, there is nothing to stop the developer creating a shit ton of accounts and simply assigning himself the coin. That is a fact.

Comparing a google analytics report to proof of work mining is ridiculous.

Why don't we just stop mining Bitcoins on ASICS and just dish out new Bitcoins based on google analytics? lmao.

You're lucky that too many people don't understand the basics of crypto and will just buy any old rubbish. But please do me a favour and stop shouting out from the rooftops about the fairness of Faircoin, the hypocrisy is shocking.

True, but then again what is the problem with that? really?

Do you know that KnCMiners operates about 7000 machines? and sells those miners too! they mined friggen 21000 bitcoins in March!

now let's talk about fairness and transparency there.  Isn't that a big conflict of interest?

Personally, I don't mind.  I know I got my shares, a lot of people did.  the coin is moving up, new services are seeing the day of light regularly and as time goes on, the market will adjust istself. Are we going to bash on people owning thousand of bitcoins because newly adopters don't have the same "fairness" that early adopters had? If not, why would it be different with FAC?

FAC is NOT BTC, so the philosophy behind it, while similar, isn't entirely the same, it is an evolving concept. You might not like it, that's fine, but you didn't have to be a geek to earn FAC, and that, IMHO, was (and still is) a concept that was worth a shot

Bro Bitcoin was just an example. If we had distributed Litecoins the last two years based on google analytics the system wouldn't work for hopefully obvious reasons.

I actually have no problem with people owning lots of Faircoin. My issue here is:

1. Calling it faircoin when it's clearly not faircoin.
2. Bashing other coins for not being "fair" despite point number 1.
3. 100% premine and a distribution method which is centralised, requires trust and most likely was massively gamed

Let's call a spade a spade here.

lol your talking about WE BASHING OTHER COINS? wtf are you doing here then? lol

http://agran.net/bc_getbalance.php?top=100 enough said buddy.

Once again you can't address anything I say.

I will let the readers judge my comments and decide whether to invest in un-faircoin.

[DailyModo]

Please, This is as transparent as it can be, check the google analytics report during the signup phase. You will see 56828 visits and 27425 unique visitors. You know the dev couldn't claim all this for himself
https://mega.co.nz/#!jQIFULSZ!vRqeTVsI0qeZ9SC9ZV7BSSTfEkKirm66VIoso-TgqkY

Not interested in? what are you complaining about then?

To repeat myself, there is nothing to stop the developer creating a shit ton of accounts and simply assigning himself the coin. That is a fact.

Comparing a google analytics report to proof of work mining is ridiculous.

Why don't we just stop mining Bitcoins on ASICS and just dish out new Bitcoins based on google analytics? lmao.

You're lucky that too many people don't understand the basics of crypto and will just buy any old rubbish. But please do me a favour and stop shouting out from the rooftops about the fairness of Faircoin, the hypocrisy is shocking.

True, but then again what is the problem with that? really?

Do you know that KnCMiners operates about 7000 machines? and sells those miners too! they mined friggen 21000 bitcoins in March!

now let's talk about fairness and transparency there.  Isn't that a big conflict of interest?

Personally, I don't mind.  I know I got my shares, a lot of people did.  the coin is moving up, new services are seeing the day of light regularly and as time goes on, the market will adjust istself. Are we going to bash on people owning thousand of bitcoins because newly adopters don't have the same "fairness" that early adopters had? If not, why would it be different with FAC?

FAC is NOT BTC, so the philosophy behind it, while similar, isn't entirely the same, it is an evolving concept. You might not like it, that's fine, but you didn't have to be a geek to earn FAC, and that, IMHO, was (and still is) a concept that was worth a shot

Bro Bitcoin was just an example. If we had distributed Litecoins the last two years based on google analytics the system wouldn't work for hopefully obvious reasons.

I actually have no problem with people owning lots of Faircoin. My issue here is:

1. Calling it faircoin when it's clearly not faircoin.
2. Bashing other coins for not being "fair" despite point number 1.
3. 100% premine and a distribution method which is centralised, requires trust and most likely was massively gamed

Let's call a spade a spade here.

lol your talking about WE BASHING OTHER COINS? wtf are you doing here then? lol

http://agran.net/bc_getbalance.php?top=100 enough said buddy.

Once again you can't address anything I say.

I will let the readers judge my comments and decide whether to invest in un-faircoin.

Ok captain! lol

[TrollboxChamp]

The blackcoin boys are shakin in their booties!!

[fair-cointeam]

reminding everyone that there is a hard fork at block 4800
your protocolversion should be 80501 before that, or you are risking finding yourself on a fork

[Kreativekrypto]

reminding everyone that there is a hard fork at block 4800
your protocolversion should be 80501 before that, or you are risking finding yourself on a fork

Approx. when is next multipool payout please?

[ene1980]

FAC on http://www.cryptmarketcap.com/

[DailyModo]

reminding everyone that there is a hard fork at block 4800
your protocolversion should be 80501 before that, or you are risking finding yourself on a fork

New wallet is updated in op?

[fair-cointeam]

personally i think blackcoin is an amazing coin, and it deserves every bit of credit it gets in the form of market value
and i only wish i had bought some when i first heard about it

that being said, please stop bashing faircoin in order to promote blackcoin
this isn't a competition
the coins have a lot of common technically, but the ideas behind them is quite different

if you don't like faircoin, don't buy any and stop trolling
thanks

[drumingspz]

reminding everyone that there is a hard fork at block 4800
your protocolversion should be 80501 before that, or you are risking finding yourself on a fork

Approx. when is next multipool payout please?

+1

[TrollboxChamp]

personally i think blackcoin is an amazing coin, and it deserves every bit of credit it gets in the form of market value
and i only wish i had bought some when i first heard about it

that being said, please stop bashing faircoin in order to promote blackcoin
this isn't a competition
the coins have a lot of common technically, but the ideas behind them is quite different

if you don't like faircoin, don't buy any and stop trolling
thanks

Well said.

I had 500k black coins i sold for a measly 14btc.

I am not fucking up with my faircoins.