★ ZEIT ★ [COMMUNITY & KNIGHTS] [ULTRA LOW INFLATION] [MICRO-PAYMENTS]

[MrKalipso]

Gotta say I think i'm about done with this coin....someone can enjoy my 40M coins......with the 60BTC walls that are up I don't see much future in the coin

ok! u may send your coons here McmD4GSaoBJ2myjdYrsmfSU3gM92srFTPq

[1714063728]

1714063728

[1714063728]

1714063728

[ydrogios]

I`m here too if you don`t want some of them!!!!!

MqXFYwuYCrWJ7rGz3qEyi1cQqjAX3JG6o8

[buzz2708]

Gotta say I think i'm about done with this coin....someone can enjoy my 40M coins......with the 60BTC walls that are up I don't see much future in the coin

Donations are welcome: MpjUJKwn57fYhUAuXCSXasHpQziUVCUPo4

[lti4301]

I love this coin and thread - random acts of kindness. 

Yes,
I love this coin
He has a bright future!

[lti4301]

To know the coin distribution, would be interesting something like this for ZEITCOIN:

http://www.mintcoinrichlist.com/

To know the coin distribution will enable us to greatly improve the working efficiency!
Bring more benefits to our!
I am very interested  to know the coin distribution!
 

[angryacorn]

It seemed to make sense from my limited understanding and lack of awareness in the specific algorithms for proof of stake


currently looking at the source code, its likely i was wrong

if only it wasn't such a disorganized mess i could of avoided this embarrassment

having a mini freak out are we? haha I understand what you getting at, but im sure this was thought of by who ever created the original concept of pos as this is a clone! fortunately there are other coins ahead of us so we can see what happens and get out before the shit hits but I highly doubt it. Please post your findings here if you dont mind

[drchris]

Gotta say I think i'm about done with this coin....someone can enjoy my 40M coins......with the 60BTC walls that are up I don't see much future in the coin

MZWnSe3CN7eSeR6PUDQd6x3Q2uiTDUBAar if you want give some coins here!

[Coinmin]

Gotta say I think i'm about done with this coin....someone can enjoy my 40M coins......with the 60BTC walls that are up I don't see much future in the coin

ok! u may send your coons here McmD4GSaoBJ2myjdYrsmfSU3gM92srFTPq

And here:

Menw1sDUabk9eyuq5N39dR9Y6YsehgkjYR

[Anonymousg64]

It seemed to make sense from my limited understanding and lack of awareness in the specific algorithms for proof of stake


currently looking at the source code, its likely i was wrong

if only it wasn't such a disorganized mess i could of avoided this embarrassment

having a mini freak out are we? haha I understand what you getting at, but im sure this was thought of by who ever created the original concept of pos as this is a clone! fortunately there are other coins ahead of us so we can see what happens and get out before the shit hits but I highly doubt it. Please post your findings here if you dont mind

i would need someone more versed with the code to explain how it all fits together, my limited grasp is not good enough and my C++ skills needs some refreshing

it may not be possible to do enough consecutive blocks without too many interrupting valid blocks to do 51% attack altho from what i understand i cannot guarantee it cant happen
it seems possible to cause constant high difficulty and make PoW block mining impossible

im currently on the fence until someone can explain how the PoS block limitations work, the whole you need >51% supply for an attack seems to be a myth based on the code i have read

[angryacorn]

It seemed to make sense from my limited understanding and lack of awareness in the specific algorithms for proof of stake


currently looking at the source code, its likely i was wrong

if only it wasn't such a disorganized mess i could of avoided this embarrassment

having a mini freak out are we? haha I understand what you getting at, but im sure this was thought of by who ever created the original concept of pos as this is a clone! fortunately there are other coins ahead of us so we can see what happens and get out before the shit hits but I highly doubt it. Please post your findings here if you dont mind

i would need someone more versed with the code to explain how it all fits together, my limited grasp is not good enough and my C++ skills needs some refreshing

it may not be possible to do enough consecutive blocks without too many interrupting valid blocks to do 51% attack altho from what i understand i cannot guarantee it cant happen
it seems possible to cause constant high difficulty and make PoW block mining impossible

im currently on the fence until someone can explain how the PoS block limitations work, the whole you need >51% supply for an attack seems to be a myth based on the code i have read

Im also not sure about this 51% business, iv read that it needs to be in the 80's for it to even be possible! I'd hope who ever came up with the concept of POS was an intelligent individual and therefore would have thought about what we are discussing.

[kreeften]

NEW POOL FOR ZEITCoin

http://zeit.poollersunited.com/

PROP PAYOUTS WITH VARDIFF

BASED AT ULTRA FAST EU 64GB/SSD HETZNER DETICATED SERVERS

1% FEES WITH 0.5% BLOCK FINDER BONUS

JOIN US NOW

30 CONFIRMATIONS

I have a day minend
0.0018555 42 coin earn
then the website changed and I get 0.000000066 and 0.00000155 paid
and the rest is gone.

beware, this site SCAM

[igigme77]

Looks like everybody watching new market....

Of course
Only the new market will bring more profit to us!
 

[igigme77]

If everything go well there is a change for zeit coin to climb at that price.Like shit happens so the dreams happens.Be positive people!!!!!!!!

Yes
Zeit coin is the product of the times!
Great Zeit coin!
Great market!

[Anonymousg64]

It seemed to make sense from my limited understanding and lack of awareness in the specific algorithms for proof of stake


currently looking at the source code, its likely i was wrong

if only it wasn't such a disorganized mess i could of avoided this embarrassment

having a mini freak out are we? haha I understand what you getting at, but im sure this was thought of by who ever created the original concept of pos as this is a clone! fortunately there are other coins ahead of us so we can see what happens and get out before the shit hits but I highly doubt it. Please post your findings here if you dont mind

i would need someone more versed with the code to explain how it all fits together, my limited grasp is not good enough and my C++ skills needs some refreshing

it may not be possible to do enough consecutive blocks without too many interrupting valid blocks to do 51% attack altho from what i understand i cannot guarantee it cant happen
it seems possible to cause constant high difficulty and make PoW block mining impossible

im currently on the fence until someone can explain how the PoS block limitations work, the whole you need >51% supply for an attack seems to be a myth based on the code i have read

Im also not sure about this 51% business, iv read that it needs to be in the 80's for it to even be possible! I'd hope who ever came up with the concept of POS was an intelligent individual and therefore would have thought about what we are discussing.

51% allows you to maintain the longest chain and therefore set what transactions get included, you can do Denial of Service by not allowing any transaction in the blocks or double spending by making it accept in one block but then continue on an other chain with another transaction and make that one longer, making the tone the merchant thought valid, invalid.

but the possibility of this can cause panic and loss of faith in coin. someone or some group may have an interest in DOSing a coin

the more i think about it the more doubt i have about how much consideration was done for making sure PoS is infallible. Humans cannot consider everything and with code only a few understand it would be hard to catch all the possible inconsideration's in time.


some blocks i got a few seconds apart
not using TX timestamp, using the block timestamp

Code:

TX amount 11764.905757
TX date 2014-03-02 03:18:43
PoS date 2014-03-22 05:50:39

TX amount 36431.654419
TX date 2014-03-02 04:31:20
PoS date 2014-03-22 05:50:41

Code:

TX amount 35010.984549
TX date 2014-03-02 14:42:45
PoS date 2014-03-22 20:21:39

TX amount 33558.460203
TX date 2014-03-02 16:36:21
PoS date 2014-03-22 20:21:53

[angryacorn]

It seemed to make sense from my limited understanding and lack of awareness in the specific algorithms for proof of stake


currently looking at the source code, its likely i was wrong

if only it wasn't such a disorganized mess i could of avoided this embarrassment

having a mini freak out are we? haha I understand what you getting at, but im sure this was thought of by who ever created the original concept of pos as this is a clone! fortunately there are other coins ahead of us so we can see what happens and get out before the shit hits but I highly doubt it. Please post your findings here if you dont mind

i would need someone more versed with the code to explain how it all fits together, my limited grasp is not good enough and my C++ skills needs some refreshing

it may not be possible to do enough consecutive blocks without too many interrupting valid blocks to do 51% attack altho from what i understand i cannot guarantee it cant happen
it seems possible to cause constant high difficulty and make PoW block mining impossible

im currently on the fence until someone can explain how the PoS block limitations work, the whole you need >51% supply for an attack seems to be a myth based on the code i have read

Im also not sure about this 51% business, iv read that it needs to be in the 80's for it to even be possible! I'd hope who ever came up with the concept of POS was an intelligent individual and therefore would have thought about what we are discussing.

51% allows you to maintain the longest chain and therefore set what transactions get included, you can do Denial of Service by not allowing any transaction in the blocks or double spending by making it accept in one block but then continue on an other chain with another transaction and make that one longer, making the tone the merchant thought valid, invalid.

but the possibility of this can cause panic and loss of faith in coin. someone or some group may have an interest in DOSing a coin

the more i think about it the more doubt i have about how much consideration was done for making sure PoS is infallible. Humans cannot consider everything and with code only a few understand it would be hard to catch all the possible inconsideration's in time.

well I hope for your sake you not solely invested in zeit if you so worried? at the end of the day all these cryptos are vulnerable to something so guess we have to just place our bets or find away to change things

[ydrogios]

Our coin needs a push up from a big website or tv so the public knows about it

[Nayto1]

  I was mining Zeit, for a couple of days, the wallet adress  I had in the pool was the oldest cryptorush and I did not realize.

It sent me to the zeit cryptorush wallet  ,cryptorush  tell me that I headed to a website (which does not work) or to the email address: zeitloss@zeit-coin.com.

Send the email and no way to answer.

Any idea where to?

Thanks in advance

translate google

[TuxNut]

Damn Anon, how much FUD you trying to spread with that ego of yours?

PoS was been about for a long time since PeerCoin and used in many coins and was created to make a 51% attack even harder than pure PoW.

To do a PoS attack, the attacker would have to the biggest biggest holdings for at least 4 blocks in a row AND wait 25 minutes to see the fruits of their labour (50 confirmations required for PoS blocks) AND be lucky that their blocks were chosen to be the primary block solver for those 4 continuous blocks AND have already planned the attack 20 days in advance AND time the attack perfectly.

It's just not going to happen, there are too many variables and too much difficulty and they'd have to hold the majority of coins which could then become worthless when the attack is noticed and people dump their coins.

There are pure PoS coins, if this was going to happen, it would be done on those coins first.


You really have missed a lot of stuff here and to think that no one else other than yourself has thought of this is just .... well, I'll let you pick the words.

[jommy99]

just a thought.. 
Hey I have been using this for Dogecoin paper wallets and bulk wallets site and love it..  Looks like it wouldn't be to tough to update it for Zeitcoin anyone good at this sort of dev effort?
https://github.com/pointbiz/bitaddress.org  is the repository  http://dogeaddress.com/  dogecoin implementation   any tools options websites added to Zeitcoin add visibility as well as usefulness and therefore market demand.  Well actually we would probably use this reoository to start with like Dogecoin did   https://github.com/litecoin-project/liteaddress.org

[LionOfNarnia]

Gotta say I think i'm about done with this coin....someone can enjoy my 40M coins......with the 60BTC walls that are up I don't see much future in the coin

I would love some coins MuX6gYtHRPwDSupabSf3WeYZbXrKw3z3yS

Thank you!

YOU BUNCH OF FREELOADING VAMPIRE FUCKS

already about 20 nobodies, who as soon as there is a SNIFF of a freebie, are there with your begging bowls out.

You all make me fucking sick.

Want some ZEIT?

Then either BUY them or MINE them

STOP polluting our community with your mindless greed. this place is not for the likes of you.

*END RANT*

Angry Lion sits with sharpened claws ready - piss him off at your peril.