Stare into the sun

[FalconFly]

Physics make you blind and stupid if you believe in it like a religion.
This is one of the lie along with "brain cannot grow new neurons".
It is only because you believe in it that you lose vision acuity and your brain get rotten.

Old people can see very well. Old people can grow new neurons and maintain their mental capacity.

If you use science to justify your point of view, at least get updated.

Physics isn't like religion - it doesn't give a sh*t about belief.
People know physics, religious nuts believe their religion (and erroneously mistake that for knowledge, despite the 100.0% perfect contradiction of terms).

Small detail, insanely massive difference. But pointless trying to explain belief vs. knowledge to a believing person (IMHO it's like their brains mashed those two completely different items into one, I have no better explanation for that permanent mistake those people make over and over and over again).

I won't even go into the percentage of (religious or non-religious) eldery who live with severely degraded vision.
Neuronal cells can recover, but only to some extend and with drastically reduced success with increased age.

No thanks to religion, scientists were able to assist and amplify the process to a high degree - but even that has limits.

Anyway superresistant (to education), tell your BS story to some paraplegic or nearly blind, elderly person.
If ever you get chocked or hit with a cane on your head by a pissed-off eldery or someone stuck to a wheelchair - it's well-deserved.

Seriously, the amount of religious BS and nonsense around threads like this is mind-bending. Never seen so much stupidity and human mad cow disease in an internet forum before, in such a concentrated form. Religious nuts truly are mental zombies. Frightening to know such people freely roam the planet and may even look healthy to the outside.

[superresistant]

Physics make you blind and stupid if you believe in it like a religion.
This is one of the lie along with "brain cannot grow new neurons".
It is only because you believe in it that you lose vision acuity and your brain get rotten.

Old people can see very well. Old people can grow new neurons and maintain their mental capacity.

If you use science to justify your point of view, at least get updated.

Physics isn't like religion - it doesn't give a sh*t about belief.
People know physics, religious nuts believe their religion (and erroneously mistake that for knowledge, despite the 100.0% perfect contradiction of terms).

Small detail, insanely massive difference. But pointless trying to explain belief vs. knowledge to a believing person (IMHO it's like their brains mashed those two completely different items into one, I have no better explanation for that permanent mistake those people make over and over and over again).

I won't even go into the percentage of (religious or non-religious) eldery who live with severely degraded vision.
Neuronal cells can recover, but only to some extend and with drastically reduced success with increased age.

No thanks to religion, scientists were able to assist and amplify the process to a high degree - but even that has limits.

Anyway superresistant (to education), tell your BS story to some paraplegic or nearly blind, elderly person.
If ever you get chocked or hit with a cane on your head by a pissed-off eldery or someone stuck to a wheelchair - it's well-deserved.

Seriously, the amount of religious BS and nonsense around threads like this is mind-bending. Never seen so much stupidity and human mad cow disease in an internet forum before, in such a concentrated form. Religious nuts truly are mental zombies. Frightening to know such people freely roam the planet and may even look healthy to the outside.

You talk like a religious fanatic.

Peace.

[LostDutchman]

Physics isn't like religion - it doesn't give a sh*t about belief.
People know physics, religious nuts believe their religion (and erroneously mistake that for knowledge, despite the 100.0% perfect contradiction of terms).

Small detail, insanely massive difference. But pointless trying to explain belief vs. knowledge to a believing person (IMHO it's like their brains mashed those two completely different items into one, I have no better explanation for that permanent mistake those people make over and over and over again).

I won't even go into the percentage of (religious or non-religious) eldery who live with severely degraded vision.
Neuronal cells can recover, but only to some extend and with drastically reduced success with increased age.

No thanks to religion, scientists were able to assist and amplify the process to a high degree - but even that has limits.

Anyway superresistant (to education), tell your BS story to some paraplegic or nearly blind, elderly person.
If ever you get chocked or hit with a cane on your head by a pissed-off eldery or someone stuck to a wheelchair - it's well-deserved.

Seriously, the amount of religious BS and nonsense around threads like this is mind-bending. Never seen so much stupidity and human mad cow disease in an internet forum before, in such a concentrated form. Religious nuts truly are mental zombies. Frightening to know such people freely roam the planet and may even look healthy to the outside.

Very well put!

I especially like this part:

"Seriously, the amount of religious BS and nonsense around threads like this is mind-bending. Never seen so much stupidity and human mad cow disease in an internet forum before, in such a concentrated form. Religious nuts truly are mental zombies. Frightening to know such people freely roam the planet and may even look healthy to the outside."

My $.02.

[dank]

Physics make you blind and stupid if you believe in it like a religion.
This is one of the lie along with "brain cannot grow new neurons".
It is only because you believe in it that you lose vision acuity and your brain get rotten.

Old people can see very well. Old people can grow new neurons and maintain their mental capacity.

If you use science to justify your point of view, at least get updated.

Physics isn't like religion - it doesn't give a sh*t about belief.
People know physics, religious nuts believe their religion (and erroneously mistake that for knowledge, despite the 100.0% perfect contradiction of terms).

Small detail, insanely massive difference. But pointless trying to explain belief vs. knowledge to a believing person (IMHO it's like their brains mashed those two completely different items into one, I have no better explanation for that permanent mistake those people make over and over and over again).

I won't even go into the percentage of (religious or non-religious) eldery who live with severely degraded vision.
Neuronal cells can recover, but only to some extend and with drastically reduced success with increased age.

No thanks to religion, scientists were able to assist and amplify the process to a high degree - but even that has limits.

Anyway superresistant (to education), tell your BS story to some paraplegic or nearly blind, elderly person.
If ever you get chocked or hit with a cane on your head by a pissed-off eldery or someone stuck to a wheelchair - it's well-deserved.

Seriously, the amount of religious BS and nonsense around threads like this is mind-bending. Never seen so much stupidity and human mad cow disease in an internet forum before, in such a concentrated form. Religious nuts truly are mental zombies. Frightening to know such people freely roam the planet and may even look healthy to the outside.

People believe in physics, so it exists.  Your reality is formulated by beliefs.  If you truly believe in something impossible, it can happen.  Hence, nothing is impossible.

[dank]

Physics isn't like religion - it doesn't give a sh*t about belief.
People know physics, religious nuts believe their religion (and erroneously mistake that for knowledge, despite the 100.0% perfect contradiction of terms).

Small detail, insanely massive difference. But pointless trying to explain belief vs. knowledge to a believing person (IMHO it's like their brains mashed those two completely different items into one, I have no better explanation for that permanent mistake those people make over and over and over again).

I won't even go into the percentage of (religious or non-religious) eldery who live with severely degraded vision.
Neuronal cells can recover, but only to some extend and with drastically reduced success with increased age.

No thanks to religion, scientists were able to assist and amplify the process to a high degree - but even that has limits.

Anyway superresistant (to education), tell your BS story to some paraplegic or nearly blind, elderly person.
If ever you get chocked or hit with a cane on your head by a pissed-off eldery or someone stuck to a wheelchair - it's well-deserved.

Seriously, the amount of religious BS and nonsense around threads like this is mind-bending. Never seen so much stupidity and human mad cow disease in an internet forum before, in such a concentrated form. Religious nuts truly are mental zombies. Frightening to know such people freely roam the planet and may even look healthy to the outside.

Very well put!

I especially like this part:

"Seriously, the amount of religious BS and nonsense around threads like this is mind-bending. Never seen so much stupidity and human mad cow disease in an internet forum before, in such a concentrated form. Religious nuts truly are mental zombies. Frightening to know such people freely roam the planet and may even look healthy to the outside."

My $.02.

So you're on team vod now?



Atheism is a religion.  Science is a religion.  There are no universal laws.

[LostDutchman]

Physics isn't like religion - it doesn't give a sh*t about belief.
People know physics, religious nuts believe their religion (and erroneously mistake that for knowledge, despite the 100.0% perfect contradiction of terms).

Small detail, insanely massive difference. But pointless trying to explain belief vs. knowledge to a believing person (IMHO it's like their brains mashed those two completely different items into one, I have no better explanation for that permanent mistake those people make over and over and over again).

I won't even go into the percentage of (religious or non-religious) eldery who live with severely degraded vision.
Neuronal cells can recover, but only to some extend and with drastically reduced success with increased age.

No thanks to religion, scientists were able to assist and amplify the process to a high degree - but even that has limits.

Anyway superresistant (to education), tell your BS story to some paraplegic or nearly blind, elderly person.
If ever you get chocked or hit with a cane on your head by a pissed-off eldery or someone stuck to a wheelchair - it's well-deserved.

Seriously, the amount of religious BS and nonsense around threads like this is mind-bending. Never seen so much stupidity and human mad cow disease in an internet forum before, in such a concentrated form. Religious nuts truly are mental zombies. Frightening to know such people freely roam the planet and may even look healthy to the outside.

Very well put!

I especially like this part:

"Seriously, the amount of religious BS and nonsense around threads like this is mind-bending. Never seen so much stupidity and human mad cow disease in an internet forum before, in such a concentrated form. Religious nuts truly are mental zombies. Frightening to know such people freely roam the planet and may even look healthy to the outside."

My $.02.

So you're on team vod now?



Atheism is a religion.  Science is a religion.  There are no universal laws.

"Christianity:

The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.:

Yeah, I am all enthused about living my life by that shit.

My $.02.

[dank]

Physics isn't like religion - it doesn't give a sh*t about belief.
People know physics, religious nuts believe their religion (and erroneously mistake that for knowledge, despite the 100.0% perfect contradiction of terms).

Small detail, insanely massive difference. But pointless trying to explain belief vs. knowledge to a believing person (IMHO it's like their brains mashed those two completely different items into one, I have no better explanation for that permanent mistake those people make over and over and over again).

I won't even go into the percentage of (religious or non-religious) eldery who live with severely degraded vision.
Neuronal cells can recover, but only to some extend and with drastically reduced success with increased age.

No thanks to religion, scientists were able to assist and amplify the process to a high degree - but even that has limits.

Anyway superresistant (to education), tell your BS story to some paraplegic or nearly blind, elderly person.
If ever you get chocked or hit with a cane on your head by a pissed-off eldery or someone stuck to a wheelchair - it's well-deserved.

Seriously, the amount of religious BS and nonsense around threads like this is mind-bending. Never seen so much stupidity and human mad cow disease in an internet forum before, in such a concentrated form. Religious nuts truly are mental zombies. Frightening to know such people freely roam the planet and may even look healthy to the outside.

Very well put!

I especially like this part:

"Seriously, the amount of religious BS and nonsense around threads like this is mind-bending. Never seen so much stupidity and human mad cow disease in an internet forum before, in such a concentrated form. Religious nuts truly are mental zombies. Frightening to know such people freely roam the planet and may even look healthy to the outside."

My $.02.

So you're on team vod now?



Atheism is a religion.  Science is a religion.  There are no universal laws.

"Christianity:

The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.:

Yeah, I am all enthused about living my life by that shit.

My $.02.

Christianity:

A man titled Jesus walked the earth and found his soul through alterations of consciousness.  He learned the true spiritual nature of the universe and shared it unconditionally.  He learned about duality, the opposing forces of negativity and positivity which compose our very being.  He learned that anything you believe is possible and practiced so by performing miracles, healing beings and ultimately resurrecting from the dead.  He stood up against a corrupt empire knowing full well they would kill him for speaking so loud.  He did so anyways for it was what he believed in and he knew that existence is eternal and beyond this life awaits a world of infinite peace and possibilities.

[FalconFly]

I have the guy on ignore but I can still see the quotes of course.

Atheism is a religion.  Science is a religion.  There are no universal laws.

As usual, his drugged up twisted mind gets the facts 100.0% wrong.

Atheism is not a religion (that would kinda defeat the purpose, now wouldn't it?).
Science is not a religion (has nothing to do with it -at all- no matter what uneducated numbnuts believe, although science can in some parts help explain how some humans can fall victim to religion).
There are universal laws (for starters, try defeating gravity please. Thank you, I thought so.).

As criticism should always have something constructive to it :
dank really is a very useful contraindicator when it comes to common sense- or sanity-checks.
Just reverse anything he says by exact 180 degrees - then you've made an excellent step towards the truth (basically takes you within about 10% of being 100% spot-on. Persistently >90% is not bad actually...).

[dank]

I have the guy on ignore but I can still see the quotes of course.

Atheism is a religion.  Science is a religion.  There are no universal laws.

As usual, his drugged up twisted mind gets the facts 100.0% wrong.

Atheism is not a religion (that would kinda defeat the purpose, now wouldn't it?).
Science is not a religion (has nothing to do with it -at all- no matter what uneducated numbnuts believe, although science can in some parts help explain how some humans can fall victim to religion).
There are universal laws (for starters, try defeating gravity please. Thank you, I thought so.).

As criticism should always have something constructive to it :
dank really is a very useful contraindicator when it comes to common sense- or sanity-checks.
Just reverse anything he says by exact 180 degrees - then you've made an excellent step towards the truth (basically takes you within about 10% of being 100% spot-on. Persistently >90% is not bad actually...).

If you say so.

religion: a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe

Atheists believe in ego.  Theists believe in god.  It's not very complicated, as I just said, negatives and positives, duality.

There are universal laws (for starters, try defeating gravity please. Thank you, I thought so.).

I disagree.  I, and several friends, have witnessed a lamp jump off a table, a violation of physics.  And I have a friend who swears that he has levitated on accident momentarily.  Girls that had never done any drugs saw this happen.

You are speaking in negatives, fallacies.  The truth is positivity, the truth is the universe is infinite.  And it really is that simple, positive statements are true, negative statements are false.  The only laws of the universe are the ones you set yourself.

[Vod]

You are speaking in negatives, fallacies.  The truth is positivity, the truth is the universe is infinite.  And it really is that simple, positive statements are true, negative statements are false.  The only laws of the universe are the ones you set yourself.

What about the laws of economics?

Why can't you simply create the coins to pay back Squall?  You gave your word you would.  All you are is your word.

Why are you ever nothing but talk?

[Bit_Happy]

"Momma told me not to look into the eyes of the Sun!"

"But Momma, that's where the fun is!"

Bruce Springsteen, "Blinded By The Light".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Iaca30QbOo

My $.02.

The Manfred Mann version is MUCH better. 

[LostDutchman]

"Momma told me not to look into the eyes of the Sun!"

"But Momma, that's where the fun is!"

Bruce Springsteen, "Blinded By The Light".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Iaca30QbOo

My $.02.

The Manfred Mann version is MUCH better. 

Well, now, each stands on its own but remember that Springsteen wrote the thing................

My $.02.

[dank]

You are speaking in negatives, fallacies.  The truth is positivity, the truth is the universe is infinite.  And it really is that simple, positive statements are true, negative statements are false.  The only laws of the universe are the ones you set yourself.

What about the laws of economics?

Why can't you simply create the coins to pay back Squall?  You gave your word you would.  All you are is your word.

Why are you ever nothing but talk?

I've been sending him money.  What's your deal?

[Vod]

I've been sending him money.  What's your deal?

You gave your word you would send coins on a regular basis.  You are not doing that.   

If you have all this power, why not pay your debt as you agreed?

[dank]

I've been sending him money.  What's your deal?

You gave your word you would send coins on a regular basis.  You are not doing that.   

If you have all this power, why not pay your debt as you agreed?

I'm paying once a month like I agreed with squall.  I don't see where the discrepancy is.

[Bit_Happy]

"Momma told me not to look into the eyes of the Sun!"

"But Momma, that's where the fun is!"

Bruce Springsteen, "Blinded By The Light".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Iaca30QbOo

My $.02.

The Manfred Mann version is MUCH better.  

Well, now, each stands on its own but remember that Springsteen wrote the thing................

My $.02.

Remember, remember the Manfred Mann version is much better.  
I never saw Springsteen in his prime, but I heard his 3+ hour shows were amazing.

[Vod]

I'm paying once a month like I agreed with squall.  I don't see where the discrepancy is.

You don't??

You said the debt was on Squall's terms.  Squall asked for 0.1btc a month.  You were making payments of 0.1btc a month.

Your last payment was in Jan.  We are in March.

Do you understand the discrepancy now?  Can you catch up on your payments?

Debt is on your terms, squall.

That was your word, dank.  And you say all you have is your word.

[dank]

I'm paying once a month like I agreed with squall.  I don't see where the discrepancy is.

You don't??

You said the debt was on Squall's terms.  Squall asked for 0.1btc a month.  You were making payments of 0.1btc a month.

Your last payment was in Jan.  We are in March.

Do you understand the discrepancy now?  Can you catch up on your payments?

Debt is on your terms, squall.

That was your word, dank.  And you say all you have is your word.

You're just lying now.  Like normal.  I just sent squall .042 BTC.  I sent him .1 last month.  If he has a problem he would contact me, I don't see why you feel the need to get in other people's business.

Don't you have your own life to live?

[Vod]

You're just lying now.  Like normal.  I just sent squall .042 BTC.  I sent him .1 last month.

Do you even have the ability to determine reality anymore?

I don't lie.  You, on the other hand, are a pathological liar.  

Your last 0.1btc payment to Squall was in Jan.  It's all public record, since as a proven scammer you cannot edit your posts.

You asked me to get involved.  You also gave your word to respect me.  Calling me a liar is not showing respect.

If your word is worth nothing, then you are worth nothing dank.  

If he has a problem he would contact me, I don't see why you feel the need to get in other people's business.

Did he not contact you?

Did he not ask you via PM to send him 0.1btc?

Did you not offer him via PM worthless potcoins instead?

HE HAS A PROBLEM - HE HAS CONTACTED YOU - PAY YOUR DEBT

[superresistant]

I have the guy on ignore but I can still see the quotes of course.

Atheism is a religion.  Science is a religion.  There are no universal laws.

As usual, his drugged up twisted mind gets the facts 100.0% wrong.
Atheism is not a religion (that would kinda defeat the purpose, now wouldn't it?).
Science is not a religion (has nothing to do with it -at all- no matter what uneducated numbnuts believe, although science can in some parts help explain how some humans can fall victim to religion).
There are universal laws (for starters, try defeating gravity please. Thank you, I thought so.).

The Newton's laws of motion are obsolete long ago but still most Atheists believe in it like a religion.

Of course science is not a religion but if you believe in it as eternal facts then you are nothing more than a fanatic.

The real science, the science of today :
Quantum mechanics,  Dark energy, String theory, Loop quantum gravity, Unparticle physics, ...

The one that people know nothing about have nothing intuitive. That's why people chose to believe in old obsolete science like they chose to believe in a religion.

If you knew about the imminent paradigm shift that science is facing today you would not consider every dank ideas as non-sense.