Overview of Bounty Managers

[Yungphash]

I voted for Yahoo.
The major reason why I love his campaigns is because of the high success rate. I've seen some of the campaigns he managed that yielded good profit for the participants. He doesn't just accept a deal anyhow like other BMs which I won't mention their names.
I will vote twice for him if possible.

[1715026842]

1715026842

[1715026842]

1715026842

[1715026842]

1715026842

[1715026842]

1715026842

[1715026842]

1715026842

[1715026842]

1715026842

[NickVasilich]

There almost 7 thousands of thread views so if all of them are voting then we have now the most voted bounty manager with a vote of 500+ or 1000.

Not all people here to vote, they just want to know which bounty managers that they should follow imo. I personally take more credit on the project instead of the manager, unless it's an extreme case where I can't verify the project by myself, I tend to look at the manager and his past job. If he tends to manage legit bounties (not a scam project), I might give it a chance. But if not, then I'd skip it.

From the list on the poll, only 2 managers that I considered as best managers which most of the time manage good projects.

Good thoughts to estimate the projects and than to make conclusions about managers.

But how do you guys estimate those managers? You evaluate them if you’re a bounty hunter?

Don’t you think to evaluate them from the side of a project? Who of them is playing the best for bounty goals  implementation - bounty goals TO REACH AS MANY ORGANIC REACH AND TO INCREASE FREE WEBSITES’ TRAFFIC.

Here is a painful topic, related to bounty campaigns’ management - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5130786.msg50561324#msg50561324

I can't vote for anyone in the list. They could be good communicative but they're not good marketers (

[ApocalypseNow]

I voted for Yahoo.
The major reason why I love his campaigns is because of the high success rate. I've seen some of the campaigns he managed that yielded good profit for the participants. He doesn't just accept a deal anyhow like other BMs which I won't mention their names.
I will vote twice for him if possible.

Yahooo is also my favorite but newbies won't ever see how his legacy works at this moment. Things got ugly and the fomo has left us for more than a year that resulted into very less bounty campaigns that yahoo could've handled professionally. And now all the good to best managers are willing to get tagged negative just to get paid but not him.

[yahoo62278]

I voted for Yahoo.
The major reason why I love his campaigns is because of the high success rate. I've seen some of the campaigns he managed that yielded good profit for the participants. He doesn't just accept a deal anyhow like other BMs which I won't mention their names.
I will vote twice for him if possible.

Yahooo is also my favorite but newbies won't ever see how his legacy works at this moment. Things got ugly and the fomo has left us for more than a year that resulted into very less bounty campaigns that yahoo could've handled professionally. And now all the good to best managers are willing to get tagged negative just to get paid but not him.

I dislike bounty campaigns, that's part of the reason I only take on a few a year. There are so many cheaters joining them, teams are not willing to pay good money to a BM, and the headache just isn't worth it in the long run.

If I do take on a client I feel I only accept the best of the best. So far most campaigns managed by me in the form of a bounty campaign have been successful for all participants.

[okala]

I like the method use to collate the data for this research the voting of the best bounty manager was left for members of this forum to cast they vote, and from the result and percentage of the various bounty managera we have in the forum you can know the best among them and the voting process is still ongoing.

[miningguru]

I voted for Yahoo.
The major reason why I love his campaigns is because of the high success rate. I've seen some of the campaigns he managed that yielded good profit for the participants. He doesn't just accept a deal anyhow like other BMs which I won't mention their names.
I will vote twice for him if possible.

Yahooo is also my favorite but newbies won't ever see how his legacy works at this moment. Things got ugly and the fomo has left us for more than a year that resulted into very less bounty campaigns that yahoo could've handled professionally. And now all the good to best managers are willing to get tagged negative just to get paid but not him.

I dislike bounty campaigns, that's part of the reason I only take on a few a year. There are so many cheaters joining them, teams are not willing to pay good money to a BM, and the headache just isn't worth it in the long run.

If I do take on a client I feel I only accept the best of the best. So far most campaigns managed by me in the form of a bounty campaign have been successful for all participants.

Yes, most of the bounties managed Yahoo has been successful, of course, it will take time for the manager to choose the right one to manage. Still, there are many people who will a lot of interest in Yahoo's management once he launches the bounty campaign.

[shiunsai]

I voted for Yahoo.
The major reason why I love his campaigns is because of the high success rate. I've seen some of the campaigns he managed that yielded good profit for the participants. He doesn't just accept a deal anyhow like other BMs which I won't mention their names.
I will vote twice for him if possible.

Yahooo is also my favorite but newbies won't ever see how his legacy works at this moment. Things got ugly and the fomo has left us for more than a year that resulted into very less bounty campaigns that yahoo could've handled professionally. And now all the good to best managers are willing to get tagged negative just to get paid but not him.

I dislike bounty campaigns, that's part of the reason I only take on a few a year. There are so many cheaters joining them, teams are not willing to pay good money to a BM, and the headache just isn't worth it in the long run.

If I do take on a client I feel I only accept the best of the best. So far most campaigns managed by me in the form of a bounty campaign have been successful for all participants.

Yes, most of the bounties managed Yahoo has been successful, of course, it will take time for the manager to choose the right one to manage. Still, there are many people who will a lot of interest in Yahoo's management once he launches the bounty campaign.

Yes I do also agree that Yahoo is one of the best campaign manager out there. I participated some of his signature campaign in the past and what I say is he manage well and the payment is on time.

[Daboy_Lyle]

Yes I do also agree that Yahoo is one of the best campaign manager out there. I participated some of his signature campaign in the past and what I say is he manage well and the payment is on time.

We can see it in the pool obviously that yahoo62278 is the best base on the people or bitcoin users and maybe we can award him the People Choice Award in Managing Bounties if possible. I am also a worker of yahoo on his past campaigns where I participated, Hhampuz  joined many campaigns and also julerz12 where in I participated on his past campaign and now with his new one. Many bounty managers are here around but not all of them are listed so better to share this thread to you local boards or even in community groups.

[klaaas]

I joined some campaigns from the managers from the list and they where honest and accurate, probably the most important thing. 
Job for the manager is to keep things positive for both sides, work provider/taker.

[anu1908]

just submitted my vote and it seems yahoo is leading by miles. surprised to see amazix got some votes though.
but it seems they don't get that many projects now due to many questionable acts.

[mersal]

Seems not many of those managers are active at the moment and even there are only two managers in the list managing multiple bitcoin paying signature campaigns so we can conclude that they were the best managers at the moment.But yahoo still got the best reputation based on votes.

[Zemomtum]

I will always guaranteed anybody to stick with Arteezy.rtx, many of the campaigns that I have participated through them give me awesome experience that I bothered to look elsewhere.

[iv4n]

I worked under many managers from this list, and most of them are good. Yahoo is one of the oldest managers on this list and he is a good guy, he is someone you can talk with, he will help or at least try to help you with any problem. Reasonable guy, with both feet on the ground, not like some other managers.
I will mention Parodium too. Bounty cloud is interesting idea, I believe they are doing their work. I voted for him!

[clickoutsourcing]

Good to know we have this kind of thread on where we could vouch for the bounty managers here in Bitcointalk.

[asyakashi]

I will always guaranteed anybody to stick with Arteezy.rtx, many of the campaigns that I have participated through them give me awesome experience that I bothered to look elsewhere.

Some of his projects were successful but he seemed busy in managing a campaign. just look at their telegram group and there are lots of compilation campaign participants and they don't get answers. he must have many teams to manage many bounties.

[79b79aa8d5047da6d3XX]

I really love Hhampuz he is so down to earth.  He listens to bounty complaints and always quick to solve them. Sylon hardly responds to complaints i dont enjoy his bounty one bit

[Marcogwapo]

I also recommend ramsdaj28 to be in the list. He's a great campaign manager and designer, and probably one of the most considerate managers I ever worked with.

Here's ramsdaj28's profile:

Name: ramsdaj28
Rank: Sr. Member   
Portfolio: Ramsdaj28 Signature Campaign Management and Services
Contact: Telegram

I also agree with most members that Yahoo is one of the best, if not the best, campaign managers in the forum.

[RapTarX]

Voted for Hhampuz, most people have voted for Yahoo though. I haven't been lucky to work with Yahoo. Hhampuz is a punctual and responsive manager.