Rating sites for confidence?

[izsara]

there are many rating sites at this time, to process the information we need a lot of information, even though 100% of the information we cannot become a size but the site rating is still useful for us, we can compare it one by one ... we can also combines site rating reviews with expert analysis

[Benarand]

If you want to invest in a project in order to get their tokens, then it is not necessary to see the rating on one site. It is easier to enter the name of the project in a search engine and there will be enough websites with ratings. But as practice shows, not all experts make an accurate prediction and not everyone can be trusted.

[PM.coins]

I think for 50% believe and 50% don't believe, nobody really or trusts about sites. It would be better to do your own research and analysis. Although it also doesn't hurt to be one particular source of information.

[Snake9999]

The cryptomarket is developing and a lot of people including I have the question about confident sites and resources to find suitable coins for investments. Some of these sites are pay and it is too responsible to trust them not to be confident in the truth of their information in the same time. I am against for trusting to these sites because I am sure that experts’ opinions are more promising in this case and it is easier to believe to the particular person than to different sites. What about you? Do you trust these sites or do you find information in the other sphere of life?

The rating of the projects listed on these assessment sites can be helpful in selecting projects. I usually use the information on these sites as part of my selection. Because they are not completely nonsense, some good evaluation sites still have their own professional ethics.

[ValeryO]

The only site I trust https://icodrops.com The Rest of the sites began to greatly overestimate the ratings of the projects.

I will support your opinion. Many projects rated on this platform gave investors X after ICO.

[shakesbear]

I often read icodrops, and now I read the telegram channel, and communicate in chat, this is quite enough.

[Thanasis]

The cryptomarket is developing and a lot of people including I have the question about confident sites and resources to find suitable coins for investments. Some of these sites are pay and it is too responsible to trust them not to be confident in the truth of their information in the same time. I am against for trusting to these sites because I am sure that experts’ opinions are more promising in this case and it is easier to believe to the particular person than to different sites. What about you? Do you trust these sites or do you find information in the other sphere of life?

Are you talking bout the ICO rating sites? If yes then those were not to be trusted because they are getting money for high rating from the sites and also many people were offering fake reviews for that projects so which is untrustworthy and not enough to invest because the best project no need any illegal activities to get succeed.So don't trust them just do your own research for investing your own money.

[mbah]

the site rating is often given a corresponding assessment of what is. Maybe it will be better when you perform your own analysis because in addition to add insight would also be useful to add to the knowledge in crypto. do not assume that the site assessment rating is good, although there are a few who could be trusted many also did not match expectations.

[toygama]

Most of the rating sites do actually do indirect promotion of ICOs.I don't trust any rating site that collects fee for listing or reviewing any ICOs on their site.Always do your own research on the ICO and discuss about the ICO on the forums/friends and come to conclusion.Don't just go blidndly with rating sites

Since we are here already and we still here for good, we try to established our own formula of selecting  credible projects asking advice from the experts and making our own research are much also applicable. Just considered rating sites as a guide.

[anov996]

Only a fool would trust others folks opinion. I mean a biased one whereas they really able to analysis and analyze by themselves instead they relinquishment the task to unknown and biased rating websites. to form an honest investment we have a tendency to should deeply analysis and analyst the project by ourself since its unbiased.

[mapsi]

The cryptomarket is developing and a lot of people including I have the question about confident sites and resources to find suitable coins for investments. Some of these sites are pay and it is too responsible to trust them not to be confident in the truth of their information in the same time. I am against for trusting to these sites because I am sure that experts’ opinions are more promising in this case and it is easier to believe to the particular person than to different sites. What about you? Do you trust these sites or do you find information in the other sphere of life?

In my opinion investors shouldnt trust anybody. Especially these ico rating websites. If you really want to find some real and valuable information about icos
you can follow some ico influencers . We have some good influencers in that area. So i never believe that websites i dont even look theirwebsites.
Please be careful while investing.

[kier010]

i think many of those rating sites are paid to give high rating to ICOs. ranking sites will accept money if it is offer to them. also i don't trust this experts opinion because they can also be paid to promote ICOs.

[Uhde]

i dont trust to any rating site at all. ico teams can easily pay and get higher rating in these sites. but i still check them because even they make manipulations, knowing about manipulations is also something important for us.

[zanzibar]

I prefer to trust expert opinion. I join crypto-trading chat in telegram with professional traders. They often make youtube stream discussing coins.

And they are often paid a lot of money to discuss that coins on their youtube channel, and they are not even paid in coin they are promoting, no they don't believe in it that much!

They have been getting paid from ico creators and that's true this happens so many times and i should remind you when someone else was creating an article about the truth of the mcafee and then it can be a very strong example about youtube stream can't be trusted at all. This based on my experience from a few years ago.

Even at the present time, many ICO review websites are being paid to list ICOs on their websites. This is one of the things that makes many people lose money when investing in such ICO

[Anna Borisovna]

I look at forecasts or signals on several telegram channels, and on YouTube.
But you can watch and listen to the forecasts of various experts, analyze yourself a little and see the right way.

[MegaPost]

The cryptomarket is developing and a lot of people including I have the question about confident sites and resources to find suitable coins for investments. Some of these sites are pay and it is too responsible to trust them not to be confident in the truth of their information in the same time. I am against for trusting to these sites because I am sure that experts’ opinions are more promising in this case and it is easier to believe to the particular person than to different sites. What about you? Do you trust these sites or do you find information in the other sphere of life?

I of course trust these sites, especially paid. It is thanks to them that I can earn and look for what I need. I do not imagine how you can ignore them and is there another way to better search for new ICO

[Lagduf]

I think for 50% believe and 50% don't believe, nobody really or trusts about sites. It would be better to do your own research and analysis. Although it also doesn't hurt to be one particular source of information.

Just take the information you need other than the biased review and that unreliable rating given to that ico project. It's always good to make an analyzation by yourself if you know enough about everything just as you said.
For me those ico rating is just a gimmick where it have no usefulness at all other than being used for advertisement or money generator LOL.

[Kunlejoe0]

If you feel rating site are paid for the rating they give to ICO, start looking for other rating site that are not paid but be ready to pay them for the rating service they will give to you. The quality project are all over if you know what to look for!

[miyaka26]

Don't make them the main base for your decision to investments just view it as a potential suggestion for future references, not all of them are accurate some of the websites can even edit their ratings when the projects collapse to a fraud scheme or they can be a one-sided reviewer because the project paid the enlistment to their rating site, do your own evaluation at some point it is your money at the end to protect.

[Badboy[BTC]]

How can you trust ICO ratings when they sell ads for huge amounts of money? I believe that the best analysis of the project can be carried out only on their own and never trust the purchased ratings.It's the same as taking the word of a stranger and giving him your money.