[ANN]🚀 TrustED🚀 Academic Credential Verification on Blockchain

[inoes]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

even better than projects that have absolutely no plans
and the community actually does not understand how difficult it is for a project to be able to list into a large exchange even after they launch the product and can't influence it

[Coinyspace.bounty]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

even better than projects that have absolutely no plans
and the community actually does not understand how difficult it is for a project to be able to list into a large exchange even after they launch the product and can't influence it

The listing costs a lot of money and the developers of ICO have a choice where to spend money. On developments or on listing on exchanges.

[SUNbitok]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

even better than projects that have absolutely no plans
and the community actually does not understand how difficult it is for a project to be able to list into a large exchange even after they launch the product and can't influence it

The listing costs a lot of money and the developers of ICO have a choice where to spend money. On developments or on listing on exchanges.

The project has a lot of cash costs, advertising is expensive, listing, product development and much more.

[Leading person]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

even better than projects that have absolutely no plans
and the community actually does not understand how difficult it is for a project to be able to list into a large exchange even after they launch the product and can't influence it

The listing costs a lot of money and the developers of ICO have a choice where to spend money. On developments or on listing on exchanges.

The project has a lot of cash costs, advertising is expensive, listing, product development and much more.

The financial side of the issue is clear, the project initially plans its expenses and actions, relying on something.

[oficman]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

even better than projects that have absolutely no plans
and the community actually does not understand how difficult it is for a project to be able to list into a large exchange even after they launch the product and can't influence it

Listing on large exchanges is more expensive than on small exchanges and conditions on large exchanges are very strict. Not all tokens meet these conditions.

[denreddit]

News from facebook

#TrustED respects the EU legislation applied to almost every company in the world. We are proud to say our project is GDPR-compliant.

Learn more: https://medium.com/@TrustED_io/trusted-is-gdpr-compliant-aa2d5f655e76

It is very good. So with the legal issues the project in Europe will not have any problems

[STORMIX]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

If the project has a finished product and it is in demand, any exchange will make listing such a coin.

[Yuzhne]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

even better than projects that have absolutely no plans
and the community actually does not understand how difficult it is for a project to be able to list into a large exchange even after they launch the product and can't influence it

The listing costs a lot of money and the developers of ICO have a choice where to spend money. On developments or on listing on exchanges.

The project has a lot of cash costs, advertising is expensive, listing, product development and much more.

But all this is necessary for the project to work and recognize it. Coin listing is one of the important stages, the more exchanges selling coins the better

[Gromstop]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

even better than projects that have absolutely no plans
and the community actually does not understand how difficult it is for a project to be able to list into a large exchange even after they launch the product and can't influence it

Listing on large exchanges is more expensive than on small exchanges and conditions on large exchanges are very strict. Not all tokens meet these conditions.

It is unrealistic to get on all the exchanges, because it is long and expensive. The listing on the serious exchanges has a more strict placement process.

[Charisma359]

You are right, but the presence of a diploma from an employee does not confirm the fact that he is an expert in his field. Anyone can buy a diploma.

A person can have a real diploma obtained after education. However, this candidate may not be suitable for the employer. That is why trial period and testing is a good way for employee selection.

You can get a real diploma, but you can buy marks for this diploma. Then you will have real documents, but without the necessary amount of knowledge in your head.

[Aleksandra 81]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

If the project has a finished product and it is in demand, any exchange will make listing such a coin.

In order for a coin to become in demand, it must first be added to the exchange platform. Therefore, it is necessary for the teams of new coins to be taken for listing on small exchanges so that their coins will attract the attention of large exchanges.

[Enchantment99]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

even better than projects that have absolutely no plans
and the community actually does not understand how difficult it is for a project to be able to list into a large exchange even after they launch the product and can't influence it

Listing on large exchanges is more expensive than on small exchanges and conditions on large exchanges are very strict. Not all tokens meet these conditions.

It is unrealistic to get on all the exchanges, because it is long and expensive. The listing on the serious exchanges has a more strict placement process.

True, a large-scale listing is expensive and problematic. It is better to do it gradually. Then the deferred budget will not be so rapidly depleted.

[MoLoKo789]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

even better than projects that have absolutely no plans
and the community actually does not understand how difficult it is for a project to be able to list into a large exchange even after they launch the product and can't influence it

The listing costs a lot of money and the developers of ICO have a choice where to spend money. On developments or on listing on exchanges.

If the team spends all the money on the listing, how can it conduct an advertising campaign? After all, without advertising a new project on the market is not well advertised and traders' attention to the coin will not be attracted.

[Aleksandra 81]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

even better than projects that have absolutely no plans
and the community actually does not understand how difficult it is for a project to be able to list into a large exchange even after they launch the product and can't influence it

The listing costs a lot of money and the developers of ICO have a choice where to spend money. On developments or on listing on exchanges.

If the team spends all the money on the listing, how can it conduct an advertising campaign? After all, without advertising a new project on the market is not well advertised and traders' attention to the coin will not be attracted.

Users can understand. They want to see new coins on major exchanges and are not interested in how realistic this can be done when the project is quite young.

[Yuzhne]

You are right, but the presence of a diploma from an employee does not confirm the fact that he is an expert in his field. Anyone can buy a diploma.

A person can have a real diploma obtained after education. However, this candidate may not be suitable for the employer. That is why trial period and testing is a good way for employee selection.

You can get a real diploma, but you can buy marks for this diploma. Then you will have real documents, but without the necessary amount of knowledge in your head.

Well, the project does not exactly solve this problem. This is a problem of this or that university, since you can buy estimates from them

[strongtree2505]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

If the project has a finished product and it is in demand, any exchange will make listing such a coin.

In order for a coin to become in demand, it must first be added to the exchange platform. Therefore, it is necessary for the teams of new coins to be taken for listing on small exchanges so that their coins will attract the attention of large exchanges.

I agree with you. Now there are a lot of various exchanges, listing on which is not expensive.

[alexcraft1590]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

even better than projects that have absolutely no plans
and the community actually does not understand how difficult it is for a project to be able to list into a large exchange even after they launch the product and can't influence it

The listing costs a lot of money and the developers of ICO have a choice where to spend money. On developments or on listing on exchanges.

If the team spends all the money on the listing, how can it conduct an advertising campaign? After all, without advertising a new project on the market is not well advertised and traders' attention to the coin will not be attracted.

Do not make a listing at once on many exchanges! This can be done gradually, so it will not be very expensive.

[strongtree2505]

.

[Aleksandra 81]

Do not make a listing at once on many exchanges! This can be done gradually, so it will not be very expensive.

Of course the team will benefit from listing gradually. Because if the token is in demand, some exchanges themselves will contact and offer the team a listing for free.

[Charisma359]

You are right, but the presence of a diploma from an employee does not confirm the fact that he is an expert in his field. Anyone can buy a diploma.

A person can have a real diploma obtained after education. However, this candidate may not be suitable for the employer. That is why trial period and testing is a good way for employee selection.

You can get a real diploma, but you can buy marks for this diploma. Then you will have real documents, but without the necessary amount of knowledge in your head.

Well, the project does not exactly solve this problem. This is a problem of this or that university, since you can buy estimates from them

We all know that demand creates supply. Students would not want to buy grades, no one would sell them. Everything is interconnected.