[ANN]🚀 TrustED🚀 Academic Credential Verification on Blockchain

[oficman]

Yes, we need useful working projects. Often we see the end of a project activity after the end of ICO. This is definitely not conducive to the development of crypto.

Most importantly, when the teams after collecting investments start working in the cryptocurrency market, but do not give empty promises to users, investors will more actively support new projects. Here everything is interconnected.

You're right. It was the inactivity of many teams that led investors to stop actively buying new projects. Not through the fall of the market projects can not collect soft caps, but through deception of developers.

I do not understand those projects that are beginning their active work, attract the audience, but after the ICO, they cease to show further activity and soon lose their positions.

I think that just this team will not do this, because it will not be beneficial for it to make a prolonged pause in the development of its project. Moreover, the project already has partners.

[Enchantment99]

We all know that demand creates supply. Students would not want to buy grades, no one would sell them. Everything is interconnected.

You are right, who wants to learn, he learns. Whoever spends time on other things, and waving his hand to study, he buys grades. And even if such a student gets a real diploma, this document does not mean anything.

[oficman]

We all know that demand creates supply. Students would not want to buy grades, no one would sell them. Everything is interconnected.

You are right, who wants to learn, he learns. Whoever spends time on other things, and waving his hand to study, he buys grades. And even if such a student gets a real diploma, this document does not mean anything.

There are also such paradoxes when a student wants to study, but he has no money. He studies everything on his own, then buys a diploma, as it is much cheaper, and gets a job.

[MoLoKo789]

In order for a coin to become in demand, it must first be added to the exchange platform. Therefore, it is necessary for the teams of new coins to be taken for listing on small exchanges so that their coins will attract the attention of large exchanges.

I agree with you. Now there are a lot of various exchanges, listing on which is not expensive.

The best way to create demand is to organize a successful project. Exchange does not create demand. Until spring 2018, listing on the exchange could create a short-term pump. Now this also does not work.

If the project is bad to promote your project, even a large-scale listing will not help. Because tokens of an unknown project will not be in demand among traders.

[big-svobodniy]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

If the project has a finished product and it is in demand, any exchange will make listing such a coin.

In order for a coin to become in demand, it must first be added to the exchange platform. Therefore, it is necessary for the teams of new coins to be taken for listing on small exchanges so that their coins will attract the attention of large exchanges.

I agree with you. Now there are a lot of various exchanges, listing on which is not expensive.

A project with a promising product and an active community around it will have a high chance of placing a token on any exchange.

[generous]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

If the project has a finished product and it is in demand, any exchange will make listing such a coin.

In order for a coin to become in demand, it must first be added to the exchange platform. Therefore, it is necessary for the teams of new coins to be taken for listing on small exchanges so that their coins will attract the attention of large exchanges.

I agree with you. Now there are a lot of various exchanges, listing on which is not expensive.

A project with a promising product and an active community around it will have a high chance of placing a token on any exchange.

I hope that there will also be a lot of interest from existing investors. and now many exchanges are popping up. and to be able to be in a quality exchange needed a concept and development from a project to be able to compete

[Gromstop]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

even better than projects that have absolutely no plans
and the community actually does not understand how difficult it is for a project to be able to list into a large exchange even after they launch the product and can't influence it

The listing costs a lot of money and the developers of ICO have a choice where to spend money. On developments or on listing on exchanges.

If the team spends all the money on the listing, how can it conduct an advertising campaign? After all, without advertising a new project on the market is not well advertised and traders' attention to the coin will not be attracted.

Advertising and listing are undoubtedly equally important, so there is no point in choosing between them, it is necessary to combine.

[SUNbitok]

Many projects initially plan listing on the largest exchanges. Reality is far from such plans. There are many examples.

even better than projects that have absolutely no plans
and the community actually does not understand how difficult it is for a project to be able to list into a large exchange even after they launch the product and can't influence it

The listing costs a lot of money and the developers of ICO have a choice where to spend money. On developments or on listing on exchanges.

If the team spends all the money on the listing, how can it conduct an advertising campaign? After all, without advertising a new project on the market is not well advertised and traders' attention to the coin will not be attracted.

Advertising and listing are undoubtedly equally important, so there is no point in choosing between them, it is necessary to combine.

In order not to choose and do everything correctly, projects are forced to attract investors.

[ayoubouni95]

In order for a coin to become in demand, it must first be added to the exchange platform. Therefore, it is necessary for the teams of new coins to be taken for listing on small exchanges so that their coins will attract the attention of large exchanges.

I agree with you. Now there are a lot of various exchanges, listing on which is not expensive.

The best way to create demand is to organize a successful project. Exchange does not create demand. Until spring 2018, listing on the exchange could create a short-term pump. Now this also does not work.

I totally agree. A working solid product would ultimately attract supporters and investors alike and that should create an absolute demand even if it is not listed yet on a single exchange.

[oficman]

I do not understand those projects that are beginning their active work, attract the audience, but after the ICO, they cease to show further activity and soon lose their positions.

I think that just this team will not do this, because it will not be beneficial for it to make a prolonged pause in the development of its project. Moreover, the project already has partners.

Any honest team does not want to postpone development. They created a project for not to wait. But many are forced, because they hold all or most their funds in crypto assets.

Sometimes unforeseen events occur, through which the team has to make small pauses. Nobody says that the teams pause on purpose. It is not profitable for them.

[Aleksandra 81]

In order for a coin to become in demand, it must first be added to the exchange platform. Therefore, it is necessary for the teams of new coins to be taken for listing on small exchanges so that their coins will attract the attention of large exchanges.

I agree with you. Now there are a lot of various exchanges, listing on which is not expensive.

The best way to create demand is to organize a successful project. Exchange does not create demand. Until spring 2018, listing on the exchange could create a short-term pump. Now this also does not work.

I totally agree. A working solid product would ultimately attract supporters and investors alike and that should create an absolute demand even if it is not listed yet on a single exchange.

But at least for one exchange, the team needs to add a project token. Otherwise, investors will be unhappy and begin to write negative reviews. This should not be allowed. Otherwise, the reputation of the team will be spoiled.

[FORTUNA88]

But at least for one exchange, the team needs to add a project token. Otherwise, investors will be unhappy and begin to write negative reviews. This should not be allowed. Otherwise, the reputation of the team will be spoiled.

This is bad for not only the team as a whole, but also for the employees individually. Then if one of them wishes to create a new product with another team, then investors will recognize it and will say that he was already in the same team as an unsuccessful project. So one listing is strictly necessary for all teams.

[Enchantment99]

Advertising and listing are undoubtedly equally important, so there is no point in choosing between them, it is necessary to combine.

Gold words! You can not choose between these things. The team needs to use them together. Only with such an approach, a new project will develop well in the market.

[Charisma359]

What's new in the TrustED project? What is the team working on now? What point of the White Paper is the TrustED team now starting to implement?

[Aleksandra 81]

What's new in the TrustED project? What is the team working on now? What point of the White Paper is the TrustED team now starting to implement?

The latest news about the work of the team can be read first of all in groups of social networks. You should join these groups to keep abreast of all the latest news and know what stage the project is at.

[STORMIX]

We all know that demand creates supply. Students would not want to buy grades, no one would sell them. Everything is interconnected.

You are right, who wants to learn, he learns. Whoever spends time on other things, and waving his hand to study, he buys grades. And even if such a student gets a real diploma, this document does not mean anything.

There are also such paradoxes when a student wants to study, but he has no money. He studies everything on his own, then buys a diploma, as it is much cheaper, and gets a job.

If a student really wants to study, he does not need a lot of money for it. Good students learn at public expense

[alexcraft1590]

I agree with you. Now there are a lot of various exchanges, listing on which is not expensive.

A project with a promising product and an active community around it will have a high chance of placing a token on any exchange.

Yes, a promising project has a chance to get a listing on a large exchange. For example, Binance from time to time creates a vote for a new listing where the community can vote for the selected asset.

On Binance to get very difficult. If I'm not mistaken, then it costs 20 kk. As for the vote, I’m not sure, it seems to me that this is done spontaneously to have an interest in the exchange

[denreddit]

I do not understand those projects that are beginning their active work, attract the audience, but after the ICO, they cease to show further activity and soon lose their positions.

I think that just this team will not do this, because it will not be beneficial for it to make a prolonged pause in the development of its project. Moreover, the project already has partners.

Any honest team does not want to postpone development. They created a project for not to wait. But many are forced, because they hold all or most their funds in crypto assets.

Unfortunately it is. Projects that even collected the required amount of cryptocurrency are forced to keep it and wait for the market to turn

[Ben4real]

I do not understand those projects that are beginning their active work, attract the audience, but after the ICO, they cease to show further activity and soon lose their positions.

I think that just this team will not do this, because it will not be beneficial for it to make a prolonged pause in the development of its project. Moreover, the project already has partners.

Any honest team does not want to postpone development. They created a project for not to wait. But many are forced, because they hold all or most their funds in crypto assets.

Unfortunately it is. Projects that even collected the required amount of cryptocurrency are forced to keep it and wait for the market to turn

You are very right, many ICO projects are no where to be found. They turn ghost after collecting people's money and only pop up in few occasions to douse out tension in their various groups. In fact, many of them keep promising the impossible

[Leading person]

But at least for one exchange, the team needs to add a project token. Otherwise, investors will be unhappy and begin to write negative reviews. This should not be allowed. Otherwise, the reputation of the team will be spoiled.

As a rule, ordinary money can be used in such services. Even without trading on the stock exchange, you can buy tokens directly in the application. This can be done to take advantage of services, as well as invest.

The project promised that the token will be added to some exchanges, many people are interested in this news and they are waiting for this, relying on their plans.