[ICO][E2C] - ELECTRONIC ENERGY COIN ✅ NEW TECHNOLOGY ✅

[Darthpotatoe]

Can I return goods purchased through you for some reason back?         

Of cource, they have whole chapter in WP about return policy.
So you can learn it by the link: https://electronicenergycoin.com/e2c_whitepaper_V1.pdf

[1714946191]

1714946191

[1714946191]

1714946191

[1714946191]

1714946191

[wz3r0]

Can I change E2C to another coin, bitcoin for example?

[Diamond]

I think this project would be cost-effective in eastern Europe, where green energy was not developed, and this market is not yet occupied by large corporations.

[BillieGin]

I think this project would be cost-effective in eastern Europe, where green energy was not developed, and this market is not yet occupied by large corporations.

I don't agree with you, due to the fact that the countries of Eastern Europe are large suppliers of electricity to Western Europe.

[Diamond]

I think this project would be cost-effective in eastern Europe, where green energy was not developed, and this market is not yet occupied by large corporations.

I don't agree with you, due to the fact that the countries of Eastern Europe are large suppliers of electricity to Western Europe.

But the main electricity in these countries is produced at thermal power plants or at nuclear power plants.

[BillieGin]

I think this project would be cost-effective in eastern Europe, where green energy was not developed, and this market is not yet occupied by large corporations.

I don't agree with you, due to the fact that the countries of Eastern Europe are large suppliers of electricity to Western Europe.

But the main electricity in these countries is produced at thermal power plants or at nuclear power plants.

It only says that they are not interested in providing the product and introducing new energy technologies.

[Diamond]

I think this project would be cost-effective in eastern Europe, where green energy was not developed, and this market is not yet occupied by large corporations.

I don't agree with you, due to the fact that the countries of Eastern Europe are large suppliers of electricity to Western Europe.

But the main electricity in these countries is produced at thermal power plants or at nuclear power plants.

It only says that they are not interested in providing the product and introducing new energy technologies.

Today, thermal power plants consuming a huge batch of coal or natural gas cease to be cost-effective

[Diamond]

I think this project would be cost-effective in eastern Europe, where green energy was not developed, and this market is not yet occupied by large corporations.

I don't agree with you, due to the fact that the countries of Eastern Europe are large suppliers of electricity to Western Europe.

But the main electricity in these countries is produced at thermal power plants or at nuclear power plants.

It only says that they are not interested in providing the product and introducing new energy technologies.

Today, thermal power plants consuming a huge batch of coal or natural gas cease to be cost-effective

Nuclear power plants also entail enormous costs in terms of uranium enrichment and the cost of a large number of workers.

[BillieGin]

I think this project would be cost-effective in eastern Europe, where green energy was not developed, and this market is not yet occupied by large corporations.

I don't agree with you, due to the fact that the countries of Eastern Europe are large suppliers of electricity to Western Europe.

But the main electricity in these countries is produced at thermal power plants or at nuclear power plants.

It only says that they are not interested in providing the product and introducing new energy technologies.

Today, thermal power plants consuming a huge batch of coal or natural gas cease to be cost-effective

Nuclear power plants also entail enormous costs in terms of uranium enrichment and the cost of a large number of workers.

But the introduction of new technologies is not cheap.

[BillieGin]

I think this project would be cost-effective in eastern Europe, where green energy was not developed, and this market is not yet occupied by large corporations.

I don't agree with you, due to the fact that the countries of Eastern Europe are large suppliers of electricity to Western Europe.

But the main electricity in these countries is produced at thermal power plants or at nuclear power plants.

It only says that they are not interested in providing the product and introducing new energy technologies.

Today, thermal power plants consuming a huge batch of coal or natural gas cease to be cost-effective

Nuclear power plants also entail enormous costs in terms of uranium enrichment and the cost of a large number of workers.

But the introduction of new technologies is not cheap.

Also, maintenance of green energy requires the transfer of training of workers and the payment of their labor.

[Diamond]

I think this project would be cost-effective in eastern Europe, where green energy was not developed, and this market is not yet occupied by large corporations.

I don't agree with you, due to the fact that the countries of Eastern Europe are large suppliers of electricity to Western Europe.

But the main electricity in these countries is produced at thermal power plants or at nuclear power plants.

It only says that they are not interested in providing the product and introducing new energy technologies.

Today, thermal power plants consuming a huge batch of coal or natural gas cease to be cost-effective

Nuclear power plants also entail enormous costs in terms of uranium enrichment and the cost of a large number of workers.

But the introduction of new technologies is not cheap.

Also, maintenance of green energy requires the transfer of training of workers and the payment of their labor.

Nevertheless, the cost of implementing green energy by paying off will last for several years.

[e2c]

Can I change E2C to another coin, bitcoin for example?

Of course, use the tidex stock exchange for that

[BillieGin]

I think this project would be cost-effective in eastern Europe, where green energy was not developed, and this market is not yet occupied by large corporations.

I don't agree with you, due to the fact that the countries of Eastern Europe are large suppliers of electricity to Western Europe.

But the main electricity in these countries is produced at thermal power plants or at nuclear power plants.

It only says that they are not interested in providing the product and introducing new energy technologies.

Today, thermal power plants consuming a huge batch of coal or natural gas cease to be cost-effective

Nuclear power plants also entail enormous costs in terms of uranium enrichment and the cost of a large number of workers.

But the introduction of new technologies is not cheap.

Also, maintenance of green energy requires the transfer of training of workers and the payment of their labor.

Nevertheless, the cost of implementing green energy by paying off will last for several years.

Why spend a lot of money for new develop, if so much cheaper to maintain in a good working condition existed?

[vnestorenko]

Will the list of major investors be published or only if they wish to do so?            

I think it needs to be done with the consent of everyone.

[Diamond]

I think this project would be cost-effective in eastern Europe, where green energy was not developed, and this market is not yet occupied by large corporations.

I don't agree with you, due to the fact that the countries of Eastern Europe are large suppliers of electricity to Western Europe.

But the main electricity in these countries is produced at thermal power plants or at nuclear power plants.

It only says that they are not interested in providing the product and introducing new energy technologies.

Today, thermal power plants consuming a huge batch of coal or natural gas cease to be cost-effective

Nuclear power plants also entail enormous costs in terms of uranium enrichment and the cost of a large number of workers.

But the introduction of new technologies is not cheap.

Also, maintenance of green energy requires the transfer of training of workers and the payment of their labor.

Nevertheless, the cost of implementing green energy by paying off will last for several years.

Why spend a lot of money for new develop, if so much cheaper to maintain in a good working condition existed?

implementation is possible and expensive, but the electricity produced by this environmentally friendly methods is cheaper.

[Diamond]

I think this project would be cost-effective in eastern Europe, where green energy was not developed, and this market is not yet occupied by large corporations.

I don't agree with you, due to the fact that the countries of Eastern Europe are large suppliers of electricity to Western Europe.

But the main electricity in these countries is produced at thermal power plants or at nuclear power plants.

It only says that they are not interested in providing the product and introducing new energy technologies.

Today, thermal power plants consuming a huge batch of coal or natural gas cease to be cost-effective

Nuclear power plants also entail enormous costs in terms of uranium enrichment and the cost of a large number of workers.

But the introduction of new technologies is not cheap.

Also, maintenance of green energy requires the transfer of training of workers and the payment of their labor.

Nevertheless, the cost of implementing green energy by paying off will last for several years.

Why spend a lot of money for new develop, if so much cheaper to maintain in a good working condition existed?

implementation is possible and expensive, but the electricity produced by this environmentally friendly methods is cheaper.

It also doesn't danger the environment.

[Diamond]

I think this project would be cost-effective in eastern Europe, where green energy was not developed, and this market is not yet occupied by large corporations.

I don't agree with you, due to the fact that the countries of Eastern Europe are large suppliers of electricity to Western Europe.

But the main electricity in these countries is produced at thermal power plants or at nuclear power plants.

It only says that they are not interested in providing the product and introducing new energy technologies.

Today, thermal power plants consuming a huge batch of coal or natural gas cease to be cost-effective

Nuclear power plants also entail enormous costs in terms of uranium enrichment and the cost of a large number of workers.

But the introduction of new technologies is not cheap.

Also, maintenance of green energy requires the transfer of training of workers and the payment of their labor.

Nevertheless, the cost of implementing green energy by paying off will last for several years.

Why spend a lot of money for new develop, if so much cheaper to maintain in a good working condition existed?

implementation is possible and expensive, but the electricity produced by this environmentally friendly methods is cheaper.

It also doesn't danger the environment.

does not exhaust the earth's resources that are not renewable (coal, gas, oil)

[BillieGin]

I think this project would be cost-effective in eastern Europe, where green energy was not developed, and this market is not yet occupied by large corporations.

I don't agree with you, due to the fact that the countries of Eastern Europe are large suppliers of electricity to Western Europe.

But the main electricity in these countries is produced at thermal power plants or at nuclear power plants.

It only says that they are not interested in providing the product and introducing new energy technologies.

Today, thermal power plants consuming a huge batch of coal or natural gas cease to be cost-effective

Nuclear power plants also entail enormous costs in terms of uranium enrichment and the cost of a large number of workers.

But the introduction of new technologies is not cheap.

Also, maintenance of green energy requires the transfer of training of workers and the payment of their labor.

Nevertheless, the cost of implementing green energy by paying off will last for several years.

Why spend a lot of money for new develop, if so much cheaper to maintain in a good working condition existed?

implementation is possible and expensive, but the electricity produced by this environmentally friendly methods is cheaper.

It also doesn't danger the environment.

does not exhaust the earth's resources that are not renewable (coal, gas, oil)

But yet, the wind, solar or wind power plants are not as powerful as traditional power plants

[BillieGin]

I think this project would be cost-effective in eastern Europe, where green energy was not developed, and this market is not yet occupied by large corporations.

I don't agree with you, due to the fact that the countries of Eastern Europe are large suppliers of electricity to Western Europe.

But the main electricity in these countries is produced at thermal power plants or at nuclear power plants.

It only says that they are not interested in providing the product and introducing new energy technologies.

Today, thermal power plants consuming a huge batch of coal or natural gas cease to be cost-effective

Nuclear power plants also entail enormous costs in terms of uranium enrichment and the cost of a large number of workers.

But the introduction of new technologies is not cheap.

Also, maintenance of green energy requires the transfer of training of workers and the payment of their labor.

Nevertheless, the cost of implementing green energy by paying off will last for several years.

Why spend a lot of money for new develop, if so much cheaper to maintain in a good working condition existed?

implementation is possible and expensive, but the electricity produced by this environmentally friendly methods is cheaper.

It also doesn't danger the environment.

does not exhaust the earth's resources that are not renewable (coal, gas, oil)

But yet, the wind, solar or wind power plants are not as powerful as traditional power plants

they need enormous unoccupied areas.

[BillieGin]

I think this project would be cost-effective in eastern Europe, where green energy was not developed, and this market is not yet occupied by large corporations.

I don't agree with you, due to the fact that the countries of Eastern Europe are large suppliers of electricity to Western Europe.

But the main electricity in these countries is produced at thermal power plants or at nuclear power plants.

It only says that they are not interested in providing the product and introducing new energy technologies.

Today, thermal power plants consuming a huge batch of coal or natural gas cease to be cost-effective

Nuclear power plants also entail enormous costs in terms of uranium enrichment and the cost of a large number of workers.

But the introduction of new technologies is not cheap.

Also, maintenance of green energy requires the transfer of training of workers and the payment of their labor.

Nevertheless, the cost of implementing green energy by paying off will last for several years.

Why spend a lot of money for new develop, if so much cheaper to maintain in a good working condition existed?

implementation is possible and expensive, but the electricity produced by this environmentally friendly methods is cheaper.

It also doesn't danger the environment.

does not exhaust the earth's resources that are not renewable (coal, gas, oil)

But yet, the wind, solar or wind power plants are not as powerful as traditional power plants

they need enormous unoccupied areas.

Due to the presence of heat, atomic, and hydroelectric power plants, it can further affect the bio-balance of the earth