Are you happy with stakes payment method ?

[InGODweTrast3]

There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?

I think we need an independent foundation that will distribute our rewards through a smart contract. Ie, before the ICO, the company contributes the budget of the bounty campaign to this fund, almost like a bounty platform, only honestly and transparently.

[fcklife]

there are some bounty managers that are not doing staking method in bounty but do the fix amount but i find it unfair for those who are doing an extra effort to achieve larger stakes. i am in favor of staking because for me it is fair.

[SSSegrio]

And how can this be achieved? if each ico project has a different budget for the bounty company. And the number of people involved also depends directly on the budget and on the bounty Manager. Especially then not to average the amount of remuneration

[pharaon]

There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?

I fully agree with your proposal, because I, too, are much better / more comfortable when there is a fixed rate, or a certain number of tokens, for certain work, rather than stack, which are counted at the end of the campaign. I hope the projects (campaign bounty) will change their vision of this.

[amanarora_1]

I'm agree with you, the amount should be fixed for each participant or according to their rank because stakes system are so annoying sometime and sometime it's not worth. We need payment according to our hardwork, so definitely this need to be change. Only managers can do it and take any action first.

[bit..what?]

I think the stake system is ok and i am actually happy with it.
It would be best, however, if a bountie already had enough money to pay the bountie participants, even if the softcap is not reached.

[auroboros]

In my opinion, the payment system with stake is the most common and fairest way, in this way developers and participants will get certain satisfaction, one of the most uncomfortable things to do with stakes is if the participants exceed expectations of development, then the result will be very little for bounty participants

[muhdede]

as long as it's published transparently I think it's fine. the provision of stake must also be determined from the quality of the bounty hunters themselves whether good or not. because each manager has a calculated stake of each participant

[Rob768]

There are advantages and dasadvantages. For example, if there is a small number of participants it's better to choose stake system to recieve tokens form all county pool. But There is a huge number of participant it's better to choose fix payments.

[jacafbiz]

This is shouldn't be an issue, there the various method has been proposed before by different campaign and it all work out well, we are debating the issue of stake now because ICOs are struggling to raise fund in the market and is affecting bounty campaigns and participants. I think both have their advantages and disadvantages but the main thing for the bounty hunters is for the project to become successful when is successful no one will be concern about what he gets, or how he get it

[Ini35]

The reward gotten through stakes has always been the best for me, instead of using a direct payment system. The bounties i participated in, where direct payment system is used, the reward most times is usually very small. This will have more effect when your rank is still very low. I have even stopped participating in bounty campaigns with such system of distribution.

[igor.vanyutin.83]

I am pretty happy with stakes, because if I look at ICOs that are offering token based rewards, they are just silly. You won't get more than 100 USD per great article, or earn more than 200 USD for wearing a signature for 12 weeks.

[marados]

Definitely fixed token amount as reward would be a lot better because bounty hunters would know from start how much they are going to earn each week. But then again stakes can be beneficial too if bounty is good and not a lot people join for it. But lately this definitely isn’t the case because there are more and more bounty hunters each day. So definitely bounty campaigns should start with fixed token amount for each rank.

[tiptopgemdotcom]

There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?

For me as long as it can give me earning it is still okay for me. There are so many ways for a bounty campaign in giving rewards from bounty. Some reward gives high earnings, some are low and some does not have any value so it was sad for me. Whether it can be staked or not as long as it can give me earnings it is still good.

In my opinion it will more fair to give stakes based on user's post quality. Mainly bounty managers always try to control the social network content with boosting the reward but rising quantity doesnt mean same amount of quality. It is not secret that, higher earnings will lead to increase post quality. I check telegram groups in my free times and try to read opinions of other crypto bounty hunters. Result is distrubing because of memes,stupid content,useless opinions like "when moon","when lambo"

[VPScreator]

There is no difference between a fixed rate and the usual distribution of funds from the total amount, as a result, tokens still fall in price.

[Whisper555]

I liked the system more, when I knew what one steak is equal to (how many tokens), it made it possible to approximately count the number of tokens you would receive as a reward and the total amount in dollars. And now find it harder. Although everyone is happy, the team just needs to regulate the number of participants.

[Viscera]

I'm happy to get alot of stakes because of high ranking account but actually the best thing i could really have is to receive stake after the campaign period.

[kalashnikovski]

I think if initially wrote the number of coins that I get for certain social activities, it would be easier for me, because I could roughly estimate my profit for participating in a particular program of generosity.

[IndianaJons]

There are numerous ongoing bounty programs who are rewarding the bounty hunters by stakes model and sometimes bounty hunters are disappointed by the fact that ICO's don't meet the softcap thus the users do not get any benefit for their hard work or sometime they receive too little rewards for their hard work due to stakes systems, do we really need stakes system or the best thing will be provided a fixed amount of tokens for bounty (like $100 work of tokens per week or so)?

There are a lot of projects. Somewhere they are paid with project tokens, somewhere with a fixed rate in ETH or BTC.
As a rule, a fixed rate is small. In case of success of the project where you were paid with tokens, you can earn a few dozen times more than in a project with a fixed rate.
Everyone chooses their own project.

[Korkorjkk]

The stakes method is good,  especially if there are only few people who participated in the bounty.  But the problem comes in when the project does not reach soft cap and the bounty hunters do not get paid.  But in general,  the stakes method is very good.