Johny Depp (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 211
Merit: 125
busting the bastards
|
|
October 03, 2018, 05:31:18 PM |
|
Should we consider it merit abuse? If yes, will the sender/receiver receive -ve trust from DT?
|
Exposing frauds since 2014
|
|
|
|
|
In order to achieve higher forum ranks, you need both activity points and merit points.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 3073
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
October 03, 2018, 05:51:38 PM |
|
Should we consider it merit abuse? If yes, will the sender/receiver receive -ve trust from DT?
Is it me? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2818350
|
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
Johny Depp (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 211
Merit: 125
busting the bastards
|
|
October 03, 2018, 06:03:35 PM |
|
Yours is neither a service announcement one, nor you have sent 50 merits to OP at one go! So, unfortunately, its not you. Interestingly, the service provider I am talking about, has also received some questionable trust feedback from DT. But, that was being discussed here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5034828.0.
|
Exposing frauds since 2014
|
|
|
LTU_btc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1330
Slava Ukraini!
|
|
October 03, 2018, 11:02:04 PM |
|
Giving 50 Merits to ANN topic isn't a best way to spend Merits, but I don't know can we call it as Merit abuse. Users are free to choose how they want to spend their Merit. IMO, it's better to give Merits to ANN threads than send to alt accounts or sell on black market. Maybe you can show us ANN about which you're talking about?
|
|
|
|
The Sceptical Chymist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3332
Merit: 6832
Cashback 15%
|
|
October 03, 2018, 11:16:34 PM |
|
That thread is almost funny looking back at it today and seeing how many merits were so freely handed out for posts that were just mediocre. I'm pretty sure bitcointalk will never see anything like that again. As to OP's point, I'd say 50 merits from a single member would certainly be excessive, but I doubt anyone would get tagged. I'm not sure who Johny Depp is talking about, though. It would be helpful for him to mention specifics and not broad generalities, because suspected merit abuse obviously depends on the circumstances. I've seen a lot of campaign threads and ANNs where the OP gets enormous amounts of merits. Hell, even DarkStar_ got 8 merits for the Chipmixer campaign thread, and there have been other bounty managers who've gotten far more than that. What can you do? I wouldn't call it merit abuse; it's more like gratitude, and members have to have a certain amount of freedom to do what they want with their sMerits. This is why I'm not putting on the gloves and stepping into the ring with suspected merit abusers. It's not usually black-and-white like it is with account sales and whatnot. As I said recently, though, I'm glad there are other DT members who are tagging the obvious cases of abuse. Edit: Giving 50 Merits to ANN topic isn't a best way to spend Merits, but I don't know can we call it as Merit abuse. Users are free to choose how they want to spend their Merit. IMO, it's better to give Merits to ANN threads than send to alt accounts or sell on black market. Maybe you can show us ANN about which you're talking about?
Dang, you basically just beat me to the punch and said very succinctly what I just wrote. Anyway, without knowing who OP is talking about, all of this is just blabbering. The answer to his question is that the member might get tagged. That might not be what OP wants to hear, but that's the truth of the matter.
|
. .HUGE. | | | | | | █▀▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ . CASINO & SPORTSBOOK ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▄█ | | |
|
|
|
actmyname
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2504
Spear the bees
|
|
October 04, 2018, 04:45:53 AM |
|
You cannot should not send out -ve feedback without sufficient reason and foresight.
Neither the thread-starter nor the merit sender should receive negative feedback (unless this is not an isolated case). We, as humans, are subjective by nature and some individuals may choose to send 50 merit on occasion to certain topics. This is not necessarily untrustworthy since we have no clear abuse between the two users.
In the case where it is not an isolated instance then we can start to formulate a conjecture. Back-and-forth merit transactions will usually dictate shady behavior.
|
|
|
|
|
coin8coin8
Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 47
False Moon
|
|
October 05, 2018, 04:50:51 PM |
|
It should be 148 meirts, on the 8th floor someone also gave it 10merits. I don't know what Nessie is.But such a short thread has only 8 replies, and all of them are very short ads. Is this really worth 148 merits? This is a pretty naked provocation.
|
|
|
|
Patatas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1115
Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!
|
|
October 05, 2018, 05:01:48 PM |
|
It should be 148 meirts, on the 8th floor someone also gave it 10merits. I don't know what Nessie is.But such a short thread has only 8 replies, and all of them are very short ads. Is this really worth 148 merits? This is a pretty naked provocation. Complete waste of merits I would say! Imagine, if they were used to rank up some deserving high-quality posters. The reason why I call it a waste is because the merited account doesn't seem to be interested in participating in the forum or offer some services here. That is not the case with ChipMixer, they're running a signature campaign from a long time also offering mixing services here.
|
|
|
|
reactorjuno
Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 43
|
|
October 06, 2018, 02:43:15 PM |
|
Giving 50 Merits to ANN topic isn't a best way to spend Merits, but I don't know can we call it as Merit abuse. Users are free to choose how they want to spend their Merit. IMO, it's better to give Merits to ANN threads than send to alt accounts or sell on black market. Maybe you can show us ANN about which you're talking about?
I'll respectfully disagree, it should be reported and even though merits cannot be removed, there should be exceptional situations where it should be possible to remove the merits when it's an obvious mistake or/and abuse. Some folks here post very quality stuff and struggle to get 50 merits in total. To be honest I already started a thread about this before and was told that little can be done.
|
|
|
|
LTU_btc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3052
Merit: 1330
Slava Ukraini!
|
|
October 06, 2018, 05:24:28 PM |
|
Giving 50 Merits to ANN topic isn't a best way to spend Merits, but I don't know can we call it as Merit abuse. Users are free to choose how they want to spend their Merit. IMO, it's better to give Merits to ANN threads than send to alt accounts or sell on black market. Maybe you can show us ANN about which you're talking about?
I'll respectfully disagree, it should be reported and even though merits cannot be removed, there should be exceptional situations where it should be possible to remove the merits when it's an obvious mistake or/and abuse. Some folks here post very quality stuff and struggle to get 50 merits in total. To be honest I already started a thread about this before and was told that little can be done. I understand your point, but unfortunately, Merit system isn't moderated, same like trust system. And it's really difficult to prove Merit abuse, this is why there not many users are red tagged by DT members. Yeah, it's not fair that some users just buying Merits to rank up and they aren't punished for that, while other users are working hard to get Merit in legit way. I see that you're making really good posts, but you got too litle number of Merits.
|
|
|
|
elda34b
|
|
October 07, 2018, 11:59:07 AM |
|
I just find a similar case where a user who posted an update about some projects got +10 merits from the projects 'owner'. In local sections, some members used this similar style to add more merits for their alts. The proof is not strong enough though, so this is also debatable.
|
|
|
|
Thule
|
|
October 08, 2018, 01:01:23 AM |
|
the biggest merit circle are Lauda's ganga
Lauda vod The Pharmacist actmyname
you got them here to close that topic quickly
|
|
|
|
Thule
|
|
October 08, 2018, 01:05:46 AM |
|
You wanna know for what Lauda and his gang needs the high amount of merit ? They need it to get hired as ico/bounty managers.
I don't wanna know how many scam accounts they own themself but seeing their abusiv actions and instant deletion of posts asking about it on their threads just shows how scared they are about these topics. BTW my red trust i gained from the Lauda Gang for buying an account so a friend can post pictures in his ICO where he gave full details about himself and his company.
So they tagged me for scamming which never accured and once i attacked them calling them stupid assholes they flooded me with red trust.
Lauda and his gang are the worst cancer on this forum
He already lost his position as Mod here because of his abuse and his gang members lost their DT status....... i guess that says everything
|
|
|
|
|
Thule
|
|
October 08, 2018, 05:47:57 AM Last edit: October 08, 2018, 12:39:05 PM by Thule |
|
I guess thats why you guys have so many dedicated threads about yourself like this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2829282.0@all and have a look which people always join on these threads instantly to destroy it. Always the same people and it has a reason why
|
|
|
|
Thule
|
|
October 16, 2018, 01:54:16 PM |
|
silence
|
|
|
|
actmyname
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2504
Spear the bees
|
|
October 17, 2018, 03:08:28 AM |
|
silence
|
|
|
|
DutchDemon
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 4
|
|
December 10, 2018, 10:37:55 AM Merited by RocketSingh (2) |
|
50 merits to a service announcement definitely raises suspicion of trade under the table.
|
|
|
|
eddie13
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
|
|
December 10, 2018, 01:37:55 PM |
|
So does bumping a 2 month old thread with a shitpost and instantly getting Jr merits for it..
|
Chancellor on Brink of Second Bailout for Banks
|
|
|
RocketSingh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1662
Merit: 1050
|
|
December 10, 2018, 03:19:50 PM |
|
So does bumping a 2 month old thread with a shitpost and instantly getting Jr merits for it..
I think, sending 50 merits to a Service Announcement appears legitimate to you. In that case, the logic is "You have the freedom to send any amount of merits". No? And when someone calls it out, that feels like shitty. If I merit 2 for it, that is questionable. Right? Let's see how you merit... Signed message today..
1vvSrTFiQY7akwbsv3iYPPe9mR3DsEbff
This is eddie13 on 8/19/2018 updating my Bitcointalk staked address
IIgvyxWXnHtM6veHdfdP+zvxb5mVC6XsGa/K2fieDj6yX/cHBVL73Z14KQnRu8ydIUugmK3AKtvee9FelXl41KU=
Quoted and verifiedWhen someone quoted & verified your staked address, you sent him 5 merit instantly. How about that? Hypocrisy at its best.
|
|
|
|
eddie13
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
|
|
December 10, 2018, 03:55:57 PM |
|
I think, sending 50 merits to a Service Announcement appears legitimate to you.
Oh yes, because I sure love me some managers.. you sent him 5 merit instantly
Try harder.. Why did you take your chain-bet sig off so fast just now?
|
Chancellor on Brink of Second Bailout for Banks
|
|
|
RocketSingh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1662
Merit: 1050
|
|
December 10, 2018, 04:39:16 PM |
|
I think, sending 50 merits to a Service Announcement appears legitimate to you.
Oh yes, because I sure love me some managers.. Learn to construct a meaningful sentence in English. you sent him 5 merit instantly
Try harder.. Tit-for-tat. Chao. Why did you take your chain-bet sig off so fast just now?
Oh. You just missed the opportunity to accuse me of signature spamming. Dint u?
|
|
|
|
eddie13
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
|
|
December 10, 2018, 04:49:00 PM Last edit: December 10, 2018, 05:10:41 PM by eddie13 |
|
Learn to construct a meaningful sentence in English. Maybe some day.. Oh. You just missed the opportunity to accuse me of signature spamming. Dint u? We both know that wasn't the significance. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Did you just word-spin xtraelv's sig? " We are surrounded by legends on this forum. Phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures. Then there are the scams. This forum is a digital museum. * The most iconic historic bitcointalk threads.* Satoshi * Cypherpunks*MtGox*Bitcointalk hacks*pHiShInG* Silk Road*Pirateat40*Knightmb*Miner shams*Forum scandals*BBCode*" " As a member of BitcoinTalk, you are surrounded by legends; phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures. The forum was created by Satoshi Nakamoto and saw the first exchange, the first altcoin, and the first ICO, but also catastrophic software flaws, massive thefts, and incredible scams. You too have an opportunity to become part of the forum's history: whether and in what way you do so is up to you."
|
Chancellor on Brink of Second Bailout for Banks
|
|
|
RocketSingh
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1662
Merit: 1050
|
|
December 10, 2018, 05:07:39 PM |
|
Learn to construct a meaningful sentence in English. Maybe some day.. Oh. You just missed the opportunity to accuse me of signature spamming. Dint u? We both know that wasn't the significance. Try harder..
Did you just word-spin xtraelv's sig?
"We are surrounded by legends on this forum. Phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures. Then there are the scams. This forum is a digital museum. * The most iconic historic bitcointalk threads.* Satoshi * Cypherpunks*MtGox*Bitcointalk hacks*pHiShInG* Silk Road*Pirateat40*Knightmb*Miner shams*Forum scandals*BBCode*"
"As a member of BitcoinTalk, you are surrounded by legends; phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures. The forum was created by Satoshi Nakamoto and saw the first exchange, the first altcoin, and the first ICO, but also catastrophic software flaws, massive thefts, and incredible scams. You too have an opportunity to become part of the forum's history: whether and in what way you do so is up to you."
It was quoted by theymos as an ideal para to introduce BitcoinTalk to newbies. Most probably the person who wrote it is xtraelv. Lemme know if you need the BBcode. Its good to serve the forum...
|
|
|
|
xtraelv
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1924
฿ear ride on the rainbow slide
|
|
December 28, 2018, 04:15:34 AM Last edit: December 28, 2018, 09:15:27 AM by xtraelv Merited by RocketSingh (2) |
|
Learn to construct a meaningful sentence in English. Maybe some day.. Oh. You just missed the opportunity to accuse me of signature spamming. Dint u? We both know that wasn't the significance. Try harder..
Did you just word-spin xtraelv's sig?
"We are surrounded by legends on this forum. Phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures. Then there are the scams. This forum is a digital museum. * The most iconic historic bitcointalk threads.* Satoshi * Cypherpunks*MtGox*Bitcointalk hacks*pHiShInG* Silk Road*Pirateat40*Knightmb*Miner shams*Forum scandals*BBCode*"
"As a member of BitcoinTalk, you are surrounded by legends; phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures. The forum was created by Satoshi Nakamoto and saw the first exchange, the first altcoin, and the first ICO, but also catastrophic software flaws, massive thefts, and incredible scams. You too have an opportunity to become part of the forum's history: whether and in what way you do so is up to you."
It was quoted by theymos as an ideal para to introduce BitcoinTalk to newbies. Most probably the person who wrote it is xtraelv. Lemme know if you need the BBcode. Its good to serve the forum... Theymos used a reworded version of my signature in the new introduction. I thought it was quite cool that it morphed into something that is used for the forum. It started off in this topic before it turned into a signature: This topic was inspired by when Eddie13 said: "lets hope he can end the cycle of cryptopia/btct - Hatfield/McCoy rivalry". I posed the question" What is so special about this forum ?" I didn't expect to find as much as I did and it changed my views towards bitcointalk We are surrounded by legends on this forum. Not just the ones that were phenomenally successful but also some that tried and failed with catastrophic results. Then there are those that scammed at the expense of others. This forum is a digital museum.
Shortly after that I started using it as a signature. We are surrounded by legends on this forum. Phenomenal successes and catastrophic failures. Then there are the scams. This forum is a digital museum. * The most iconic historic bitcointalk threads.* Satoshi * Cypherpunks*MtGox*Bitcointalk hacks*pHiShInG* Silk Road*Pirateat40*Knightmb*Miner shams*Forum scandals*BBCode* Theymos gave me credit for it here: Here's a draft of a welcome message for new users. The user will see it on the screen confirming their registration, and it'll also be available in the help center at any time.
Some text in the intro was obviously inspired by xtraelv's signature, which I really like.
It morphed into:
|
|
|
|
Pffrt
|
|
December 28, 2018, 09:39:08 AM |
|
There are a lot of ANN where merit is being spent in OP. Sometime those are clear abusing while sometime people give because the project/service is good for them. Therefore, it can be told abuse clearly. Checking the previous merit spending tendency we can assume someone as abuser but without proof, no one can tell him abuser.
|
|
|
|
|