HOW TO ACHIEVE HIGHER BOUNTY REWARDS

[sadmaster]

I think you could get higher bounty awards if you join a bounty campaign where there are less people involved or less bounty hunters. Since most of the bounties are stakes it means you could get shares base on the total number of stakes you have and the total stakes all in all.

[1714867320]

1714867320

[1714867320]

1714867320

[1714867320]

1714867320

[1714867320]

1714867320

[Btc_1856]

I think there is no specific amount like higher and lower because of it completely depends upon the rank you have and the budget allocated to the bounty. Still, there is no guarantee how much money we are going to make because every participant will have different level stakes and which we cannot able to guess how much we are going to get.

[Callanta787]

With limited participants in a bounty does makes it easier to get paid ,this is why i don't like bounties with unlimited participants as the chance of getting paid is so low

[entebah]

I think you could get higher bounty awards if you join a bounty campaign where there are less people involved or less bounty hunters. Since most of the bounties are stakes it means you could get shares base on the total number of stakes you have and the total stakes all in all.

Yes, that's right, if you want to reach a higher Bounty you must choose a bounty campaign that has a small number of participants to participate in the bounty campaign. And especially the bounty of the signature campaign category is an option if you have the highest ranking in this forum, it is very good because usually the pay is higher than other categories.

[puremage111]

Hi everyone, i have been hearing so many bounty hunters complain of receiving low rewards after participating in a bounty Campaign for a long time.. Here is my own Suggestion. I think that bounty managers should have a required number of participants on every campaign in a Bounty. With this, there would be limited number of participants and Higher bounty rewards..

Guys what do you think?

Yeah of course this is one of the way
But it also makes the bounty more skewed on less participants, which means if the bunch of bounty hunters are one who dump coins immediately, it caused market goes crashed
which is why now most bounty make a criteria where if bounty campaign exceed X amount of participants, they will pay more

Well, the most straightforward point to achieve higher bounty rewards is contribute more xd

[mardaed]

You can aquire more bounty rewards when you do or joining more bounty campaign. But i can suggest to do signature campaign than social media campaign, dont expect more bounty reward on every social media campaign because its so crowded in social campaign. The more participant the less token allocation.

[gabbie2010]

I agreed to the fact the with a lower numbers of participants in bounty campaigns the higher the rewards however the ICO managers always wanted widely coverage of the advertisement and promotion of their ICOs thus necessitates for more numbers of participants ignoring the fact that lower rewards will paid to the hunters at the end.

[steampunkz]

Hi everyone, i have been hearing so many bounty hunters complain of receiving low rewards after participating in a bounty Campaign for a long time.. Here is my own Suggestion. I think that bounty managers should have a required number of participants on every campaign in a Bounty. With this, there would be limited number of participants and Higher bounty rewards..

Guys what do you think?

Yeah, that's a good idea but also the campaign manager needs to recruit good quality supporters like for example one is based on followers and friends for FB and twitter. And also need for promoters to be legit and active in social media sites.

[3kpk3]

Hi everyone, i have been hearing so many bounty hunters complain of receiving low rewards after participating in a bounty Campaign for a long time.. Here is my own Suggestion. I think that bounty managers should have a required number of participants on every campaign in a Bounty. With this, there would be limited number of participants and Higher bounty rewards..

Guys what do you think?

I think this is important and a key to bounty hunters earning more. Bounty platforms like bountyhive tend to limit the number of participants on each campaign by having a cap. Once it's reached, new entrants aren't accepted.

Again, for projects, the more people that help spread the word about their ICO, the better for them. So while capping the number of participants benefits the bounty hunter, it's a disadvantage to the project.

This is a double edged sword indeed. As a bounty hunter myself, I personally like the idea of limiting the number of participants in order to gain higher rewards at the end of the project which would help decrease the problems being faced by hunters these days.

Never worked on Bountyhive, but some positive and negative stuff about it, but I do like how they are restricting the number of participants which is more likely to benefit them at the end of the day.

[ridertiger]

Not everyone will change the total number of participants just because you asked with all capital letters.

[OnceTwiceThird]

You can get higher achievement from bounty campaign by joining translation media campaign, first time you have speak english well before you joined translation campaign, participants are limited and you have faster for joining translation campaign.

[Siti Nurbaya]

If you want to get a higher prize, then try it on a video campaign or signature, but if this signature all depends on the rank and also the allocation of funds. But it seems that the video campaign gives more hope to high rewards, especially the participants are few.

[nicolas1979]

Hi everyone, i have been hearing so many bounty hunters complain of receiving low rewards after participating in a bounty Campaign for a long time.. Here is my own Suggestion. I think that bounty managers should have a required number of participants on every campaign in a Bounty. With this, there would be limited number of participants and Higher bounty rewards..

Guys what do you think?

Mostly I agree with you but need to understand that bounty manager have their own thinking and decisions, as bounty hunter we only can follow it. Your idea is very good but I'm afraid many bounty hunter can reach many people to replace their money into the project ( marketing method ), that's why most of them never give limit participants. If you want get higher reward, join bounty program and follow every sub program finish it with high quality and time. Just like that.

[kiryamikronov]

I think it won't work for the project more profitable to have more people who advertise the project. For them, the costs are the same for 1000's to 10,000 people. I think this is our problem, nobody will come to help, I just don't engage in campaigns where a lot of people.

[Milka86]

I fully agree with your proposal . With a limited number of course earnings will be higher. I often pay attention to such companies, many managers often limit the number of participants in the signature and social networks. And it is very attractive to the participants, everyone wants to have time to participate

[Dewi89]

There are several things about the bounty now

- The quota for campaign participants is increasing, so the calculation of allocations for each participant becomes small
- very long distribution is not comparable to expected

From the internal factors of the project, it may require many bounty participants to maximize promotion

[temilade200]

Hi everyone, i have been hearing so many bounty hunters complain of receiving low rewards after participating in a bounty Campaign for a long time.. Here is my own Suggestion. I think that bounty managers should have a required number of participants on every campaign in a Bounty. With this, there would be limited number of participants and Higher bounty rewards..

Guys what do you think?

I think there are some bounty managers that put limit to the number of participants, but that sometimes does not guarantee the success of the project. I have seen situations where bounty hunters were many and i was able to get good rewards for my participations, which was about $800, despite being a Jr. Member. So, i would suggest you check the pool and the allocation for each program of yhe bounty before participating.

[tridverju]

You need to participate in campaigns with higher rewards and less competitors. It is a pretty easy formula, because the most profitable campaign is the signature, but you can take part only in one project. Than you need to take part in the content campaigns, that are the second most profitable campaigns.

[EdenHazard]

Might this things will be applied immediately, every bounty campaign should be like a signature campaign or twitter campaign that is paid with BTC. This will certainly reduce spammers which are always a problem in this forum, and there are still many positive sides if this idea is applied. And also, the bounty campaign manager can properly oversee the work done by each participant. It seems that their concept refers to the more bounty hunters who are in the project, the greater the chance the project will attract many investors.

[john alex young]

A good idea if the manager limits the number of participants in each bounty campaign. Then, the next question that must be anticipated is, what about the ICO who wants to be promoted as much as possible the ICO.