Thule (OP)
|
|
November 02, 2018, 02:31:02 AM |
|
I didn't say you were a criminal. I said you lied about risking 100btc. You called me in public a criminal.I got it on screenshot. Are you on drugs or something that you don't remember what you wrote 24h ago ? Also you wrote i stated that thepharmacist scammed me with 100 BTC .Even if i would accept your stupid logic and would act like a dumb person even than i can't see where i claimed he scammed me for 100 BTC since its saying : Risked BTC and not scammed BTC which is a total diffrence. Also Edmonton,Alberta right ?
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 3099
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
November 02, 2018, 02:36:17 AM |
|
I didn't say you were a criminal. I said you lied about risking 100btc. You called me in public a criminal.I got it on screenshot. Are you on drugs or something that you don't remember what you wrote 24h ago ? Also Edmonton,Alberta right ? Edmonton area, yes.
|
|
|
|
Thule (OP)
|
|
November 02, 2018, 02:48:07 AM Last edit: November 02, 2018, 03:06:06 AM by Thule |
|
For the public record i'm giving Vod the opportunity to remove his false claims against me till monday to resolve that issue directly.
By failure this will be used as proof against him that i tried to resolve that matter outside of court which was denied by Vod.
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 3099
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
November 02, 2018, 02:52:32 AM |
|
For the public record i'm giving Vod the opportunity to remove his false claims against me till monday to resolve that issue directly.
By failure this will be used as proof that i tried to resolve that matter outside of court which was denied by Vod.
Thank you very much. If you can sign from an address that shows you had 100btc, I will gladly remove the negative trust.
|
|
|
|
Thule (OP)
|
|
November 02, 2018, 02:54:23 AM |
|
For the public record i'm giving Vod the opportunity to remove his false claims against me till monday to resolve that issue directly.
By failure this will be used as proof that i tried to resolve that matter outside of court which was denied by Vod.
Thank you very much. If you can sign from an address that shows you had 100btc, I will gladly remove the negative trust. In court it doesn't work this way.You will have to provide proof of your claims. And i doubt any judge will accept your way of thinking.You clearly have no understanding of law or justice Your god acting who sets the rules will stop there.They will show you were your borders are. Good luck
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 3099
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
November 02, 2018, 03:06:00 AM |
|
In court it doesn't work this way.You will have to provide proof of your claims.
You'll have to prove you risked 100 btc on The Pharmacist. Good luck to you!
|
|
|
|
Thule (OP)
|
|
November 02, 2018, 03:10:35 AM |
|
In court it doesn't work this way.You will have to provide proof of your claims.
You'll have to prove you risked 100 btc on The Pharmacist. Good luck to you! You clearly have no law understanding. If you claim that i lied ,scammed and am a criminal its on you to proof these claims. Don't forget innocent until proofen guilty.Since i know you can't proof it since i never scammed someone or have any criminal records or even cases it will be impossible for you. And asking the judge that i should proof that your poor claims are invalid is not how the legal system works. I would recommend to study a bit more law before acting these stupid. Its a fair warning since i know what i'm talking as my wife is running her own chamber. I said it multiple times i won't let these false claims stay.Decission how it goes is on you. Its my last post on this topic and i will wait till monday.
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 3099
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
November 02, 2018, 03:18:40 AM |
|
If you claim that i lied ,scammed and am a criminal its on you to proof these claims.
I'll simply point to the feedback you left saying you risked 100 btc with The Pharmacist. Then it will be up to YOU to prove you risked that, otherwise what I wrote is true. Its a fair warning since i know what i'm talking as my wife is running her own chamber.
Very nice of her to adopt an illiterate like you. <love>
|
|
|
|
Thule (OP)
|
|
November 02, 2018, 03:26:39 AM |
|
lol maybe someone enlighten him how the legal system works since his grey cells clearly have a lack of understanding,
No Vod is not enough,If you show that claim first you would need to proof that the 100 BTC are invalid.Its on you to proof it since its you who claim that.However i even highly doubt any judge is going to listen at that crap when reading the comment on that feedback but good luck.
And even accepting theoraticly your argumentation it will be interresting to listen how these leads to the claims that i'm a scammer and criminal. Will love to see your explanation which leads to these claims from the risked amount of BTC.
You will have an opportunity to show how i tried to scam someone and also my criminal records which i have since you called me a criminal
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 3099
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
November 02, 2018, 03:32:04 AM |
|
No Vod is not enough,If you show that claim first you would need to proof that the 100 BTC are invalid.Its on you to proof it since its you who claim that.
Not a problem. Judge asks you to prove you owned 100 btc. You can't. He dismisses your lawsuit.
|
|
|
|
actmyname
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2562
Merit: 2510
Spear the bees
|
|
November 02, 2018, 03:34:40 AM |
|
<> It seems you have a flawed understanding of the burden of proof. The risked amount in your feedback to The Pharmacist is 100 BTC. Fact. You have not shown that you have even traded with The Pharmacist, never mind risked 100 BTC. Fact. Vod claims that your feedback shows a risked 100 BTC. Fact. Vod claims that the 100 BTC risk is not substantiated. Fact.
Your lawsuit is based upon this claim: "Vod is committing libel by claiming that I lied, scammed, and am a criminal." You have the burden of proof. You need to substantiate why Vod's claim that you lied is false. You have the burden of proof.
You're using a similar strategy to Christian apologetics in which they shift the burden of proof onto the one rejecting the claim.
|
|
|
|
Thule (OP)
|
|
November 02, 2018, 03:44:04 AM |
|
I see let's wait for the court to decide. I see you want it the hard way.
I only say it one time.Don't think i will step back.
You will have to proof that i scammed someone which means you need to present somebody who i stole money from or tried to steal money and you will need to provide criminal records of me since you called me a criminal.
If you are to stupid to understand you can't provide these since they are non existend than you will get a lesson which makes you understand it.
If you think these 100 BTC is going to protect you ok belive in it.You will be teached how the real world works
@actmyname your poor try to reverse staff is just annoying,Your stupid comments doesn't even need any explanation. People who have some knowledge about law know what i'm talking about. You will get the hard lesson.Once there is a court decission i will make it public here. You call somebody a criminal or scammer its not on him showing its not true but its on you to show that your claims are true and that you didn't defamed someone. I know you both guys are not the smartest one which also shows your past actions but its starting to annoy me. Monday and after that i will post the decission of court since its public.
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 3099
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
November 02, 2018, 03:47:30 AM |
|
I see let's wait for the court to decide. I see you want it the hard way.
I only say it one time.Don't think i will step back.
I don't think you'll step back.... you'd have to step forward first... and you won't do that. Since you are not posting again until Monday, I guess I can proclaim right now that Monday will come and go, and you will still be a liar.
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4172
Merit: 8086
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
November 02, 2018, 03:51:15 AM |
|
<> It seems you have a flawed understanding of the burden of proof. The risked amount in your feedback to The Pharmacist is 100 BTC. Fact. You have not shown that you have even traded with The Pharmacist, never mind risked 100 BTC. Fact. Vod claims that your feedback shows a risked 100 BTC. Fact. Vod claims that the 100 BTC risk is not substantiated. Fact.
Your lawsuit is based upon this claim: "Vod is committing libel by claiming that I lied, scammed, and am a criminal." You have the burden of proof. You need to substantiate why Vod's claim that you lied is false. You have the burden of proof.
You're using a similar strategy to Christian apologetics in which they shift the burden of proof onto the one rejecting the claim. While Thule may need to prove his case he can still drag vod into a court room and cost him money defending himself. At vod let us know if you get served next week. I have a friend that spent more then 20000 fighting a completely bogus lawsuit.
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 3099
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
November 02, 2018, 03:52:30 AM |
|
At vod let us know if you get served next week.
Hmmm, I just checked the future (vods can do that) and nothing happened. :/ While Thule may need to prove his case he can still drag vod into a court room and cost him money defending himself.
It will cost him money (he doesn't have) to file and follow through. I will defend myself, costing nothing. The judge will dismiss his case and he and I will laugh about it over dinner.
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4172
Merit: 8086
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
November 02, 2018, 03:54:58 AM |
|
At vod let us know if you get served next week.
Hmmm, I just checked the future (vods can do that) and nothing happened. :/ Okay
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 3099
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
November 02, 2018, 04:01:08 AM |
|
At vod let us know if you get served next week.
Hmmm, I just checked the future (vods can do that) and nothing happened. :/ Okay Seriously, I know your friend spend lots of money on a bogus lawsuit, but Thule is a liar. He is not suing me. He is giving me until Monday to remove my trust, which is your standard empty threat. I've been in part time law enforcement for 30 years and I grew up on a farm. I can smell bullshit, and I can recognize an actual threat. Thule is nothing more than a cowpie.
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3724
Merit: 8996
https://bpip.org
|
|
November 02, 2018, 04:02:11 AM |
|
Its my last post on this topic and i will wait till monday.
You're such a trustworthy individual, any judge will immediately see that and will send Vod into an electric chair (or whatever they use for death penalty up there in Canada... drowning in an ice hole?).
|
|
|
|
Thule (OP)
|
|
November 02, 2018, 04:04:18 AM |
|
I've been in part time law enforcement for 30 years and I grew up on a farm. You mean a security guard working 12-18h/day which you posted on your FB Which law are you able to enforce as security guard ? LOL Calling the cops ? Like i said i will get my satisfaction/justice...... Its always funny i don't know why but security guards always think they are smarter in law where they in general have no clue at all. I don't know how its in canada but in europe they are basicly cheap workers without a good education but with a big mouth thinking they enforce any laws lol where in reality they have no special rights.
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 3099
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
November 02, 2018, 04:06:42 AM |
|
I've been in part time law enforcement for 30 years and I grew up on a farm. You mean a security guard working 12-18h/day Like i said i will get my satisfaction/justice...... Are 18 hour days considered part time where you live? I'm sure you will get satisfaction some day, but you'll have to get your cousin alone and drunk first.
|
|
|
|
|