Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2016, 03:17:31 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Looking for someone to create/modify software for this forum [5500+ BTC]  (Read 157664 times)
live627
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574


View Profile
November 07, 2012, 09:43:41 AM
 #261

I think we must be versions behind because another forum I use which is similar treats it as subscriptions and you can subscribe and unsubscribe anytime.
This forum is using 9 year old software.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481339851
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481339851

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481339851
Reply with quote  #2

1481339851
Report to moderator
1481339851
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481339851

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481339851
Reply with quote  #2

1481339851
Report to moderator
Xenland
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980


I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man


View Profile
November 13, 2012, 01:41:18 AM
 #262

forums using 1.1 latest is    
SMF 2.0.2 lot more features and custom mods made for it. Might want to upgrade first before  having custom built wouldn't be hard to d upgrade
Oddly enough this has been suggested in the first few pages(not your fault, i don't blame you for wasting your time)
It's in my opinion based on theymos' response patterns he/she wants an Open-Source project that will fulfill the bounty and at the same time release a suitable Bitcoin secure software forum package for everyone to use. This is just my opinions based off what theymos said to some of my proposals last year.
live627
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574


View Profile
November 13, 2012, 01:52:15 AM
 #263

Sharing is caring, they say.
zero3112
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546



View Profile
November 25, 2012, 12:22:10 AM
 #264

So what if its that old do they not update the forum software anymore?
live627
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574


View Profile
November 25, 2012, 12:53:05 AM
 #265

Oh, they have updates, alright. 2.0 a year ago, and 2.1 is in alpha.
zero3112
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546



View Profile
November 26, 2012, 04:17:18 AM
 #266

well it says Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines so it must be old then.
johnniewalker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896



View Profile
December 18, 2012, 01:33:37 AM
 #267

I've read through this forum, theymos you have a lot of good offers to consider. I look forward to an enhanced BTCtalk. You mentioned you have a budget of 920 BTC. I'm just curious where this comes from-not trying to be nosy btw. I'm just saying because the reason I love this site so much is its user-user with no intermediary (BitMit) taking a percentage of transactions. Is all of that 920 BTC donated? If so thats incredible. Give me an address and I'll donate if thats the case!
live627
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574


View Profile
December 18, 2012, 01:51:15 AM
 #268

Please see the Donate link at the top of the page.
dethdeks
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 208



View Profile
January 02, 2013, 03:07:47 AM
 #269

I'm not sure if you have looked at this path, but a previous forums site I am on had been running SMF as well and was taken down by an exploit in its coding (can't remember what version they were running) but they upgraded there forums software to IP Board, and so far have not had an issue with it. Mind you what they use it for is probably not as high maintenance as required by BCT. but this could be an alt solution

Donations Accepted
LTC: Lcv7XmxnHJ7BhRjXjzCUBJ4Cfrq43SA5qc
BTC: 16mHGGVgntqtTmrddud8BFgN3XAsBobvVe
payb.tc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812



View Profile
January 02, 2013, 03:19:57 AM
 #270

Mind you what they use it for is probably not as high maintenance as required by BCT.

bitcointalk is also targeted at a group of people who are more likely than average to be interested in coding & hacking.

eg. even with exact same forum software, and same number of members, grandmasknittingtalk.org would probably be less likely to get hacked.
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506


View Profile
January 10, 2013, 08:07:56 PM
 #271

Not the post new reply link, if that was what you were thinking, as you said "bigger text". I meant the image that opens unread replies on a thread.
Pagination and clicking that image are the biggest difficulties, at least for me, and I use a tablet. I can only imagine how much pinching to zoom people will have to do on a smartphone lol

I:
- Replaced with larger "[new]" text.
- Increased the size of page links.
- Removed the top page numbers from section pages because they took up a lot of space.

Better?

Does anyone know what it is that's forcing pages like "recent unread topics" to be a certain minimum width?

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
ripper234
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260


Ron Gross


View Profile WWW
January 11, 2013, 06:26:21 AM
 #272

One feature request for the new forum that is critical for me: The ability to post/reply via email.
E.g. is the Google Groups interface.

I hate logging into the forum constantly to do these stuff.

(Dunno if this has been discussed or not)

Please do not pm me, use ron@bitcoin.org.il instead
Mastercoin Executive Director
Co-founder of the Israeli Bitcoin Association
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106



View Profile
January 12, 2013, 05:50:31 AM
 #273

One feature request for the new forum that is critical for me: The ability to post/reply via email.
E.g. is the Google Groups interface.

I hate logging into the forum constantly to do these stuff.

(Dunno if this has been discussed or not)
Some 2013 technologies first, then, maybe, some NNTP-like stuff.


Does anyone know what it is that's forcing pages like "recent unread topics" to be a certain minimum width?
Don't know, i can resize it without any problem.

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
felipelalli
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 226


Hi! I am the Bitcoin Paranoid developer.


View Profile WWW
January 16, 2013, 11:45:27 PM
 #274

3600 BTC is still  the offer? I want...

~ 1LipeR1AjHL6gwE7WQECW4a2H4tuqm768N

Bitrated user: felipelalli.
Bit_Happy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442


A Great Time to Start Something!


View Profile
January 24, 2013, 10:09:17 PM
 #275

Hi theymos, two quick questions about your huge, exciting project.

1)
Security
...
No user group should be able to run arbitrary code...

Would you allow a Super-admin (one single person) with "full privileges", combined with "No user group (including any other admins) should be able to run arbitrary code" ?

2) If you accept a detailed bid that includes an impressive, partially finished demo site, then is a BTC down payment of ~25 to 33% possible, to provide income while the project is finished?

Thank you.

15DYJpWJe9H1YofsNQbP9JEWWNn7XPZgbS
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506


View Profile
January 24, 2013, 11:08:07 PM
 #276

Would you allow a Super-admin (one single person) with "full privileges", combined with "No user group (including any other admins) should be able to run arbitrary code" ?

I'd definitely prefer that it be impossible to run arbitrary code from the Web interface.

2) If you accept a detailed bid that includes an impressive, partially finished demo site, then is a BTC down payment of ~25 to 33% possible, to provide income while the project is finished?

If the code is available, I could pay by milestone. 25% seems like too much.

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
live627
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574


View Profile
January 24, 2013, 11:21:42 PM
 #277

By arbitrary code, you mean eval(), right?
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506


View Profile
January 24, 2013, 11:22:39 PM
 #278

By arbitrary code, you mean eval(), right?

Yes. With SMF, administrators can run arbitrary code by modifying the themes, which are executed via eval().

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
Bit_Happy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442


A Great Time to Start Something!


View Profile
January 25, 2013, 08:24:53 AM
 #279

Yes. With SMF, administrators can run arbitrary code by modifying the themes, which are executed via eval().

Can the Super-admin (the site owner who logged in securely over ssl) have web-based access to (for example) ./inc/plugins/example_mod.php to change code that is *not* executed via eval()  ?

15DYJpWJe9H1YofsNQbP9JEWWNn7XPZgbS
live627
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574


View Profile
January 25, 2013, 08:45:13 AM
 #280

That would imply the file being world writable (0666) which is insecure.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!