[ANN] [ICO] AQER: the first blockchain & AI marketplace for Vloggers and Brands

[gatucci]

No, you confuse everyone. Legal projects can’t involve residents of this country.

[Xtonyonyack]

I agree. their tokens are equal to securities, and this suits them completely, since the US securities market is quite developed.

They seem to don’t really know yet what to do with. Now, apparently, senators are trying to figure the ways to get some doug out of it. Everything’s sold there, you know

i’m confused, i though ico do not accept US citizens 

This is not entirely true; some ICOs that are negotiating with their securities agency may operate in the US market. Moreover, there are those who work under the American jurisdiction.

That’s true. That’s exactly why I wrote above that they themselves do not know what to do next with the ICO...

This is not entirely true; some ICOs that are negotiating with their securities agency may operate in the US market. Moreover, there are those who work under the American jurisdiction.

everything seems to be even more difficult. Projects first laucnh ICOs without Americans and after they get some audience, they get a license to enter the US market.

[Phileste]

I agree. their tokens are equal to securities, and this suits them completely, since the US securities market is quite developed.

They seem to don’t really know yet what to do with. Now, apparently, senators are trying to figure the ways to get some doug out of it. Everything’s sold there, you know

i’m confused, i though ico do not accept US citizens 

This is not entirely true; some ICOs that are negotiating with their securities agency may operate in the US market. Moreover, there are those who work under the American jurisdiction.

That’s true. That’s exactly why I wrote above that they themselves do not know what to do next with the ICO...

This is not entirely true; some ICOs that are negotiating with their securities agency may operate in the US market. Moreover, there are those who work under the American jurisdiction.

everything seems to be even more difficult. Projects first laucnh ICOs without Americans and after they get some audience, they get a license to enter the US market.

Wow, I wonder if the organizers of AQER are going to do things this way

[kanovi]

 I think if they manage to collect money without the participation of US residents, they are unlikely to want to into all the mess with the US regulations)))

[ballrimswatch]

I think if they manage to collect money without the participation of US residents, they are unlikely to want to into all the mess with the US regulations)))

But nevertheless, I would like to hope that a regulatory authority will appear anyway. So now we would not sit here, would not guess about the AQER, but already could trust the conclusions of experts. And then there are only homegrown specialists))))

[Sevreki]

I think if they manage to collect money without the participation of US residents, they are unlikely to want to into all the mess with the US regulations)))

But nevertheless, I would like to hope that a regulatory authority will appear anyway. So now we would not sit here, would not guess about the AQER, but already could trust the conclusions of experts. And then there are only homegrown specialists))))

Well, if they really make an organization that will check project documents for a scam, it will be cool

[spacerbrug]

I think if they manage to collect money without the participation of US residents, they are unlikely to want to into all the mess with the US regulations)))

But nevertheless, I would like to hope that a regulatory authority will appear anyway. So now we would not sit here, would not guess about the AQER, but already could trust the conclusions of experts. And then there are only homegrown specialists))))

Well, if they really make an organization that will check project documents for a scam, it will be cool

wait a minute, so what if homegrown? ... But then, for example, as a crypto enthusiast, I understand this topic more than those whom I can hire for the post of inspector of similar projects. So let's get here without insults.

[Mariia_BT]

I agree. their tokens are equal to securities, and this suits them completely, since the US securities market is quite developed.

They seem to don’t really know yet what to do with. Now, apparently, senators are trying to figure the ways to get some doug out of it. Everything’s sold there, you know

i’m confused, i though ico do not accept US citizens 

This is not entirely true; some ICOs that are negotiating with their securities agency may operate in the US market. Moreover, there are those who work under the American jurisdiction.

That’s true. That’s exactly why I wrote above that they themselves do not know what to do next with the ICO...

so far this question remains open for many projects.
developers do not know, how to do it right with the sale of tokens.

[Urakeavan]

Apparently, in terms of a ban in the USA, everything was limited only to a sentence. Well, you see, it’s not necessary to forbid it, but to regulate it correctly. And it is in this direction that the vast majority of countries are going. It’s just that for the time being there are no particular perspectives with regard to regulation

[saveeege]

 it seems to me that people who are advanced in the cryptoindustry, are well aware that you can earn not strictly on the things you can touch....

[JohnYDillinger]

it seems to me that people who are advanced in the cryptoindustry, are well aware that you can earn not strictly on the things you can touch....

Oh, come on!)) That is why in the Emirates all sheikhs buy gold for themselves)))

[pogi23]

it seems to me that people who are advanced in the cryptoindustry, are well aware that you can earn not strictly on the things you can touch....

Oh, come on!)) That is why in the Emirates all sheikhs buy gold for themselves)))

you think you really know who is buying all this cryptocurrencies)) By the way something is going on with market...

[GucciGangClub]

it seems to me that people who are advanced in the cryptoindustry, are well aware that you can earn not strictly on the things you can touch....

Oh, come on!)) That is why in the Emirates all sheikhs buy gold for themselves)))

you think you really know who is buying all this cryptocurrencies)) By the way something is going on with market...

I do know) No one there really makes bets on ICOs! I try to be as much careful while choosing ICO for investing...

[Tamandrac]

Apparently, in terms of a ban in the USA, everything was limited only to a sentence. Well, you see, it’s not necessary to forbid it, but to regulate it correctly. And it is in this direction that the vast majority of countries are going. It’s just that for the time being there are no particular perspectives with regard to regulation

Well, it is always easier to prohibit than regulate this process))))))))

[saveeege]

it seems to me that people who are advanced in the cryptoindustry, are well aware that you can earn not strictly on the things you can touch....

Oh, come on!)) That is why in the Emirates all sheikhs buy gold for themselves)))

you think you really know who is buying all this cryptocurrencies)) By the way something is going on with market...

I do know) No one there really makes bets on ICOs! I try to be as much careful while choosing ICO for investing...

But my business partner has a familiar dude who has access to the most well-off circles in Dubai. So, there are a lot of  business owners who are actively engaged in the search for cryptoexperts, who would advise them a suitable for investing ICO.

[ripzombie]

no matter what anyone says, but it seems to me that over time, large investors will also catch up with this ICO.

[Xtonyonyack]

Apparently, in terms of a ban in the USA, everything was limited only to a sentence. Well, you see, it’s not necessary to forbid it, but to regulate it correctly. And it is in this direction that the vast majority of countries are going. It’s just that for the time being there are no particular perspectives with regard to regulation

Well, it is always easier to prohibit than regulate this process))))))))

you are like in a tank))))) Now there are generally several ICOs under American jurisdiction, which means that they are fine with this.

[TheFirstCreator]

no matter what anyone says, but it seems to me that over time, large investors will also catch up with this ICO.

All ICOs (and this is no exception) directly threaten the growth of the economy. And in this case, it becomes clear why the United States wants to introduce this kind of innovation. As for other countries, I think they will pick up this innovation, as a trend.

[Phileste]

The answer is that if they buy the whole bitcoin, then they can control it. And in another way they are unlikely to succeed.

[Guardsman]

think that uniqueness is not in the first place. new cryptocurrency exchanges may appear, and, despite the fact that there are already similar projects, if your particular project turns out to be better, it will take its place in the market.

was there someone talking about 80% of scam? These figures are understated)) As practice has shown, 99 percent of ICOs were scam. But there is a positive side to this - now investors will become smarter, they will think better where to invest))))))