Delete

[suchmoon]

not banning people that are serious scammers?

Scams are not moderated.

Should not legends and heros deserve a ban with a clear reason at least. Imagine spending years here to be banned and not even realise why it happened?  I also worry that like some have said that if one individual has the power to perm ban with no reason then there is obvious worries that could be abused and people are silenced without fair trial.

There is always a reason even if it's not displayed in the ban message. The reason was given in this thread. The OP can appeal. If the appeal is successful the OP will likely be banned again. Put that straw man back in the barn.

[1714626994]

1714626994

[1714626994]

1714626994

[1714626994]

1714626994

[1714626994]

1714626994

[1714626994]

1714626994

[cryptohunter]

@ bones and hilarious

thanks for explanation about edits.

I would have though plagiarism (taking work as your own)  would be like claiming you had a great or novel idea. I have often seen people ask a question and people post a reply they have cut from the net or some other post and post with no obvious gain to themselves at all they were just being helpful.

Would it not be best to rid ourselves of real scammers and scamming icos than these sort of people.

What sort of person is analysing threads of all these years previously? who would seriously even do that. Most merit sources admit the job of looking for a good post in alt section is just too much trouble.

Who has perma ban powers? all mods? can they ban even legends without a warning given first?

The unofficial rules are called unofficial for a reason I guess? who even listens to these appeals from members who consider their ban incorrect or overly harsh? who makes the final call?

I am not talking about this person specifically I mean if there are multiple cases of plagiarism even if minor and almost pathetic with no real damages to persons with original or novel thoughts/ideas then i guess this can be seen as deliberate. Although after a year of such well just lazy behaviour I would maybe dig deeper to see what else he had done in a positive note.


@suchmoon

There is always a reason even if it's not displayed in the ban message. The reason was given in this thread. The OP can appeal. If the appeal is successful the OP will likely be banned again. Put that straw man back in the barn.

Can you explain the straw man you refer to and also tell me why even after successful appeal the member will likely get banned again?

I am trying to understand exactly what you mean. Are you saying people who get bans over turned will be banned by the mod that banned them because they believe in their original decision or that they were genuine bad eggs whom could not help replicating the things that contributed to their ban?

[hilariousandco]

One coincidence...

~~~
Even gold is good as an investment but if you want to make best profits from it then you need to wait for a very long time and that is not the case with bitcoins as it can give you very high profits in quick time and that also with an limited investments so at this stage if I have to invest my money then I will surely prefer bitcoins over gold as I don't have patience to hold my investments longer to make profits from it.

Gold is good as an investment but bitcoin is the best and it has clearly proved over the years and it has gone much higher then gold so if you want to make huge profits then you need to take a risk of investing higher capital in bitcoins as gold will never give you higher profits like bitcoin and also you need to hold gold for a very long term to make profits from it.

Lol. A classic bitcoin is good because it is profit and profit is good post.

Phase One: Copy and paste post
Phase Two: ? ? ?
Phase Three: Profit.
Phase Four: Get banned.
Phase Five: Cry coincidence?

@ bones and hilarious

thanks for explanation about edits.

I would have though plagiarism (taking work as your own)  would be like claiming you had a great or novel idea. I have often seen people ask a question and people post a reply they have cut from the net or some other post and post with no obvious gain to themselves at all they were just being helpful.

Would it not be best to rid ourselves of real scammers and scamming icos than these sort of people.

What sort of person is analysing threads of all these years previously? who would seriously even do that. Most merit sources admit the job of looking for a good post in alt section is just too much trouble.

Who has perma ban powers? all mods? can they ban even legends without a warning given first?

The unofficial rules are called unofficial for a reason I guess? who even listens to these appeals from members who consider their ban incorrect or overly harsh? who makes the final call?

I am not talking about this person specifically I mean if there are multiple cases of plagiarism even if minor and almost pathetic with no real damages to persons with original or novel thoughts/ideas then i guess this can be seen as deliberate. Although after a year of such well just lazy behaviour I would maybe dig deeper to see what else he had done in a positive note.

Only really Global's can ban and they can ban anyone regardless of rank (except admins and possibly other mods). Copy and pasting is pretty clear cut, but if you want staff to moderate scams then petition theymos about it to chnage the rules, but it's likely something he doesn't want us to do. If you're concerned with scams though you can leave them feedback yourself.

[suchmoon]

I would have though plagiarism (taking work as your own)  would be like claiming you had a great or novel idea. I have often seen people ask a question and people post a reply they have cut from the net or some other post and post with no obvious gain to themselves at all they were just being helpful.

It takes a few seconds at most to quote and attribute properly. Those are the rules and everyone (including you) should follow them. Not doing that may make it seem like the intent was to pass the content as your own.

Would it not be best to rid ourselves of real scammers and scamming icos than these sort of people.

This has nothing to do with scams at all. Moderators are not involved in that. Users who research scams are good at what they do and generally that skillset is different from reporting shitposts. So what's your point?

What sort of person is analysing threads of all these years previously? who would seriously even do that. Most merit sources admit the job of looking for a good post in alt section is just too much trouble.

Looking for a good post requires reading many posts, including shitty ones. Looking for plagiarism requires very little reading, if any at all, and you don't have to be a merit source for that. Apples and oranges, again.

@suchmoon

There is always a reason even if it's not displayed in the ban message. The reason was given in this thread. The OP can appeal. If the appeal is successful the OP will likely be banned again. Put that straw man back in the barn.

You quoted my post improperly. So a few years from now some horrible person is going to search through all these threads and report you for plagiarism

Can you explain the straw man you refer to and also tell me why even after successful appeal the member will likely get banned again?

The straw man is your attempt to raise some non-existent issues and to debate them, instead of the actual problem here, which is the OP's plagiarism and appeal thereof. The OP would likely get banned again because the OP has done this sort of thing more than once.

[logfiles]

This has nothing to do with scams at all. Moderators are not involved in that. Users who research scams are good at what they do and generally that skillset is different from reporting shitposts. So what's your point?

Oh, come on, why don't the identified scammers get banned then?
I have seen a number of scamming accounts getting identified in the scam accusations board with concrete proof but all they do is red tag them. Why don't they ban them too?
I find it quite lame... Zero tolerance on plagiarism but you leave a scammer scot-free as if scammers do not gravely destroy the quality and actual aim of the forum.

[S_Therapist]

Why don't they ban them too?

Both cases are different, in fact. Scammers will continue his/her scamming if s/he gets banned with creating a new account.
Now, imagine, you have made a Sr member account by plagiarism and you get caught and get banned. I don't think you will ever think of copy/pasting again. At present, it is a more scaring issue because merit is needed for rank up.
If a scammer gets a ban, s/he will create a new account, of course. So, this goes with the same rule of account buy/sell. There can be rules but no one can prevent account buy/sell. So, no rules there. The same is also applied in this case. There can be a rule of banning scammers but the scam will be continued.

It's worthy to have a look- Why aren't obvious scammers banned?

[cryptohunter]

I would have though plagiarism (taking work as your own)  would be like claiming you had a great or novel idea. I have often seen people ask a question and people post a reply they have cut from the net or some other post and post with no obvious gain to themselves at all they were just being helpful.

It takes a few seconds at most to quote and attribute properly. Those are the rules and everyone (including you) should follow them. Not doing that may make it seem like the intent was to pass the content as your own.

This is very true. However imagine some noob asking what criteria for is  one to give merit to another. A legend simply copy and pastes theymos post which says something like " should be for a post containing objective high quality material" or something like that. But didn't put the " " or say it was from theymos. The legend has 1000's of great posts and has made a great difference to the board in the past Isn't wearing a sig etc etc.. Is that to be treated exactly the same as a bot account or intentional spammer making multiple and repeated copy and pastes for obvious motives pumping icos, sig spamming and ruining the board?  Are they to be both treated exactly the same?

Would it not be best to rid ourselves of real scammers and scamming icos than these sort of people.

This has nothing to do with scams at all. Moderators are not involved in that. Users who research scams are good at what they do and generally that skillset is different from reporting shitposts. So what's your point?

Well, to say most of the most offensive and deliberate copy and pasters are nothing to do with scams is perhaps not correct. I suspect for sure that lots of these people are closely related to or part of the teams of scammers/scams. However, let's assume for now they are not related.  My point was what would be the reward of catching a person like this who has made some pathetic copy and pastes that nobody would really care to claim for their own unless they were devoid of all creative thought. Or even less rewarding getting a person banned for attempting to help someone else but not quoting the original poster correctly.

So my point is simply a question of would you prefer to be part of a board which has a high proportion of scammers since there is more time spent pointing out some people are doing copy and paste on unimportant areas or even just some of the most general statements ever made on this board. (now I have said both are closely related but some of the ones I have seen a recent fuss about seem a lot less damaging to this board and crypto in general that real scamming icos and other scammers that destroy confidence in this arena in general.   Should we encourage more copy and paste sniffers to switch some effort over to locating and stopping scams before they get off of the ground and financially ruining people?
Or are you saying it is only mods doing this historical research and that is just what theymos has asked them to do so that is why they are not investigating into possible scams? I mean that most reports i would think are not just from mods. This task is far too huge for them to do alone.

What sort of person is analysing threads of all these years previously? who would seriously even do that. Most merit sources admit the job of looking for a good post in alt section is just too much trouble.

Looking for a good post requires reading many posts, including shitty ones. Looking for plagiarism requires very little reading, if any at all, and you don't have to be a merit source for that. Apples and oranges, again.

This is a very interesting reply. Could you explain how it takes little reading to spot plagiarism a year old? I mean would it not take knowledge of every post ever made and everything on the internet to read through a persons post history and spot it as plagiarism and find the evidence of such that you can provide? I mean surely it would take less effort and be far more rewarding to read though some good threads and find some good posts to merit?  Can you explain this point perhaps I am wrong and there is some easy way to spot this?

@suchmoon

There is always a reason even if it's not displayed in the ban message. The reason was given in this thread. The OP can appeal. If the appeal is successful the OP will likely be banned again. Put that straw man back in the barn.

You quoted my post improperly. So a few years from now some horrible person is going to search through all these threads and report you for plagiarism

Well exactly although I am in a thread with you and replying to you and identifying you as @suchmoon then perhaps quoting you to yourself then replying to that could actually be an attempt to claim that the work of myself that i needed to disagree with involving you in the process. On the other hand it could just be an example of what I am talking about that one must bring context into things else it becomes a place of punishing idiotic things/mistakes when major offenders get away totally free and scamming away like there is no tomorrow.

It would seem copy and paste at all is highly risky here even if you are being well intentioned. Not just copy and paste what about paraphrasing or expressing a view in a way that is closely related to the form others have expressed similar views.

Can you explain the straw man you refer to and also tell me why even after successful appeal the member will likely get banned again?

The straw man is your attempt to raise some non-existent issues and to debate them, instead of the actual problem here, which is the OP's plagiarism and appeal thereof. The OP would likely get banned again because the OP has done this sort of thing more than once.

Do you mean the fact if no reason is required to be given that that could lead to

1. the poster not knowing why he is banned
2. possible abuse by the banning agent for not having to have supply a reason (that would be valid) to ban people
3. Are their statistics for reinstated banned individuals getting banned again?


You have said that either a reason is given in the ban message or you can come and ask for the ban reason here which will be given to you (hence this thread as an example)  

That seems reasonable enough.

edit = = messed up that post not meant to be all different colours and replies inside and outside of boxes.

[logfiles]

Scammers will continue his/her scamming if s/he gets banned with creating a new account.

All am saying, once a scammer is caught, ban them too. By the time they are red-tagged, it means there is enough evidence that S/he scammed someone. They are not welcome here.
The same energy used to ban those who commit plagiarism should be the same energy used to ban scammers

If a scammer gets a ban, s/he will create a new account, of course. So, this goes with the same rule of account buy/sell. There can be rules but no one can prevent account buy/sell.

"Just because someone has been a rapist or robber all his life doesn't mean they should just let it be, punish the bustard if caught"

[cryptohunter]

Why don't they ban them too?

Both cases are different, in fact. Scammers will continue his/her scamming if s/he gets banned with creating a new account.
Now, imagine, you have made a Sr member account by plagiarism and you get caught and get banned. I don't think you will ever think of copy/pasting again. At present, it is a more scaring issue because merit is needed for rank up.
If a scammer gets a ban, s/he will create a new account, of course. So, this goes with the same rule of account buy/sell. There can be rules but no one can prevent account buy/sell. So, no rules there. The same is also applied in this case. There can be a rule of banning scammers but the scam will be continued.

It's worthy to have a look- Why aren't obvious scammers banned?

The two things are not isolated in all cases.

However the plagiarists I hope we want to catch are not the helpful people who make citing mistakes or those that just are a bit lazy to find the source whilst obviously trying to help others with no attempt to gain from it. We want to catch those bots, ico spammers that are shilling and faking activity on boards to suck people into scams. Or previously just power up accounts to resell.

Now there is no less incentive for them to make more accounts and just text spin a bit better than there is for scammers to rejoin. The only people that will not rejoin are those that made an honest mistake or were overly battered for being lazy one time after years of putting effort in.

I would rather be the only honest person in between a bunch of helpful lazy people or honest noobs making mistakes than I would be surrounded by hardcore scammers.

The worst real plagiarists will never be caught because a text spinner will be used and they are now not a plagiarist they are simply a scammer which is not on the ban menu right now.

Years ago there was not all this stuff about people copy and pasting if it was not blatant and repeated it's almost got nitpicking in some cases . Most people were reporting spammers and scams.

[suchmoon]

This has nothing to do with scams at all. Moderators are not involved in that. Users who research scams are good at what they do and generally that skillset is different from reporting shitposts. So what's your point?

Oh, come on, why don't the identified scammers get banned then?
I have seen a number of scamming accounts getting identified in the scam accusations board with concrete proof but all they do is red tag them. Why don't they ban them too?
I find it quite lame... Zero tolerance on plagiarism but you leave a scammer scot-free as if scammers do not gravely destroy the quality and actual aim of the forum.

Who's "you"? I'm not an admin and I don't make the rules, which as it currently stands don't do anything with regards to scamming. The main reason as I understand is to avoid having moderators make the judgement on what is scam and what is not, which is not always as clear-cut as it may seem. So can we stop derailing the topic now? Not yet?

The same energy used to ban those who commit plagiarism should be the same energy used to ban scammers

Doesn't make any sense. There's almost nothing in common between catching a scammer and catching a plagiarising shitposter. So there would be a lot more "energy" required to start banning scammers should theymos decide to do so (don't hold your breath).

Is that to be treated exactly the same as a bot account or intentional spammer making multiple and repeated copy and pastes for obvious motives pumping icos, sig spamming and ruining the board?  Are they to be both treated exactly the same?

Again, you're arguing something that doesn't exist or is extremely rare. Moderators have wide discretion in how they apply the rules and I'm sure they would consider the context. Then there is the appeal process and given how few of those appeals are successful I think it's safe to say that the process is quite solid.

So my point is simply a question of would you prefer to be part of a board which has a high proportion of scammers since there is more time spent pointing out some people are doing copy and paste on unimportant areas or even just some of the most general statements ever made on this board. (now I have said both are closely related but some of the ones I have seen a recent fuss about seem a lot less damaging to this board and crypto in general that real scamming icos and other scammers that destroy confidence in this arena in general.   Should we encourage more copy and paste sniffers to switch some effort over to locating and stopping scams before they get off of the ground and financially ruining people?

It's not an either/or situation. There are scam-busting efforts and there are spam-busting efforts. The methods involved are completely different. What you're saying is akin to saying that we should focus more on DUI drivers than cleaning the streets. Yeah, DUI is probably more consequential but that doesn't mean we can't do both, otherwise we will end up with streets no one will want to be on, drunk or sober.

This is a very interesting reply. Could you explain how it takes little reading to spot plagiarism a year old? I mean would it not take knowledge of every post ever made and everything on the internet to read through a persons post history and spot it as plagiarism and find the evidence of such that you can provide? I mean surely it would take less effort and be far more rewarding to read though some good threads and find some good posts to merit?  Can you explain this point perhaps I am wrong and there is some easy way to spot this?

There is software that can detect plagiarism (e.g. Google). AFAIK there is no software that can't detect meritorious posts.

Well exactly although I am in a thread with you and replying to you and identifying you as @suchmoon then perhaps quoting you to yourself then replying to that could actually be an attempt to claim that the work of myself that i needed to disagree with involving you in the process. On the other hand it could just be an example of what I am talking about that one must bring context into things else it becomes a place of punishing idiotic things/mistakes when major offenders get away totally free and scamming away like there is no tomorrow.

Or you can stop with the useless exaggerations and instead of typing walls of text and arguing imaginary problems spend that time to learn how to quote.

[cryptohunter]

This has nothing to do with scams at all. Moderators are not involved in that. Users who research scams are good at what they do and generally that skillset is different from reporting shitposts. So what's your point?

Oh, come on, why don't the identified scammers get banned then?
I have seen a number of scamming accounts getting identified in the scam accusations board with concrete proof but all they do is red tag them. Why don't they ban them too?
I find it quite lame... Zero tolerance on plagiarism but you leave a scammer scot-free as if scammers do not gravely destroy the quality and actual aim of the forum.

Who's "you"? I'm not an admin and I don't make the rules, which as it currently stands don't do anything with regards to scamming. The main reason as I understand is to avoid having moderators make the judgement on what is scam and what is not, which is not always as clear-cut as it may seem. So can we stop derailing the topic now? Not yet?

The same energy used to ban those who commit plagiarism should be the same energy used to ban scammers

Doesn't make any sense. There's almost nothing in common between catching a scammer and catching a plagiarising shitposter. So there would be a lot more "energy" required to start banning scammers should theymos decide to do so (don't hold your breath).

We have to realise also plagiarism is certainly not clear cut either as several recent cases have demonstrated. Also I don't believe it should be a black and white issue given the reasons I have stated.

Also the real bad plagiarists (repeat offenders and obvious text spinners , fake conversations) are much more closely related to real scams than you may think. I think teams of this type are organised and arranged by the scam icos to promote them in various sneaky ways to the board.

By wasting time of noob mistakes, innocent helpful persons we are missing the real bad guys here and that is a sad thing to see.

Anyway let's not derail further this guys thread I guess. I guess if there are multiple occasions of a sentence being semi copied from years back one could argue he must go. I wonder why anyone would bother doing this seems completely stupid unless it is a sophisticated bot that managed to remain under the radar for a time. I have not looked into his entire post history to really evaluate his contribution to the board.

[suchmoon]

By wasting time of noob mistakes, innocent helpful persons we are missing the real bad guys here and that is a sad thing to see.

The only people wasting time here are you and me, arguing this pointless hypothetical situation. Let the OP appeal their case and see where that takes us.

As far as i can see there is no widespread punishment of "noob mistakes" or "innocent helpful persons" (the OP is certainly not an example of either) and it doesn't make any difference with regards to "real bad guys".

[cryptohunter]

By wasting time of noob mistakes, innocent helpful persons we are missing the real bad guys here and that is a sad thing to see.

The only people wasting time here are you and me, arguing this pointless hypothetical situation. Let the OP appeal their case and see where that takes us.

As far as i can see there is no widespread punishment of "noob mistakes" or "innocent helpful persons" (the OP is certainly not an example of either) and it doesn't make any difference with regards to "real bad guys".

My point is quite simple and as far as I can see is not in any real doubt. So not worth arguing about.

Time spent on nitpicking on " probable copy and pasters from years ago" could be better spent either 1/ finding the plagiarists that are likely parts of a wider scam team that are still constantly offending to promote the scams 2/ analysing the ANN section for scams and scam teams before they take peoples bitcoin/eth
I'm not sure why you would assume these copy and paste sniffers are unable to spot obvious scams building in the ANN section with btc and eth being asked for with no escrows and other known accounts from other scams. Even just posting there comments like why no escrow why no team with backgrounds that are possible to validate. Also these should be able to use context before reporting and wasting mod time.

If this plagiarism hunt going back years can be automated then fine. I don't essentially assume because some copy and pasted back in 2015 something pointless for no personal gain they are worthy of a ban 2018 if in subsequent time they have behaved well .

Also i even question if this is a net gain for the board at all. I mean a person not behaving back in 2015 then behaving well for subsequent years is essentially a useful member now and spending time and effort going back years to nitpick them and kick them out could be altogether a waste of time and actually harmful to the board.

If does not need be even widespread I would prefer to see it not happen at all.  Although as you say if context and intent is considered (you believe) that is all that is need to be said really.

[suchmoon]

I'm not sure why you would assume these copy and paste sniffers are unable to spot obvious scams building in the ANN section

I've done both so I don't have to assume anything. I can report 100 shitposters in the time it takes to create a simple scam report. And I'm quite certain we have 1000+ times more shitposters than scammers. So I choose to work on shitposting and send some merits to folks who dedicate time to scam busting. This way we can tackle both problems. Trying to favor one or the other isn't gonna work. None of us are getting paid and we just do what we think can help the forum. If you think ANN scam busting can help - go ahead and do it.

If this plagiarism hunt going back years can be automated then fine. I don't essentially assume because some copy and pasted back in 2015 something pointless for no personal gain they are worthy of a ban 2018 if in subsequent time they have behaved well .

Also i even question if this is a net gain for the board at all. I mean a person not behaving back in 2015 then behaving well for subsequent years is essentially a useful member now and spending time and effort going back years to nitpick them and kick them out could be altogether a waste of time and actually harmful to the board.

The OP deleted their appeal so apparently this wasn't one of those "useful members". Let me know when you find one and we can continue this discussion.

[cryptohunter]

I'm not sure why you would assume these copy and paste sniffers are unable to spot obvious scams building in the ANN section

I've done both so I don't have to assume anything. I can report 100 shitposters in the time it takes to create a simple scam report. And I'm quite certain we have 1000+ times more shitposters than scammers. So I choose to work on shitposting and send some merits to folks who dedicate time to scam busting. This way we can tackle both problems. Trying to favor one or the other isn't gonna work. None of us are getting paid and we just do what we think can help the forum. If you think ANN scam busting can help - go ahead and do it.

If this plagiarism hunt going back years can be automated then fine. I don't essentially assume because some copy and pasted back in 2015 something pointless for no personal gain they are worthy of a ban 2018 if in subsequent time they have behaved well .

Also i even question if this is a net gain for the board at all. I mean a person not behaving back in 2015 then behaving well for subsequent years is essentially a useful member now and spending time and effort going back years to nitpick them and kick them out could be altogether a waste of time and actually harmful to the board.

The OP deleted their appeal so apparently this wasn't one of those "useful members". Let me know when you find one and we can continue this discussion.

I have done a lot of ANN scam busting in the past and always on the lookout when I get the time.

I would say 1 scam taking a lot of btc can be 100x more important than nitpicking some 3 year old instances of copy and pasting a few linked words that nobody would be proud to claim as their own work. I would only then investigate their recent activity to see if this is an ongoing issue.

The final comment is again assumption. Just because they saw no hope to get reinstated does not essentially prove they were not a useful member in recent years. Of course I have not gone through their post history so who can say. I am just saying you stating his actions as proof of non usefulness is not statistical proof that anyone can make optimal conclusions upon.

Head over to the reputation board. There is a member there whom is according to some here not useful at all and deserves a ban for allegedly claiming work is his own. Having read through a lot his post history I believe is a legit trader and therefore of great use to CC. I have not really had much time to look into many of these kind of cases. However like i say one good member deleted for a mistake or small lapse of effort is not what I would feel good about reporting to a mod. I would feel far better to find real offenders. If they must be plagiarists or nonsense posters (bots etc) it would want it to be a clear case not a one off period/mistake from an otherwise useful member.

I notice many meta hiders are very quick to be negative towards others. It is better to save that negativity for those that certainly deserve it. Perhaps this guy is such a person but on the basis of a few probable copy and pastes years ago of insignificant common place views I don't see much to be afraid of.

Anyway he is gone now it would seem. I am not here to defend wrong doers only try to shift focus to real scammers and persons that are destroying the alt discussion board so that we are not all cooped up in meta comparing merit and nitpicking on easy targets. Get rid of all sigs for everyone would be the best idea or introduce a junior board for alts.

[Collider1]

I'm not sure why you would assume these copy and paste sniffers are unable to spot obvious scams building in the ANN section

I've done both so I don't have to assume anything. I can report 100 shitposters in the time it takes to create a simple scam report. And I'm quite certain we have 1000+ times more shitposters than scammers. So I choose to work on shitposting and send some merits to folks who dedicate time to scam busting. This way we can tackle both problems. Trying to favor one or the other isn't gonna work. None of us are getting paid and we just do what we think can help the forum. If you think ANN scam busting can help - go ahead and do it.

If this plagiarism hunt going back years can be automated then fine. I don't essentially assume because some copy and pasted back in 2015 something pointless for no personal gain they are worthy of a ban 2018 if in subsequent time they have behaved well .

Also i even question if this is a net gain for the board at all. I mean a person not behaving back in 2015 then behaving well for subsequent years is essentially a useful member now and spending time and effort going back years to nitpick them and kick them out could be altogether a waste of time and actually harmful to the board.

The OP deleted their appeal so apparently this wasn't one of those "useful members". Let me know when you find one and we can continue this discussion.

Lol, I deleted it because I see that you dont want to find any solution and help me to get my account back.
I promised that I will improve my posts and will try to do my best to help this forum, but you dont want to hear that  .

[Lafu]

I deleted it because I see that you dont want to find any solution and help me to get my account back.
I promised that I will improve my posts and will try to do my best to help this forum, but you dont want to hear that  .

There is no way to get your Account back ! You are banned perma !

[cryptohunter]

I deleted it because I see that you dont want to find any solution and help me to get my account back.
I promised that I will improve my posts and will try to do my best to help this forum, but you dont want to hear that  .

There is no way to get your Account back ! You are banned perma !

I had heard you can appeal your ban in here are you saying that is not correct?

How do you appeal a ban then?

[suchmoon]

I have done a lot of ANN scam busting in the past and always on the lookout when I get the time.

I couldn't find anything in your recent post history. Point me to your threads in Scam Accusations and let's move this discussion there.

I would say 1 scam taking a lot of btc can be 100x more important than nitpicking some 3 year old instances of copy and pasting a few linked words that nobody would be proud to claim as their own work. I would only then investigate their recent activity to see if this is an ongoing issue.

I would say that a shitposter in hand is worth than a hypothetical scammer "taking a lot of btc" in the woods but again - there is no reason to believe that both can't be caught.

The final comment is again assumption. Just because they saw no hope to get reinstated does not essentially prove they were not a useful member in recent years. Of course I have not gone through their post history so who can say. I am just saying you stating his actions as proof of non usefulness is not statistical proof that anyone can make optimal conclusions upon.

It's not an assumption. I have gone through a large part of OP's post history. You keep claiming things based entirely on your own assumptions and projecting that onto me. Not cool.

I am not here to defend wrong doers only try to shift focus to real scammers and persons that are destroying the alt discussion board

Just do it.

Lol, I deleted it because I see that you dont want to find any solution and help me to get my account back.
I promised that I will improve my posts and will try to do my best to help this forum, but you dont want to hear that  .

Who's "you" again? No one who posted here except hilarious has much of a say in what happens to you. Deleting your thread before an admin could weigh in is not gonna help your case.

[hilariousandco]

I have done a lot of ANN scam busting in the past and always on the lookout when I get the time.

I would say 1 scam taking a lot of btc can be 100x more important than nitpicking some 3 year old instances of copy and pasting a few linked words that nobody would be proud to claim as their own work. I would only then investigate their recent activity to see if this is an ongoing issue.

Copy and pasters are scammers. They're defrauding money from the campaigns they're meant to be advertising for whilst ruining the forum in the process, and when there's literally thousands of them doing it all that money adds up over the years.