deisik (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 08:11:47 AM Last edit: January 03, 2019, 11:45:31 AM by deisik |
|
If so, good fucking riddance to them. A plague o' both your houses! my guess is that no they are not because these people believe in bitcoin more than anybody else. that is why they attempted to take over bitcoin and failed but created BCH instead. you can't expect such people to sell the most valuable possession they have...
Unless their inflated egos step in ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fa.radikal.ru%2Fa29%2F1811%2F93%2Fe830247f6d2a.jpg&t=665&c=Q6R8cq-MXJiyFA) My point is that, given the hash war, folks like CSW and his likes on the other side have to finance this war somehow. Ultimately, it all comes down to their financial muscle. In the end, provided they stick to their guns, they will be burning their BTC stashes right after selling the opposing chain coins. In fact, we already see something like that by Jihad moving HP from mining BTC to mining BCH to support his chain against Craig's, and as mining regular Bitcoin is twice as profitable as mining Bitcoin Cash right now, he is already effectively losing bitcoins by not mining them. While mining Bitcoin Cash itself is outright unprofitable at the moment, even for Jihad And we can hope they destroy each other in the process
|
|
|
|
talkbitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1032
All I know is that I know nothing.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 10:02:53 AM |
|
there is no way for any of us to know because wise people don't share their financial matters with others. and anybody who advertises whet they did is surely lying.
my guess is that no they are not because these people believe in bitcoin more than anybody else. that is why they attempted to take over bitcoin and failed but created BCH instead. you can't expect such people to sell the most valuable possession they have...
|
|
|
|
leea-1334
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 10:22:16 AM |
|
What a photo to see,,, we have one famous white guy listened to by other balding white guys in corporate suits, showing his middle finger, and Satoshi's name enshrined in a corner,,, it is like this is how it is with the cryptocurrency world. Powerful people who want to keep their power and treat this new technology as their private battleground.
Sickening to see that they do not see they are everything like the old system Bitcoin wanted to replace.
|
|
|
|
Pursuer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1163
Where is my ring of blades...
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 10:24:19 AM |
|
overlords? seriously ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) and how do you explain the lack of price drop if they are really overlords and are selling their "stashes"? price entered $5k level on 14th (4 days ago) and has stayed there. that was basically the bulk of the drop which was panic sellers and whales having fun with the market. if your theory of the "overlords" were true then price should have gone down at least 10-15% per day and be at $3k already.
|
Only Bitcoin
|
|
|
deisik (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 10:32:19 AM Last edit: November 18, 2018, 03:22:01 PM by deisik |
|
overlords? seriously ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) and how do you explain the lack of price drop if they are really overlords and are selling their "stashes"? price entered $5k level on 14th (4 days ago) and has stayed there. that was basically the bulk of the drop which was panic sellers and whales having fun with the market. if your theory of the "overlords" were true then price should have gone down at least 10-15% per day and be at $3k already. I said Bitcoin Cash overlords Not that they matter a lot in Bitcoin terms, though they obviously still do. Anyway, I should have said "will be selling", and we have yet to see such prices as one possible scenario. Yeah, I know it sounds painful already and feels creepy a little but this is kinda inevitable if no side gives in and calls it a day. Craig has already made it clear he is in for a long game (of thrones), and let's hope he doesn't change his mind too soon
|
|
|
|
Pursuer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1163
Where is my ring of blades...
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 10:40:23 AM |
|
people like CSW and his likes on the other side have to finance this war somehow. ... Anyway, I should have said "will be selling",
when you create a useless new altcoin, you want to pump it in early days of its existence specially when there is a war going on that you want to survive. so if your theory was right and they were to sell "bitcoin" to finance their war, they should have done it already that is why is said the drop in your scenario should have happened but has not. not to mention that this war is between BCash and BCashSV not between them and bitcoin. CSW tried to pull bitcoin in the drama and could succeed a little but not much. hence the $5.5k current price instead of a lower one.
|
Only Bitcoin
|
|
|
barota
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 10:40:57 AM |
|
Certainly I think the reason fall of prices is sell off bch As long as it is on its way to the fork
|
|
|
|
deisik (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 10:48:50 AM |
|
people like CSW and his likes on the other side have to finance this war somehow. ... Anyway, I should have said "will be selling",
when you create a useless new altcoin, you want to pump it in early days of its existence specially when there is a war going on that you want to survive I'm afraid you can't have it both ways It is either the survival part or the pump part. They are already financing the war via Bitcoin (though indirectly) by drawing in mining resources taken from Bitcoin and renting HP from independent miners. That you can't deny. And it is a short path to selling bitcoins directly once they run out of money. Basically, it is just a matter of time as it happens in any prolonged war, which impoverishes both sides and makes the parties take desperate steps
|
|
|
|
1Referee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 11:21:53 AM Merited by BrewMaster (1) |
|
People overcredit these bastards.
They aren't selling their BTC to USD because they don't even need to. The main disadvantage is that selling BTC subjects them to taxation, and it lowers the income for their main mining pools heavily depending on a higher BTC value. Jihan is an asshole, but not an idiot, he needs BTC to perform well, especially in the runup to his IPO. Dumping BTC down means less demand for his miners.
The don't need part comes into play in form of free BCHSV coins they will use to fill up financial gaps. They'll dump them and celebrate being freed from faketoshi.
|
|
|
|
5ensei
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 11:37:34 AM |
|
The price of bitcoin cash has also plummeted so their plans have not been overly successful. Creating a new coin out of nothing was a great achievement so from a greed aspect they done well for themselves, but they never toppled BTC
|
|
|
|
deisik (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 11:55:30 AM Last edit: November 18, 2018, 08:34:30 PM by deisik |
|
People overcredit these bastards.
They aren't selling their BTC to USD because they don't even need to. The main disadvantage is that selling BTC subjects them to taxation, and it lowers the income for their main mining pools heavily depending on a higher BTC value. Jihan is an asshole, but not an idiot, he needs BTC to perform well, especially in the runup to his IPO. Dumping BTC down means less demand for his miners.
The don't need part comes into play in form of free BCHSV coins they will use to fill up financial gaps. They'll dump them and celebrate being freed from faketoshi.
Better the devil you know, huh? Jihad is not an idiot, but can you say the same about Craig and his minions? If the latter acts like the one and starts burning his money (well, actually not his money but it doesn't matter here), what will Jihad do? You can't gain much from selling SV coins if there is no place accepting them and no price tag attached. And for the record, right now you can't sell ABC coins under whatever ticker either. Major exchanges disabled BCH deposits and withdrawals for the time being anyway. As I said, it is a matter of time until things start to escalate scarily, and then the part which has more financial muscle (read, bitcoins) wins, if we can call that so. In other words, it is a potentially lethal engagement for Bitcoin Cash as a whole, a trap of sorts, because if one side is insane (which it is), the other is set to act as insane. In the simplest of terms, no rest for the wicked and Craig is extremely toxic to his environment. There's no way out for these clowns, and it is a good thing and luck for us they got locked in the same room finally. Let the rats eat each other
|
|
|
|
1Referee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 12:29:01 PM |
|
Better the devil you know, huh?
Jihad is not an idiot, but can you say the same about Craig and his minions? If the latter acts like the one and starts burning his money (well, actually not his money but it doesn't matter here), what will Jihad do? You can't gain much from selling SV coins if there is no place accepting them and no price tag attached. And for the record, right now you can't sell ABC coins under whatever ticker either. Major exchanges disabled BCH deposits and withdrawals for the time being anyway. As I said, it is a matter of time until things start to escalate exponentially, and then the part which has more financial muscle (read, bitcoins) wins, if we can call that so. In other words, it is a potentially lethal engagement for Bitcoin Cash as a whole, a trap of sorts, because if one side is insane (which it is), the other is set to act as insane. In the simplest of terms, no rest for the wicked and Craig is toxic. There's no way out for these clowns, and it is a good thing for us. Let'em eat each other
Craig is a lunatic, and he may even be at a point he believes in his own lies. Bitmain has a company to run, as I said before, heavily depending on BTC to perform well. If Bitmain for whatever reason positions itself in a situation it is forced to obtain fiat to pay bills and whatnot, they will liquidate other coins. As per their own released holdings report, they own 930,000 LTC, 300,000 DASH, and a small amount of Ether. Tone Vays had Craig Wright in his show for an hour, where Craig said that they use BitPay as their fiat exit point to pay bills and whatnot, so another reason why he's not affecting the market personally. BitPay doesn't immediately sell their coins, just short a fraction and keeps the rest in reserve. And we don't actually know what he is cashing out, he can act like a tough boy, but he need all his Bitcoins (if he has a noteworthy amount to begin with) to pump up his shitty coin. Tone Vays vs Craigh Wright show; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACEUOCoVvmw
|
|
|
|
davis196
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 01:00:28 PM |
|
there is no way for any of us to know because wise people don't share their financial matters with others. and anybody who advertises whet they did is surely lying.
my guess is that no they are not because these people believe in bitcoin more than anybody else. that is why they attempted to take over bitcoin and failed but created BCH instead. you can't expect such people to sell the most valuable possession they have...
They could sell their most valuable possesion for two reasons: 1.To fund their "crypto civil wars".Bying more mining equipment,listing their forked altcoins in exchanges,etc. 2.To crash bitcoin core,so they could buy again bitcoins at a price lower than 6K USD after a while,which means easy "bearish" profits.
|
|
|
|
deisik (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 01:02:47 PM Last edit: November 18, 2018, 08:37:28 PM by deisik |
|
Better the devil you know, huh?
Jihad is not an idiot, but can you say the same about Craig and his minions? If the latter acts like the one and starts burning his money (well, actually not his money but it doesn't matter here), what will Jihad do? You can't gain much from selling SV coins if there is no place accepting them and no price tag attached. And for the record, right now you can't sell ABC coins under whatever ticker either. Major exchanges disabled BCH deposits and withdrawals for the time being anyway. As I said, it is a matter of time until things start to escalate exponentially, and then the part which has more financial muscle (read, bitcoins) wins, if we can call that so. In other words, it is a potentially lethal engagement for Bitcoin Cash as a whole, a trap of sorts, because if one side is insane (which it is), the other is set to act as insane. In the simplest of terms, no rest for the wicked and Craig is toxic. There's no way out for these clowns, and it is a good thing for us. Let'em eat each other
Craig is a lunatic, and he may even be at a point he believes in his own lies. Bitmain has a company to run, as I said before, heavily depending on BTC to perform well. If Bitmain for whatever reason positions itself in a situation it is forced to obtain fiat to pay bills and whatnot, they will liquidate other coins. As per their own released holdings report, they own 930,000 LTC, 300,000 DASH, and a small amount of Ether. Tone Vays had Craig Wright in his show for an hour, where Craig said that they use BitPay as their fiat exit point to pay bills and whatnot, so another reason why he's not affecting the market personally. BitPay doesn't immediately sell their coins, just short a fraction and keeps the rest in reserve. And we don't actually know what he is cashing out, he can act like a tough boy, but he need all his Bitcoins (if he has a noteworthy amount to begin with) to pump up his shitty coin. Tone Vays vs Craigh Wright show; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACEUOCoVvmwYou can't expect a lunatic to act rationally If we accept that and assume that Craig actually delivers on his promises to ground the other chain (or at least makes an earnest attempt to), everything boils down to whether Bitmain and their benefactors are willing to sacrifice Bitcoin Cash in favor of Bitcoin to avoid getting caught in a death spiral of raising stakes infinitely (well, until the other side runs out of money). If they are not, then they will have to sell bitcoins to keep Craig's attempts to derail BCH contained. Selling litecoins or whatever will simply crash these coins, so from a purely economic point of view selling Bitcoin is a given when things go from bad to worse for these dudes
|
|
|
|
clrpod
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 04:18:51 PM |
|
Even if they're selling, they hold so many that what we've seen so far would barely make a dent on their stacks, CSW said that he is selling and is willing to sell all of his bitcoin holdings, how much you can trust that statement is your own decision - personally I don't really buy in to it.
|
GIGZI INDEPENDENT WEALTH MANAGEMENT Crowdsale Starts on 23rd November 2018
|
|
|
cellard
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1252
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 05:22:43 PM |
|
They could have attempted to bring the price down when the hashrate went down as well to create a chain spiral of events. CSW was FUDding hard on twitter all day claiming that, if needed, he would bring the price to 2013 levels. The fact is, CSW has already failed. ABC team did the cheeky move of adding arbitrary checkpoints, so as far as I can tell right now they cannot reorg the chain as they wanted, so it's a failure. He said there would be no split, but the reality of the situation is, they have lost a lot of money, and we now have $BCHABC and $BCHSV fighting with each other for who is the real "Bitcoin Cash", which "is the real Bitcoin". Imagine having to defend that narrative ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
|
cellard
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1252
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 05:55:03 PM |
|
They could have attempted to bring the price down when the hashrate went down as well to create a chain spiral of events. CSW was FUDding hard on twitter all day claiming that, if needed, he would bring the price to 2013 levels. The fact is, CSW has already failed. ABC team did the cheeky move of adding arbitrary checkpoints, so as far as I can tell right now they cannot reorg the chain as they wanted, so it's a failure. He said there would be no split, but the reality of the situation is, they have lost a lot of money, and we now have $BCHABC and $BCHSV fighting with each other for who is the real "Bitcoin Cash", which "is the real Bitcoin". Imagine having to defend that narrative ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Checkpoints are useless against replays and double spends Unless they want to put them after each block. But in that case they wouldn't need an overhead in the form of miners confirming transactions, just a server processing payment in a perfectly centralized way. The implication is that the ABC chain should at all times have higher hash rate to prevent such things from happening. That basically means they are in a losing position by default and have to keep up a safety margin. Otherwise they instantly render themselves vulnerable to a 51% attack and all kind of ugly things that CSW can try to pull off. I don't know how that can be considered a failure on the SV side They promised no split by the end of the 15th and there is a split, we have 2 coins, 2 price tickers, 2 chains. So it's already a failure. I thought CSW and Calvin were shadow mining but at this point it isn't the case. Hashrate is also not keeping up: https://cash.coin.dance/blocks/hashrateCSW so desperate that he bought satoshi twitter handle to shitpost and he got banned short after: http://twitter.com/satoshiBunch of clowns on both ends that will end up bankrupt for good.
|
|
|
|
deisik (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 18, 2018, 06:08:02 PM |
|
They could have attempted to bring the price down when the hashrate went down as well to create a chain spiral of events. CSW was FUDding hard on twitter all day claiming that, if needed, he would bring the price to 2013 levels. The fact is, CSW has already failed. ABC team did the cheeky move of adding arbitrary checkpoints, so as far as I can tell right now they cannot reorg the chain as they wanted, so it's a failure. He said there would be no split, but the reality of the situation is, they have lost a lot of money, and we now have $BCHABC and $BCHSV fighting with each other for who is the real "Bitcoin Cash", which "is the real Bitcoin". Imagine having to defend that narrative ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Checkpoints are useless against replays and double spends unless they want to put them after each block. But in that case they don't need an overhead in the form of miners sticking around. A couple of servers processing payments in a perfectly centralized way would do just fine. The implication is that the ABC chain should at all times have a higher hash rate to prevent such things from happening. That basically means they are in a losing position by default and have to keep up a safety margin at any price. Otherwise, they instantly render themselves vulnerable to a 51% attack and all kinds of ugly things that CSW can try to pull off. I don't know how that can be considered a failure on the SV side of the chain. And this can go on for months without CSW actually doing anything other than fearmongering and selling wolf tickets. Overall, it is a losing game for the ABC chain over the long term, and this is what counts, not "they promised no split by the end of the 15th and there is a split" ABC team's only viable option is to change the protocol but in that case they are no longer Bitcoin
|
|
|
|
Tyr808
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 606
Merit: 278
06/19/11 17:51 Bought BTC 259684.77 for 0.0101
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 19, 2018, 04:45:26 AM |
|
CSW is unreliable. He often resorts to threats and silly allegations. He's called Faketoshi for a reason. Anyway as I stated previously, CraigCoin seems to be valued much more highly than it should. I'll explain.. BCHABC is basically the continuation of BCH as per full implementation of the old protocol. BCHSV is a completely new thing still unbacked by commercials. Which is fine - but how could that possibly justify BCHSV current market cap being as high as ADA? BCHSV might be doomed to a steep downfall. Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
deisik (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 1280
English ⬄ Russian Translation Services
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 19, 2018, 08:43:19 AM |
|
Thoughts?
No rest for the wicked ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fc.radikal.ru%2Fc14%2F1811%2Fd6%2Ff454343e83ab.png&t=665&c=AMdNPlwxo7x3jw) The statistical correlation is apparent and undeniable Personally, I think the causal relationship is bidirectional here, which means whenever there is a change in the SV chain hashrate, there is a subsequent change in the ABC chain hashrate as well to keep the safety margin I mentioned earlier. On the other hand, Craig and his sidekicks are playing up by adding some hashes to the furnace as they see fit in order to keep ABC bleeding. As I said, the ABC chain is set to fail eventually unless they back off from this mortal engagement. But that would likely mean they can't be called Bitcoin XYZ any more
|
|
|
|
|